Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Jewish Rep Battles Anti-Semitism, Racism and Religious Discrimination in Re-Election Campaign

Posted by Pam Spaulding, Pam's House Blend at 1:16 PM on February 15, 2008.


Memphis Rep. Steve Cohen is under attack from homobigoted ministers hoping to pits Jews against African-Americans.
ph2008021302276
Hate ad

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Boy what a trifecta in that headline - and there's a dash of homophobia for extra seasoning!

In Tennessee's 9th district (Memphis and environs), Rep. Steve Cohen, who is Jewish, is being attacked in an flier (right, "Memphis Congressman Steve Cohen and the Jews hate Jesus") distributed by a black homobigoted pastor from Murphreesboro not even from Cohen's district, Rev. George Brooks. Cohen's opponent, Nikki Tinker, who happens to be black as well, and was called to condemn the flier. (WaPo):

[T]he literature encourages other black leaders in Memphis to "see to it that one and ONLY one black Christian faces this opponent of Christ and Christianity in the 2008 election."

The Commercial Appeal wrote an editorial in Wednesday's paper condemning Tinker for not speaking out against the anti-Semitic literature.

"What does Nikki Tinker think about anti-Semitic literature being circulated that might help her unseat 9th District Congressman Steve Cohen in the Democratic primary next August?" the editorial asked. "The question goes to the character of the woman who wants to represent the 9th District, and 9th District voters deserve an answer. But Tinker declined to return a phone call about the flier."

What was also raised in the editorial is the fact that Cohen was also assailed last year by a group of black pastors who were angered by the congressman's support of hate crimes legislation (surprise!). Even more insane and bigoted, the newspaper reported a more pointed reason for the pastors' opposition to Cohen's representation -- Rev. Robert Poindexter: "He's not black and he can't represent me, that's just the bottom line." Boy, doesn't that bring back memories of the whole Patricia Todd election debacle down in Alabama.

More below the fold, including Tinker's reaction.

Tinker's reaction to the flier as reported by the AP:

Nikki Tinker, a black lawyer expected to be Cohen's chief opponent for re-election in the Democratic primary in August, said she was incensed by the anti-Semitic attack.

"My faith teaches me to love, not hate," said Tinker, who is Christian.

The Anti-Defamation League issued a statement from Atlanta describing the flier as an attempt "to incite tension between the Memphis African-American and Jewish communities."

While I think her sentiment is laudable, you can't help but notice that she brings up faith into the reaction, underscoring that she is Christian. Why must politicians running for office feel compelled to inject religion into campaigns? Their private faith has nothing to do with civil lawmaking and representation. Anyway...

One blogosphere reaction that is interesting is that of The Malcontent, who spanks various left-of-center organizations for not jumping on this story.

The story broke yesterday, and yet, as far as I can tell, the list of people and entities that have failed to respond in any way to this vicious fusillade include Tinker herself, who declined a request for comment, the Democratic Party (in the guise of either the DCCC or DNC), the Human Rights Campaign, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

One would think that the Log Cabin Republicans would be all over this, but they aren't. It would be a great way to show that anti-Semitism and anti-gay animus, particularly in the realm of political campaigns, are not the sole province of the GOP. It would also be a good way to set themselves apart from groups like HRC and NGLTF, with whom some critics say Log Cabin works too closely, too often. Log Cabin, and anyone who claims to be promoting equality and dignity for gays, Jews or any other minority group, needs to loudly condemn such bald hatred, no matter which political party (or race) from which it emanates.

Of course I cannot speak for any of the above organizations, but racism, homophobia, gender and trans bias, and anti-Semitism, among other blights, should always be pointed out, regardless of party affiliation. I've blogged incessantly about the historic silence by mainstream organizations (black or white) to the outlandish homophobia in the black religious community has been deafening, with small whispers emerging here and there.

This case is no different, because it would mean criticizing a part of the Dem base -- religious blacks -- that many organizations are loathe to criticize in any way lest they appear to be racist. Again, it's about lack of honest and open discussion that has made these third rail topics.

On the GOP side of anti-Semitism, there has been little criticism of John McCain's national finance co-chair, Fred Malek, who has a quite a history. When he worked in the Nixon White House, he was known as the "Jew Counter." Hat tip, dnA at Too Sense:

Nixon suspected that a "cabal" of Jews at the Bureau of Labor Statistics was skewing economic figures to make the administration look bad and assigned Malek to report back on how many Jews were employed at BLS. When former President George H.W. Bush hired Malek as a top official at the Republican National Committee (RNC) in 1988, revelations in the press regarding Malek's work for Nixon reportedly led him to resign. McCain's hiring of Malek would seem to warrant the same disclosures from the media, but so far, only one news outlet other than The Nation has reported it.

