Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama Notches 10th Victory in a Row, Can He Be Stopped?

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 7:12 AM on February 20, 2008.


Clinton is now in a position in which she'll have to win big in two weeks.
art.obamatex.gi

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

The good news for Hillary Clinton is, there are no more Democratic contests in the month of February. The bad news is, any additional good news at this point is pretty elusive.

For the past week or so, Barack Obama was expected to do fairly well in Wisconsin and Hawaii, and he entered yesterday as the favorite in both contests. He wasn't, however, expected to do this well. With just about every precinct reporting:

* Wisconsin: Obama 58%, Clinton 41%, Edwards 1%

* Hawaii: Obama 76%, Clinton 24%

In the two weeks since Super Tuesday, Democrats have seen 10 contests (nine states and the Virgin Islands). Obama has won all of them -- at or near landslide margins. Indeed, the closest race of the 10 turned out to be Wisconsin, which Obama obviously won by 17 points.

The margin has to be especially disappointing for the Clinton campaign, because none of the usual asterisks apply. Wisconsin isn't a caucus state; it doesn't have a large African-American population; and Clinton actually tried to compete here. What's more, it has a large white, working-class population, which has generally leaned in Clinton's direction in previous contests.

Given this, yesterday's setback(s) are pretty tough spin. For that matter, the race for the Democratic nomination seems to be slowly slipping away from the senator from New York.

This is not to say that Clinton is finished; she's too talented a candidate to just quietly fade away, going down without a fight. But the road ahead isn't especially encouraging. Winning Texas and Ohio on March 4 will be challenging enough, but given Obama's recent successes, Clinton is now in a position in which she'll have to win big in two weeks.

Her latest losses narrowed even further Mrs. Clinton's options and leaves her little, if any, room for error. Her road to victory is now a cliff walk.

By the calculation of her own aides, she now almost certainly will need to win the next two big contests, Texas and Ohio on March 4, as well as Pennsylvania on April 22 in order to maintain a viable claim to the nomination and stop so-called superdelegates from breaking for Mr. Obama. But there has been evidence this month that Mr. Obama is building momentum with each victory, and recent polls have suggested that Mrs. Clinton's once-large lead in Ohio and Texas is shrinking.

What is more, it may not be enough at this point for Mrs. Clinton to simply win Ohio and Texas. She needs delegates to catch up with Mr. Obama; under the rules by which the Democratic Party allocates delegates, she will need to win double-digit victories to pick up enough delegates to close the gap.

Realistically, barring unforeseen events, this seems like a very high hurdle to clear.

Digg!

Tagged as: delegates, hawaii, wisconsin, texas, ohio, clinton, obama

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Dems' Godly God-Fest Ends with Prayer by Former Christian Coalition Leader
A leader among the "New Evangelicals."
Post by Joshua Holland. August 29, 2008.
John McCain is Older Than Alaska
23 years older.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. August 29, 2008.
Palin Thinks Hillary is a Whiner
These days Palin is all about praising Hillary's efforts, but she used to sing a different tune.
Post by Melissa McEwan. August 29, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Go Barack
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on Feb 20, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take that NeoCon cow Clinton to the Cleaners

(lol alliteration)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

!
Posted by: sui_generis on Feb 20, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank god.


I have never had more hope for our country than right now.

Now all we have to do is beat the old man. Who is clearly terrified of facing Obama instead of Clinton, based on the fact that he's ignoring her and throwing the kitchen sink at Barack already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ! Posted by: fg
This proves something!
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 20, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe the people of Wisconsin and Hawaii (although not so much there, since he is a Native Son of Hawaii) sent a strong message that they don't like the attack and smear tactics of the Republicans that Hillary has chosen to use against Obama these past two weeks. I hope she got the message loud and clear.

She's also losing significant ground in Texas, too. I'm not sure about Ohio because I really haven't heard much about what's going on in that state. I think it's all over but the crying for her.

The Elephants would do well to heed that message. (Although you know they won't) This is going to be very interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah Sure, and all that...
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Feb 20, 2008 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...But will we have Universal Health Care, with Barack? He's a nice, personable guy, and I've listened and listened to him, but, other than his now-standard inspirational speeches, all I've heard from him is "reduce health-care costs BY $2500.00.

And that's not good enough for me. Last year, I paid $8,500.00! (mostly asthma costs for the kids) I had to take out a LOAN AT 18%, for 4 GRAND of that (the rest I'm paying slowly to my providers) !!!

