Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Demonization of Hillary Clinton

Posted by Melissa McEwan, Shakesville at 4:58 AM on May 19, 2008.


Violent imagery abounds in media coverage of Sen. Clinton's campaign.
shedevil

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Bless you, Julia Keller, for giving us this wonderful piece in today's Chicago Tribune, about the untold story of this primary: Devil in a pantsuit or the demonization of Hillary Clinton.

When the doctor checks to see if the patient is still breathing, it's disgust, not compassion, that leaks out between his syllables: "You couldn't kill her with an ax," he sneers.

That patient—the wide-hipped, unwieldy woman at the heart of Dorothy Parker's 1929 short story "Big Blonde"—is a familiar image in books, films, songs, comic books, TV series, video games and, now, politics: The woman as monster. The over-large, over-ambitious, overbearing creature who irritates everybody, the death-defying witch who just won't go away—and who therefore must be destroyed.

...Revealed in the coverage of Clinton's campaign is the persistence of an ancient and distasteful cultural theme: the powerful, ambitious woman as cackling fiend, as fantastically terrifying ghoul threatening civilization. And because this creature (or "she-devil," as MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews called Clinton) is not human, the only solution is to kill it. Not just derail its career—obliterate it. Smash it to smithereens. Vaporize it. Leave not a trace of the foul beast behind.

Hence the appalling preponderance of violent, death-infused imagery in conversations about Clinton, smuggled into otherwise ordinary political discourse like a knife taped on the bottom of a cake plate...
Keller goes on to detail much of the cast-as-inhuman and violent-death-to-the-monster imagery that we've detailed here, over the course of now nearly 100 posts, and notes, quite rightly, that, beyond the "normal" othering of sexism or racism, this is "something different and more sinister," because it is, cumulatively, "an unprecedented public call—albeit metaphorically, but still violently and persistently—for a person's death."

Death, death, death. The steady, depressing drumbeat continues. What these commentators seem to seek is not just a proud female's withdrawal from a political contest—but her outright annihilation. They evoke the nightmarish vision of a commanding woman intent on destruction—thus she must be destroyed before she can launch her evil scheme.

Hmm...a reluctance to give Clinton the room to drop out with dignity and on her own terms because that just wouldn't be humiliating enough. Now where have I heard that before?

What makes Keller's piece so interesting is that she's not a partisan. She's not even a political writer. Keller is a cultural critic, and her piece is filed in the Tempo section, which is where you'll find, among other things, the funny pages. And Keller, while tracing the history of the monstrous women through our cultural history via literature and film, makes the point that she is teasing out a cultural meme perfectly clear:

These observations, by the way, have nothing to do with the issue of Clinton's or Obama's continued candidacies. That's a subject to be debated on the editorial pages, not here. This corner is reserved for cultural imagery, for a spirited exploration of the way a shared belief or preoccupation ultimately manifests itself in our entertainment products. Such an idea is like a splinter driven so deep, resting undisturbed for so long, that for a time you may not even be aware of it. Then slowly, slowly, it begins to work its way to the surface. One day, the sharp tip breaks the skin, and you see what's been down there all along, spreading its poison.
It's a distinction that is lost on every person who's accused me of being in the bag for Clinton. Feminism/womanism is a cultural critique first and foremost, and, although Chris Matthews calling Clinton a she-devil piques my political ire in the same way pernicious media misrepresentations of Al Gore did, the way the MSM's disfavor toward Democratic candidates always does, but that Matthews specifically goes for misogynist attacks against Clinton is not a political concern for me nearly as much as it's a cultural concern, akin to Jay Leno's homophobia and sexism and racism, David Letterman's transphobia, Adam Carolla's sexism and homophobia and fat hatred and transphobia, Bill Maher's sexism and rape jokes, and on and on and on. Our media is a giant tool of the kyriarchy, and, while there are certainly exceptions (we've spoken before in a great QotD thread about films that opened our minds about something), the MSM is largely little more than a jack-booted thug enforcing the biases that protect existent privilege, and politics is only a tiny part of that.

The Sexism Watch has way more to do with the larger culture than it does to do with the subculture of political discourse. Keller's piece clarifies beautifully how a critique of the rhetorical cudgels being wielded against Clinton is a cultural issue, not a specifically political one. And thusly, it underlines once again how a failure to address what's being done to Clinton is not justifiable because she's not your candidate, or because she voted for the AUMF, or because because because...

Not if you care about women and the means of their subjugation. Not if you're a progressive.

Truly, I cannot urge this more fervently, read the whole thing.

[H/T to Shaker Julie, via email.]

Digg!

