Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Tonight's Debate: Schieffer, Obama, and McCain's Manhood

Posted by Booman, Booman Tribune at 7:01 AM on October 15, 2008.


The topic of discussion for the third-debate will be domestic issues and, chief among them, the economy.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

I'm glad Bob Schieffer is looking forward to moderating tonight's debate. I like Bob Schieffer. I don't watch Face the Nation, but that's because it is only a half an hour long, and I prefer the hour-long format. When I do see Schieffer in action, I generally like what I see. Schieffer is annoying in the exact same ways that all contemporary political pundits are annoying, but less so.

The first debate was at podiums and the second debate was townhall-style. Tonight's debate will be the sit-down variety, where the moderator and the two candidates share a table. I like the fact that the three debates are done in three different styles because it gives the voter a variety of perspectives by testing the candidates in different ways.

The sit-down style of debate is the most intimate and is generally thought to be the least conducive for personal attacks. There are several psychological reasons, for both the candidates and the viewing audience, why this is thought to be the case. It's much harder to level a personal attack at someone's face than it is when you are directing your remarks to a camera, a studio audience, or the moderator. From the viewer's point-of-view, it is perceived as rude to insult someone with whom you are sharing a table. For these reasons, sit-down debates tend to be both more chatty and more amiable. It won't be possible for McCain to repeat his performance from debate one, where he refused to acknowledge Obama's presence. And if he tries to repeat his stunt from debate two, referring to Obama as 'that one', it will come off very badly, indeed.

The topic of discussion for the third-debate will be domestic issues and, chief among them, the economy. That doesn't mean that Schieffer won't address any current issues in the campaign, though. There could be questions about William Ayers or ACORN or Sarah Palin's violations of the law or the thuggish behavior of the McCain-Palin supporters. Unfortunately for McCain, the format is not conducive to advancing his recent lines of attack. In a sense, the McCain-Palin efforts have been aimed at dehumanizing Obama, making him out to be mysterious, foreign, and radically out of the mainstream. But there is nothing more humanizing than sitting down at a table and having a chat about important issues.

If you've watched much in the way of Sunday morning political programs, you've probably noticed that senators tend to maintain a respectful decorum when you sit them down next to each other. It goes with the culture of the institution in which they serve. This common courtesy can be frustrating to partisans, but any breach in that protocol is jarring. People expect senators to disagree, but respectfully.

These circumstances put John McCain in quite a spot. His manhood has repeatedly been called into question, including by Barack Obama himself. As a result, John McCain has promised to bring up the issue of William Ayers, even though it can in no sense serve his interests to do so. This will be, after all, a debate that is largely focused on the economy and other pressing domestic issues. If McCain is very lucky, Bob Schieffer will raise the issue himself and give McCain an excuse to defend his honor by maliciously savaging the honor of his opponent. If Schieffer does not provide McCain with a natural in to bring up the wholly irrelevant Ayers, McCain will be compelled to shoehorn the issue into an answer to a question that is totally unrelated.

Either way, McCain will have to perform some kind of Jedi mind-trick to avoid giving the impression that he is an insufferable, out-of-touch, grumpy sore loser when he talks about William Ayers. And the same can be said of almost all of his campaign-trail talking points. McCain will score no points for rudeness, and he'll be eviscerated for passivity. He's painted himself into a box and the format allows for no easy route of egress.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, simply needs to maintain the high road. What could be easier than that?

Digg!

Tagged as: debate, obama, mccain, shieffer

Booman is the proprietor of the Booman Tribune.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
History Buff
Posted by: Mike U. on Oct 15, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although the topic of tonight's debate is about domestic issues, I would like to see somehow one question about Iraq submitted: Will you stop paying $100,000 in Amercian dollars to the tribal leaders and $300 per month to the Shiite and Sunni militia NOT TO ATTACK U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: History Buff Posted by: VZEQICVA
» we should be paying them more Posted by: hurricane hugo