I don't see what's wrong with Hillary--other than that Karl Rove and his people hate her. And by me, that's a plus--so much for, 'it isn't only health care' argument, whatever that was supposed to mean.

All the world's foreign policy leaders know (and like and respect her), from the last Clinton years too--that's got to stand for something!

And I don't care that 'Hillary voted to fund the war'--I have a cousin in Iraq and thank God she voted to fund him! Barack was against the war from jump? Great--and I praise him to the skies for that, every Dem should. But sorry--for me, that doesn't trump all of Hillary's pluses.

I was against the war from jump too--and I believe in hope and all that other good stuff too, but that sure doesn't qualify ME to be President!

Also--I still remember the last Clinton economy. I was in school but everyone in my family was working--UNLIKE now! OK, now is Bush and that's to be expected. But the Clintons are KNOWN to deliver good government--they've done it before. And after the disaster of the Bush administration, I sure don't trust anyone new and untried to clean up after these pigs running things now.

So, that's why Hillary's got my vote today (TX). Barack may be all that--but let him get some experience under his belt, and good Washington (Democrat) ties. Let him be Hillary's VP--and when her 8 years is up, then I'll vote for him because by then, eight years of Hillary and them 8 years of Barack, will give this country all it needs to be the great country we were, before Bush.
With Barack, we'll only get 8 good years--and then, what? Hillary by then will be 58--and Rove etc will yell SHES TOO OLD and enough dilldocks will buy that, enough to chisel America out of its second eight needed Dem years.

Please folks. THINK...Barack's fine, maybe better than fine, but so is Hillary and we need them BOTH, right now. One after the other--what's wrong with TWO great Presidents, instead of just one, which is all we may get, with Barack???


(Sorry to be so long winded. But I really didn't think I'd have to be afraid any more after this November, and now this is really been eating at me.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please! Someone tell me what has Hillary ever done? What are her accomplishments?
Posted by: seacaptdon on Feb 20, 2008 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all of her talk about experience and accomplishments, what has Hillary Clinton ever accomplished? What has she done to gain experience? What are her personal credentials (not Billary sideline experience) to be president? For all of her talk, I can see no tangible evidence. If she were before a court in need of proving her "experience" and "accomplishments", what could be offered as proof?
It appears to me that Ms. Clinton is more of a divider via status quo than a leader and inspirer and motivator... the only thing she can seem to inspire is division and negativity and hostility.
She talks about universal health care, but she had eight years to provide the leadership to do that and she failed. There is no reason to think another four or eight years would be any different.
The big difference between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is that he is a leader... he inspires leads by example and motivating his fellow countrymen (and countrywomen) to get involve and be part of the solution instead of part of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary is toast; she should drop out now
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Feb 20, 2008 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If she cares about the party - and the country - she should accept defeat gracefully. She ain't gonna win Texas. 19,000 turned out here in Houston for an Obama rally last night. Turnout for this primary is gonna set records.

By accepting defeat gracefully now, she can help herself and the party.

Show some class Hillary!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary had her shot at universal health care
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Feb 20, 2008 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That was THE issue in the 92 election. Bill was elected with a clear mandate to get us universal health care - remember?

He turned it over to Hillary - remember?

She took it behind closed doors with the industry lobbyists and refused to even consider single payer - remember?

She has gotten more campaign contributions from that industry than any other candidate this time - have you noticed?

Whatever her motives, her last plan took the number one issue in the 92 election off the table for fifteen years!

Has the leopard changed it's spots?

Look, I have vowed to speak no ill of any Democrat before the election. I don't accept that somehow because the Bush years have been such a disaster, that is evidence that a Clinton shouldn't have another shot - that is some of the screwiest illogic the Rethug spinners have ever foisted on us - but fair or unfair, Clinton is probably the only candidate McCain has a shot of beating in November.

She will unite the Rethugs as McLiar never could; even if she won, she would have no coattails. 48% of the voters say they would never vote for her!

