Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

MoveOn Endorses Obama, Clinton Loses Vote by 40 Percent

Posted by Ari Melber, The Nation at 11:12 AM on February 1, 2008.


Organizers said they would "immediately" begin mobilizing on behalf of Obama.
obama

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Today Barack Obama earned the endorsement of MoveOn, one of the largest grassroots membership organizations in the United States, after clobbering Hillary Clinton by 40 percent in Internet balloting. Obama led the final tally 70.4% to 29.6%, clearing the supermajority required for the endorsement. MoveOn, which has never endorsed a presidential candidate before, boasts that it has 1.7 million members in Super Tuesday states. The group has over half a million members in California alone – roughly one out of ten primary voters in Tuesday's largest state.

"We've learned that the key to achieving change in Washington without compromising core values is having a galvanized electorate to back you up," said Executive Director Eli Pariser, "and Barack Obama has our members 'fired up and ready to go' on that front."

Obama welcomed the endorsement on Friday. "In just a few years, the members of MoveOn have once again demonstrated that real change comes not from the top-down, but from the bottom-up. From their principled opposition to the Iraq war – a war I also opposed from the start – to their strong support for a number of progressive causes, MoveOn shows what Americans can achieve when we come together in a grassroots movement for change," he said in a statement. "I thank them for their support and look forward to working with their members in the weeks and months ahead," he added.

Organizers said they would "immediately" begin mobilizing on behalf of Obama, leading turnout programs and phone-banking members of MoveOn in targeted states. The group made seven million "GOTV" calls for Democrats in the mid-term elections, and it has an extensive voter file database.

The decisive victory shows that Obama is consolidating support from the netroots in the wake of John Edwards' withdrawal. Obama also won the Edwards vote in Thursday's Daily Kos reader poll. He bounced 35 points to reach an all-time high of 71 percent, while Clinton held steady at 11 percent. If Super Tuesday is a tie and both campaigns brace for a protracted delegate hunt, Obama could draw fundraising, volunteers and advocacy from a united front of MoveOn, netroots activists and bloggers.

Matthew Smith, an Ohio MoveOn member who voted for Obama yesterday, said he was excited by the Obama's "ability to draw people to him, to energize people who generally don't vote [and] to create an atmosphere of long-overdue possibility."

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, moveon, edwards

Ari Melber is a regular contributor to The Nation, focusing on American politics, public policy and Internet activism, and a writer for The Nation's Campaign 08 blog.


Obama Expands on Economic Plan, Emphasizes 'J-O-B-S'
Obama struck an optimistic yet pragmatic tone in a policy speech on the economy today.
Post by Steve Benen. October 13, 2008.
McCain Makes the Case Against Himself
Next President "won’t have the luxury of studying up on the issues."
Post by Faiz Shakir. October 13, 2008.
7-11 Store Poll Shows Big Obama Lead
A poll at 7-11 convenience stores shows Obama at 59.68 percent and McCain at 40.32 percent.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. October 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
:D
Posted by: Scientz on Feb 1, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Best news I've heard all day.

California, in my less-than-humble estimation, is the key battleground here. I think that if he can take California, we'll be inaugurating President Obama in 11 months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: D---the kiss of death/// Posted by: niliadis
Oh, Great
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 1, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, great. I am definitely in favor of Obama over Clinton. But this endorsement could be the kiss-of-death for Obama. MoveOn is wrongly seen as an organization of kooks by a majority of Americans and by the Mainstream Press, unfortunately. Watch as the Hillary campaign repeats the mantra that Obama is MoveOn's candidate, as if this is a bad thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, Great Posted by: cwilsondrum
I wish I could support Obama, someone help
Posted by: fifthworld on Feb 1, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really would like to think (is it conceivable?) that Obama will not cave to the corporate-military establishment -- the interests of the shadow government, in more explicit terms. I hold him to his word with what he has said in the recent past about Pakistan and Iran.

