Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lindsey Graham Drilled by Big Oil

Posted by Steven D., Booman Tribune at 8:46 AM on October 23, 2009.


Graham had the nerve to attempt some real bipartisanship on the issue of climate change.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Politics in your
mailbox!

 

Republican Senator from the Great State of South Carolina, Lindsey Graham, apparently isn't chummy enough with one of the major constituencies of the Republican Party. Neoconservatives? No, not them. Religious Fundamentalists? Maybe, but he's still talking the talk. Glenn Beck and the tea-baggers? You betcha, but that's not the group that he's really offended. Offended enough that they are running advocacy ads against him in his home state. No the group that is really pissed off at Senator Graham is the group that thought he was always in their hip pocket, bought and paid for, as it were: Big Oil

WASHINGTON -- A Washington advocacy group with close ties to Big Oil started running ads Thursday on South Carolina radio stations, targeting Sen. Lindsey Graham for supporting taxes on carbon emissions.

The American Energy Alliance, funded in part by oil and natural gas companies, utilities and other energy-industry firms, launched the initiative in response to Graham's recent collaboration with Sen. John Kerry on cap-and-trade legislation. [..]

"This is going to be more than a radio campaign," Creighton said. "We're going to roll out additional TV and Internet ads in the next few weeks."

Oh my. What did Lindsey do? Well, he had the nerve to attempt some real bipartisanship on the issue of climate change and energy with John "The Purple Bandaid" Kerry, that's what:

Graham, a military lawyer and a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat and the party's 2004 presidential nominee, wrote an Oct. 11 column in the New York Times.

"Our partnership represents a fresh attempt to find consensus that adheres to our core principles and leads to both a climate change solution and energy independence," the two senators wrote.

Their column sketched a potential compromise in which Democrats would allow offshore oil drilling and new nuclear power plants, while Republicans would recognize global warming as an urgent problem and accept caps on carbon emissions from big factories and power plants.

Poor Lindsey. Being a hardcore Republican isn't enough anymore. You cross one little line and Ka-BOOM! out come the big guns to blast you back into the fold. I wish the "Far Left" had this kind of power over Democrats. But then, we don't have entire industries at our beck and call to enforce party discipline. All we have is phone calls, boycotts and the occasional small political contribution. Funding major ad campaigns to target a Senator for not supporting the public option? A little beyond our means.

Digg!

Tagged as: energy, big oil, graham, cimate change


Buying Sarah Palin's Book Will Help Save Wolves?
There's one good thing about it...
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 18, 2009.
Sorry Monsanto, You're Wrong: More GE Crops Mean More Pesticides
When do we get to officially call the "green revolution" an environmental nightmare?
Post by Tara Lohan. November 17, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Howdy-do, Burson-Marsteller
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 23, 2009 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The original McClatchey article has more details about the American Energy Alliance, which has been very good at shielding its funding sources from public scrutiny.

AEA paid at least $1 million to Burson-Marsteller in 1993 to organize astroturf opposition to Clinton's BTU tax, which went down in (blue) flames.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Lindsey Graham drilled by Big Oil"
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 23, 2009 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hahahaha, where do we even start?

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]