Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The White Preacher Double Standard: How Hagee, Parsley and the Rest Get Away with Everything

Posted by Cenk Uygur, Huffington Post at 12:03 PM on March 19, 2008.


If the disparity in coverage isn't racist, then what is it?
mediumparsley
Reverend Rod Parsley believes America was founded to destroy Islam.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Also in Election 2008

Missouri Nuns Fight Voter Disenfranchisement
Jill Hussein C. Brilliant at Breakfast

We'll "Never" See McCain's Tax Returns?
Steve Benen The Carpetbagger Report

Unfortunate Racial Talk Creeps Back into the Democratic Campaign
Steve Benen The Carpetbagger Report

Rudy Giuliani's priest has been accused in grand jury proceedings of molesting several children and covering up the molestation of others. Giuliani would not disavow him on the campaign trail and still works with him.

Mitt Romney was part of a church that did not view black Americans as equals and actively discriminated against them. He stayed with that church all the way into his early thirties, until they were finally forced to change their policies to come into compliance with civil rights legislation. Romney never disavowed his church back then or now. He said he was proud of the faith of his fathers.

Jerry Falwell said America had 9/11 coming because we tolerated gays, feminists and liberals. It was our fault. Our chickens had come home to roost, if you will. John McCain proudly received his support and even spoke at his university's commencement.

Reverend John Hagee has called the Catholic Church the "Great Whore." He has said that the Anti-Christ will rise out of the European Union (of course, the Anti-Christ will also be Jewish). He has said all Muslims are trained to kill and will be part of the devil's army when Armageddon comes (which he hopes is soon). John McCain continues to say he is proud of Reverend Hagee's endorsement.

Reverend Rod Parsley believes America was founded to destroy Islam. Since this is such an outlandish claim, I have to add for the record, that he is not kidding. Reverend Parsley says Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" brought down from a "demon spirit." Of course, we are in a war against all Muslims, including presumably Muslim-Americans. Buts since Parsley believes this is a Christian nation and that it should be run as a theocracy, he is not very concerned what Muslim-Americans think.

John McCain says Reverend Rod Parsley is his "spiritual guide."

What separates all of these outrageous preachers from Barack Obama's? You guessed it. They're white and Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not. If it's not racism that's causing the disparity in media treatment of these preachers, then what is it?

I'm willing to listen to other possible explanations. And I am inclined to believe that the people these preachers go after are more important than the race of the preacher. It's one thing to go after gays, liberals and Muslims - that seems to be perfectly acceptable in America - it's another to accuse white folks of not living up to their ideals.

I think there is another factor at play as well. The media is deathly afraid of calling out preachers of any stripe for insane propaganda from the pulpits for fear that they will be labeled as anti-Christian. But criticism of Rev. Wright falls into their comfort zone. It's easy to blame him for being anti-American because he criticizes American foreign and domestic policy.

If Rev. Wright had preached about discriminating against gay Americans or Muslims, there probably would not have been any outcry at all. That falls into the category of "respect their hateful opinions because they cloak themselves in the church."

But one thing is indisputable - the enormous disparity in how the media has covered these white preachers as opposed to Rev. Wright. Have you ever even heard of Rod Parsley? As you can see from what I listed above, all of these white preachers have said and done the most outlandish and offensive things you can imagine - and hardly a peep.

If the disparity in coverage isn't racist, then what is it?

Reverend John Hagee has called the Catholic Church the "Great Whore." He has said that the Anti-Christ will rise out of the European Union (of course, the Anti-Christ will also be Jewish). He has said all Muslims are trained to kill and will be part of the devil's army when Armageddon comes (which he hopes is soon). John McCain continues to say he is proud of Reverend Hagee's endorsement.

Reverend Rod Parsley believes America was founded to destroy Islam. Since this is such an outlandish claim, I have to add for the record, that he is not kidding. Reverend Parsley says Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" brought down from a "demon spirit." Of course, we are in a war against all Muslims, including presumably Muslim-Americans. Buts since Parsley believes this is a Christian nation and that it should be run as a theocracy, he is not very concerned what Muslim-Americans think.

