Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Guide for Watching Election Night Results

Posted by Thomas B. Edsall, Huffington Post at 11:15 AM on November 3, 2008.


For those obsessed with the results on Tuesday night, here is a guide to watching TV and searching exit poll data on the web.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

For those obsessed with the results on Tuesday night, here is a November 4 guide to watching television and searching exit poll data on the web.

There are three basic questions (with hundreds more to follow in the weeks ahead): 1) When can you feel confident about the outcome of the presidential contest?; 2) How well are Democrats progressing toward their goal of 60 seats in the Senate?; and 3) Will 2008 be another Democratic blowout, signaling the possibility that the party could establish a majority coalition in future elections?

The basic rule of thumb is to follow the closing times of the polls in each state. Once voting is stopped, the networks can start using detailed exit polling and post the material on their websites. If the networks are unwilling to call a given state, an examination of the exit poll data can often give you a clear signal of the ultimate results. The state-by-state exit polls released after poll closings will have large samples and should not suffer the defects that plagued the early findings in 2004 which pointed to a solid Kerry victory nationwide.

For additional help, HuffPost has election night widgets from CNN and MSNBC that will allow you to "watch the electoral vote count and the congressional balance of power with the national U.S. map or choose a state and see how individual counties are voting."

Fortunately for those who cannot stay awake, some of the first states with earliest poll closing times of 7 PM EST are key battlegrounds: Indiana, Georgia, Virginia, and Kentucky.

Virginia is a crucial battleground state, and an Obama win there (without Georgia or Indiana) would suggest he is likely to take the oath of office on January 20. In terms of the future, an Obama victory would mean that Virginia has completed the move from red to purple, with all the demographic changes pointing toward further Democratic gains.

If Obama carries either Georgia or Indiana, look for a big Democratic night all around. If he carries both (along with Virginia), Republicans should consider turning on the gas and closing the windows. Those who care only about the presidential outcome should feel free to switch to sports, watch a movie, or go to bed.

Conversely, if McCain carries Virginia, Indiana and Georgia, plan to stay up a little later.

These early states are also key to the Senate outcome:

The Kentucky Senate race, pitting Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell against Democratic challenger Bruce Lunsford, a businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a crucial contest in the fight for filibuster-proof control of the Upper Chamber. McConnell has a 5.7 percent advantage according to RealClearPolitics and a Democratic victory would be a major upset.

Another upset could be in the making in Georgia where Democrat Jim Martin has been closing the gap in his challenge to incumbent Saxby Chambliss, although Martin remains 2.7 points behind. If Georgia goes for Martin, it will indicate that black voters are turning out in droves, mobilized by the prospect of electing the first African American president.

Just a half hour after the data from these states starts pouring in, polls close at 7:30 in the Big Enchilada of 2008: Ohio -- and may close in another important state, North Carolina, although officials there have the option of staying open until 8:30 if there are problems in completing the voting process.

Ohio has become the national battleground state and this year is no exception. Carried twice by George W. Bush, this year Obama is favored, with a 7 point edge, but neither side is taking it easy. The closing Ohio trend line has been in favor of McCain, who in recent days has cut in half what had been a double digit deficit.

The presidential race in North Carolina is a dead heat, and has been so for a month. The RCP average has Obama ahead by a statistically meaningless 0.3 percent. An Obama victory there would be another strong sign of a good night for the Democratic nominee and his party -- especially if combined with an Obama win in Virginia.

North Carolina Senator Elizabeth Dole (R) is fighting for her life against Kay Hagan (D) in the Tar Heel state. Hagan holds a 5.5 point advantage and appears likely to pull off an upset win, but the big question is whether Dole's last minute airing of highly controversial commercials linking Hagan to a "Godless" supporter gains traction.

At one point, Obama supporters had thought West Virginia, where polls close at 7:30, was within reach, but in recent surveys, the Democratic nominee has faced a double digit deficit.

The flood of voting results and poll data begins at 8 PM EST. In the presidential race, hotly contested states include Florida, Pennsylvania, Missouri, and New Hampshire. In addition, there are two crucial Senate races: Sen. John Sununu (R) v. Jeanne Shaheen (D) in New Hampshire, and Senator Roger Wicker (R) v. Ronnie Musgrove (D) in Mississippi.

Of the presidential states with 8 pm poll closings, Florida is by far the most important. RCP's 4-poll average in Florida gives Obama a 4.2 point edge over McCain. If that holds up, Obama would be well on his way to victory.

If, conversely, McCain wins Pennsylvania while holding Florida and other states carried by George W. Bush in 2004, it's a whole new ball game, and a late night: you will have to wait for returns from Colorado, New Mexico (both 9 PM ET closings) and Nevada (10 PM), to have any real confidence in the outcome.

The networks will not go anywhere near calling the race until the polls close on the West Coast at 11 PM. Barring the Pennsylvania-McCain scenario, the odds are that the winner will be known to anyone following the results once the states with 8 PM closings are in.

There will be plenty of interesting results coming in from the states in the Central and Mountain time zones -- especially Senate races in Louisiana, Minnesota, Colorado, and New Mexico. In addition, House results will be constantly trickling in.

