Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

When Did the Ability to Kill Animals Become Prerequisite for the Presidency?

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 4:09 PM on February 18, 2008.


What is it with politicians who feel that they have to prove they have the ability to kill something with a weapon?
3a.johnkerryproveshiscrockettinchiefcredsduringthe2004reelection.739205
Kerry hunting

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Over the weekend, Hillary Clinton was doing some campaigning in Kenosha, Wisconsin. At a Q&A session, a question was raised on what she would do to prevent tragedies such as occurred last week at Northern Illinois University, in which 5 students were killed and 22 more wounded by a former NIU student who had gone off his meds.

Her answer was troubling to me - not her stock political answer (background checks, no gun permits for terrorists or the mentally ill) - but that she felt the need to impress Wisconsin voters with her own killing credentials:

"You know, you may not believe it but I've actually gone hunting," Clinton, 60, said at a question-and-answer session with voters at a crammed bratwurst restaurant in Kenosha.
"My father taught me to shoot 100 years ago," she said jokingly...
Wait a second. Didn't Mitt Romney say basically the same thing earlier in his own campaign, in an attempt to boost his own machoness / killing cred with New Hampshire voters? Why, yes, yes he did.

And Huck? Boom, boom, and a pheasant sacrifices itself for the greater good of a Huckabee photo op.

What is it about politicians in 2008 that they feel they have to pander to a crowd by proudly proclaiming their ability (past or present) to kill something...a defenseless animal - and by extension, a terrorist; an inner city bad guy robbing a liquor story; a Mexican crossing the border under the cover of darkness? It almost feels sociopathic.

The only answer that I can come up with is that, at a very visceral level, presidential candidates feel they have to prove that they have the ability to pull the trigger. Really, that's at the core of why politicians who have never served in the military feel the need to use hunting imagery.

I have nothing inherently against those who hunt for sport, and I support the right (within reason) for anyone to legally own a firearm. What I don't understand is how a Democratic Party presidential candidate can so blithely fold a demonstration of support for gun ownership, by personal example of killing ability, into a response about a type of tragedy that is becoming all too common.

I'd be more impressed if Hillary said she had once rassled a bear, so she'd support putting bear rasslers in every college classroom to prevent VT / NIU-style tragedies...

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, romney, hunting, huckabee, animal cruelty

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


Franken-Coleman Update: Norm Returns To Senate As Non-Senator
Al Franken, has been declared the winner of the Minnesota contest but has yet to be sworn in as court battles continue.
Post by Ryan Grim. January 21, 2009.
A Bar Stool View of This Moment in American History
Some reactions to Obama's inauguration speech (which, yes, I watched in a bar).
Post by Joshua Holland. January 20, 2009.
Franken-Coleman Recount: How Far Will It Go?
Will Norm be able to take this all the way to the conservative-controlled US Supreme Court?
Post by Phoenix Woman. January 10, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?