I liked Bill - sometimes. He was the best Republican president we ever had. He ain't running. Hillary can't win. It's over. Accept that and let's see what we can do to move Obama left after he is elected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you are the cow, and you'll be led over the cliff with the other Obamagoons
Posted by: johnp on Feb 20, 2008 6:03 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much is being made of the fact that Hillary appeared to vote for the war. Obama, you nitwits, voted to fund that war, two times. Why? The angriest argument grassroots democrats have had agaisnt the Democratic senate, is that they have the purse strings. Anytime they want to, they could stop Bush's war, by refusing to give him the money to conduct his war. Why did Obama vote, twice, to fund the invasion of Iraq? I'd like to hear your lame excuses, dummy. "10 in a row" you say? Hillary has already won California, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York. Media and you don't make a fuss about "that," do you? Does it occur to your small brain, that California has more voters than all the "10 in a row" States? Another thing nitwit, did you know that Obama out-spent Hillary 4 to 1 and had 11 campaign offices to Hillary's 4, in Wisconsin? Some impressive win. What a bunch of suckers and idiots you Obamagoons are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey buddy Posted by: meetmeineleusis
Hillary is part of the "vast right-wing conspiracy"
Posted by: metamind on Feb 20, 2008 7:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's right. She once said something about a "vast right-wing conspiracy" and she should know all about it because she is part of it.

Notice the harmonics between her positions and Bush's positions.

1. Supported the Bankruptcy bill.
2. Supported the Iraq war resolution which gave Bush the authority to delcare war on a whim, in gross violation of the Constitution which says "Congress has the power to declare war." That's NOT a transferable power. That resolution was a mistake because it was an UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRANSFER OF POWER. She helped create the "unitary executive" ( dictator ).
3. She suggested an economic stimulus bill and Bush chimed right in as soon as she did.

Come on, people. Wake up! Hillary is a Republican in Democratic drag! Look at the facts!

Insurance mandates? That was Romney's idea in Massachusetts and Arnold's plan in California.

Jeepers jimity crickets!

Reject Hillary NOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

...and she's an Iran hawk!
Posted by: herbal on Feb 20, 2008 8:52 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
74% of Democrats think that Hillary Clinton has pledged to end US occupation of Iraq within one year, acccording to he current issue of the Harper's Index. Of course, the truth is that she has pledged to end it by 2013!

In fact, she is the most outspoken person in the Senate advocating war in Iran. See:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVWagtd8uwM

She is clearly threatening nuclear attack on Iran at the behest of Israel's right wing.

Hillary's warmongering needs to be brought to the fore in Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania the next two weeks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American for liberty, truth, and justice
Posted by: Michael_D on Feb 25, 2008 4:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is a mouthpiece for the CFR. Like so many, most likely caught up in the crossfire of all this massive, bureaucractic nightmare that is the US government/media/corporations today. Many, (NOT all), of our politicians can and are bought routinely bought out for special interests. Obama says "change" allot thus proving his inexperience or will to tackle some of Americas REAL problems. He is no different than the other rich, elitist, fake leaders that do not care about the American people, or the US Consitution.

Realize this fact too
Coke Bush

The revolution is on. Wake up to what has been and is still going on with our American mainstream media and their ability to keep us all uninformed, brainwashed, and shopping.

These globalist, neocon-type media faces and leaders like O'Rielly, Hannity, Kristol, and yes even Obama are all in bed with AIPAC, the U.N., overthrowing governements with the CIA, etc. and pretty much dominate American TV. They are all being mislead themselves or are part of it now aren't they?

If you want to see some REAL patriots look here
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero

and watch this TRUTH too
REAL American Hero

They do this by contolling information and by GREATLY influencing our elections with the BUSH-CHENEY connected DIEBOLD MACHINES.

Wake up if you love American freedom and hate needless war for profit and/or overthrowing of governments and confusion of the masses by corrupt CIA and all the neocons!

http://ronpaul.meetup.com

This is what the media/government has done to us for too long. The internet and people rising up with the TRUTH after all these years of media lies is the only thing that can help America now. There is no left or right in America at this moment. Only corruptness and media lies so big that most can't see though it.

McCain is one of the WORST puppets out there!!! His top four contributors, (like most candidates, are... BANKS!

R E S E A R C H

Ron Paul’s military contributions are greater than those of all other current candidates – John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama –combined.

The “Top Contributors” figures can be found at www.opensecrets.org.

JOIN the rEVOLution to restore America people.

IT IS DUTY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American citizen - Paul or Nader 2008
Posted by: Michael_D on Feb 25, 2008 4:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When big media blocks Ron Paul out, it blocks YOU (and all your kids and family) out. Why do you think they spew so much about "terrorists"?

Starting to get the picture now? Are you believing this bs about "islamo-fascism"? Looking back at what we now know... WHAT A FRIKKEN JOKE.

The time is now.

Shun the non-believers - for our fight is to help them too.

TaxDay08

Wake the f*ck up people! Protect our country and military from such openly corrupt ass "charismatic" leaders. They are simple character actors, with little or no principles, in the end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]