Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama Ratchets-Up His Attacks on Big Media

Posted by Matt Stoller, Open Left at 6:01 AM on May 20, 2008.


In Oregon, Sen. Obama discussed creating greater diversity in media to better serve the public.
mediaconsolidation

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

On Friday, I wrote about how Obama is subtly sending out signals that he is going to reform media by emphasizing a more diverse ownership structure. Currently, radio station ownership is mostly held by white men. Latinos own 2.9% of all radio stations and African-Americans own 3.4% of them. TV is even worse. According to Free Press, "people of color own just 3.15 percent of commercial television stations in the United States... while women own just 5.87 percent of television stations."

Pledging a more diverse ownership structure is a serious challenge to the current media environment. Today, Obama pledged to use antitrust tools to work on media consolidation.

"I will assure that we will have an antitrust division that is serious about pursuing cases," the Illinois senator told an audience of mostly senior citizens in Oregon.

"There are going to be areas, in the media for example where we're seeing more and more consolidation, that I think (it) is legitimate to ask...is the consumer being served?"

I wrote about this in November, 2007, when Obama came out with his media and tech proposals. He's got a strong open source, almost libertarian attitude, as evidenced by his technocratic advisors and slightly more conservative stances on economic stimulus and health care. While cautious instincts are part of his DNA, when it comes to media, they serve the public extremely well. Unlike health care and the green economy, elites in technology are extremely powerful and progressive, so they counterbalance the more corrupt and conservative telecom and cable interests. The Obama camp is close with Silicon Valley, which is both libertarian in general matters and progressive when it comes to technology; venture capitalists were some of Obama's first Presidential backers, and you can get a really good sense of who he is by reading this blog post endorsing Obama by Marc Andreesen, the founder of Netscape (and a Mitt Romney donor). Google itself is willing to get into the fray, pushing back against Joe Lieberman's demands to censor Youtube.

Obama's media policies are quite progressive, and you can see the outlines of what it will take to keep the Obama camp going in a progressive direction. The combination of activists, elites, businesses, nonprofits, and labor has been quite successful in the media reform movement. Replicating that in health care, the green economy, and international trade will produce similar fruitful results.

It's going to be really interesting to see how Obama's administration takes on the media, and frankly, if I were a network executive, I'd be worried. The White House and Brian Williams may find the Pentagon Pundit scandal to be nothing more than what happens on liberal blogs, but Obama is wondering if their business model is really "serving the consumer," and what the Justice Department might have to say about that.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.
Van Halen, Heart, Others to GOP: Stop Using Our Songs!
GOP ignores copyrights, raises ire of multiple recording artists.
Post by Dave Burdick. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
oops...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on May 20, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He better be careful.

If Edwards, Ron Paul, and Kucinich taught us anything its that the media goes a LOOONG way towards deciding who becomes president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's why Posted by: lamac66
It's not a fun issue
Posted by: particle on May 20, 2008 5:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but reforming the way big media does business is near the core of making any meaningful change in the direction of this country. Obama is to be commended for addressing this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The positive side of Bush Media Policy
Posted by: peacekeepertwo on May 21, 2008 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More and more ordinary people, and Uneducated Old White Folks, Are questioning Main Stream Media, the time is right for change. It is becoming harder to make money when our government has so many enemies. I think Rush Limbough is on the way out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]