Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Karl Rove Thinks He's Smarter Than 2,900 Doctors Regarding McCain's Health

Posted by ZP Heller, Brave New Films at 8:00 AM on October 27, 2008.


Rove twists NY Times medical reporter's findings in McCain's favor.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

One thing Karl Rove has never lacked is hubris.  A few days ago, Rove, an informal adviser for John McCain, appeared on FOX News and claimed McCain has been "an open book about his health issues for years and years and years."  Obviously, Rove thinks he knows more than the 2,900 doctors who have signed our open letter calling on McCain to provide full disclosure of his medical records.  Not to mention Dr. Lawrence Altman, a physician and journalist who has covered the health of presidential candidates for the past 36 years. 

In an article for The New York Times last Monday, Dr. Altman expressed grave concerns about McCain's lack of candor regarding his health history.  Dr. Altman wrote:

Last May, [McCain's] campaign and his doctors released nearly 1,200 pages of medical information, far more than the three other nominees. But the documents were released in a restricted way that leaves questions, even confusion, about his cancer.

A critical question concerns inconsistencies in medical opinions about the severity of his melanoma; if the classification of his melanoma is more severe, it would increase the statistical likelihood of death from a recurrence of the cancer.

Altman's article called for a fuller release of records from all four nominees in this election.  And while he concluded that McCain has released more pages of medical records than Obama, Biden, and Palin, he stressed the fact that McCain has been far more elusive about his health history with both the press and the public.  

As I have written previously, McCain released a relatively small portion of his health history this past May under suspiciously restrictive conditions.  He allowed only a select group of journalists (not including Altman) to view nearly 1,200 pages of medical records -- covering the years from 2000-2008 -- for just three hours, without use of photocopiers or cell phones.  This was a wholly insufficient means of examining medical records.  Though ironically, it was similar to how McCain controlled press access to his records in 1999, just before two melanomas were detected on him.  

Of course, Rove twisted Altman's findings in McCain's favor. Rove made the ludicrous comparison between McCain's 1,200 pages of medical records and the one page from Obama's doctor that declared the Democratic candidate to be in "excellent health."  He also raised concerns over records regarding the aneurysm Biden suffered in 1988.  

This is typical Rovian spin, coupled with a move straight out of the FOX playbook.  First, Bill O'Reilly cries foul over Brave New Pac's ad regarding McCain's medical records.  They compel other networks to censor the ad.  But rather than discussing McCain's health record secrecy, FOX merely objects to our ad and uses its impact as an excuse to go after Biden in a warped double standard.  

Make no mistake, I think all four candidates ought to come clean about their health, especially when two of them have histories of life-threatening ailments.  And I'm not the only one.  A CNN poll from earlier this month found that 47 percent of Americans question whether McCain could finish his first term, and actuarial math suggests McCain stands a 25 percent chance of not surviving a second one.  The reality is that McCain has been the least forthright and the least transparent about his records.  He continually goes out of his way to obfuscate his past, which Dr. Richard Sagebiel, co-director of the UCSF Melanoma Clinic, said leads us to wonder "What is he hiding?"  

Let's continue to make this an issue for McCain and his obvious friends at FOX.  We've obviously got them on the defensive here.  Sign the open letter to McCain and continue getting this video to all of your friends, especially the doctors with the expertise to weigh in on this crucial debate.

Digg!

Tagged as: health, cancer, john mccain, 2008 election, doctors, medical records, melanoma, brave new pac

ZP Heller is the editorial director of Brave New Films. He has written for The American Prospect, AlterNet, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and The Huffington Post, covering everything from politics to pop culture.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
ROVE > Ridiculous, Odious, Vain, Ectomorph?
Posted by: Knowmad on Oct 27, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sad little man is becoming what he's always feared more than anything else: an irrelevant embarrassment. Not to mention laughably misguided and out-of-touch, and a ridiculous buffoon to boot. In other words, the perfect Fox/GOP mouthpiece.

