Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Franken Campaign: Al Pulls Ahead by 22 Votes

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 12:39 PM on December 3, 2008.


For the first time since the Minnesota recount began, Al Franken has actually pulled ahead of Republican Sen. Norm Coleman.
salflarge

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Al Franken's campaign announced on Wednesday that, for the first time since the Minnesota recount began, the Democrat has actually pulled ahead of Republican Sen. Norm Coleman.

Speaking on a conference call with reporters, Franken's chief counsel Marc Elias said the campaign's own internal count showed them up 22 votes, a jump from the 13 vote deficit that they faced on Tuesday.

"We have approximately 138,000 ballots left to count," said Elias. "94.3 percent of the state has now been counted... Obviously that number is going to change, but we are pleased thus far with how things are going."

If true (the official state and newspaper numbers show a margin more favorable to Coleman, owing to the many challenges each campaign has logged), the tally underscores just how incredibly close the Minnesota race has become. On Wednesday, the state will go over ballots from Wright County -- a largely Republican area that could thrust Norm Coleman back into the lead.

Indeed, observers of the recount process and even members of both campaigns are bracing themselves for the near certainty that the courts will become involved. Among those aspects of the recount that have been or seemed destined to be legally debated: rejected absentee ballots (of which the Franken campaign says there are some 1,000 that should be counted), missing ballots (171 of which emerged in Ramsey County on Tuesday), and the pool of ballots that the campaigns have contested.

The last group has been building up into the thousands, as both candidates have filed both legitimate and frivolous objections. On the Wednesday conference call, however, Elias said that the Franken campaign would withdraw roughly 600 of their challenges.

Digg!

Tagged as: al franken, norm coleman, politics news, minnesota senate race, minnesota recount, al franken ahead, franken 22 votes, franken 22 votes ahead, franken ahead, franken minnesota recount

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
YEEEEEESSSSSS!
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 3, 2008 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I needed this right now.

Keep it going, Al!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Frank
Posted by: Baukunin on Dec 4, 2008 1:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only for certain in this race seems to be that any certainty in the outcome is ill-founded at this point.

Here's hoping those rejected ballots get counted. Coleman never should have gotten elected in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of Course
Posted by: redbird30328 on Dec 4, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... if the Franken campaign announced it and it appears on VictimNet, then it must be true. Interesting there has not been a syllable on VictimNet regarding the Saxby Chambliss annihilation of Democrat Jim Martin in the Georgia run-off days ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Of Course Posted by: dmb8762
» RE: Of Course Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Of Course Posted by: doneman2000
The recount isn't over yet
Posted by: catmandoo on Dec 4, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are still some 56,000 votes yet to be counted (as of 8 a.m. this morning) and then the panel of judges go to work on the contested ballots. After that, either candidate can go to court and challenge the results based on specific ballots. There are also some 130 ballots missing from a precinct as of last night's 10 p.m. news. We could wind up without a clear winner in January as a result.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a little early on the call...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Dec 7, 2008 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
official state recount tally here

Precincts Recounted: 99.98% (4129 of 4130) Last update was: 12/6/2008 8:00:01 PM

the totals posted are not 4 votes but actually showing;
Nov. 4 Ballots Cast for Norm Coleman 1210995
Nov. 4 Ballots Cast for Al Franken 1210285

sorry Al,
I do think you would have been a force to be reckoned within the Senate buildings...

lets hope I'm wrong and you get the nod.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]