Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why McCain is Betting Big on Pennsylvania

Posted by Chris Bowers, Open Left at 9:47 AM on October 22, 2008.


Here's why, when presented with a list of crappy choices, Pennsylvania is the best option for McCain.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Here is the McCain Pennsylvania targeting theory, as best as I can tell:


  1. McCain has to win a state where he is way down: Right now, McCain is more than 8.0% behind in states worth 277 electoral votes (the Kerry and / or Gore states plus Virginia). With only 270 needed to win, and 269 to tie, he has to target a state where he trails by more than 8%. That isn't even an option.



  2. Take a look at the 8% or more states: A quick glance at last week's polling from the 277 8% or more states (the Kerry and / or Gore plus Virginia states) doesn't show a pretty picture for McCain. A short list of states quickly emerges:































































    StateEV'sObama %McCain %Margin# Polls
    New Hampshire450.0%43.0%+7.0%1
    Virginia1351.8%43.8%+8.0%4
    Minnesota1051.3%41.3%+10.0%3
    New Mexico553.5%43.5%+10.0%2
    Pennsylvania2151.7%40.7%+11.0%3
    Wisconsin1051.0%39.3%+11.7%3



    If a state isn't listed here, then it is even worse for McCain. These six, crappy options are his only choices.




  3. Why not New Hampshire? McCain has did well in New Hampshire during the 2000 and 2004 primaries, and it is also the closest state here. So, why not New Hampshire? Because he needs to pick up at least nine electoral votes to crack the 277 8%+ Obama states, and New Hampshire is only worth 4.


  4. Why not Virginia?: Why doesn't McCain just target Virginia, which is worth enough electoral votes and closer than Pennsylvania? Because Virginia is the most early voting of all early voting states, with early voting starting one month ago. During that month, Obama has repeatedly and continually posted large leads in Virginia. By comparison, Pennsylvania has no early voting (except for no-fault absentee). Given that, compared to Virginia, a far lower percentage of the vote in Pennsylvania has already been cast, a 3% difference in polling doesn't really mean anything. Easier to come back from an 11% deficit with 3% of the vote in than a 8% deficit with 30% of the vote in.


  5. Why not Minnesota? Or Wisconsin? Or New Hampshire and New Mexico? Why shouldn't McCain just target a smaller, cheaper combination of states that reaches nine electoral votes, instead of Pennsylvania? The reason is Colorado, and it's nine electoral votes. While McCain only trails by 5% in Colorado, some estimates are that 50% of Colorado votes will be early votes. This means that McCain needs a way to overcome not only the 277, but potentially 277 + 9 (Colorado). The only state on this list that provides that sort of coverage is Pennsylvania.


So, when presented with a list of crappy choices, Pennsylvania is the best option for McCain. It's large size and lack of early voting provides McCain with potential time and a potential margin no other targeting strategy can. He has to win a state where he currently trails by 8% or more, and Pennsylvania is clearly the best option.


During this time, please ignore anything Ed Rendell says, as he is a long-time concern troll for Democrats (remember: he loves Rick Santorum,   Justice Alito, and Fox News, but hates Social Security). On top of it all, any trolling Governor in his position would write dozens of memos to cover his ass in the event of a Pennsylvania debacle. If, somehow, it all goes wrong, Rendell can at least say to Fox News "hey, I warned Obama to campaign more in Pennsylvania."



In summary, early voting and large poll deficits have forced McCain into a desperate play for Pennsylvania. There is basically no way it will work, but at least I will have a good way to rally the other committee people at our ward meeting on Thursday evening. That, and the World Series will unfortunately collide with the election now.




Oh, and any commenters (such as Jack Murtha) who might be tempted to say that McCain's strategy is also based on Pennsylvanians somehow being more racist than the rest of the country, please just shut up right now.

Digg!

