Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The ABCs of the House GOP's Dick Cheney Energy Plan

Posted by Josh Dorner, Sierra Club at 4:00 PM on June 15, 2009.


The leadership of the increasingly embattled GOP minority in Congress continues to circle the wagons around the failed policies of the past.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Environment in your
mailbox!

 

They say you can't teach an old dog new tricks. It also appears that you can't teach a bunch of old-line conservatives about New Energy for America. The leadership of the increasingly embattled GOP minority in Congress continues to circle the wagons around the failed policies of the past. As the Waxman-Markey clean energy jobs plan moves toward a House floor vote as soon as 10 days from now, the House GOP leadership unveiled their "alternative." 

Unfortunately, their so-called alternative was a not-even-thinly-veiled redux of the failed Bush-Cheney energy policies of yesteryear. You know, the ones that ruined the economy, made global warming worse, and left us even more dependent on tin-pot dictators to meet our growing addiction to oil. Yeah, those.

Our friends at Media Matters for America took a little looksee at the plans put forward by Bush and Cheney and the House GOP's latest plan, the American Energy Act. The two plans looked suspiciously similar, shall we say. Almost as if a group of powerful special interests in the energy industry essentially dictated the plans behind closed doors. Not that that would ever happen… 

The Bush-Cheney plan was based on increased oil drilling on the outer continental shelf, expedited construction of more oil refineries, building more nuclear power plants, opening the Arctic Refuge to drilling, increasing the production of dirty and destructive oil shale.

And what's the House GOP's plan based on, you say? Why, on increased oil drilling on the outer continental shelf, expedited construction of more oil refineries, building more nuclear power plants, opening the Arctic Refuge to drilling, increasing the production of dirty and destructive oil shale.

To be fair, their plan isn't all recycled from the Cheney era. It also incorporates John McCain's disastrous $1 trillion (yes, trillion with a T) campaign pledge to build 100 new nuclear power plants.  

And, just in case you wondering -- no, the House GOP still does not believe in global warming. Thank. You. Very. Much.

Digg!

Tagged as: republicans, gop, energy, global warming, climate change

Josh Dorner is a writer for the Sierra Club.


PETA Teams Up With Glenn Beck to Bash Al Gore
Apparently Beck thinks PETA is as rad as the NRA. Who knew?
Post by Tara Lohan. November 6, 2009.
Climate Change: The Grown-Ups Are Back In Charge
By moving forward without Republicans and a troublesome conservaDem, Boxer puts climate change bill back on track.
Post by Raquel Brown. November 6, 2009.
On the Lookout for Attempts to Indoctrinate Our Schoolchildren? Try the American Coal Industry!
It's clean!
Post by Amanda Terkel. November 6, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Same as it ever was...
Posted by: wrinklemomma on Jun 15, 2009 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since almost ever Republican owes his/her career to energy money and energy interests, what do you expect them to propose? Why look to the future when I'm getting rich on the pillaging and polluting today? Screw future generations, I got mine today! "A politician works for the next election, a LEADER works for the next generation". We don't have any leaders, apparently.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reclaim OUR Natural Resources from the Corps
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 16, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's be Honest Here WE will Never Be 'energy Independent' Until We Own and Control all aspects of our energy production and distribution. Even if we go entirely 'green' and these corps own and control all aspects of production and distribution we will always be subjected to their greed and influence.
To be a True Free Market Proponent, one must concede Each contender must come to the market with their own privately held and produced products. We have allowed these Corps to Poach from our lands, extract OUR Resources and then Sell them back to US at a huge profit, all the while be given Tax breaks to pull off this scam.
Revoke all leases of Public property by these corps, push them back on to the actually properties they own, make them compete against US as a collective producer/provider to the American people, then sell off any remaining energy to other countries. Under cut the shit out of these corps who will already have reduced output due to their limited portfolio's, While making profits in a area we have never been allowed access to- a way to pay off foreign debt and bring down the deficit, perhaps even build a surplus.
A Lil Reality check Folks- we are not able to wave a magic wand and suddenly convert to mere solar or wind power yet, so we will have to dance with the Devil (dirty, unsafe energy) for a while longer- so why not make the 'Devil' pay US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rational population reduction is the only way out
Posted by: leemiller38 on Jun 16, 2009 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reducting our population size worldwide is the only way out of the environmental/energy mess we are in. You can build all the windmills and solar panels you want, but the gains will be eaten up by ever more needy people. The decline of fossil fuel is going to be a rough slide.

The GOP dosen't seem to know this as they are the ones often cutting family planning funds and trying to make abortion illegal. They are fools and while the Democrats are lesser fools and the Catholic heirarchy and religions are the paramount fools. Maybe those of us who think it still possible to get out of a horrible bust by rational population reduction are only fooling ourselves, but at least we have a grasp of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sorry. Posted by: sasquuatch55
The Republican Party should just go away
Posted by: greenknight on Jun 17, 2009 1:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Political parties have come and gone before in this country, and I think it's time for them to go. The Repugs no longer have any ideas, just a blind fealty to a way of doing things that really doesn't work any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]