Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Strange Turns in the Franken-Coleman Recount

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 5:01 AM on December 3, 2008.


The Republican incumbent now leads by 50 votes -- and that's before these 171 uncounted ballots.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

You probably thought, as I did, that the recount in Minnesota's Senate race couldn't possibly take any more strange turns. Think again.

The final day of ballot recounting in Ramsey County in the U.S. Senate race kicked up controversy today when 171 uncounted ballots from Maplewood turned up.

The ballots apparently had been uncounted because of a ballot-counting machine malfunction on Election Day. Although the official numbers were still being tabulated, representatives from U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman's campaign said challenger Al Franken appeared to pick up a net gain of 37 votes because of the situation.

They also said there were 31 more ballots than the number of voters who signed in at Maplewood's Sixth Precinct at the Hazelwood Fire Station. "We're looking into that right now because there should not be more ballots than voters," said Joe Mansky, Ramsey County's elections manager. He said the number of voters who were registered and signed in, plus the number of same-day registrants and absentee voters should equal the number of ballots, but the 31 extra ballots remain under investigation.

The ballot counter malfunctioned after 171 ballots had been feed into the machine, Mansky said. When the machinery was replaced, the ballots were in the ballot box but went uncounted until today's recount.

Of course, it's extremely unlikely that all 171 uncounted ballots will go to Franken; he may, however, be positioned to narrow the gap against Coleman a little more. If this precinct was similar to those around it, Franken would pick up a net gain for about 12 votes.

And what kind of gap would that leave? According to the Franken campaign, the Republican incumbent now leads by 50 votes -- and that's before these 171 uncounted ballots are factored into the mix.

About 7% of ballots have not yet been reviewed as part of the statewide recount, and the issue of rejected absentee ballots remains unresolved.

Stay tuned.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let's Start a Pool
Posted by: Xynyx on Dec 3, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$5.00 to get in - winner takes all

pick the winner and the vote margin, and a preferred third party in case nobody wins

duplicate entries will not be accepted, and each participant may play only once

if nobody nails the number, we send all the money to the most popular third party

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]