What gives us "hope" that he would be a progressive? Is he not a defense-industry-thinktank-hogtied-warhawk putting on a smiley face??? His advisors list is not something to laugh about, and his fill-in-the-blanks-rhetoric of HOPE and CHANGE still gets my undies in a bunch. I would like to think better of him as the candidate, but my gut still has some reservations. Any promising input from the anti-imperialists out there??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thebigkate Posted by: Thebigkate
Little Hope
Posted by: dbkchi on Feb 1, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have little hope that Obama will end the "roaylty" phase of the American Presidency, despite my having voted for him in MoveOn's poll. Their poll had only two choices, so, as I have been forced to so many times in the past, I voted the lesser of two evils. And I may do that on Super Tuesday here in California.

As this point, though, I am very disappointed in all of the "GE-approved" candidates and will likely vote for Cynthia McKinney in November.

Also, added to the complete spinelessness of 95% of the Democrats in congress, most aggrivatingly my own Senator Feinstein, Bill Clinton's outright denials of govenment involvement in 9/11 continues to push me away from ANY Democratic party candidate.

The war criminals should already be out of office. That the congress will not act makes them war criminals. And that the people do not force our legislators' action makes us war criminals. Shame on us.

I hereby secede from the Fascist States of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Little Hope Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Little Hope Posted by: dbkchi
» RE: Little Hope Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Little Hope Posted by: 0hmygod
SEEMS PREMATURE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 1, 2008 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't dislike Obama. I'm stll undecided. But between the Kennedy endorsement and Move On can still make his own decisions without undue influence by those who would like him to be beholden to them? In that regard Hillary still gets to call her own shots. I have to admit, it isn't dull. It's good to see that people have a genuine interest in what's going on. Very encouraging. Can't wait to see Obama & Clinton vs. McCain & Romney. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But Anna... Posted by: kww355
» But Anna Posted by: Thebigkate
A Bigots Dream
Posted by: lc on Feb 1, 2008 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A "Black Boy" or a White "Woman"; what more could the GOP ask for?
McCain is the designated President for 08 and will be installed by the Anointed One; it's time to burn Bush. This election is rigged.
IM
Belteshazzar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Bigots Dream Posted by: niliadis
A Little Puzzled By Obama Mania
Posted by: arieden on Feb 1, 2008 12:51 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Obama is OK and I would have no trouble voting for him if he is the nominee in the genreal election, but I'm not captivated by him.
I'm supporting Hillary. She is not perfect, but she is strong, smart and qualified and I think she will deliver.
Obama makes me think of the many men who breeze through offices, having been hired because they were impressive talkers. They talk a good game, but don't do anything and then leave and others have to pick up the pieces (usually someone like me, who is not flashy but gets things done). Often the others in the office who have to clean up are women (I'm a gay man). So I guess I identify with Hillary a little. I certainly identify more with her than with him.
I need a lot more than "inspirational" talking to impress me - I need to be shown results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Little Puzzled By Obama Mania Posted by: left_libertarian
What's with the 40% in this title? MoveOn said she got 29.6% of the vote.
Posted by: saywhat on Feb 2, 2008 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I missing something here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politics make strange bedfellows
Posted by: mnascimento on Feb 2, 2008 11:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time I hear someone talk about a dream ticket, Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton, I understand that they are not seeing what I see.

If Obama were to serve as Clinton's VP, it would be the KISS OF DEATH for his future.

Gore was as much destroyed by association with the Clintons, as he was by sabotage. Meaning voting irregularities, the intervention of Jeb bush in Florida, and Scalia in the Supreme Court.

I personally, am not trying to elect a Democrat, I am trying to elect an inspiring and forward thinking young leader. Whose vision is not clouded by a Cold War, or post Cold War Vision of geopolitical realities in the world.

I recommend a thoughtful article that appeared in the New York Times on 1/30/08, Tittled "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony". There are two other Super Powers, China, and the European Union competing for markets and resources in the world.

The days of Diplomacy at Gun point are over. The Middle Eastern, Asian, and South American Countries are already trading with the Countries that offer the most advantageous deals. They don't even want our worthless currency.