John McCain says Reverend Rod Parsley is his "spiritual guide."

What separates all of these outrageous preachers from Barack Obama's? You guessed it. They're white and Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not. If it's not racism that's causing the disparity in media treatment of these preachers, then what is it?

I'm willing to listen to other possible explanations. And I am inclined to believe that the people these preachers go after are more important than the race of the preacher. It's one thing to go after gays, liberals and Muslims - that seems to be perfectly acceptable in America - it's another to accuse white folks of not living up to their ideals.

I think there is another factor at play as well. The media is deathly afraid of calling out preachers of any stripe for insane propaganda from the pulpits for fear that they will be labeled as anti-Christian. But criticism of Rev. Wright falls into their comfort zone. It's easy to blame him for being anti-American because he criticizes American foreign and domestic policy.

If Rev. Wright had preached about discriminating against gay Americans or Muslims, there probably would not have been any outcry at all. That falls into the category of "respect their hateful opinions because they cloak themselves in the church."

But one thing is indisputable - the enormous disparity in how the media has covered these white preachers as opposed to Rev. Wright. Have you ever even heard of Rod Parsley? As you can see from what I listed above, all of these white preachers have said and done the most outlandish and offensive things you can imagine - and hardly a peep.

If the disparity in coverage isn't racist, then what is it?

Digg!

Tagged as: hagee, parsley, religious right, religious intolerance, obama, mccain, racism, homophobia, media

Cenk Uygur is co-host of The Young Turks, the first liberal radio show to air nationwide.


Missouri Nuns Fight Voter Disenfranchisement
After their Indiana sisters were disenfranchised, Missouri nuns are mad as heck and not gonna take it anymore.
Post by Jill Hussein C.. May 9, 2008.
We'll "Never" See McCain's Tax Returns?
Cindy McCain declares herself off limits.
Post by Steve Benen. May 9, 2008.
Unfortunate Racial Talk Creeps Back into the Democratic Campaign
The Clinton campaign plays the race card in an argument for her electability.
Post by Steve Benen. May 8, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thanks.
Posted by: Aimleft on Mar 19, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny how there's hardly a peep when these guys say their ridiculous BS. I don't even much disagree with what Rev Wright said. I'll tell you one thing, I agree with him more than any of these other clowns. But do you see anyone jumping all over McCain for cozying up to the religious nutcases? Nope. It's double standard, it's racist, and it's typical of the Republican Way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» pfft! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: Thanks. Posted by: sawdust
Right Wingnuts
Posted by: dayenta on Mar 19, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Christian" right is very well-funded and in bed with the right-wing-controlled media. They are racist at heart, even though they court conservative black churches for support. They are a plague on this country and a danger to the world at large. They will not stop until they control everything, and bring about "Armageddon." Sociopaths every last one of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sunday Shows
Posted by: ianfan on Mar 19, 2008 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watching Meet the Press and Stephanopolous this weekend, it was odd. Both had a black person on the panel who tried to explain the cultural context of fire at the pulpet and also (although to a lesser extent) the contrast pointed out here that there are plenty of white conservative preachers that people really don't see as all that significant when talking about the political candidates who accept their support.

And of course, in both cases on both shows, the rest of the panel (all white) completely ignored the point. Didn't even acknowledge it and just went right back into how important it was and how much impact this will have on Obama.

I really think this is a wonderful oppertunity to open peoples eyes up to the hypocracy that is the marriage of the christian right and the Republican party that exists today. Of course though, none are more blind than those who choose not to see...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Kills me
Posted by: JSquercia on Mar 19, 2008 1:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kills me is that the Reagan Democrats a largely Catholic Group supports McCain who has yet to disavow Hagee who as the artcle points out refers to THEIR church the Catholic Church as the WHORE of Babylon . Of course they also reject the sermon on the mount and that whole whatsoever you do to the least of my brothers you did unto ME .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bearing In Mind That America Is a Licentious Mix of Post-Calvinism & Capitalism
Posted by: blackie4aces on Mar 19, 2008 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Roughly 45% of those in America who consider themselves Christians believe the bible is the literal word of god. 25% of those who identify themselves as Christians also fit the category of fundamentalist/evangelical, roughly a third of this group being Dominionists, the movement that shares with the jihadists the belief that government should be run according to their own particular interpretation of god's law as opposed to democratic principles. That's one hell of a lot of crazy motherfuckers running around loose in one country, even if it happens to be a big one. Crazier than batshit on a hot summer night they may be, but they do buy shit, a lot of shit because there are a lot of 'em. And based on what they believe, they obviously can be sold just about anything, which means "a substantial market," my friends.

