Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

NARAL Pro-Choice Endorses Obama

Posted by Liza Sabater, Culture Kitchen at 3:57 PM on May 14, 2008.


In a move sure to invoke controversy, the pro-choice group disses Sen. Clinton by endorsing her opponent.
narallogo
Naral logo

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

This has made my friggin' day :

NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC Endorses Senator Barack Obama for President
Washington, D.C. – NARAL Pro-Choice America, the political leader of the pro-choice movement with more than one million member activists in all 50 states, today announced that its political action committee is endorsing Sen. Barack Obama for president.
"There are few more tireless defenders of women's rights in this country than NARAL Pro-Choice America and I'm proud to accept their support," Sen. Obama said. "For decades, they have worked in the courthouse, in the legislature, and in the streets to make sure that women have the right to choose. This is a fundamental civil right that I've fought to protect in Illinois and in Washington, that's being threatened by Senator McCain, and that I'll be fighting in the months ahead to make secure today, tomorrow, and always."
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, praised both Sen. Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton for their leadership in standing up for women's reproductive rights throughout this campaign, but only one of these dynamic candidates can advance to the general election.
"Pro-choice Americans have been fortunate to have two strong pro-choice candidates in Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton, both of whom have inspired millions of new voters to participate in this historic presidential race," Keenan said. "Today, we are proud to put our organization's grassroots and political support behind the pro-choice candidate whom we believe will secure the Democratic nomination and advance to the general election. That candidate is Sen. Obama."
Keenan said the stark contrast between Sen. Obama's pro-choice record and John McCain's 25 years of anti-choice votes in Washington will be a major reason many voters, especially pro-choice Independent and Republican women, will cross party lines to support Sen. Obama in the fall.

"While Sen. Obama has consistently and passionately stood up for and articulated his support for the values of freedom and privacy, John McCain has said that he wants Roe v. Wade to be overturned," Keenan said. "Sen. Obama is the leader who can unify Americans on both sides of this issue behind commonsense, common-ground ways to prevent unintended pregnancy. In contrast, McCain wants to continue George W. Bush's failed abstinence-only policy, eliminate funding for low-income women's access to birth control, and stack the Supreme Court with even more right-wing judges who don't believe in the right to privacy. Without a doubt, the clear differences between these candidates on the critical issue of a woman's right to choose will unify America's pro-choice majority behind Sen. Obama's campaign."
NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC's endorsement of Sen. Obama is part of the organization's Protect & Elect program. NARAL Pro-Choice America is working to protect the net gain of 23 pro-choice seats in the U.S. House and three in the U.S. Senate from the 2006 midterm elections by electing even more pro-choice leaders in 2008, including a pro-choice president.
This is an amazing piece of good news. I am so excited that it really makes me want to scream, "I'm a born-again feminist".

Thank you, Nancy Keenan.

Thank you.

Digg!

Tagged as: choice, barack obama, naral


Franken-Coleman Update: Norm Returns To Senate As Non-Senator
Al Franken, has been declared the winner of the Minnesota contest but has yet to be sworn in as court battles continue.
Post by Ryan Grim. January 21, 2009.
A Bar Stool View of This Moment in American History
Some reactions to Obama's inauguration speech (which, yes, I watched in a bar).
Post by Joshua Holland. January 20, 2009.
Franken-Coleman Recount: How Far Will It Go?
Will Norm be able to take this all the way to the conservative-controlled US Supreme Court?
Post by Phoenix Woman. January 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Edwards just did, too
Posted by: fanny666 on May 14, 2008 4:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LINK

What a brilliant way to knock the "Hillary's West Virginia Victory" headlines off the front page

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm very impressed
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on May 14, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had written off NARAL after the 2000 primary season when they endorsed Gore over Bradley, who had a stronger pro-choice voting record. This goes a long way towards restoring their integrity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kiss of Death?
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 14, 2008 9:02 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm an unyielding supporter of abortion rights, but I wonder if this type of endorsement does more harm than good. I don't think it will sway any McCain supporters to vote for Obama, but the conservatives will use it to sway evangelicals and conservative Catholics who have been so disillusioned by the Bush presidency that they're considering voting for Obama to stay in the GOP tent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Kiss of Death? Posted by: progdem
» RE: Kiss of Death? Posted by: Frank J. Burris
» RE: Kiss of Death? Posted by: Quannah
Was it that hard to see coming? What with Clinton's proposed healthcare "mandates"?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 15, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honestly, what part of a "mandate" would you expect to find congruent with "choice".

Clinton is diametrically opposed to choices in health care, Obama happens to be less so. NARAL's options among the candidates they could realistically consider made for an easy-peasy decision, thanks to Clinton's heartfelt attacks on choices regarding letting people have freedom over the choices they make with their bodies.

The only difference between her and...say...the right rev. Falwell's*, is her proposals attack the choice of both men and women. Well, at least she's an equal opportunity-advocate when it comes to cracking down on health options!


*ok, that's a stretch, admittedly...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real Libbers for Real Womens Rights and Freedoms
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 15, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YEAH!!!
As a dis illusioned former NOW member (not only for their insane endorsement of Hillary, but the Stale and down hill roll for the last 3 decades on womans rights & REAL issues) I applaude NARAL, has Planned Parenthood endorsed Yet??League of Women Voters?
Only shortsighted Reverse sexist 'Feminists' are buying the BS Hillary is 'Mis speaking' and of course the ability to recall where we started 35 yrs ago and how far We Have NOT come.So Her claim to fame "35 yrs of experience' only makes me PISSED and makes me focus on WHO has caused this down ward spiral an dwho were the Ones who stood by a watched it happen or enabled it to happen
Obama was Not my first Choice - but he is Now our only Choice for Real Change! this 45yr old white blue collar college educated rural female has got your Back!The last 35 yrs has been a CON GAME!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stick to issues
Posted by: axjxhx on May 15, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NARAL should be sticking to issues, not endorsing one democratic primary candidate over another (the race isn't "over" - believe it or not). What a waste of resources, NARAL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stick to issues Posted by: somegirl
» RE: stick to issues Posted by: Quannah
» RE: stick to issues Posted by: MplsVala
» RE: stick to issues Posted by: Quannah
» RE: stick to issues Posted by: Quannah
Well, if you approve you should donate
Posted by: MplsVala on May 15, 2008 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was highly displeased by NARAL's choice and I was one of the legions who clogged their phone lines cancelling regular donations and instituting do not call orders. It took a long time to get through. If you approve of their action then you should donate to help them take up some of the slack this is going to put in their finances. Some of us have been regularly donating for decades but will not be continuing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]