Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Barack Obama's Very Good Primary Night

Posted by John Nichols, The Nation at 3:47 AM on May 7, 2008.


The Senator's win in North Carolina and virtual draw in Indiana almost assures him of the nomination.

The last really good primary night for Barack Obama was February 19, when the senator from Illinois won the Wisconsin primary by a 58-41 margin.

Since then, the candidate who has been on the verge of claiming the Democratic presidential nomination for so very long has struggled to "close the deal."

He did not close it Tuesday night.

But he did have his best finish since February. And that finish all but assures that this most unlikely presidential contender will soon secure the nomination of his party.

The headlines may suggest that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton split Tuesday's primaries in North Carolina and Indiana -- with North Carolina for Obama and Indiana for Clinton.

But it was not an even split.

As Obama secured a landslide win in North Carolina, Clinton barely prevailed in her firewall state of Indiana.

In North Carolina, Obama was ahead 56-42. His popular vote advantage was more than 230,000.

In Indiana, Clinton squeezed out a 50.5 to 49.5 win. Her popular vote advantage was barely 20,000.

Bottom Line No. 1: Obama has come out of a night that was supposed to be a mixed one for him with a solid boost in his delegate total. He now leads Clinton by almost 150 pledged delegates and the gap is widening.

Bottom Line No. 2: Barack Obama has finished the night with a tremendous improvement in his popular vote total -- a boost so significant that it now seems all but certain that he will finish the primary competition with an overall popular-vote advantage.

That's very bad news for Clinton, who really needed to narrow the margin in the delegate race and improve her popular vote position if she was going to make an effective appeal to wavering super delegates.

Obama's landslide win in North Carolina and his virtual tie in Indiana has dealt the Clinton its worst setback in months -- a defeat so serious that it is all but certain to undermine her ability to raise the money she needs to carry this campaign forward.

That doesn't mean the former first lady will quit campaigning before the West Virginia and Kentucky primaries she is likely to win.

But it would mean that whatever momentum might have been with Hillary Clinton before Tuesday's primary voting is now gone. And Barack Obama will be looking more and more like the candidate who Democrats will take on Republican John McCain in November.


Laura Flanders: Vanity Fair's Retort to the New Yorker's Obama Cover Misses the Mark
If Vanity Fair wanted to flip the New Yorker cover on the GOP, they'd have to portray the media's lies about the candidate. Not the true stuff.
Post by Laura Flanders. July 24, 2008.
Veterans Against McCain
New VoteVet.org ad gives voice to veterans for redeployment.
Post by Vote Vets. July 24, 2008.
Conservatives are Livid: Obama Printed Flyers for Speech in Germany IN GERMAN!
How dare a presidential candidate have the audacity to use any other language than American? Ever?!
Post by Gavin M. July 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yet...
Posted by: Wacre on May 7, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
she will fight on. If we were talking about cancer or some other affliction, then it's admirable. In her case, it's becoming pathetic.

Numerically speaking, there's virtually no way that she can beat Obama, yet she goes on, her 'fuzzy math' somehow showing her competitive in terms of the popular vote.

This is only possible if you include the votes from Michigan and Florida, which is highly unlikely because they held their primaries early, and the DNC isn't counting their votes. Also Hillary ran alone in those primaries, so even if those votes were included, they unfairly favor Hillary.

She acts as if the Democratic nomination were hers by fiat, and how dare anyone else actually receive it, nevermind the popular will.

The only advantage to her desperate campaign is that she is showing how strong a candidate Obama is, for despite her efforts to link him to his Reverend Wright's words, he remains strong; so despite giving the Republicans attack points in the general election, it has the inoculating effect of getting the smears and attack points out there to such a degree that the general populace will have heard them all before, weakening their impact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yet... Posted by: Vik
» RE: Yet... Posted by: jvaljon1
» RE: Yet... Posted by: CJC
» RE: Yet... Posted by: Bibsisis
embarrassing, bizaare and delusional
Posted by: foreverhope on May 7, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watching Hellary is like watching a train wreck in slow motion.