Gore might have, because of his belief in the dangers of Global Warming made retooling our economy and infrastructure a priority. A long term vision for growth and stability, benefitting every one.

Clinton, because she is old school, will basically continue, Bush's "Free Market Mentality" (GAT and NAFTA did begin under Clinton) That may mean not only placing the interests of the few above the many, it will mean tinkering and trying to FIX to obsolete.

She can be "ready on Day One" to continue archaic thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Someone On The Right Anne Coulter Feels Good About
Posted by: SweetEarth on Feb 4, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coulter on Fox (Jan 31): likes Clinton because "she's more conservative than McCain." Do Caroline & Uncle Ted--Have All The "Stones?"

It's easy to see why the 1% who Love! U.S. politics just as it is, would ditto the nasty, autocratic, combative, ad hominem "code" rhetoric of Bill Clinton. But, we're not all , beer-drinking, macho bullies in this country. You'd have thought (or at least I did) our so-called "leaders" would have the "stones," if not the self-respect to object. But, looks like the Kennedys, alone, may have felt obliged to tell the truth (about Ted’s former friends, the Clintons).

The Combative Clintons dominate every former democratic institution and whip up militancy & conflict everywhere they go, probably incurably. The aggressive zealotry they model is a disservice to their base as well, in that it turns so much of the public off. They manipulated long honored primary tradition by “dis-ing” the rules unilaterally, and won't hesitate a minute, to force these ad hoc changes down our throat no matter if they take the party down with them. Their ugly smear campaigns discredited/eliminated several strong candidates from the race selecting Obama --who they thought would be easier to beat/bully/compromise and smear--

It's so much easier to complain about our democratic congress rather than object to the strident Hillary, matriarch of that congress, who dictates the rules none of her poor subordinates dare dispute, or might favor independently, that is, without her approval. It's Hillary's congress which almost invariably, gives George Bush the "heads up" no matter the usual faux "protests." And while Hillary dominates congress, it’s Bill, Champion of the One-Percent, the New World Order (takeover by the elites), still leading the choir for his hasty, ill conceived global initiatives (NAFTA, WTO, et al). The 1% who rule the World Economic Forum at Davos Switzerland are all about indecent, inordinate, entitlements incommensurate by any measure, moral OR!! Economic.

It's pathetic that among those who profess to stand for and love democracy-- so few have the Guts To Take These Dictators On, and instead, stand by quietly and watch them violate the spectrum of progressive values our once advanced society prided itself on. And my posts focus on Hill & Bill so much! because they did the heavy lifting for George Bush, pushed our country closer than we've ever been to a dictatorship & tore apart our party from within.

I oughta mention that a (VERY!!) small handful of the media HAVE tried to be heard with respect to Clinton on ISSUES & POLICIES (and not the good old "Boys Will Be Boys") misadventures with Monica. And…well, I’m pleased to report a few of those (not all) still have their jobs. And I have my fingers crossed America finds itself worthy of being viewed again, as the Progressive Leader of the Free World.
Some may think it’s not major but there’s a super-substantive difference between Clinton & Obama—with the Clintons’ as criteria, we can T-R-U-S-T Obama with the farm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Fact Is...
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 4, 2008 10:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nobody cares who Move-On endorses for President. They're irrelevant.

The fact is we are stuck, yet again, with choosing the candidate who is the least offensive to us. I can't get behind any of them. They are all the same... say anything to get elected. The only people who would truly make a good president are smart enough not to run. So we're stuck with those who choose to run, not those who should run.

Maybe I'm just too cynical anymore. But after 7 years of the bullshit we've been through, can you blame me?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Day after "Super Tuesday" and...
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 6, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what good did the MoveOn endorsement do? As I stated above, they are irrelevent.

It isn't over yet, though. Perhaps some alien will conduct brain exchanges with these candidates and... oh, I dunno... Noam Chomsky???

We can always dream, can't we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]