GObama!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Egotistical. Posted by: Lauren
Numbers
Posted by: charemor1 on Oct 27, 2008 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't anyone concerned with the sheer number of pages McCain released? Over 1200? What kind of healthy person has that many pages in his medical records?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Numbers Posted by: Lauren
No thanks.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 27, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd rather not stoop to the level of snooping about in someone's medical history. You can make a compelling argument for having to certify candidates physically well enough to be president, but then you'd have excluded folks like FDR, JFK, and other folks with severe medical complications that are under treatment the day the person assumes the presidency--not just a sneaking personal suspicion that a hyper-aggressive primary tumor excised eight years might have hanging out idle somewhere for the better part of a decade.

I'll vote for someone besides McCain because his policies make him unfit to be president, not because I think folks with prior cancers should be ineligible for the presidency. Do I suspect that the tone here would be different in Mrs. Clinton had been treated and released after suffering from breast or ovarian cancer? Do I suspect there would be restraint from demanding her mammograms or abdominal CT scans be posted on youtube for public consumption? Especially if she had been declared cancer-free by a doc a decade prior?

Yeah, but I mean, that's the hypocrisy that comes from putting politics above good sense. How do I know it's a hypocritical demand? Because I don't suspect anyone at all looking at this story would change their mind about John McCain even if you got the honor of sitting across from his excised tumors all the way up until Nov. 2. Really, tell truth! Even if you got to pet it and sing it song, how would it change your opinion?

There are plenty of reasons to disfavor McCain; I'll put his discretion over what medical records to make public, and for how long, at the very, very, very bottom of the list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No thanks. Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: No thanks. Posted by: lively56
Cancer? We're Concerned about That?
Posted by: sallyride on Oct 28, 2008 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it, "my friends" malignancies are usually growing for at least 10 years before they're diagnosed, but the most serious problems facing the world with another Bush have been going on for many decades - McCain is not a mentally healthy person. Yes, Palin is evidence of that - poor victim - but it wasn't because he's "not well", it's because he's "twisted-not well".

How on earth his spouse can stand there like a Stepford Wife filled with Botox and permit this to go on is beyond me - it reflects seriously on how they both perceive women, and "the least of those". Look around us: Laura, Cindy, Sarah, and those females showing up on CNN, The View, Fox, and all, screeching out - always on the defensive by throwing in someone else's name - for us to "just understand" McBlame, and realize "how much America loves Sarah" - they're desperate, but we better realize what desperate does.

Kind of reminds us of Betty Ford, and her running mate in the White House? Is it any cellular coincidence they both came down with breast cancer during that term? STRESS KILLS - like holding in pain, hurt, and torture! Do you remember who then died in a hotel bed with his mistress! No wonder Ms. Rockerfeller had breast cancer! He had been torturing her at a cellular level for years, and his wife before her. Believe it! (Why are we the sickest nation on earth? Because we support violence!).

Saints preserve us - this is worse today - WE'RE STILL LETTING IT HAPPEN!

We're grasping at straws, here. No, McBlame's health record will no more evidence his ability to serve Americans, but his actions to date are a RED FLAG, to all of us, and to the world.

At least, think about our children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why isn't Carl Rove in Jail
Posted by: mdharold on Oct 28, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't this man in jail? Why? He's been directly involved in war crimes and acts of treason. Why is he on talk shows? Why is he speaking at banking conventions? Why is he a commentator on Fox News?

Why isn't he in the docket at The Hague?

Why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Smarter?
Posted by: aonghus36 on Oct 28, 2008 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, Karl Rove is shrewder than 2,900 doctors.
Does that count? *kidding*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course! Karl Rove thinks he's smarter than 350 million Americans...
Posted by: Quannah on Oct 28, 2008 9:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's a side effect of DELUSION!

Wonder if he'll be smarter than the judge and jury and his new husband in the slammer???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]