Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class

Posted by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim, Huffington Post at 9:16 AM on January 6, 2009.


Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
sfrankenlarge

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is refusing to seat Roland Burris, appointed by disgraced Ill. Gov. Rod Blagojevich, for lack of state certification. That's a problem for Al Franken, who also lacks final state certification despite the fact that the state canvassing board declared him the winner Monday.

Will Senate Democrats seat Franken without official certification? "I don't think so," said Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois.

"Republicans will object to trying to seat him," said Reid spokesman Jim Manley. Later in the day, Manley said that Democratic leadership would not seat Franken when the new class of Senators was sworn in on Tuesday. "Now that the bipartisan state canvassing board has certified Al Franken as the winner, we hope Senator Coleman respects its decision and does not drag this out for months with litigation... However, there will not be an effort to seat Mr. Franken tomorrow."

The remarks from Senate's top two Democrats cast a shadow on what was an otherwise bright day for Franken's political objectives. The comedian-turned-Senate aspirant claimed victory on Monday after the Minnesota canvassing board's final tallies showed him with a 1,212,431 to 1,212,206 vote victory.

"After 62 days, after the careful and painstaking hand inspection of nearly three million ballots, after hours and hours of hard work by elections officials and volunteers across the state, I am proud and humbled to stand before you as the next Senator from Minnesota," Franken declared before a crowd of reporters.

But even in victory, the Democratic challenger foreshadowed potential obstacles ahead. "There may still be additional legal proceedings related to our recount," he said.

Indeed, in private, some Democrats are conceding that they simply don't have the votes, at this juncture, to seat Franken without certification, though that won't stop them from at least trying to do just that. Moreover, legal challenges to Franken's declared victory seem all but certain to come from Sen. Norm Coleman within the next week.

"The actions today by the Canvassing Board are but the first step in what, unfortunately, will now have to be a longer process," said the Senator's counsel, Tony Trimble. "This process isn't at the end; it is now just at the beginning. We will contest the results of the Canvassing Board -- otherwise, literally millions of Minnesotans will be disenfranchised."

The tone of defiance was echoed in the nation's capital as well. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) declared to reporters, "The race in Minnesota is not over." Claiming that Minnesota law doesn't allow certification of a senator while litigation is ongoing, he added, "It's my understanding that litigation is commencing."

And so, an election that went weeks beyond its supposed end-date seems likely to drag on a bit further. Aides to Franken told the Huffington Post that, in the end, they don't see the final tallies changing. But that won't stop Coleman from appealing the results to state and even federal court, where he will argue that some Minnesotans were denied equal protection through the methods of the state's recount process.

In the interim, procedural steps are being undertaken to accommodate a possible transition of power, not just for Franken but for other incoming Senators as well.

Durbin, addressing the even more contentious Senate replacement process in Illinois, said that Burris was welcome to come "to Washington and welcome to have an office, but I can't see him taking any official action." At this point, he added, the potential Barack Obama replacement had been unable to "produce the documentation necessary" to certify himself as a senator.

Coleman, too, had office-related issues pop up on Monday. His staff arrived at the Senate apparently unable to enter their workplaces. The Senate Rules and Administration Committee had followed its own guidelines, which stipulate that the Senator's term expires on January 3rd and therefore their offices should be closed. Coleman had been notified. But aides showed up regardless.

"I think there was a misunderstanding about what they needed to do," said Howard Gantman, staff director for the Senate Rules and Administration Committee. "They corrected it."

Digg!

Tagged as: senate, minnesota, al franken, reid, election '08, coleman, franken, recount, blagojevich, blago, burris

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Franken-Coleman Update: Norm Returns To Senate As Non-Senator
Al Franken, has been declared the winner of the Minnesota contest but has yet to be sworn in as court battles continue.
Post by Ryan Grim. January 21, 2009.
A Bar Stool View of This Moment in American History
Some reactions to Obama's inauguration speech (which, yes, I watched in a bar).
Post by Joshua Holland. January 20, 2009.
Franken-Coleman Recount: How Far Will It Go?
Will Norm be able to take this all the way to the conservative-controlled US Supreme Court?
Post by Phoenix Woman. January 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Battle
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 6, 2009 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans are such poor losers, aren't they?!

Is it correct that this dispute could go to the US Supreme Court? Let's see, the Supreme Court has only gotten MORE conservative since its 2000 ruling the installed George W as president.

Let me guess, Coleman will only stop fighting when he finally gets his way, even if the battle needs to go all the way to the top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Battle Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Battle Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Battle Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Its nice to see Franken pull a Bush
Posted by: rickiey on Jan 6, 2009 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love Franken's irony. In one of his books, he detailed how Bush stole the 2000 election.

And then he runs for office and steals his seat using the "recount, recount until we find a recount that puts me ahead, and then call it the official recount" method.

To be honest, I'm just happy that there is one less republican in office. But I think the way Franken stole this one, really has to sting to the party that invented the stolen election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its nice to see Franken pull a Bush Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Harry FUCKING Reid will only seat corrupt status quo hacks.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 6, 2009 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alright you sleepy Nevadans. Primary that motherfucker out in 2010 or be stuck with the dud again !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: same old bunch of pussies
Posted by: goeswithness on Jan 7, 2009 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to agree with you on that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coleman Should Concede
Posted by: bloggeddowninMKE on Jan 7, 2009 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One can only hope that Coleman concedes like a gentleman, but from what I have read about him that seems unlikely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only in Amerika...
Posted by: BigRon on Jan 7, 2009 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...can such things happen. Back here in the UK, I routinely take part in my local "count". We routinely know exactly how many votes were cast (because we physically count 'em!) and how many each candidate got, within a few hours of the polls closing. If there's a "problem" with a ballot, it's sorted out, individually, right there and then, while the count is underway. Even as many as THREE recounts can be completed by breakfastime the next day.

Democracy isn't particle physics, nor is it rocket science. Counting ballots is something the average third--grader is capable of doing. But it seems to be WELL beyond the reach of the USA's electoral system. Why, oh why do you stand for this fiasco?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]