There's enough bigotry to go around, and there's no excuse for anyone to defend it or let it slide because of political bedfellows. The problem is that too many people want to remain in denial.

Digg!

Tagged as: anti-semitism, racism, tennessee, cohen, tinker, memphis

Pam Spaulding blogs at Pam's House Blend.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How very sad
Posted by: desidid on Feb 15, 2008 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that natural allies have become opponents. I did notice the possible candidate issued a statement in which she made it clear that her Christianity was about love. The author of the article found that offensive. I thought perhaps she was teaching the ministers who started this mess a lesson in true Christianity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've got a pretzel in my head!
Posted by: Suz on Feb 15, 2008 8:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasn't Jesus jewish? If were alive today, would he have to hate himself to believe in himself?

*Sigh* I grow weary of religion being an issue in campaigns for public office. I cannot immediately think of any other occupation (excepting those, of course, in the religious fields) where an employer (we, the people) can, during an interview with a prospective applicant, feel we have the right to demand to know what their religious practices are and make it a stringent condition of hire.

I mean, shouldn't that be illegal? Wouldn't any of us, finding ourselves in a like scenario, perhaps even consider litigation against the perpetrator? Shouldn't the applicant with the best skills, talents and integrity naturally win the position?

Ah, but that's just me. I must confess, I'm a bit of a dreamer, and there's still that damn pretzel in my head...(let's see, if Jesus is a jew, and the reverend hates jews, then how can he love Jesus, again?...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lack of empathy
Posted by: serval_la on Feb 16, 2008 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, there is no shortage of race in this election cycle. Certainly we are seeing the race issue being played out in the presidential campaign, no matter how hard the media try to tell us the younger voters, living in a post civil rights movement world, are color blind. Ain't so with some older voters.

But as for the religion, I guess the ugly head of some conservative social "values", such as being anti-gay, which is not uncommon among some African-American Christians, are conveniently being married to a backlash against liberal social values, which are held by many Jews, as the majority of Jewish voters continue to identify themselves as Democrats.

To me, it demonstrates a sore lack of empathy that this situation has not been seized upon by such groups mentioned in the article--the Democratic Party, HRC or NGLTF. It appears few truly care, and as the author pointed out, the Democrats are afraid of upsetting an important constituency, namely African-Americans. At least in my experience, a good number of non-Jewish people I have met in my lifetime have little or no understanding of Jews and thus have no feelings about anti-Semitism at all. It simply doesn't appear on their radar and I have often attributed it to a lack of contact, especially among those who live in homogenous communities. They have no interest in even learning--and what's the excuse when one can learn about pretty much anything online?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lack of empathy? Posted by: gregii
These are not my people...
Posted by: gregii on Feb 17, 2008 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why must politicians running for office feel compelled to inject religion into campaigns?
Why? Because our voting peers (yours and mine) want to know if candidates have the "right" belief system and are thus fit to provide leadership (such as RMN, GWB etc.)

Our so-called peers suffer religious overload leading to cognitive dissonance and compartmentalized thinking (when they think, which seems to be rarely). It is probably impossible to get elected dog catcher in this country today unless you have a supportive attendance record at a local church. Our peers believe they can trust their votes only to the certified Christian to lead us. Makes you consider where they want to be led?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gratutious criticism
Posted by: gregii on Feb 17, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I think her sentiment is laudable, you can't help but notice that she brings up faith into the reaction, underscoring that she is Christian. Why must politicians running for office feel compelled to inject religion into campaigns? Their private faith has nothing to do with civil lawmaking and representation. Anyway...

For your information, you had me, a Tennessean, totally in your corner until you took this cheap, gratuitous shot at the challenger! Let me ask my own rhetorical question: Why do the anti right bloggers feel compelled to feed us information using the same manipulative and nasty tactics as the anti modern, anti progressive, pro-right wing talk radio hosts and bloggers? Have you not observed the success of the tactics of Obama? Doesn't he maintain observable higher standards than the voices from right? Why can't you? Or - like your political opposites, are you afraid we won't get your message if you don't use gutter-blog tactics? You don't trust our intellect and emotional objectivity - do you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]