Tagged as: hillary clinton, sexism


Republican National Convention: Whitest in Forty Years
As America diversifies, the GOP goes against the grain.
Post by Blue Texan. September 4, 2008.
Talk About Bad Planning: McCain to Speak Tonight, the Start of Football Season
McCain has got some big time competition tonight on the TV dial. Talk about bad planning.
Post by Steven Reynolds. September 4, 2008.
Giuliani and Palin Use Racist Dog Whistle in Speeches
Treating 'activist' like a dirty word is bad, using it to invoke racism is much, much worse.
Post by Melissa McEwan. September 4, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
She Demonized Herself
Posted by: Phred42 on May 19, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Acknowledging that she did so is appropriate.

Personally, she lost me That evening on the stage many months ago when she proudly announced that she WOULD continue to take Lobbyists money "because they are people too". They are not people but that's a rant for a different place. Then her Faustian deals with Mellon Scaife and Murdock and announcing how FOX 'News' was reporting on her more honestly than anyone else. Then Her and Bill's support for McCain over Obama on multiple occasions not to mention the myriad other incidents including racism. Finally the unwavering support of Hannity, Limbaugh and the other of the Reich-wing although MAY not be doing, but even so, it HAS to tell you something.

Turning the other cheek doesn't work in Politics as John Kerry can attest. Yes we need to Heal. But personally I can't heal while I'm still being kicked. Healing comes after the violence has stopped.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is awful.
Posted by: Scientz on May 19, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only does it not address the obvious--that Hillary is done and of course the commentators have to discuss that fact in creative ways . . . but this paragraph:

Jay Leno's homophobia and sexism and racism, David Letterman's transphobia, Adam Carolla's sexism and homophobia and fat hatred and transphobia, Bill Maher's sexism and rape jokes, and on and on and on. Our media is a giant tool of the kyriarchy, and, while there are certainly exceptions (we've spoken before in a great QotD thread about films that opened our minds about something), the MSM is largely little more than a jack-booted thug enforcing the biases that protect existent privilege

Really, people? Transphobia? When did it become a rule that society had to culturally acquiesce at the same rate as its most "progressive" (read "radical") members? There are folks out there who are talking--in public--about not voting for Obama because he's half-black and you act as if TRANSPHOBIA is a serious problem?

Meh. I'm a hierarchist. I see some problems being worse than others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Clintons Are The Un-dead
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 19, 2008 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe if we all wear garlic and turn on our lights we can be rid of them. Worth a try.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this a joke?
Posted by: Bru on May 19, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary thought she would just be The Candidate, coasting in like a queen. We don't like that. Then she started the macho business about getting fired on in Bosnia. That made her ridiculous like Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For me it was NEVER just about Hillary, it is about BILL & Hillary & DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA!
Posted by: foreverhope on May 19, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Clintons, a horror film that never ends

linked text


The Clintons have always had a touch of the zombies about them: unkillable, they move relentlessly forward, propelled by a bloodlust for Republicans or uppity Democrats who dare to question their supremacy. You can’t escape; you can’t hide; and you can’t win.

Now all this may seem a little melodramatic. Perhaps it is. I’m not kidding. I woke up in a cold sweat early last Wednesday. There have been moments this past week when I have felt physically ill at the thought of that pair returning to power.

Why? I have had to write several columns in this space over the years acknowledging that the substantive legacy of the Clinton administration (with a lot of assist from Newt Gingrich) was a perfectly respectable one: welfare reform, fiscal sanity, prudent foreign policy, leaner government. But remembering the day-to-day psychodramas of those years still floods my frontal cortex with waves of loathing and anxiety. The further away you are from them, the easier it is to think they’re fine. Up close they are an intolerable, endless, soul-sapping soap opera.

The media are marvelling at the Clintons’ several near-death political experiences in this campaign. Hasn’t it occurred to them how creepily familiar all this is? The Clintons live off psychodrama. They both love to push themselves to the brink of catastrophe and then accomplish the last-minute, nail-biting self-rescue. Before too long the entire story becomes about them, their ability to triumph through crisis, even though the crises are so often manufactured by themselves. That is what last week brought back for me. The 1990s – with a war on.

Remember: Bill Clinton could have easily settled the Paula Jones lawsuit years before he put the entire country through the wringer (Jones sued Clinton for sexual harassment alleged to have occurred while he was governor of Arkansas).

Recall: Hillary Clinton could have killed what turned out to be the White-water nonstory at the very outset by disclosing everything she could (the scandal centred on a controversial Arkansas property deal).

