Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Unhinged Chambliss Grabs Camera When Asked About Lawsuit

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 12:21 PM on November 21, 2008.


The pressures of the runoff and the continuing questions about his ties to a scandal-scarred sugar company seem to be getting to Chambliss.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

The pressures of the runoff election and the continuing questions about his ties to a large, scandal-scarred sugar company seem to be getting to Sen. Saxby Chambliss.

Asked by a reporter whether a lawsuit involving deaths at an Imperial Sugar plant -- a lawsuit in which Chambliss claims he has senatorial immunity from testifying -- were making his chances at reelection harder, the Georgia Republican responded by knocking away a nearby camera.

The video, put out by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, is another chapter in a bizarre but brewing saga that could very well affect the outcome of the Senate race.

In February 2008, an explosion at the Imperial Sugar Factory in Savannah, caused largely by combustible dust particles, killed 14 workers and injured 40. The whistleblower who brought the issue to light came before Capitol Hill to testify on the matter. Chambliss sat in on the hearing, though he was not part of the Senate Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety. He was accused by his opponents of verbally harassing the whistleblower. Moreover, Chambliss continued to oppose a new combustible dust standard at the plant even after the explosion. Finally, when families of the victims filed a lawsuit, the Senator refused to give evidence or testimony, citing Senatorial immunity, which doesn't actually exist.

Imperial Sugar, which has funneled a moderate amount of donations into Chambliss' coffers, has defended the Senator's conduct as appropriate.

Digg!

Tagged as: georgia, chambliss, anger, imperial sugar

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Wow, are they buying protection?
Posted by: Lauren on Nov 21, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to buy a senator too, I want protection. Is that how we get it? I wrote my senator a letter and she sent the spy agencies after me. Peace in the middle east was not part of her agenda so a girl scout leader with ideas about that was apparently very threatening.

I sure felt threatened by that helicopter but what I didn't know was my husbands reaction was going to be the most dangerous part of it all. People told him I was nuts, that NO ONE would believe me. He took that as an invitation for ownership with no holds barred. No was no longer a word he had to listen to from me. The police told him so.

So I started getting raped on a regular basis, what a surprise. We didn't communicate because everyone told him he couldn't talk to me.

He didn't think he should loose out on sex just because we were no longer speaking to each other. It just made him more angry to be deprived, after all, everything was my fault.

It was a surprise to me, I was totally unprepared for it. I thought I had a loving husband, I didn't know he was secretly a vicious rapist. I learned that the hard way and it precipitated a full mental breakdown.

Why did they do that to me? Because I am a woman? Or 'lefty'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A specical place in Hell for Chambliss
Posted by: CatDad on Nov 21, 2008 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Winning an election by smearing the patriotism of a triple amputee Vietnam vet....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barbara
Posted by: blkantola@comcast.net on Nov 22, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's just another Republican crook. I watch the Senate daily and see this guy in action. He votes for anything to help big business. He votes AGAINST anything to help the American People, including his own constituents, the ones he's supposed to be working for. Just check his voting record and see also how many Bills he blocked or filibustered, rather than allow a vote to help the American PEOPLE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Examplar of the Southern Scoundrel
Posted by: Midway54 on Nov 22, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Southland Biblebelt is filled with political scoundrels like Shameless Saxby Chambliss, a rightwinger chicken-hawk Stooge, but he stands head and shoulders above the rest of them as so very much more deserving of contempt.

The whole lot of them in the House and Senate from the same section of the Country grovel before the Plutocrats for whom they so feverishly strive to keep them and their
corporations from paying their fair share, if even that, of the tax burden in order to keep the military costs of the Iraqui Oil Grab paid for by drawing on our line of credit mainly from China. It is simply astonishing to see their remote, backwater constituencies, many of whom are stuggling from payday to payday with no health insurance, economically and socially fornicate themselves when they repeatedly send them to Congress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your article title, Sam, is total hyperbole!
Posted by: MsCher on Nov 22, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Either you linked the wrong video to your story, Sam, or you, like many reporters believe in the use of hyperbole to get readers to read your story. I am not an aficionado of Chambliss by any wild stretch of the imagination, I find him to be a morally reprehensible human being. But, to use the word "unhinged" to describe him and then to put up as evidence this lame video, honestly, Sam, either in the future publish an honest news story or get a new day job because I do not appreciate having my time wasted.
Do Not Take A Bow!
Cher Tanner

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're right.
Posted by: steveconn on Nov 22, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The story is important. The video and the unhinged stuff is guff. It's called pandering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make it a crime......
Posted by: tap17x on Nov 22, 2008 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....for a corporation to donate directly or indirectly to any campaign, for a candidate or an issue. Make it a very serious crime, akin to bribery (which it is). A corporate officer forcing subordinates to donate gets 20 years, as does he and his family for donating. Corporate purchase of the government has to stop and a tiny fraction of "free speech" is a reasonable tradeoff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unhinged?
Posted by: Scientz on Nov 22, 2008 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, so, I have no problem believing Saxby Chambliss is a shill for Imperial Sugar, or that he might just be crooked. But, seriously, what was "unhinged" about his conduct in that video?

What are we, FOX News?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unhinged? Posted by: herronsmith
THE GOOD OLD BOY SYSTEM....
Posted by: joeocho88 on Nov 22, 2008 6:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is used to the Good Old Boy Patronage of the South because the GOOD OLD BOYS TAKE CARE OF THEIR OWN --as long as they are ALL making LOTS OF MONEY that is.

AND THIS IS THE GOOD OLD BOY SYSTEM OF BELIEFS:

Women are whores or mothers.
African Americans are savages.
Native Americans have an ecological friendly way of life that makes a lot more sense than mindless, wasteful, conspicious consumption so they have to be surpressed and genocided!
Mexican Americans are just CHEAP,DISPOSABLE LABOR --wait a minute, that applies to ALL LABOR!
GOOD OLD BOYS CLAIM TO BE CHRISTIAN BUT ARE NOT!
GOOD OLD BOYS WAVE A FALSE FLAG OF FAMILY VALUES -- BUT ONLY WHEN EVERYBODY IS LOOKING!
GOOD OLD BOYS ONLY CARE ABOUT WHITE MALES OF THEIR RELIGIOUS (PRIVATE CLUB) GROUP AND THEIR SOCIOECONOMIC CASTE AND EVERYBODY ELSE CAN GO TO HELL OR SLAVE LABOR JOBS.
GOOD OLD BOYS CAN ONLY BE TRUSTED TO DO THE THINGS THAT THEY DENY THAT THEY DO IN PUBLIC!

SO I DON'T THINK ANYTHING IS GOING TO BE DONE TO THIS POLITICAL CROOK BECAUSE HE'S A GOOD OLD BOY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent Description Posted by: itzamirakul