Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The One Mexican Border-Crossing Immigrant Family That Tancredo Likes? The Romneys

Posted by Henry Fernandez, Think Progress at 2:45 PM on December 26, 2007.


Perhaps it's not just Tom Tancredo who needs a quick reminder of the Romney family history?
tomtancredo
Tancredo

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Tom Tancredo, the only candidate for president from either party to declare himself in opposition to legal immigration, and to have a specific aversion to Mexican immigration, dropped out of the presidential race last week. Then he did something quite odd -- he endorsed Mitt Romney, the only candidate whose father was born in Mexico and whose family made use of the porous border to immigrate between Mexico and the United States.

Tancredo made his endorsement because he was enamored by Romney's recent -- apparently hypocritical -- conversion on immigration. Romney has been running ads across Iowa decrying what he now believes is the horrible impact of "illegal immigrants."

Well here's a little fact check for Tancredo.

Mitt Romney's father George was born in Chihuahua, Mexico in 1907, the son of Gaskell Romney and Anna Amelia Pratt. Three generations of Romneys lived in Mexico because Miles Park Romney, a polygamist, moved the family there in 1884 as it became increasingly clear that the U.S. government would not tolerate polygamy in the Utah Territory. The 1882 Edmunds Act stripped polygamists of the basic rights of U.S. citizenship, denying them the right to vote, serve on juries or hold office. Not dissimilar to current immigration raids, U.S. federal agents hunted and arrested polygamists. Polygamists were forced to leave the country or risk jail.

Miles chose to leave the country, bringing his multiple wives and children with him across the southern border. In his 1902 book The Story of the Mormons, author William Alexander Linn states that the "Secretario de Fomento of Mexico" related that "The laws of this country [Mexico] do not permit polygamy," and that the contracts for the establishment of Mormon colonies in Mexico required the same. If true, Miles Romney then knowingly arrived in direct violation of Mexican immigration law.

Utah became a state in 1896, only after laws were passed there prohibiting polygamy. While polygamy may have been illegal in both countries, the Romneys still found Mexico more to their liking. All four of George's grandparents would live out their days in Mexico, with Anna's mother Dorsey being the last to die -- in Chihuahua in 1929.

Gaskell and Anna (who were monogamous) were married in 1895, and according to George's biographer Tom Mahoney, lived in Chihuahua until the height of the Mexican Revolution in 1912. Relative Junius Romney negotiated with rebel leaders to get women and children out of the colony for their safety. Anna, with Mitt's father George in tow, fled across the U.S. border by train (with no apparent delay or search at the border). A short time later Gaskell, like many Mexican immigrants before and since, covered hundreds of miles under a hot sun, crossing by land into New Mexico.

As a Mexican born immigrant, George would do quite honorably, becoming Governor of Michigan and running for the Republican nomination for President in 1968. His support for civil rights and opposition to the Vietnam War resulted in his loss to Richard Nixon. His son Mitt is of course where this post began.

Perhaps it's not just Tancredo who needs a quick reminder of the Romney family history?

Digg!

Tagged as: immigration, romney, tancredo

Henry Fernandez is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress focusing on state and municipal policy.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
AlterNet continues to amaze
Posted by: LonewackoDotCom2 on Dec 26, 2007 3:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Per this: It is the consensus of scholars, however, that foreign born children of Americans are natural born citizens. And that would mean that [George Romney] and McCain would certainly qualify. Thus, calling George Romney an "immigrant" is false. And, for that reason and others, most of the post has nothing to do with Mitt Romney. He's the one who's running for president, not his late father.

Also, what our guest blogger forgot to note is that he’s married to the former head of a NewHaven CT nonprofit that is/was collaborating with the Mexican government. She also led the charge to get that city to distribute an ID card for use by illegal aliens. And, oddly enough, the mayor of that town may have a financial interest in the scheme due to a bank. Fernandez served as the mayor's campaign manager when the mayor ran for governor of that state.

As for the post, the NYT link says Tancredo’s “platform calls for restrictions even on legal immigration”; somehow Fernandez has morphed that into “declar[ing] himself in opposition to legal immigration”. Does the reader think those are the same?

The second link about an aversion to Mexican immigration doesn’t have a single word with “mexic” in it.

As for the post’s attempt to hide massive lawbreaking behind something one group and the Romney family did over a hundred years ago, does Fernandez think everyone here is five years old? Can't AlterNet do better than this and the recent SPLC and MaxBlumenthal articles?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Funny ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Amending ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Please don't waste everyone's time Posted by: LonewackoDotCom2
» RE: Please don't waste everyone's time Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Funny ... Posted by: bloggeddowninMKE
» RE: AlterNet continues to amaze Posted by: Bohica Babe
Validity of Scholastic Opinion
Posted by: RON_KING on Dec 27, 2007 3:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the consensus of scholars, however, that foreign born children of Americans are natural born citizens.

It is not really a question of scholars holding such views in cases of law, but if jurists do as interpreters of the law. Scholars may hold ANY view they wish but it has no impact on how immigration law is applied.

Then there is also the question of if Mitt's grandfather renounced his citizenship when he fled to Mexico, which would mean that Mitt's father was not a foreign born son of an American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tommy White-credo's real issue
Posted by: QQOblivion on Dec 27, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether Mitt is the son of illegal Mexican immigrants or not is immaterial to Tancredo. What really matters to Tom is that Mitt is alright because he is all White.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]