Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Will Pro-Choice Women Vote for McCain?

Posted by Jane Hamsher, Firedoglake at 8:34 AM on May 28, 2008.


Yet another issue on which the Republican Senator's image does not match his beliefs.
mccainonmtp

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Following up on my post from yesterday on John McCain's bid for Hillary Clinton's female voters, I see my good friend Arianna Huffington has finally joined the ranks of pro-choice bloggers and writes about a promising poll by Planned Parenthood. The poll concludes that many of McCain's supporters in swing states are pro-choice, and don't realize what a reactionary barbarian he is when it comes to a woman's right to control her own body.

People in our comments thread were also quick to note that no woman who really cares about choice could vote for a President who might put another Alito on the bench. Well, people such as myself who are die-hard pro-choice voters might wish that were true, but there really isn't any statistical proof to back up the conclusion that John McCain's Neanderthal position on choice is going to hurt him significantly in November.

A recent nation wide Gallup poll indicates that only 13% of those polled say that a candidate "must share your views" with regard to abortion; 49% said it was "just one of many important factors," while 37% said it was "not a major issue" and 2% had "no opinion."

Here's Newsweek:

McCain aides say his hard line on abortion isn't necessarily a disadvantage among many women. Though about 60 percent agree in general with Roe, that doesn't mean they vote based on a candidate's position on abortion. The McCain camp believes Hillary backers—working-class white women and independents, in particular—could migrate to McCain rather than to Obama. A Planned Parenthood poll of women voters in 16 battleground states earlier this year showed 49 percent of McCain's supporters called themselves pro-choice and said they support Roe.

What do women care about? Well, that is the eternal question, isn't it. From a May 14 Quinnipiac poll:

Which of the following will be the single most important issue in your vote in the election for President this year?

IssueWomen
Terrorism 5%
War in Iraq 22%
The economy 46%
Illegal immigration 6%
Health care 14%
Something else (Vol) 4%
DK/NA 2%

"A woman's right to choose" doesn't even chart.

McCain's big vulnerability among women is the economy. The Quinipiac poll also states that 77% of women disapprove of Bush's handling of the economy, and Progressive Media demonstrates that in 2008 John McCain voted with Bush 100% of the time. In 2007, he voted with him 95% of the time. If Obama can articulate a meaningful vision of how he'll handle the economy, it's going to be a lot more persuasive to female voters at this point in time.

Choice is -- or should be -- a core Democratic value. It's critical for party leaders to be vocal in their support of it, because the people who really care about it really care about it and they're the activists who get stuff done. And good on Arianna for getting the message out about McCain, because the Planned Parenthood poll indicates that when people are aware of what a pig he is on choice, it starts to chip away at their willingness to support him. But for those looking to a position on choice to keep women in the Democratic tent, there just isn't a compelling argument that this issue alone will prevent women from defecting to McCain.

All this is by way of reinforcing my central thesis, which I still stick by -- Hillary Clinton's exit from the stage needs to be carefully managed, and a bum's rush may have undesirable consequences. Those looking to see her burned at the stake may be firmly convinced of their righteousness, but it's questionable whether this is in the best interest of a November victory for Obama.


Fox, CNN, CBS Reaction Groups: Obama Won
Who won the debate? It's looking like a clean sweep for Obama.
Post by Sam Stein. October 7, 2008.
Obama Coolly Dispatches Punch-Drunk McCain
Tonight's winner is clear.
Post by Ian Welsh. October 7, 2008.
McCain Shows Disdain at Debate: Calls Obama 'That One'
Sounds like McCain is buying into the hate rhetoric spouted at his own rallies. Click through for more analysis.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 7, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You Have Been Warned
Posted by: QQOblivion on May 28, 2008 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Hillary-supporting women vote in droves for McCain instead of Obama out of spite, then they DESERVE the America that will come about as a result.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Have Been Warned Posted by: Moira61
No
Posted by: foreverhope on May 28, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They won't, and that alone will lose him the election. There are many many reasons he is going to lose. I can hardly wait to see who he picks for his VP and their convention. Wait till voters get to see the repug's platform and see the repugs up close and personal. The repugs are NOT united behind McSame, dems shouldn't be so worried about disunity in our own party. The repubs have their own Nadars. If he doesn't select Huck for VP I bet some repugs will rebel and vote for Huck anyway (after all, he believes, as they do, in creationism not evolution), others will vote for Barr, AND Paul (his people won't give up). They are all going to sap repug votes from McSame.

LOL! McCain had to reschedule his fund-raiser with GWB this weekend NOT because they wanted to keep the press out so much as because they couldn't sell enough tickets to fill the convention center they rented.

I could almost feel sorry for them, but no.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to win the womans vote
Posted by: gc94112 on May 28, 2008 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are many reasons besides abortion for women to support Obama and the Democrats. They opposed SCHIP the fereral/state funded health care for low and moderate income families, they opposed raising the minimum wage for single mothers, they opposed family leave, they have refused to clean up the rampant problem of sex abuse in the military. Their Supreme Court has restricted claims of sex discrimination.(Wright v. Rolette County, Ledbetter v. Goodyear)and undermined use of maternity leave (Quick v.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) The Republicains are clearly an antiwoman party based on their record, There is more opportunity for women and more women elected officials in the Democratic party. -

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will pro-choice women
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on May 28, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ever move away from single-issue politics?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Will pro-choice women Posted by: 23skidoo
» P.S. Posted by: foreverhope
Call them what they Are 'Pro Birth'ers'
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 29, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have allowed for far too long this misnomer to be perpetuated.
The proclaimed 'Pro Lifers' do not give a shit about Life, Only Birth. Once a childis born they stop caring or doing ANYTHING to improve their situation.
Let's be very honest - they are Only Waiting On ONE BIRTH!These arrogant, small minded and basically heretical champions of Birth think they must make sure the 'Messiah' is born. and frankly seem to feel that this 'savior' should be allowed to be born into ANY condition- they more suffering the Better ah? Makes for a better story?
Areal Pro Life person wants every child that IS born to have th ebnefit of all that we as mankind can give them from Birth to Death. We want them to have all that is necessary to reach their Potential-education healthcare, not to mention food ,shelter a Non Toxic environment and Loving Parents/Adults to help them along the way. We want every child to grow to see old age in the best possible condition, benefiting from science and technology to eleviate unnecessary suffering while going through this natural process towards their end. And at the End we want to be sure it is Dignified and painfree and of THEIR choosing if necessary. REAL ProLife Honors ALL of Life- From Beginning to End, Human and Non Human. It's time to challenge this lie of Rhetoric, and those who Proclaim they are Advocates for Life.PROVE IT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]