A much, much smaller group is the African American Christians who ascribe to liberation theology in the prophetic tradition, which, despite the idiotic media's portrayal of this brand of Christianity among black Americans as somehow "the Black Church"-there are many other forms of Christian worship practiced in the black community (Charismatics, Catholics, Seventh Day Adventism, etc.), though white people genrally wouldn't have a clue. So, if you decide to villify a politician in connection with their church or pastor or spiritual mentor for the sensationalism and viewer hook, who is it going to be? Which group can your bottom line most tolerate if they get all riled and pissed-off? Corporate news organizations, particularly television news, have as their purpose making a profit. That's the purpose as opposed to their mission, which is disseminating information. I need not state which of the two is primary.

Should you doubt the power of the religious groups on this issue, ask the question: "Why all of a sudden (the last decade or so) has all this religious bunkum become so goddam important?" Think about the endless prattling on about religion in the campaigns of both the Republicans and the Democrats, all of the front-runners trying to out-god the others. Consider the fate of the candidates, the two-percenters, who didn't get into the god-O-rama. The issue of religion has become almost as dominant as domestic policy, and in the case of the Republicans, whose domestic policy is implicit to their constituency-there isn't any and that's the way they like it-religion is second only to foreign policy-usually. One has to wonder if this trend is a symptom of the fear and hopelessness in the society having grown to such proportions as result of economic instability, fear-mongering as a ruling zeitgeist, and the gestalt of an almost totally mediated reality, that the concern as to whether god is or is not on our side has risen to a level of primal political importance (and irresistable to those who might reap appreciable profit from it).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One More Thing-Methinks the Lady Doth Protest Too Much
Posted by: blackie4aces on Mar 19, 2008 2:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not sure I can go along with every single one of Wright's assertions, but certainly 75-90% of what he said was right on. Why else do you think what he said attracted the level of shock and awe that it did? Is America not racist? Cerainly not as much as it used to be, but the datum for that measurement is human enslavement Is America not run by a handful of rich white men? Does anyone doubt this? Is the American policy concerning the racist, fascist state of Israel not in its own interest? Does that have no connection to the "threat of Islamic terrorism?" Has America not killed millions and millions of people in its various wars since the unnecessary dropping of nuclear ordinance on Japan? Tomfoolery may receive derision, but only unpopular truth elicits true outrage, real shock and awe.

This is one, there are others, of the reasons the lunatic non-fringe led by the likes of Hagee and Parsley does not draw very much attention. Although it would be a very good idea to do so, George Bush and his cohorts being proof of that pudding, little notice is paid to these buffoons and the theater of the absurd within which they operate by the so-called sophisticated media. It is easy to underestimate the primitives, that is, until an arrow is taken through the neck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ruling class has decided it has seen enough of Obama
Posted by: chief of okeefe on Mar 19, 2008 5:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So now they are destroying him.

Make no mistake. The "mainstream liberal press" concept is a republifascist lie. These guys bow to the big $$ boys. And the big $$ boys have decided on McCain, and passed the word to wipe out Barack Obama.