Consider: the Clintons could have prepared for primaries and caucuses after February 5 – so-called Super Tuesday, when 24 states held their presidential nomination vote – as any careful candidate would. They chose not to do any of these things. Not because they are incompetent. But because they live to risk.

Politics is also their life. They know nothing else. Most halfway normal people in politics could at some point walk away. Reagan seemed happy to. Not the Clintons. In the words of the American-based British writer Christo-pher Hitchens, these are the kind of people who never want the meeting to end. Hillary Clinton will never concede the race so long as there is even the faintest chance that she can somehow win.

They endure all sorts of humiliation – remember the taped Clinton deposition in the Ken Starr investigation (in which Clinton admitted to the inquiry headed by the far-right prosecutor that he had had an “improper physical relationship” with Monica Lewinsky)? Hillary’s dismissal of the Lewinsky matter as an invention of the right-wing conspiracy? – because they know no other way to live. They have been thinking of this moment since they were in college and being a senator or an ex-president or having two terms in the White House are not sufficient to satiate their sense of entitlement. Even if they have to put their own party through a divisive, bitter, possibly fatal death match, they will never give up. Their country, their party . . . none of this matters compared with them.

*************

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Self Responsibility
Posted by: RobNLA on May 19, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At some point, the Hillary is responsible for her own campaign of lies, dirty tricks, and race laced comments.

Some articles like to protray Hillary as the victim. That somehow, because she is a woman and is losing, that the media's unfairness and latent sexism that is the cause.

But the main cause of Hillary's down is herself. She started already with high negative numbers. Then she planned poorly, assuming she'd be the nominee come Super Tuesday.

Then she turned negative and began her ugly campaign to try and regain the lead. But the public had has it's fill of negative divisive politics from Bush and Republicans during the last 8 years. So Hillary's attacks ended up hurting her more than they hurt Obama.

Hillary is responsible for her demise and poor reputation. Sure the media has attacked her with some sexist remarks. But most of the injuries that Hillary's campaign suffered came from the candidate and her husband.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Criticize Hillary--Not her gender
Posted by: BobS on May 19, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point of Julia Keller's article was the vicious misogyny that has characterized the media coverage of Clinton. These are attacks on her gender, a physical characteristic she was born with and has no control over.

Personally I believe Clinton's campaign has sunk into the lower depths of racial pandering, but she is not the first to that. Her campaign has modeled itself after the racial pandering first pioneered by George Wallace in his quest for white working class votes.

It's an insult to the white working class as a whole, many of whose members want to have multiracial alliances and resent being stereotyped as ignorant redneck bigots.

None of this has anything to do with Hillary Clinton's gender and it is stupid and insulting to suggest that it does,

The intersection of race, class and gender is complex and painful and deserves far better treatment than it has received from either Clinton or Obama.

Maybe we'll mature enough as a nation by 2012 to see it handled intelligently, but I'm not holding my breath.

Bob Simpson
The BobboSphere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A dead horse
Posted by: sheena2u on May 19, 2008 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know how much this topic can be beat to death, but it has gotten very tiresome. These two articles are much ado about nothing.

Great care has been taken to suggest gently that Hillary leave the race for the good of the chances of the Democrat's success in 2008. She has decided not to listen to anything but her own drive to power. We should, instead, be talking about what is best for the greatest number at this crucial time. But, no one is stopping her. She is free to do as she wishes.

The argument put forth in the articles seems to suggest that powerful women are always hated and condemned, and this is not true. Many powerful women have been loved such as Catherine the Great, Evita, and Elizabeth I.

As for the reference to the imprisoned wife in Jane Eyre, it is not a story about a strong woman being locked away, and a demure heroine. The woman is locked away because she was mentally ill and violent, and at that time there was no treatment. Jane Eyre was demure but this was hardly the point.

Far more relevant was the fact that Jane had integrity, independence, patience, humility, controlled passion, and she lived according to her own terms. Jane was strong and admirable for those qualities, and not merely because she was young and sweet. She was not a weak character as seems to be implied in the article.

The insane, imprisoned, wife was destroyed by her excesses, and not destroyed because she was strong. Indeed, she was weak because she had no judgment or self control. Yet, Rochester does his best to do his duty by her, and treat her with kindness. She repays his kindness by biting and scratching him. It was a poor example in terms of the points the writer seemed to be trying to make. If we are supposed to have sympathy for the woman as "monster," this character is a poor example.

Yes, women have had problems and challenges to overcome through history. However, much has been gained. Aside from some truly preposterous ridicule on several U Tube videos, I have not observed any unfairness toward Hillary, or any extreme discourtesy because of her sex. Most rational people do not take such attacks seriously.