Unfortunately, it will be virtually impossible to ascertain early whether Senate Democrats will hit the magic number of a 60 seat majority, unless Republicans win in some of the early states listed above, in which case it will be possible to rule out a Democratic super-majority. In the event that Democrats keep winning in every key state, those who can't go to sleep before they find out will have to wait at least until the votes are counted in Oregon, where the last polls close at 11 PM EST and where Democratic challenger Jeff Merkley leads incumbent Gordon Smith by 5.3 points.

If Democrats are still on the cusp, with 59 seats, when Oregon's results are counted, it will take until the polls close at 1 AM EST in Alaska to be sure of the balance of power in the Senate. In Alaska, recently convicted incumbent Republican Ted Stevens looks like a probable loser to Democrat Mark Begich, who leads by 10.3 points -- although no one is going to state publicly that Stevens is politically dead until the results are officially declared.

There is an even worse scenario for those with a desperate need to know: The Democrats could be at 59 Senate seats at 2 AM on November 5, but, when all the votes are counted in the Georgia race, a number of experts say that a reasonable expectation is that neither Chambliss nor Martin will reach the 50 percent required to win, and that Libertarian Allen Buckley will siphon off enough votes to force a run-off later in the month.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: 2008, obama, mccain, biden, palin, election guide

Thomas B. Edsall is the political editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
they are doing their dirty work and we will pay dearly
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 4:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is ample cause for general alarm and for the measures we've recommended, in what has emerged from the ongoing court action in Ohio. If evidence of electronic-voting manipulation follows the election tomorrow, it must be pursued regardless of who wins. And if the campaigns involved do not challenge the results where this evidence emerges, or if local and state authorities do not cooperate to resolve these questions, it is certain that a tidal wave of protest will develop. Nonviolent resistance was used successfully by African-Americans to win their civil rights in the 1960s, and earlier by American women to win the right to vote. Millions would not hesitate to use it again, if there is evidence of a stolen presidential election. The first Democratic president, Thomas Jefferson, said that "eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." The failure of the Bush administration to permit systematic reform of this nation's elections infrastructure so as to make it impossible for these manipulations to occur is bad enough. Even worse would be to refuse to take seriously the possibility that these abuses could alter or adulterate the results of what may well be the most important presidential election of our lifetimes. gO TO THRUTHOUT.ORG FOR MORE INFO

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STAND UP FOR YOUR VOTE,
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we are on the doorstep of another US Presidential Election. If John McCain is declared the winner, everyone who voted should hit the streets and protest. It's that simple. The vote will have been manipulated because all polling up to now suggests Obama will win. And evidence exists already of vote flipping by the electronic machines. Vote flipping, voter intimidation, excessive challenges, voter purging, insufficient equipment (foreshadowed by the MSM TODAY!), secret certifications, inaccurate polling site location information. All these violations have been documented in the past 4 years and there's no reason to believe they won't be an issue this very week. STAND UP FOR YOUR VOTE, PEOPLE. And may God help us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

waynep
Posted by: waynep on Nov 4, 2008 3:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There have been predictions of rioting, etc. if McCain is the victor. Most of this speculation is based upon race. I believe that the reality is that if this election is STOLEN again, then the American people are going to take to the streets, and it will not be pretty. I assure you that I am among those who will be there...and I am a 60 yr. old white man, small businessman, parent and grandparent, and a Viet Nam era veteran.
If we had not wimped out 8 yrs. ago when we knew in our hearts that what was happening was an unprecedented overthrowing of the will of the American people, think of all of the lives that could have been saved, the people who have not lost their homes and everything else they own, the jobs that we would not have lost. NEVER AGAIN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The straight talk express
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Nov 4, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/
536335/STRAIGHT%20TALK%20EXPRESS.WMV

The igorance of alternet's webmaster cannot learn how to allow this to be one continuous link.
You probably have to either copy/paste it into your own comment to light it up or google it.

It is informative to a T.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another not-so-secret secret.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 4, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has not been talked about much since the '76 presidential election, but early reporting from the east coast can throw an election. Results, including exit polling, in the east should never be announced until the polls close on the west coast. By prematurely announcing who is leading, and by how much, on the east coast, enough voters in the big states in the West like California could be influenced to stay home (why bother? it's already been decided ...) and thus change the outcome.

As I recall, a ban on early reporting from the east was discussed after the presidential election of 1976, because the reporting DID influence the overall result for down-ballot candidates.

What really chaps my butt is that some talking as ... uh, heads have already announced the trends in early voting, DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION! You cannot tell me that this, along with incessant blathering about long lines, will not influence who will and will not vote.

We need a "zip it" law to force all of the self-important talking heads, and their corporate masters who would try to manipulate which early results we hear in order to influence turnout, to keep their mouths shut until ALL of The People have voted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the upside
Posted by: Shey on Nov 4, 2008 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
monkeywrench may have some valid points, but freedom of the press (TV media included) is an issue, as well.
CNN is airing ongoing reports of problems being encountered by voters and polling places, surely this is more important than silencing news media. Add this to the Obama campaign's poll-watch volunteers, AlterNet (and others) reporting on the ability to program voting machines to "flip" votes from Obama to McCain, and it's going to make it a lot harder for republicans to steal this election, as they have the two previous.

It's the responsibility of every citizen to understand that their vote counts. The idea that someone in an electoral vote heavy state such as California would believe that their vote "wont count" because they've already heard preliminary results from eastern states, speaks to a need for voter education, not media censorship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]