Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

GOP Senators on Environment Committee Hit All-Time Low, Third-Graders Have More Maturity

Posted by Tara Lohan, AlterNet at 1:59 PM on November 4, 2009.


Why the Party of No is now being called the Party of No Show.
lohanheadshotmedium
Tara Lohan is a senior editor at AlterNet.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Environment in your
mailbox!

 

Keeping in step with the rest of the Party of No, this week 6 of the 7 Republicans on the Senate's Environment and Public Works committee are refusing to show up in a desperate attempt to stall action on the climate and clean energy bill.

Reminder me again why these people are paid public servants?

Their apparent gripe is that they want EPA to do more extensive modeling runs on the proposed legislation. But really, what they want is to make sure we never have a viable climate bill and most certainly not before Copenhagen.

Of course, the EPA has already done modeling on all of this -- 90 percent is the same as the House bill from last Spring. The Washington Post reported that the data was analyzed closely by EPA, the Congressional Budget Office, the Energy Information Administration and many NGOs. "Indeed, EPA Associate Administrator David McIntosh said Tuesday that the differences wouldn't even show up in the agency's computer modeling, leaving little reason to conduct a completely new analysis before committee work commences," the Washington Post reported.

So, their stunt is pure bogus and their motivation is equally sad. Noreen Nielson, Director for Energy Communications at Progressive Media writes:


Perhaps it has something to do with the $3,507,321 the seven minority members of the EPW Committee have received from Big Oil, along with millions more from utilities, mining and the national resource sector. This is in addition to the billions Big Oil has spent on lobbying, astroturfing and smear campaigns. Exxon Mobil alone spent $7.2 million on lobbying in the last quarter -- more than the total of the entire alternative energy sector.

Just like on health care, the Republicans have no solutions, just obstructionist ploys. Passing comprehensive legislation is hard enough, having to do that with a bunch of elected officials who are acting like they're in a fight on the playground is ridiculous. Time for the GOP to grow up or get out of the game.


 

Digg!

Tagged as: global warming, climate change, climate bill, waxman markey, kerry boxer

Tara Lohan is a senior editor at AlterNet.


Buying Sarah Palin's Book Will Help Save Wolves?
There's one good thing about it...
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 18, 2009.
Sorry Monsanto, You're Wrong: More GE Crops Mean More Pesticides
When do we get to officially call the "green revolution" an environmental nightmare?
Post by Tara Lohan. November 17, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Just imagine...
Posted by: jebpgh on Nov 4, 2009 3:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The DCCC will have a field day in developing commercials for next year's races. From the "no alternative to health care" to the "no alternative to climate change" to....well it just keeps rolling along. The Dems need to keep it all moving along.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL... what's "moved"?? Posted by: ChicagoWay
» No, Mr. Beck, I expect you to cry! Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
My vote is that they just get the hell out.
Posted by: karinkdf82 on Nov 5, 2009 2:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whankers
Posted by: mtatasmith on Nov 5, 2009 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are too busy whanking. Cowardly Whankers - that's it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]