Why is what Obama's preacher said more important than hearing about McCain's 7-year extra-marital sex binge he visited against his first wife after coming home from Vietnam? At the end of this binge, he tossed out the older first wife for a younger model with a rich daddy. Let's hear all about McCain's "family values" tonight on the evening news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Question... Posted by: Gungneir
(It's Really Not Funny)
Posted by: kamcguffin on Mar 19, 2008 7:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard Hagee interviewed on the BBC world radio over 3 years ago. He started screaming at the interviewer that the US must start world war 3 so that Jesus can come back. He was completely out of control. He was screaming that his bible is the only real bible and only members of his church can be true Christians. I wish people in this country would wake up. It's not as if he has only 20 followers. And there are enough ignorant Americans who think the entire world is out to hurt them who would follow his hate doctrines if not his church doctrines. His followers include Bush and two other cabinet members who have also been interviewed and made the same world war 3 for Jesus claim. I have forgotten their names, had them written down someplace. Part of the problem is when whites rabble hate speech it's just a few nuts, when it's "blacks" or other than whites do the same, it's a potential problem or an anti-american act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Goodbye to all that
Posted by: hquain on Mar 20, 2008 2:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To get a hint of how real, pervasive, and ineradicable the social stance is that leads to the disease diagnosed here, take a look at middle-brow liberal Salon, whose editor has recently declared that Obama must have known all along about the disgusting radicalism of his 'pastor' because said pastor decried the Sharpeville massacre from the pulpit, I kid you not, and demanded a free South Africa. The putative founder of our local faith mentioned something about a mote and a log, but like just about everything else he said, it didn't sink in.

At bottom, the Farrakhan and Wright flaps are proxies for a visceral revulsion at the cultural difference that Obama's barely perceptible blackness signals. Our guys, no matter how loony or disgusting, belong by definition to our family and cannot be totally disavowed. Their guys, at the slightest twitch, set off hysteria. That's the way it is, and will be. Hello John McCain -- square-jawed icon of Northern European maleness that the presidency always seems to require -- and goodbye to fleeting dreams of anything else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Separated by an Ocean
Posted by: talkville on Mar 20, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The writings of F Nietzsche, especially regarding the concepts of values, morals, and Christianity, have yet to be honestly and carefully and objectively considered way over here across the Atlantic (helped of course by an immense resistance). Europeans are on the whole already about 100 years ahead of us on such matters.

To the point are considerations about the inversion of values throughout the vast developments in Western societies with respect to religion and philosophy and just about every aspect of our contemporary lives. Love can be Hate, Truth can be Lie, Justice can be Cruelty. Single and double standards; One "World" eternal and of Absolute Value; This World temporary and imperfect, of Absolute Dis-Value. Two Truths, one All Good, one All Evil.

It's for each of us as individuals to consider such things or not, but it goes a long way towards helping to understand how, as discussed in this article, CERTAIN preachers and religious 'leaders' and organizations are so continuously able to maintain regimes which, indeed, are based on double-standards. Such 'ministers', ad-ministrators, and others who practice such beliefs and faith are perfectly within their rights in doing so in their own locations. But for myself, I'd rather remain Outside such Absolutes which in extreme degrees can only mean Absolutism, which in turn is understood as Totalitarianism these days. Many of these Faith-based preachers of pulpits far and wide do not favor the value attached to living right here, right now and their bid for power must be resisted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only double standard
Posted by: fratricide08 on Mar 20, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is right here at home. We have railed at every right wing whacked out preacher since Oral Roberts. I've read tirades about how progressive politics and even democracy is incompatible with Christianity in any form. The Nation ran an article not long ago about how the American progressive movement was uncomfortable with liberal Christianity operating sanctuaries for illegal immigrants. Although, I don't disagree with everything Rev. Wright says his treatment by the media is on par with the treatment right wing nut ministers like Phelps receive.

The reason, the coverage has been greater is because of his relationship with Obama. You can whine about endorsements all you want but the fact of the matter is endorsements and even church attendance do not compare to a 20 year relationship that Obama himself describes as an intense spiritual mentorship and deep if not familial bond.

