Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Academic Study: Franken Likely to Win Minnesota Senate Race

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 4:07 AM on November 18, 2008.


Franken's position looks surprisingly good, new political study shows.
safranklarge

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Despite trailing his opponent by slightly more than two hundred votes, Democratic challenger Al Franken stands a strong chance of passing Sen. Norm Coleman during the upcoming recount, according to at least one prominent political scientist.

Professor Michael C. Herron of Dartmouth College, has put together a new study of the voting patterns in Minnesota, in the process determining that the majority of voters who cast unrecorded ballots in the Senate race were likely Franken supporters.

"If someone put a gun to my head and said, 'You have to bet,' I would bet Franken," Herron said, when reached by phone. "It won't be a wipe-out. Two hundred votes is effectively tied. We just know that, in this case, Democrats tend to [screw up their ballots] more often [than Republicans]." In Minnesota, the "intent" of the voter is considered during recounts.

According to Herron's analysis, of the 2.9 million people who went to the polls in Minnesota, there were approximately 34,000 residual voters in the Senate race. In other words, there were 34,000 more ballots cast than total number of recorded votes for all the Senate candidates.

Why the difference? A good portion of voters, Herron concludes, voted in the presidential election but deliberately did not vote for a Senate candidate. These people won't matter when it comes to a recount.

There is, however, a portion of the 34,000 who intended to vote for one of the Senate candidates but messed up. Voters were supposed to fill in the circle next to the name of the candidate they supported. Some, however, marked X's. Others circled the name itself or crossed out the names of candidates they didn't like.

This group is key to determining the Minnesota Senate victor.

In his study, Herron looked at the figures from the 2006 congressional election and the 2008 presidential election to determine which areas of the state have the most residual voters. By isolating these areas, Herron could determine which group was most likely to have wanted to vote one way but failed to cast their ballots properly.

He found that the majority of residual voters came from two, not necessarily distinct places: African American communities and traditionally Democratic communities. With the former, he theorized, there was likely a "turnout surge" -- many people went to the polls to support Barack Obama and no one else (or at least not Franken). The latter, however, contained voters who "almost certainly intended to cast a vote in the Senate race [and likely for Franken] but for some reason did not do so."

How big that group is, is crucial. And a way to figure it out is to first look at how Barack Obama and John McCain fared in the state.

According to Herron there was an approximately 0.34 percent residual vote rate in presidential race voting among Minnesotans. This means that of the 2.9 million votes cast for a presidential candidate, nearly 10,000 individuals wanted to vote but screwed up. There may have been people who wanted to vote in local and congressional contests, but not the presidential race. But this group is likely quite small.

In other words, there are probably somewhere between 8,000 and 10,000 Minnesota voters who had clear problems filling out a ballot and likely voted in the Senate race. Many of these individuals, moreover, hailed from Democratic communities.

"Ultimately, the anticipated recount may clarify the relative proportions of intentional versus unintentional residual voters," writes Herron. "At present, though, the data available suggest that the recount will uncover many of the former and that, of the latter, a majority will likely prove to be supportive of Franken."

All Franken needs is to win more than 207 votes from this group than Coleman, and he will take over the Senate seat.

 

Digg!

Tagged as: senate, minnesota, al franken, election '08, coleman, franken, dartmouth college

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When Al wins, tune into FOX, immediately!,
Posted by: yale on Nov 18, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so we can catch that second round of slumping reporters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Assumption may be wrong
Posted by: gabbyone on Nov 18, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An election representative from Minnesota was on CNN and said this will not be a hanging chad
situation because they will not be discerning
the intent of voters just recounting the ballots that were already counted. He said that don't expect the vote to change much from where it is sitting right now. This means that all those circle not filled in right will
not be part of this recount.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So Called Election Rep Is Wrong Posted by: shortpantz
Franken, Go Al Go!!!
Posted by: bobtr900 on Nov 18, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take it away Al Franken. Go, Go, Go.

****

On a side note, I strongly recommend that all of you on this forum (Alternet) read Dick Cavett's column in today's New York Times, Opinion section. Read it online or read it even if you have to actually BUY the now right wing newspaper. Your money and time will be TOTALLY well spent, it is a scream.

I'll tempt you with this clue. It is entitled: The Wild Wordsmith of Wasilla, by Dick Cavett, and is in the NYT dated today, !!/18/08. After reading it I thought it also could have been labeled: The Thrilla' From Wasilla. The, as usual, delightfully understated Dick Cavett is once again at his incomparable best.

I printed it out and strongly recommend you do the same. I am still screaming and ROTFL. It's the best thing I have read for a long time, ever since the endless horrors of the Bush administration began eight years ago. This nation may be in the grip of rampant and rabid Theo-Fascism but the laughter is not yet dead. Hope springs eternal and comedy/ comedic relief is still the best medicine and a major part of 'eternal hopes' driving force, not only in the worst of times but in these, possibly the 'bettering' (my non-word) of times.

Here is a teaser from Cavett's piece. He called Sarah Palin: "the serial syntax killer". Now if that doesn't grab you, the Neocon-Rovian-Bushies have killed you, just as they have killed religion and very nearly killed our democracy.

Begging everyone's indulgence, I'm going to try to cross post this 'heads-up' to a piece of political comedy that demands to be read, to Salon.com, HuffPo and MOJO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Franken, Go Al Go!!! Posted by: sam3
» RE: Franken, Go Al Go!!! Posted by: Longdream
By Hook or By Crook
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Nov 18, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course Franken will win
at any cost

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: By Hook or By Crook Posted by: Gomeraman
gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Nov 18, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it weren't so critical that another Democrat be elected, voters so stupid that they cross out a name, mark with an "x", etc. deserve a result for which they are partially to blame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I love Al...
Posted by: schiffer on Nov 18, 2008 2:34 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... except for that small problem of his support for the mass murder of Palestinian women and school children.

No big deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]