She's loaned herself another 6.5 mill. Hellary for Prez, the greatest most shameless vanity campaign in the history of America.

She still believes somehow she is going to 'win' the nomination, maybe she thinks she already has! Her denial of reality is truly stunning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's strengths
Posted by: CJC on May 7, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see that Clinton supporters are busy today, discounting the import of NC and Indiana, complaining on the NYTimes editorial blog, downgrading comments here.

The large turnouts and increase in voter registrations are great signs for our democracy. Not only is the old-style politics on the defensive, but many of the voters who have tolerated or supported it are also on the defensive.

Clinton, to say nothing of McCain, represent the past and Obama is the future. Those who cry that he is "too young" are just bleating. He's about the same age as JFK and WJC were when they were elected. We had the Bushes, we had a Clinton. It's time for change.
(I'm 65 and active and engaged, but the world belongs to my children and grandchildren.)

Chris Matthews made an interesting observation on MSNBC last night when he said that Clinton's vote on the Iraq War in 2002 has undermined her ability to argue for change. All those still preferring Clinton should remember that not only did she agree to drink the Bush administration Kool Aid on Iraq, she has never disavowed or changed her mind about that vote. And just recently she said she would "obliterate" Iran if it attacked Israel (presumably she meant with a nuclear weapon.)
But Iran does not even have a nuclear weapon. Her verbal saber-rattling is dangerous and irresponsible.

Democrats should now be rallying behind Obama, thinking about how to inform the voters about McCain's real record and real values and real platform.

And starting Jan 2009 it will be our collective responsibility to hold an Obama presidency to a high standard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama's strengths Posted by: jvaljon1
» Balderdash Posted by: CJC
DUH!!
Posted by: lefty010 on May 7, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nd Barack Obama will be looking more and more like the candidate who Democrats will take on Republican John McCain in November.

Really?!?!? Why doesn't someone tell the maniacal, delusional Clinton this stuff?

I see she lent her campaign another 6 some odd million dollars. Hmmmm....and Obama is an elitist.

Why can't she let it go???????

I view this endless campaigning-WHEN SHE HAS LOST-as THE most self-serving, fuck EVERYBODY else, bunch of shit that I have ever seen. That she would continue on KNOWING that everyday that she drags this out potentially puts us at more risk of having to endure another four more years of Republican RULE is reprehensible.

THINK ABOUT SOMEBODY ELSE BUT YOUR SELF-SERVING SELF. GET THE FUCK OUT!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DUH!! BOBBY DECKER Posted by: Bobby Decker
» RE: DUH!! Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: DUH!! Posted by: CJC
» I'm sure I could... Posted by: lefty010
» Oops! Sorry... n/m Posted by: lefty010
» RE: DUH!! Posted by: lefty010
» RE: DUH!! Posted by: lefty010
The Clintons
Posted by: frank69 on May 7, 2008 3:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many people still praise Bill Clinton as a great president. (I voted for Bill twice.)
But consider: When Bill first took office in 1992, both the House and the Senate were in Democratic hands. Most of the Governors were Democrats. When Bill Clinton left office in 2000, both the House and the Senate were in Republican hands. Most of the Governors were also Republicans. Ergo, Bill Clinton was good for Bill Clinton. He was hell on the Democratic party. Harry Truman he wasn't. Harry wrenched both the House and the Senate from the Republicans in 1948. Look it up. If the Democratic party is important to you, DON'T VOTE for Hillary Clinton. The Clintons work only for the Clintons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Clinton's legacy Posted by: foreverhope
It was all because Bill couldn't keep his hands off of the help.
Posted by: jimidee on May 7, 2008 7:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know, he was reduced to having prison sex in the coatrooms and under his desk, which is an outrage! Our Presidents should be able to have sex with anyone that they want, any time they want. It should be part of the job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]