Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Well Done, Iowa: All Three Top Dems Trounce Huckabee

Posted by Scarecrow , Firedoglake at 6:14 AM on January 4, 2008.


Over 236,000 Iowan's turned out in bitter cold to participate in the Democratic caucuses, about twice as many as participated in the GOP caucus.
barack08pic

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

No matter whom you supported in last night's Iowa caucuses, I think all Democrats and more than a few Independents will be saying "thank you, Iowans" this morning, not for the specific choices they made -- many may disagree -- but for the process they used. Iowa did a great job helping the whole country sort out the choices for President.

And Iowans did it with impressive numbers. Over 236,000 Iowan's turned out in bitter cold to participate in the Democratic caucuses, nearly 90 percent more than 2004, and as Howard Dean noted on CNN, about twice as many as participated in the Republican caucus. There were record numbers of first time participants, and large increases in women and young voters. As Marcy Wheeler and Hubris Sonic noted, all three Democratic front runners trounced Huckabee last night.

Iowans put up with a lot from the media, ignoring Beltway insults from those like the Washington Post's David Broder who declared yesterday that Iowans don't matter. After all, the imperious Broder declared, they're either left wing radicals or right wing religious nut cases who don't have enough sense to select the Serious candidates the Beltway pundits had already annointed for President.

I'm impressed by what the Iowa process did to educate the country. Iowans forced all the candidates to come there and answer their questions, in person, in hundreds of large and small gatherings all over the state. In the process we learned that some of the Republican candidates are not honest men; some are just phonies.

We learned that one Republican front runner is a political chameleon who changes his views to fit his surroundings; another can't stop padding his resume while obscuring his questionable past and association with thugs. Several are so mean spirited you'd never want to meet them, let alone allow them near the Oval Office, while most are either stunningly uninformed about the world or dangerously misguided in how they interpret it. The nation is forewarned.

The press reported Iowans were not happy with the choices on the Republican side, and that message came through last night when only half as many Iowans showed up for the Republican caucuses. The Republican annointers had already rejected Huckabee; last night, Huckabee's supporters rejected those who once annointed Republican candidates. Their party has now inherited its own sectarian cultural war.

On the Democratic side, Iowans examined the candidates and concluded they like these Democratic candidates -- all of them, even the second-tier guys. They like the qualities they saw and were genuinely torn in choosing among them. Iowans remained uncertain to the last minute about which of the front runners to support, because they had good choices across the board.

On PBS' News Hour last night, before the caucuses began, David Brooks conceded Iowa Democrats got that conclusion right. These are good Democratic candidates, he said -- all of them -- and it's a shame we have to eliminate any of them. Biden is gone now; Dodd bowed out. They competed honorably and made their party stronger. If the media had given the second-tier guys more attention, Brooks added, they too would be in contention. No kidding.

In the comments last night, oldgold summed it up best (h/t Elliot):

The caucus I attended was very friendly. The comment I heard most often is how proud people were with the strength of our candidates.

I have attended quite a few of these events. I have never seen the party so upbeat.

I was surprised by the number of young people in attendence. Most of them were for Obama.

As Sam Cooke sang: "A Change is Gonna Come."

Tonight was a victory for our party.

After absorbing Obama's victory last night, MSNBC's analysts gushed over Obama's electrifying speech (our Attaturk was there) and swooned on the message it might be sending to the country and the world. "We are one nation, one people, and our time for change has come," he said.

So even though many of us/you may be disappointed that a favorite did not win, I'm feeling pretty good today about what Iowa did. Thanks, Iowans; well done. On to New Hampshire.

Digg!

Tagged as: huckabee, obama, republicans, democrats, iowa

Scarecrow is a regular blogger for FireDogLake


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.
Van Halen, Heart, Others to GOP: Stop Using Our Songs!
GOP ignores copyrights, raises ire of multiple recording artists.
Post by Dave Burdick. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
early VP prediction
Posted by: drmflorida on Jan 4, 2008 7:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I learned from the Iowa caucus is that whoever the nominee is, Bill Richardson is in the lead for VP. In reading interviews with voters, he seemed to make a very favorable impression on Iowa voters. He has a great resume, is a likeable but serious statesman, he was the governor of a western state, and will reach latino voters.

Edwards/Richardson 2008!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama/Webb 2008
Posted by: mcartri on Jan 4, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Virginia Senator Jim Webb appears to me to be the best VP pick for Obama(Yes, I know he isn't the nominee, but...). Webb has a solid background in government and the military, with good knowledge of world affairs. He would bring Virginia into the Dem column in November. I cannot imagine a Republican victory without Virginia. What do you think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama/Webb 2008 Posted by: drmflorida
Obama/Edwards 2008
Posted by: sunspot on Jan 4, 2008 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Obama/Edwards would be unstoppable. 60% or more of Democrats in polls already like them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]