On the contrary, since she is a former first lady, a Clinton, and because this is 2008, she has been treated extremely well. To believe Hillary has been unfairly persecuted is to be blinded and deluded by a fractured world view of woman as perpetual victim.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A dead horse Posted by: sheena2u
Once you've sold your soul to The Man, do you quality as a female candidate anymore?
Posted by: nc green on May 19, 2008 1:03 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jane Fonda was right. Hillary is a megaphone for the patriarchy.

She actually got us for a short while there when it looked like she might have emotions left under all that ambition, but, alas ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is why the left is looked down upon
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on May 19, 2008 3:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conservatives and moderates constantly ridicule liberals as wanting to make a victim out of everyone. Hillary's apologists have made an art form out of this mentality. Didn't Hillary vote for: 1)The Iraq war 2)The Patriot Act 3)The Bankruptcy bill 4) No Child Left Behind 4)Designating the Iran Guards a terrorist organization 5)Continuing to allow the sale of land mines for use in civilian areas and other Bush agenda items? We're not supposed to criticize all this? And why not? Because she's a Democrat instead of a Republican? She may have had some scruples at some point in her life, but from what I can see, she's been completely consumed by the desire to get elected or re-elected at any cost, no matter who gets killed in the process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Today, she's citing Karl Rove.
Posted by: Longdream on May 19, 2008 7:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, give me a break.

The woman has lost her last marble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The War of the Isms
Posted by: ez2c on May 20, 2008 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Racism, sexism, whateverism; the Democratic election process has turned into a War of Isms! I'll trump your race card with a sex card!

Seemingly, the Democratic race is less about who is more qualified to lead and more about being the first white woman or first black man elected to the presidency. The preponderance of blacks support Obama and I would venture an equal percentage of feminists support Hillary.

Of course there’s the usual amount of pandering about issues expected in any election; however, do either of them have viable solutions for what I consider to be the greatest threat to the future of the country, Peak Oil?

http://klintons.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Live By The S
Posted by: bc430 on May 20, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
h**, die by the Sh**.

Drag the filthy dead tormentor off the field.

"Ahh just another colored fella like Jesse Jackson." Bill Kkklinton.

"This is a contact sport. If you don't want to be hit don't put the uniform on." Bill Kkklinton.

"I'm ready. Senator McCain is ready. This colored boy has a speech." tee hee hee hee, kackle. Hillary Kkklinton. in the year of somebody's Lord - 2008.

We heard ya.

The moral of the story Bro. and Sis. Kkklinton and "hard working" right of center friends: "Don't write nuke powered carrier size checks that your row boat ass can't cash."

Ya gotta bring some to get some.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HRC's behavior makes this article illogical
Posted by: Mary Price on May 20, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary herself has wanted to be treated as a man--not as a woman. She has gone overboard in trying to be tougher and more manly than Obama...hence the alleged gun-toting and whiskey chugging, Rocky comparison, etc. So treating her like a man is logical since that's how she wants to be measured. Then to complain when she is attacked and for this person to want her to be "let down" easy is completely illogical. If she wants to be judged as a man, she should be able to take it and since when do men have to be treated with kid gloves and "let down easy" ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary is a shrieking demon in her own right!
Posted by: zipoka on May 20, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary doesn't need anyone to demonize her. She's done that herself with her lying, her pettiness, her bad ideas, her warmongering and her just plain bad sportsmanship. To this day I can't stand listening to that disagreeable, scolding voice of hers, saying any desperate, ridiculous thing that comes to her mind. I wanted Kucinich, and I don't think Obama is the messiah that our country needs, but if Hillary gets the nomination, I'm moving to Norway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ms
Posted by: fagel on May 20, 2008 7:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where do all you guys come from? This is the most exciting election year you will ever experience and you spend time demonizing Hillary Clinton. You are all jackasses for not seeing the first black man and the first woman vying to be president of the United States. The media - one and all - have really done a number on most of the American people, which is an utter disgrace. You are all unable to see for yourself that the hatred and fear of women in positions of power is so threatening to men that they want to kill her. ALL the American citizens should be allowed to have their say in this momentous election, which is why nothing will be settled until after all the primaries are over.

And if you can come up with the name of any woman in any prominent position in this country who has Hillary's smarts, guts, steel and willingness to show everyone her strengths, let's have it.

Obama, whether black, white, green or whatever, is just another man who can't wait to be president he wants it so badly. But, you know what? He's just another man and we've had 43 of them in the WhiteHouse and this country is going drown the drain!! Wake up!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ms Posted by: Frank J. Burris
» RE: ms Posted by: Frank J. Burris