Is it terrible and out of line? Yes. However, there's no media double standard at work -- just the usual trash the media dredges up for ratings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Religion
Posted by: caitlain on Mar 20, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the single biggest fraud perpetrated upon mankind in all of history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the single biggest Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Tell me are you a Christian?
Posted by: elviseinstein on Mar 20, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To those who consider themselves Christians and conservatives and voted for George Bush considering him a fellow Christian, a good conservative, I say look objectively at what your support for this administration has wrought. If it was an Al Gore or Bill Clinton administration that took the nation to war - under what has now proved to be false and misleading intelligence, a war now in its sixth year, with 4,000 Americans dead and nearly 40,000 irreparably wounded , not to mention perhaps well over a million Iraqi citizens killed, wounded or displaced, our token allies now either withdrawn or soon to do so, our national prestige and respect in the world at an unprecedented all time low, Three trillion in mostly borrowed money and stolen social security funds ( two billion dollars every week) now spent with only a still utterly decimated Iraq and a still destroyed and insecure Afghanistan to show for it, while Pakistan, our once steadfast and stable ally in the region, now on the precipice of complete breakdown and civil war with president Mushariff enjoying less support from his people than the still lose Osama Bin Laden probably in hiding there, and an administration that apparently which not only refuses to admit any of its mistakes but worse, refuses to learn anything from them, that is now on the verge of attacking Iran - I believe you would be among the first in line screaming for impeachment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gee why didnt i think of that?
Posted by: ukeman on Mar 20, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama may lose the nomination, not to mention the election, due to racism.... whoʻd a thunk it?
Prior to march a lot of progressives were on cloud nine; myself included.
Hold on to your hats folks... and that Joe Scarborough gives me hives..
No wonder Bill is smirking all the time... gee too bad he cant criticize the repubs for being racist.
oh well too good to be true?
Hey we have Hillary sharp as a blade.... whoop de doo.
she may be able to steal it all the way... is that what we will get behind?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Did I Not Realize This?
Posted by: Roger Király on Mar 20, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Listening to the outraged reactions (feigned or real) coming from the "news commentators" after the same video clip of Jeremiah Wright was shown AGAIN AND AGAIN, I was ashamed of myself. All these years I've thought that this country was indeed ruled by "rich white men." Now, at age 64, I have learned that, on the contrary, everything is actually being run by poor black women. Furthermore, anybody who says anything different is a demagogue and very likely a communist. Or a terrorist. Or both. I am so happy that the "liberal media" have finally shown me the light.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Black and Liberal
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Mar 20, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't doubt that the media picked up on Reverend Wright's comments in large part because he is black. And I agree with some of the posters here that it's also a reaction by the media and Republicans to reduce Obama's chances of winning the presidency.

But I also believe that it's because Wright is, or seems to be, liberal. The United Church of Christ is probably the most liberal protestant church in this country. I visited some of their websites, and often the home page invites people of all walks of life to join. They are quite specific about being open and welcoming to everyone.

The "liberal" media is a lot more likely to expose "anti-Americansim" by leftwingers than it is to condemn rightwingers for similar behavior or speech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Black and Liberal Posted by: mainspark
Hello, Cenk?
Posted by: mainspark on Mar 20, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Have you ever even heard of Rod Parsley?"

Yes, and it wasn't just from reading your post.

And that disturbs me. You sound as if you, too, had never even heard of Rod Parsley. If that's the case, where have you been? When did you first hear about him?

He didn't pop up overnight. I first heard of him in 2004.

I'm not troubled by what Hagee and Parsley have to say. I dismiss them as bizarre absurdities. What is much more troubling, no, frightening, is that they have so much influence and support.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is a tragedy to me that faith
Posted by: cisc on Mar 20, 2008 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is hijacked for personal power by the likes of Parsley, Roberts, Robertson, Hagee-the whole slimy pack. How does a person of faith argue with someone like Bill Maher who says no matter what underlying good there is in the teaching of Jesus that it is so corrupted by people seeking wealth and power that it is rendered dangerous? Does that totally discount the many good christians out there quietly giving assistance, providing peaceful resistance, shoring up where there is need? I loaned my ink pen to a young black girl at work and she put it down to do another shore. I "borrowed" it back, she teasingly called me an "indian giver". I (humourously, yet with a cringe)told her to watch that, don't look at my white face, look at my black hair. Poor kid was SOOO embarrassed but she asked me why it is that white people are so destructive. I wish I knew; I wish I could say I didn't know what she was saying. Why do white people constantly strive for prestige so that they may immediately divorce themselves from responsibility or accountability? Look at Bush and Cheney-does anyone imagine a black man a white woman or a liberal EVER doing what these two men have done and getting away with it? Of being PROUD of it? Where is reason? There is one thing Reverend Wright (in his intemperence) and Falwell (in his arrogance) can agree on, the chickens will come home to roost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is a tragedy to me that faith Posted by: blackie4aces
Cisc: As To Your Question Re: Bush, Cheney, & Cohorts
Posted by: blackie4aces on Mar 20, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do they get away with it? This is why:

