Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

McCain Blogger Once Wrote: Who Cares if Bush Policies Increase Terrorism?

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 11:45 AM on June 17, 2008.


John McCain doesn't seem too worried, either...
wtcterror

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

In an interview with ABC News's Jake Tapper yesterday, Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) argued that "we can crack down on threats against the United States" while staying "within the constraints of our Constitution." He added that the Bush administration's approach has "given a huge boost to terrorist recruitment" in countries that say, "Look, this is how the United States treats Muslims."

Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) presidential campaign is now trying to attack Obama over a reference to the first World Trade Center attack in the interview, accusing him of embracing a "mindset" that "contributed to the tragedy of September 11th." On the McCain campaign blog, Michael Goldfarb takes issue with Obama's "gall"; for suggesting that Bush policies have helped "terrorist recruitment."

Obama wants to take us back to the bad old days of going after terrorists with prosecutors rather than predators. And he even has the gall to blame the Bush administration’s methods as having been a boon to terrorist recruitment. With all the international credibility the Clinton administration earned, and the international terrorists they incapacitated, one wonders how bin Laden even recruited 19 men to attack this country on September 11.

This is a curious line of argument coming from Goldfarb. Soon before he was detailed to the McCain campaign, Goldfarb declared on the Weekly Standard blog, "As to whether Bush is a recruiting tool for terrorists," who cares?"

What's more, Bush's policies have actually helped terrorist recruitment. Just today, staunch McCain ally Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) noted during a Senate Armed Services hearing that Abu Ghraib had inspired people to "join al Qaeda in Iraq." [...]

An April 2006 National Intelligence Estimate found that "the Iraq War has become the 'cause celebre' for jihadists" and is shaping "a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives." A McClatchy investigation published today "found that instead of confining terrorists, Guantanamo often produced more of them" by "inspiring a deep hatred of the United States" in "men with no allegiance to radical Islam."

Marcy Wheeler and Spencer Ackerman are liveblogging the Senate Armed Services hearing.

Transcript:

LIEBERMAN: So this is an important matter, but obviously we’re a nation, as my colleagues have said or I need not belabor it, that is a nation of law. And therefore, to me, the standard that we have to hold up in our attempts to obtain information from detainees is: is it legal? And is it effective? In other words, does it produce information that is helpful or does it have other effects that might produce, as Dr. Ogrisseg said in response to Sen. Graham, information that’s not truthful. Or, in the larger context, as we’ve seen after Abu Ghraib, might it affect our standing generally and our effectiveness in the war on terrorism. I remember once being with Sen. McCain and Sen. Graham, meeting at Camp Bucca in Iraq, meeting — which is a large detention center — meeting a former member of al Qaeda in Iraq, who said that one of the reason he was motivated to join al Qaeda in Iraq was what he heard had happened at Abu Ghraib, so, this is important stuff.

Update: Jonathan Chait notes that McCain actually attacked Obama in February for wanting to go after terrorists with predators.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, terrorism, mccain, blogger


Franken Campaign: Al Pulls Ahead by 22 Votes
For the first time since the Minnesota recount began, Al Franken has actually pulled ahead of Republican Sen. Norm Coleman.
Post by Sam Stein. December 3, 2008.
More Strange Turns in the Franken-Coleman Recount
The Republican incumbent now leads by 50 votes -- and that's before these 171 uncounted ballots.
Post by Steve Benen. December 3, 2008.
Republican Incumbent Chambliss Wins in Georgia
We'll have more on this tomorrow.
Post by Staff. December 2, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hmm... Prohibition?
Posted by: Xynyx on Jun 17, 2008 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How was it, again, that we got Al Capone? Was it for his liquor business? Being a crime lord? For murders? No... it was income tax evasion. Accountants and lawyers nailed him.

And then we changed our minds about the whole Prohibition thing... thankfully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let Me Tell You A Secret
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jun 17, 2008 2:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those pesky liberals and their quaint Constitution...Geesh!...

Let me tell you a secret. Republicans, John McCain included, do NOT care about keeping America safe. If they did, then all Americans would have universal health care, there would be adequate environmental protections, there would be adequate consumer product and prescription drug safety protections, the aftermath of Katrina would have been taken care of more effectively, more than 4000 dead US servicemen would still be alive.

And America would have acted like a responsible and humane world citizen in the "war on terror", if it even was fighting the war on terror in the first place, thus not recruiting angry Muslims to Al Qaeda.

No, the Republicans do not really care about keeping Americans safe. What they REALLY care about is their own power, their own ability to break the law and violate the Constitution without being held accountable. They want to enrich their already-wealthy buddies even more. And they actually WANT to hurt the little guy in the process.
They are sadistic and selfish. This is what defines them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's not forget that . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 18, 2008 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a corporate capitalist country. Its government is run like a corporation. That means it lives by the Ford Pinto Rule, considers "collateral damage" only in the context of profit margin. How many are maimed or die is not the critical consideration, only how much will be earned as a result.

We live with this, and have since the early years of the Twentieth Century. Here in Texas, an in situ leech-mining company is freeing uranium into the water tables, streams and lakes - the water supply. They, and the politicians who "authorize" this kind of crime against humanity, know that people will contract leukemia, bone and soft tissue cancer. Their interest? Only the prospective profit.

The Pinto Rule, by the way, says that when you can pay all the lawsuits and phony politically arranged fines and still turn a profit, you ignore the "collateral damage." The wonder here is that people fail to correlate these things, things like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

With capitalism, only profit counts. It's an absolute like gravity, something inherent in the ideology. Learn it, and you'll find you understand a lot of things better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]