Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush 2000 = Palin 2008

Posted by Faiz Shakir, Think Progress at 2:00 PM on October 4, 2008.


Watch the eerie similarities.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

On MSNBC, Countdown aired a video compilation showing the similarity in rhetoric between George W. Bush in 2000 and Sarah Palin in 2008. Keith Olbermann reported that “the people around [Palin] — the top-level campaign staffers crafting her message of change and reform — are almost all from the inner-circle of the same Bush campaigns and administration from which she offers that change.” He concluded, “Small surprise then that even in the very act of claiming her background, her experience qualify her to offer us that change from Bush, she does so sounding almost exactly like Bush.”

Progressive Accountability put together its own Bush-Palin video compilation earlier today. Check it out here.

Digg!

Tagged as: george bush, sarah palin

Faiz Shakir is the Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Editor of ThinkProgress.org and The Progress Report.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hoohah for the Video Age!
Posted by: zipper696 on Oct 5, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not so long ago we would have had only a written record of these fakers to compare. Now we can see the limited pallette with which The Alaskan Breeder's handlers have crafted her parrotted responses.

Let's not worry about McCain being "4 more years" - if this airhead get's into office we could face TWELVE more years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama campaign ad?
Posted by: carlos63 on Oct 6, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't this being presented as an Obama campaign ad?

I am Barack Obama and I approve this ad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do ya' think they picked her?!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 6, 2008 9:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin was the perfect pick for the McCain campaign, because she IS George Bush, in panties. She is and will be the same pathologically narcissistic, clueless, easily-duped self-promoter that is Bush, and thus just as easy to manipulate by the real powers in America: Rove, Cheney, and their financial elite/neocon cabal.

McCain/Palin is an absolute, iron-clad, gold-plated guarantee that nothing will change–– except, perhaps, that America will cease to exist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And we thought
Posted by: modeler on Oct 7, 2008 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that Dubyas stupidity was without match?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]