Tagged as: mccain, colorado, new hampshire, pennsylvania


Franken-Coleman Update: Norm Returns To Senate As Non-Senator
Al Franken, has been declared the winner of the Minnesota contest but has yet to be sworn in as court battles continue.
Post by Ryan Grim. January 21, 2009.
A Bar Stool View of This Moment in American History
Some reactions to Obama's inauguration speech (which, yes, I watched in a bar).
Post by Joshua Holland. January 20, 2009.
Franken-Coleman Recount: How Far Will It Go?
Will Norm be able to take this all the way to the conservative-controlled US Supreme Court?
Post by Phoenix Woman. January 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Gov Rendell
Posted by: boing007 on Oct 22, 2008 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't like him. Can't the Democratic party do
better than him for governor of the State of
Pennsylvania?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fast Eddie Rendell Posted by: socialpsych
» RE: Fast Eddie Rendell Posted by: Inlander
Accuracy
Posted by: ebmeyer6w on Oct 23, 2008 2:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pennsylvania is not an early voting state. Is this indicative of the standards of accuracy adopted in the entire article?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Accuracy Posted by: cary
The good news
Posted by: socialpsych on Oct 23, 2008 3:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that Obama signs are suddenly popping up all over Pennsylvania. There is hope that the racist motive in hinterland PA will be soundly defeated (note to Mr. Bowers: I for one will NOT shut up about racism in PA--it's an embarrassing reality).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The good news Posted by: Inlander
» RE: The good news Posted by: socialpsych
OK: It's not just racism
Posted by: taxidriver on Oct 23, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in PA, in a rural area. Yes, there's prejudice (I see Confederate flags flying from houses in the woods, and they're a popular feature on pickup trucks). But rural PA can also be provincial and is inherently conservative. There's a fear here of outsiders, of anyone who's "different."

McCain is an angry old White guy, but that's a big demographic here (I think PA has the 2nd or 3rd highest average age, behind Florida and West Virginia, if I remember right).

So McCain has a slim chance because this state's demographics and its conservative nature (at least in rural areas) do favor him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PA
Posted by: frank69 on Oct 23, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, I remember that Rick Santorum "just couldn't lose." Why, hello Senator Casey!
And on November 5th we'll be saying "hello President-elect Obama."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The fix
Posted by: willymack on Oct 23, 2008 5:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep in mind that the rethugs have gotten away with election fraud TWICE because of our clueless citizenry and gutless "congress". It would be foolish not to expect extra-dirty tricks this time around as well. Two well-qualified men in the persons of investigative journalist Greg Palast, and voter advocate Robert Kennedy jr. have spelled out exactly how it will be brought about, again. Pick up the Oct. 27th issue of The Nation and see what I'm talking about. The only question on my mind is this: If mcnut, despite all evidence to the contrary, pulls off a miraculous eleventh hour "win", will our people let it slide yet again,or take to the streets in a giantic protest and nationwide strike. I seriously doubt we have it in us to do the latter. All the backbone seems to have been taken from us by successive rethug regimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I expect PA to go to McCrazy
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 23, 2008 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up in NE PA and those people are positively batshit stoopid. I was lucky to escape that craptastic culture. I remember the daily beatings between 6th and 8th grades because I was "different" (I have Tourette's)... such good times.

I'd listen to the other PA folks who still live there who posted above. They're 100% spot-on.

One parent still lives in the Poconos. She put an Obama sticker on her car and it got the baseball bat treatment with "N****r-lover" spray painted on it. It was a brand new econobox too and she was so proud of herself that she'd bought it with cash. Her insurance company refused to total it citing the civil unrest clause.... fuckers.

Meanwhile my Xtian fundie parent (Lancaster, PA--where Eden surely was located 'way back and where the New Jerusalem is fated to come to rest once JAY-zis comes through the clouds on his might steed to kill all the ungodly libruls and joooz) is proudly flying the McCrap-Pallid sticker and is confident his god will deliver the USA from the "n*gras."

That's just how PA rolls, people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]