Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

American Liberalism Making a Come-Back

Posted by Daniel De Groot, Open Left at 3:10 PM on July 12, 2008.


Data from 1984-2006, shows a narrowing gap between cons and libs.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

A good amount of attention has been paid to the ever larger party affiliation gap that Democrats are enjoying this year.  Unfortunately there is not nearly so much attention paid to the underlying ideological alignment of voters (not much polling on it either).  It is these beliefs that largely impact how elected officials behave with respect to policy, and particularly so for the Democratic party which still has a substantial conservative wing unlike the decimated ranks of the extinct or endangered liberal Republicans.

One thing I want to see the left doing more effectively is laying the blame for the disasterous policies of the Bush Administration and Republican congresses on the ideology that crafted them, namely conservativism.  John McCain is still demonizing "failed" liberal ideas from the 70s and trying to raise the spectre of a second term for Jimmy Carter (a really weak and self-dating attack).  Yet Democrats do not routinely link the failures of Iraq, Katrina and the Economy on the ideology that dreams up all these great ideas like invading unrelated countries after being attacked or handing a large state's energy system over to a bunch of unaccountable sociopaths happy to screw up the grid so prices will increase.  

Despite the relative lack of effort in this area outside of blogs, I'm happy to report that some people are figuring it out, and the lead conservativism has on liberalism is the smallest is has been in decades (I went back as far as 1984):

Source is the General Social Survey.

Now that's the gap, whither conservativism and liberalism in the populace? Some more charts and observations below.



2004 is quite the blip.  Looking at that I have to figure Kerry did surprisingly well considering the prevailing ideological winds.  Gore and Dukakis had far more favourable conditions.  Seeing that Gore did actually win, I think this also explains why Bush ran so hard to the center in 2000 and so hard right in 2004.  

It's also interesting and amusing how conservativism declines as Republican presidencies wear on (look at the end of the Reagan Presidency), but liberalism actually increased toward the end of Clinton's presidency.  Even though it would be inaccurate to call Bill Clinton a liberal, it wouldn't be wrong to suspect the population that were happy with the results of his presidency thought of him that way, and would be more favourable toward liberalism because of it.  

I'm speculating here because I can't find any data on people's attitudes to/beliefs about liberalism/conservativism.  Many polls will ask respondents if they are lib/con/moderate but not why, and only the GSS breaks it down to a 7 point scale to get some indicator of how liberal/conservative a person believes themselves to be.

Anyway, I'm eagerly awaiting the 2008 GSS data.  I could use some more recent polling that asks respondents about their ideology, but I want to compare apples here.  The GSS question asks:


67a. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. I'm going to show you a seven-point scale on which the political views that people might hold are arranged from extremely liberal - point 1 - to extremely conservative - point 7. Where would you place yourself on this scale?

Which is significant, because though I don't break down the 7 categories in these charts, 12% of the 2006 "liberals" self-rated "slightly liberal."  I think what happens on surveys that only ask between liberal, moderate and conservative that these people all say "moderate" rather than admit they are just like those people who hate America, the dreaded liberals with whom they agree slightly on a few things.

This is an important question because it cuts to, how accurate are these self-identifications?  I don't think it's elitist to say that a good chunk of the population is not well versed in ideological theory to understand that they might be actually more liberal than they thought.  Paul Rosenberg has demonstrated this in his posts on GSS data) showing majorities of self-identified conservatives supporting increased social spending in all sorts of areas.  

Conservatives have been the only ones on the ideological playing field for a long time.  Is it so improbable that a great many people have come to believe "liberal" is a bad thing while holding quite liberal views?  

Finally, this data is yet more proof why Obama does not need to run away from the left or fear being labelled a "liberal" (though liberals may rightly fear him be labelled as one of us) - people don't really mind it that much.  In the long run fixing the negative perceptions of liberalism will really defang the right.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.
Van Halen, Heart, Others to GOP: Stop Using Our Songs!
GOP ignores copyrights, raises ire of multiple recording artists.
Post by Dave Burdick. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Conservatism of Liberalism
Posted by: pdxstudent on Jul 12, 2008 3:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The linch-pin of American liberalism, whether you spell that with a big or a little "L," whether you're Milton Freedman or Barack Obama, is Capitalism. Questioning the religious, sexual and racial factors that over-determine our lives has been sustained by a crucial denial and thereby conservation of economic structures that determine our individual and collective lives.

The Leftism I support is critical of all ideology that conserves oppressive social relations, including those that sneak-by under the banner of liberalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Graphs and Charts
Posted by: kathiparker on Jul 13, 2008 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think I'm stupid. I have an MBA and got a B in a PhD level statistics class, but these graphs leave me scratching my head. Can someone explain them to me please.
kathiparker

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Graphs and Charts Posted by: Xynyx
» "have", dang it! Posted by: Xynyx
Are You Related to That Republican Representative from TX named POE?
Posted by: Turiye on Jul 13, 2008 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been and always shall be a left-leaning liberal. Oh but the graphs, not the graphs!
Poe from Texas uses graphs even if the bill is @ naming a Post Office, then ends it every damn time with, "And THATS THE WAY IT IS, Ladies and Gentlemen.", turns on his heels and stomps off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LIBERAL AND A LEFTIST
Posted by: chlamor on Jul 15, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Leftist says that the fundamental organization of our society is intolerable because it leads directly to war, poverty, oppression, and environmental destruction. The Leftist argues that a new and different framework is necessary.

