Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Republicans to Campaign as Democrats

Posted by Chris Bowers, Open Left at 6:02 AM on May 19, 2008.


The Republicans are hoping to co-opt the Democratic message to stem their losses in November.
elephantdonkeyboxingthumb

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Following up on D-Day's article on this past week's string of progressive victories, which Paul already followed up earlier today, comes the new Republican message for the 2008 campaign season:

Republican Solutions and a Positive Agenda

Posted By: Tom Cole, May 16, 2008 - 9:52 AM

Families today face challenges that yesterday's laws simply don't address. We need to fix government, and one solution is to update our laws so they provide America's families with more freedom in their jobs; greater healthcare and retirement security; safer communities; access to quality, affordable education; and the ability for future generations to compete in the global economy.

Embarrassed by three special election defeats over the last two months, all in supposedly deep red districts, Republicans apparently plan to campaign as Democrats this year. This passage could have come out of virtually any Democratic campaign from 1992-2004, and reverses a long standing trend where Democrats have felt the need to campaign like Republicans over the past two decades. It is another sign of realignment, as Republican narratives collapse and they are forced to campaign as Democrats in order to have any chance. Campaigning against "liberal elites" along with more recognizable conservative rhetoric just doesn't work for Republicans anymore.

Now, rhetoric from Republican campaigns is one thing, and voting patterns, legislation, and base attitudes are another. The laws behind this messaging are undoubtedly still retrograde corporatism. Also, the over 1,300 comments that appeared below this post from Tom Cole, more comments than appeared on the last 100 NRCC blog posts combined, were all negative, as online conservatives signaled their intention to revolt against this new messaging. Further, even as the NRCC sounds conciliatory notes, conservative whipping infrastructures such as the Club for Growth are still running ads against Heath Wilson in the New Mexico Republican Senate primary for supporting S-CHIP, no matter how hopeless that campaign is for Republicans. So, we are a long way from conservative and Republican capitulation to progressive ideas like expanding the social safety net.

However, a collapse of public conservative rhetoric from Republicans is still a major victory. If they are further wiped out in the 2008 elections this November, and reduced to a rump party with only 40-43 Senators, 175-180 members of the House, and a 7-8% loss in the Presidential election, we could start witnessing major changes in voting habits, too. Or, even if they don't, we can bury them further in 2010, when they have to defend 21 Senate seats and we only have to defend 12, and when we can draw new maps that will solidify a Democratic majority until at least 2022.

Either way, we are approaching a true, long-term political victory, where we not only realign the public, but where out political opposition comes to accept many of our core policies that they once opposed. And this would be a true reversal, as for the past two decades many Democrats helped pass conservative legislation like NAFTA, the 1996 telecommunications act, the bankruptcy bill, and the authorization for the use of military force in Iraq. As Gul Dukat once said:

A true victory is to make your enemy see they were wrong to oppose you in the first place; to force them to acknowledge your greatness.

That would be true victory, and it is the path to a more progressive America. We are moving down that path already.


Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.
Van Halen, Heart, Others to GOP: Stop Using Our Songs!
GOP ignores copyrights, raises ire of multiple recording artists.
Post by Dave Burdick. September 5, 2008.
The McCain Campaign's Big McMansion Mystery Mistake
What exactly was that giant building on the screen behind John McCain last night?
Post by dday. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Same as it ever was...
Posted by: Gracews on May 19, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that Democrats should redraw the maps to ensure their continued access to power is an idea of the past that we should NOT bring into the future. We need to transform the political process, and that includes eliminating things like redistricting which artificially creates strongholds of partisan power. With the technology and communications opportunities we have today, it shouldn't be a real hardship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes we are!
Posted by: foreverhope on May 19, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A true victory is to make your enemy see they were wrong to oppose you in the first place; to force them to acknowledge your greatness.

That would be true victory, and it is the path to a more progressive America. We are moving down that path already."


