Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Voter Suppression Happens (in Indiana)

Posted by dday, Hullabaloo at 5:19 PM on May 6, 2008.


According to the AP, 12 nuns were turned away from voting by one of their own sisters.
nunsvoting
nuns voting

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

The primary results from Indiana and North Carolina should be pretty much projected by 8:00ET or so. But we already know who's won, at least in Indiana - voter suppression advocates like the 9 robed figures on the Supreme Court.

About 12 Indiana nuns were turned away Tuesday from a polling place by a fellow bride of Christ because they didn't have state or federal identification bearing a photograph.
Sister Julie McGuire said she was forced to turn away her fellow sisters at Saint Mary's Convent in South Bend, across the street from the University of Notre Dame, because they had been told earlier that they would need such an ID to vote.
The nuns, all in their 80s or 90s, didn't get one but came to the precinct anyway.
"One came down this morning, and she was 98, and she said, 'I don't want to go do that,'" Sister McGuire said. Some showed up with outdated passports. None of them drives.
They weren't given provisional ballots because it would be impossible to get them to a motor vehicle branch and back in the 10-day time frame allotted by the law, Sister McGuire said. "You have to remember that some of these ladies don't walk well. They're in wheelchairs or on walkers or electric carts."

This is merely the one story that's been reported. You have to expect there are many more; in fact there are several more later in the story. Of course, the Scalia-Thomas-Alito-Roberts faction on the Court will tell you that's just the price we have to pay for dealing with the scourge of non-existent voter fraud.

Today's vote was kind of a test market for the fall. There's high turnout throughout the state anyway so I don't expect this aspect of the vote to be widely reported.

...a group of voting rights advocates that established a separate hot line reported receiving several calls from would-be voters who were turned away at precincts because they did not have a state or federal identification bearing a photograph.
One newly married woman said she was told she couldn't vote because her driver's license name didn't match the one on her voter registration record, said Myrna Perez of the Brennan Center Justice at New York University's law school, coordinator of the 1-866-OUR-VOTE hot line. Another woman said she was turned away from casting her first-ever ballot because she had only a college-issued ID card and an out-of-state driver's license, Perez said.
"These laws are confusing. People don't know how they're supposed to be applied," she said.
In case you're interested in continuing the mentality that allows voter suppression to be codified into law, there is a Presidential candidate that's right for you.
Here’s what McCain was really telling the party base: If you liked George W. Bush’s nominees, you’re going to love the judges John McCain will put on the bench.
McCain also touted his support for the so-called Gang of 14 as a supposed sign of moderation. But the fact is that he has voted to give lifetime jobs as federal judges to every one of President Bush’s most dangerous and damaging nominees. And they’re already eroding individual rights and legal protections. We’re all going to be living with the consequences of those votes for a long, long time.
The two Supreme Court justices nominated by President Bush are already making it harder for workers mistreated on the job to get justice. They’re letting politicians get away with making it harder for some people to vote. They’re redefining our Constitution and laws to erode progress on women’s rights, educational opportunity, environmental protections, and more.
We all know that a vote for McCain is a vote against women's reproductive rights, a vote against consumer rights, a vote against worker rights, and a vote for massive corporate power under the law. And we know that the Republicans aren't able to win legitimately, so laws like Indiana's will be replicated wherever possible in an attempt to game the system. In a sense awareness is a powerful way to counteract this - sunlight is the best disinfectant. At the same time part of me believes that the vote margin in November needs to be higher than the last two elections in order to get a result in line with the will of the people. But this is not a cause for despair, but a clarion call to get to work right now.

Digg!

Tagged as: voting rights, voter suppression, disenfranchisement


Franken-Coleman Update: Norm Returns To Senate As Non-Senator
Al Franken, has been declared the winner of the Minnesota contest but has yet to be sworn in as court battles continue.
Post by Ryan Grim. January 21, 2009.
A Bar Stool View of This Moment in American History
Some reactions to Obama's inauguration speech (which, yes, I watched in a bar).
Post by Joshua Holland. January 20, 2009.
Franken-Coleman Recount: How Far Will It Go?
Will Norm be able to take this all the way to the conservative-controlled US Supreme Court?
Post by Phoenix Woman. January 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is what patriotism is really about
Posted by: foreverhope on May 6, 2008 6:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"You have to remember that some of these ladies don't walk well. They're in wheelchairs or on walkers or electric carts."

Bless their sweet hearts. THAT is what patriotism is really all about. Their spirits are willing. I hope they live long enough to cast their ballots in November.

"The whole course of human history may depend on a change of heart in one solitary and even humble individual - for it is in the solitary mind and soul of the individual that the battle between good and evil is waged and ultimately won or lost."

~M. Scott Peck~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, there you go...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 6, 2008 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...a genuine case of voter suppression by "ID laws" that people have been pissing and moaning over the "potential for" for the past 4 years.

Find folks like these who will accept representation, and take the cases to the (very sympathetic) supreme court.

Picture I.D. laws will be struck down in fifty states, if you have any faith (or have read) the latest SCOTUS ruling on the issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the nuns need to sue Posted by: chaoslegs
Weren't Laws Requiring Poll Taxes Struck Down in the 20th Century
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on May 6, 2008 11:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Picture IDs cost money, requiring every voter to have one is instituting a poll tax.

In Iraq they put a black ink mark on a thumb or hand to prove you had voted once, they couldn't come up with the same thing here?

Just more evidence why Democracy and Democratic Republics will never work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ID laws
Posted by: g on May 7, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way in which an ID law will not constitute an unfair burden is if the expenses for the ID (missed work hours, transportation, cost of obtaining documents etc) are paid by the state. States should be mandated by law to pay the bill if they want to enforce ID laws. Once they see the bill, they will hastily backtrack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What A Lot of Phony Baloney !!!
Posted by: Last Chance on May 7, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In every state in America, to legally drive a car you must get a driver's licence, and 99.9% of the population complies with little or no problem, and even those who don't drive like to have an ID in case of accident or illness away from home. But now all of a sudden during the primaries and the approaching November elections a requirement to show that ID at the voting booth is oh so inconvenient and oppressive? C'mon, stop your kidding. The only reason some people oppose voter ID is because they want thousands of illegal aliens to vote for their candidate!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recent changes in our pharmacy
Posted by: fernando1 on May 21, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]