Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

When Did the Ability to Kill Animals Become Prerequisite for the Presidency?

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 4:09 PM on February 18, 2008.


What is it with politicians who feel that they have to prove they have the ability to kill something with a weapon?
3a.johnkerryproveshiscrockettinchiefcredsduringthe2004reelection.739205
John Kerry's lame 2004 hunting photo op.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Also in Election 2008

McCain’s Flea-Market Economy
Tula Connell AFL-CIO

McCain's Balanced "Fudge-It"
Isaac Fitzgerald Countdown

Woman Arrested at McCain Event for "McCain=Bush" Sign
Lindsay Beyerstein Majikthise

Over the weekend, Hillary Clinton was doing some campaigning in Kenosha, Wisconsin. At a Q&A session, a question was raised on what she would do to prevent tragedies such as occurred last week at Northern Illinois University, in which 5 students were killed and 22 more wounded by a former NIU student who had gone off his meds.

Her answer was troubling to me - not her stock political answer (background checks, no gun permits for terrorists or the mentally ill) - but that she felt the need to impress Wisconsin voters with her own killing credentials:

"You know, you may not believe it but I've actually gone hunting," Clinton, 60, said at a question-and-answer session with voters at a crammed bratwurst restaurant in Kenosha.

"My father taught me to shoot 100 years ago," she said jokingly...

Wait a second. Didn't Mitt Romney say basically the same thing earlier in his own campaign, in an attempt to boost his own machoness / killing cred with New Hampshire voters? Why, yes, yes he did.

And Huck? Boom, boom, and a pheasant sacrifices itself for the greater good of a Huckabee photo op.

What is it about politicians in 2008 that they feel they have to pander to a crowd by proudly proclaiming their ability (past or present) to kill something...a defenseless animal - and by extension, a terrorist; an inner city bad guy robbing a liquor story; a Mexican crossing the border under the cover of darkness? It almost feels sociopathic.

The only answer that I can come up with is that, at a very visceral level, presidential candidates feel they have to prove that they have the ability to pull the trigger. Really, that's at the core of why politicians who have never served in the military feel the need to use hunting imagery.

I have nothing inherently against those who hunt for sport, and I support the right (within reason) for anyone to legally own a firearm. What I don't understand is how a Democratic Party presidential candidate can so blithely fold a demonstration of support for gun ownership, by personal example of killing ability, into a response about a type of tragedy that is becoming all too common.

I'd be more impressed if Hillary said she had once rassled a bear, so she'd support putting bear rasslers in every college classroom to prevent VT / NIU-style tragedies...

Digg!

Tagged as: hunting, clinton, romney, huckabee, animal cruelty

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


McCain’s Flea-Market Economy
Candidate pushes more of Bush's "eBay economics" instead of jobs and high standards.
Post by Tula Connell. July 8, 2008.
McCain's Balanced "Fudge-It"
Rachel Maddow picks apart McCain's new economic fix-it plan.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. July 8, 2008.
Woman Arrested at McCain Event for "McCain=Bush" Sign
61-year-old librarian single-handedly proves that McCain=Bush.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 7, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Me tough guy. Me hunt good.
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 18, 2008 2:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do presidential candidates need to reveal their hunting side to the public? It's a regular-guy (or gal) thing -- politicians always want to seem like just-one-of-the-guys, I guess. It's a macho thing (probably going back to at least Teddy Roosevelt). (Maybe, in regard to Clinton's comments, this was Hillary's attempt to make herself seem less effeminate to the voters.) Seems to me that SOME hunter-politicians (Dick Cheney -cough cough) have penis-envy or something. That may also explain Cheney's ruthlessness with the torturing of innocent people, the starting of unnecessary wars, etc. You see, vicious ruthless sadistic fascism = masculinity.
(Ah, I get it.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "REGULAR GUY" THING? REALLY? Posted by: bimasta
The NRA was tough
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Feb 18, 2008 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When they had low voter turnouts and they could count on a group of single issue wachos to swing elections. That's about to change. High voter turnouts means the demise of the NRA and other single issue groups, especially if we get a round of street violence from those "law abiding" gun owners out to "protect" their rights. A crash and burn economy and the social unrest it will certainly breed will force conservatives to play the "law and order" card which will trump the "libertarian" card.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Penrose
Posted by: Penros on Feb 19, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OH MY EXPLETIVE! Such righteous city folks we are! Forgotten our agrarian, countrifried roots.

City folks only eat meat that has been killed by the conscience-free slaughterhouses.

My old generation and I wouldn't be alive today if we hadn't been nourished on "game" that was killed by our "macho" responsible fathers and brothers and sons. If we hadn't been protected from predation by grizzlies and wolf packs and cougars by our macho fathers and brothers and sons. Those are guns, honey. That's why we have guns.

The corruption that has forced such an insane increase in the human population, also has forced an insane reaction to overcrowding and and insane proliferation of the idea via TV that killing other people with guns is a solution to anything.

I am a flaming liberal peacenik tree-hugger and I have a 22 rifle just in case the idiot so-called men running the country run it into the ground and in order to eat I have to kill myself a rabbit.

I hate to think what city dwellers will have to eat in case of a really bad recession. Pigeons and rats perhaps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pigeons and Rats, eh? Posted by: Xynyx
Or perhaps you could eat
Posted by: PJAW on Feb 19, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
your less-prepared neighbors.

There aren't enough wild critters left on the planet to sustain whatever meat eaters might be left among us in a really bad recession. Or some other catastrophic event such as a major meteor impact or a massive volcanic eruption or a serious disruption in the oil and gas supply. Yep, cannabalism would probably return with a vengeance under severe enough circumstances.

So, these two survivors of the next great catastrophy head their separate ways in search of food. They happen upon each other a month or so later and the difference between them is stark. One is sleek and well-fed, while the other is gaunt and on the verge of starvation.

"Good lord, man, you look great", says the skinny fellow, "What have you been eating?"

"Republicans", says the healthy one.

"Me too", says the skinny guy.

"Well how do you catch them?" says the other.

The thin one replies, "I usually hide behind a rock or a tree, and when I see one comin', I jump out and scream at him, to shock him for a moment as I run full speed into him and headbutt him right in the gut. If I catch 'em just right, it stops their heart and then I eat 'em."

"Ahh, no wonder", says the first guy, "When you shock 'em like that, you scare the shit out of them. And when you headbutt 'em, it knocks the wind out of them. With Republicans, there ain't much to eat after that."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]