This left me with a tear in my eye and a smile on my face, you are so right. More than any election I can remember in forty years, I feel it 'in my bones', our country is changing rapidly, in a positive way. Like an awakening, Obama's campaign is beyond a grassroots movement now, no one has ever seen anything like this, NEVER! It is taking on a life of it's own that will benefit down ticket dems in November. I feel we are on the verge of something monumental and spectacular and just in the nick of time.

The republican party can't even raise money, Barack has a splendid funding machine in place and is already millions ahead. They are disorganized, their base lethargic. On the other hand Barack is already well-organized in FIFTY STATES. Their campaign motto is "A Change You Deserve", already a slogan for the anti-depressent EFFEXOR. Nice marketing, poor things. Their candidate is so so SO old he can barely remember what his handlers told him an hour ago, trying to appeal to moderates and independents while at the same time pandering to his rabid religious base!

HAHAHAHAAAAHAAHAAAAHAAAHAHAAAAAAAA......clicking heels in the air!

*A footnote for naysayers: When McCain can fill a staduim with 35,000 + happy excited enthusiastic voters, and thousands more waiting outside just to see him, in even ONE American city, I MIGHT begin to worry.

YES WE CAN, YES WE WILL, YES WE MUST SAY NO TO 100 MORE YEARS!

BARACK THE VOTE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Rising in Portland Oregon! Posted by: foreverhope
Deb
Posted by: debmcd on May 19, 2008 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They can run as Democrats but the people who vote for them are still Republicans. Are they going to go along with their party switching sides? How are they going to sell progressive ideas as Republican? If they had any good ideas of a conservative nature there might be hope, but if they are going to try to get through the election by masquerading as Democrats to get people to vote for them, what happens if they win? Are they going to tell those folks who voted for them because of the Democratic ideas that they were only joking to get votes? That's a pretty underhanded, sneaky, disingenuous election strategy to say the least. They have been getting Republicans, Independants and some Democrats to vote for the Republican party against their best interests for at least seven years but people are just starting to wake up to the fact that the only thing they are getting at the voting box each time they vote is a big fat empty Republican Party promise that means squat. As soon as they get your vote, they can forget you for another 2 to 4 years. The Republicans only care about their base or constituencies at election time. The rest of their terms they could give a rat's but what the voters might think or say. Republicans are so Sad. It couldn't have happened to a better bunch of criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

parsing time...
Posted by: lexicon on May 19, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you have to LEARN how to read "GOP-speak". It isn't intuitive:


QUOTE:..."Families today face challenges that yesterday's laws simply don't address."

TRANSLATION: cut taxes on the wealthy. It'll work.


QUOTE..." We need to fix government, and one solution is to update our laws so they provide America's families with more freedom in their jobs;"


TRANSLATION: bust up those damnable unions.



QUOTE:..." greater healthcare and retirement security;"


TRANSLATION: privatize medicare and social security.


QUOTE:..." safer communities;"


TRANSLATION: gated communities with private cops.


QUOTE: ..."access to quality, affordable education;"


TRANSLATION: kill off the public schools and give out vouchers instead.


QUOTE:..." and the ability for future generations to compete in the global economy."


TRANSLATION: Myanmar can make that sweater or toy or computer for 1/2 what you can.


see, it's actually not that hard!


lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bravo! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: parsing time... Posted by: gc94112
Cry babies
Posted by: frank69 on May 20, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ReThuglicans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats in Name Only?
Posted by: Quannah on May 20, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, are we gonna get a fresh new crop of DINOs? A new gaggle of "Lieberman Democrats?"

I've said before that the number of Democrats elected to the new Congress is important. A bigger (veto-proof) majority is wonderful. BUT...

It's not the quantity so much as the quality of Democrats elected. What we need are new progressive elected officials that will enact the necessary legislation to really make significant change and who will turn back the clock on the insanity of the past 8 years.

What we need are Statesmen NOT politicians. There's a difference. Vote for that difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]