A Liberal says that the basic organization of our society is reasonably good, and should therefore be accepted, and that any efforts at further improving society should come from working within the already-established framework. IOW, the liberal wants slight modifications to what already exists, believing that its basic structure is reasonably sound.

Liberal- will blithely be assimilated.

Leftist- will likely be assassinated.

Liberal- possesses a quaint notion that one can reform hierarchical power structures.

Leftist- desires to completely unravel and eliminate the functions and forms of hierarchy.

Liberal- wishes to reform The Bank into The People's Credit Union.

Leftist- sees the need to turn the tables of the moneychangers and smash the marketplace.

Liberal- says "Living Wage".

Leftist- says "Solidarity".

Liberal- willingly shells out $4 for a glass of carrot juice.

Leftist- sees Root Vegetables as sustenance and metaphor.

Liberal- outside the coffee shop talks about the need for the Cappuccino Revolution but balks at acting out for fear this would endanger his/her daily cappuccino.

Leftist- reuses the same coffee filter, paper towels or odd socks when all other options have been exhausted in an attempt to squeeze one more cup from yesterday's grounds.

Liberal- wants to 'get out the vote'.

Leftist- recognizes voting as a nominal form of political activity meant to validate the Democratic State and convince the political consumer that they are a participant in governance.

Liberal- can often be seen mouthing the "education is the answer" mantra particularly in the rarified atmosphere of the Citadels of Expertise. Revels in being near theory or people 'doing theory' in the academy.

Leftist- sees education as social engineering and cultural imperialism. Education Academies seen as the proving grounds for the future ruling class.

Liberal- users of 'all natural' deodorant. The armpits are fresh particularly during commercial breaks.

Leftists- recognize deodorant as one of the essential pillars of Empire. Will often raise their armpits in tight quarters due to quixotic impulses.

Liberal- writes lengthy position papers on the plusses of developing more efficient killing machines (See Amory Lovins for more details).

Leftist- sees the Techno Warfare State as one of the great life destroying mechanisms in the history of Mankind and understands the relationship between war and oppression. The "Health of the State" being that which kills everything else.

Liberal- true believers in the New Economy and Seattle (the city) home of Microsoft, Boeing and Starbucks.

Leftist- acknowledge a different Seattle (the Amerindian prophet)

Liberals- have recently been experiencing a population explosion which seems to have been caused by a grey form of technocratic inbreeding. Liberalism is now a major growth industry much like Cancer. Much of this exponential proliferation of this well-groomed disease seems to emanate directly from Academia.

Leftists- an endangered species. Said to be only 723 remaining in the contiguous 48 states of the United States of America. For years they have been scooped up and exiled to the Periphery. To date all efforts to exhume the spirit of Eugene Debs have fallen on deaf ears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LIBERAL AND A LEFTIST- PT. 2
Posted by: chlamor on Jul 15, 2008 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both liberals and socialists empathize with the suffering of society's weaker members, and are sensitive to "man's inhumanity to man." However, the liberal is basically at peace with the socioeconomic system that produces this suffering, while the socialist recognizes that the system itself is a core cause of the suffering.

A liberal might get upset by militarism, but happily invests in Martin Marietta Corp, and rejoices when it increases its dividend. Liberals are also often susceptible to nationalist propaganda appeals, & thus can easily be persuaded to support wars like the NATO war in Kosovo, simply because it was cleverly marketed as a "humanitarian intervention." A socialist would never fall for this sort of ploy.

A liberal might be properly horrified by pollution, waste, hyper commercialism, and many of the ills of modern society, but pays little conscious attention to the underlying issue of corporate power that allows such things to dominate our lives. A liberal will vote for Democrats, despite the obvious fact that these contemptible worms are nothing but bought servants of corporate monopolies or oligopolies. The liberal sleeps easily, figuring, "Well, at least the Dems are better than Bush!" as though this really implies some sort of resistance to rampant corporatism.

Basically, the liberal tut-tuts disapprovingly at some of the blatantly horrible end-effects of policies, politicians, and economic philosophies that, for the most part, he accepts. A socialist, on the other hand, is conscious of where the roots of these disasters lie....


Now is a good time to cue up some Phil Ochs:

I cried when they shot Medgar Evers
Tears ran down my spine
I cried when they shot Mr. Kennedy
As though I'd lost a father of mine
But Malcolm X got what was coming
He got what he asked for this time
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I go to civil rights rallies
And I put down the old D.A.R.
I love Harry and Sidney and Sammy
I hope every colored boy becomes a star
But don't talk about revolution
That's going a little bit too far
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I cheered when Humphrey was chosen
My faith in the system restored
I'm glad the commies were thrown out
of the A.F.L. C.I.O. board
I love Puerto Ricans and Negros
as long as they don't move next door
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

The people of old Mississippi
Should all hang their heads in shame
I can't understand how their minds work
What's the matter don't they watch Les Crain?
But if you ask me to bus my children
I hope the cops take down your name
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I read New republic and Nation
I've learned to take every view
You know, I've memorized Lerner and Golden
I feel like I'm almost a Jew
But when it comes to times like Korea
There's no one more red, white and blue
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I vote for the democratic party
They want the U.N. to be strong
I go to all the Pete Seeger concerts
He sure gets me singing those songs
I'll send all the money you ask for
But don't ask me to come on along
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

Once I was young and impulsive
I wore every conceivable pin
Even went to the socialist meetings
Learned all the old union hymns
But I've grown older and wiser
And that's why I'm turning you in
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]