Polling indicates that 55% of the American public is strongly against the war and occupation of Iraq. There are roughly 130 million people in this country that are eligible or could be eligible to vote. That means plus or minus 71 million citizens are strongly against the horrendous policies of the Bush government which has murdered, plundered, and brutalized in the name of the American people. If only 1% of these showed up in Washington DC for a protest, a demand, in fact (it is after all our money, our blood, and our good name that is being usurped), that would put 715,000 folks at the steps of the White House or the Capitol. I will not forget the effect that half that number had during the Vietnam War.

Why are Bush/Cheney getting away with it? Where are those 715,000 citizens?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Virginia Kind
Posted by: gingerb on Mar 20, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They never talk politics in my church. I wish they would but they have been intimidated by the IRS. How come we have so much equality in the country? What a bunch of CRAP!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Virginia Kind Posted by: shd1230
Nobody gets away with anything, nobody ever has..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Mar 20, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially those who use Jesus or His name for their vile greed, hatred, pedophilia, ignorance or to incite war and or violence...

Remember: Nobody gets away with anything and nobody ever has...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unchristian Christians
Posted by: philipo54 on Mar 22, 2008 7:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's people like Hagee and Parsley that give Jesus a bad name, and all Christians a bad name who try to LIVE like Christ did! They're so self-righteous. Parsley doesn't seem to know about the sin of pride and Hagee has forgotten that gluttony is one of the seven deadly sins! The frightening thing is that there are too many people who have given up their right to reason for themselves and let these jokers think for them. That's how we got Bush for eight years. All they have to do is strike FEAR into the hearts of those who no longer think for themselves and those folks will vote for or embrace anything they say. The difference between real pastors and the fakes is that the real ones try to instill hope and love; the fakes use despair and fear. Shame on them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is the outrage
Posted by: lamac66 on Mar 23, 2008 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is right on point! So we see how the right wing conrolled media is regarding this double standard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Typically...
Posted by: JOHN L. on Mar 24, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is an almost uniquely (US)American trait to be so short-sighted, so ignorant.
The Democratic "PARTY" is, and always has been of the same mind as the Republican Party, almost equally at odds with-and equally undermining the public in every area of their real interests.
Look at the actual record of all our so-called political leaders.
They do spread a few crumbs around to protect their system, whenever the scent of rebellion grows, but have always nevertheless been in league with the rich and powerful, militaristic rulers.
This country always sides with (and installs) dictators, puts down populist, democratic, "lefty" foriegn leaders, always puts down peoples movements, labor, and any truely humanitarian actions both here at home and abroad, always spews out millions and billions in propaganda to perpetuate its own interests over the public.

With corporate-government Capitalism and likewise Religion, BOTH fascist systems, we are in for a very, very hard time of it. Both are destructive the the mental health and physical security of the public and the country.
~old74

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'll tell you what it is based on
Posted by: SergeiRostov on Mar 24, 2008 4:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, the difference has nothing to do with race.

The Wright comments which were objected to the most were notable because - unlike all the others - they were BOTH intended as negative AND directed at America itself - "The US of KKK", "God Damn America!" - rather than a group or groups within it. Even Falwell's comment only blamed certain groups for making America do what he believed it shouldn't, and what he believed was going against its own founding principles, rather than blaming America itself.

The MSM goes after *everyone* who who makes anti-American statements, regardless of religion, gender, or race.


SR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]