Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Was Israel Justified?

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 3:10 PM on July 18, 2006.


That is the (misleading) question...
israeli children send missiles
Image of Israeli children autographing warheads from Beirut blogger EDB.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Echo Chamber in your
mailbox!

 

My mom called last night to tentatively ask: "But do you think Israel is justified?" She knew the answer but didn't have the words.

Which is the genius of good framing. You ask a question in a way that forces even your opposition to be conflicted about identifying as the opposition.

A recent Israeli poll asked, among other questions, whether "[the] aerial campaign in Lebanon is justified," according to the Washington Post (The raw data isn't available). 90% of Israelis agreed that it was.

But the question leaves little wiggle room. What if a person believes that a targeted and extremely careful aerial campaign is "justified"? And what if a person is pissed at Hezbollah's attack and capture of Israeli officers but doesn't agree with Israel's response at all? That person is apt to put a check in the justified box too.

The same question dominates U.S. news coverage. Israel regularly employs...

American P.R. agencies to help shape American public opinion as well as its own but there are so many avenues of information-sharing at this point between the two nations that the meme could've originated in any number of places...

The better question, the question, is: did Israel do the smart thing, the right thing?

The answer to that question is, of course, no.

The crux of the problem is the belief that problems can be solved by barreling in and destroying the enemy. Screw history, screw the fact that the enemy was created by a former mistaken belief in the problem-solving capabilities of violence itself.

Hamas and Hezbollah are both direct outgrowths of Israeli militarism. Hell, Hamas was nurtured by Israel.

Internal politics being what they are, however, Olmert almost has to be even more of a musclehead than Sharon whose militaristic chops were never in question. It'd be like questioning Cheney's devotion to regime change. Some things are a given.

So Israel pummels Lebanon swinging wildly like a bear at a beehive (again, of the well over 200 casualties only a fraction have been military and only a fraction of those are Hezbollah). It has the ill-considered odor of our very own Iraq War.

Al Qaeda couldn't topple us in a million years with arms yet they lured the most deficient among us -- in this case our leadership -- to lunge at them, in the process creating the monster they said we were before the eyes of much of the Arab world.

Israel wasn't threatened by Hezbollah (Iranian missiles or no). Lebanon's government was comprised of a fragile fabric of primarily three ethnicities (a sort of ethnic separation of powers). Fragile but with hope. Israel's lunge at Hezbollah, far from making the population rethink their tolerance of the militant group, has forced many to embrace them -- if only temporarily as the only hope for repelling Israeli attack.

The U.S., the U.N., the E.U. and other acronyms more or less sit on their hands. As Juan Cole says, "Peacekeeping is a ways off. The Israelis will fight their war first."

Of nations of enemies, Cole writes:

A wise Great Power can walk back such bad situations, as the US did in Europe and Japan after World War II. Unwise Powers get stuck with the Tar Baby.
Perhaps Israel's next Tar Baby will come from one of the nearly one million Lebanese refugees, many of whom are fleeing by the bomb-strewn road to Syria.

**For some comic relief, go HERE

(JuanCole)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Digg!

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.


Peace in Lebanon -- now!
The USA has a moral obligation to resolve the conflict raging in Lebanon and rest of the Middle East -- and it can.
Post by Rep. Dennis Kucinich. July 24, 2006.
President Bush sent me an internet
Democrat v. Democratic and the Iraq War
Post by Evan Derkacz. July 24, 2006.
A new kind of money
Today's money is based on the belief that it's worth something. Crazy, no? Why not back your dollar in sustainable energy produced in your hometown?
Post by Julian Darley. July 20, 2006.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RESPONSE
Posted by: zack1 on Jul 18, 2006 4:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I CANT BELIEVE HOW A PERSON CAN BE SO IGNORANT AS TO TAKE YOUR OPINION AS THAT OVER A TERRORIST SUPPPORTER. AS FAR AS SAYING THAT ISRAEL GOING TOO FAR IN LEBANON AND THAT THAY ARE USING EXTREME FORCE....... LETS TRY TO REALIZE WHO WERE DEALING WITH. HEZBOLLAH,IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION WHO CORRUPTS THE MIND OF THE YOUNG AND INNOCENT. THEY DONT CARE ABOUT LEBANON IN THEIR QUEST TO DESTROY ISRAEL. THEY ARE HIDING OUT IN THE CIVILIAN POPULATION IN ORDER FOR THEM TO BE TARGETED AND IGNORANTS LIKE YOU TO SO STUPIDLY BRING THEM RECOGNITION AS RESISTANCE FIGHTERS. AS FAR AS USING DIPLOMACY TO BRING ABOUT PEACE, IT WOULD TAKE NO BRAIN CELLS TO REALIZE THAT HEZBOLLAH IS NOT AFTER PEACE AND THAT THEY DONT CARE IF THEY WIN THE WAR AS LONG AS THEYR CREATIN CHAOS. TO KIDNAP 2 SOLDIERS AND THEN SAY THAT THIS CAN BE RESOLVED BY SITTING DOWN IS ABSURD. THERE WILL NEVER BE PEACE IN THAT REGION DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEYVE NEVER RECOGNIZED ISRAELS RIGHT TO EXIST, AND EVEN IF THEY LAY DOWN THEIR ARMS ITLL ONLY BE A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE THEY CAN FIND ANOTHER SPREADER OF HATE AND STABILITY, AS YOURSELF, TO GIVE THEM ANY SENSE OF REASON AND JUSTICE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» turn off your CAPS LOCK Posted by: aurora2484
» you're right, i know Posted by: aurora2484
» No censorship is good Posted by: Citizendeane
War is INSANITY!!
Posted by: aurora2484 on Jul 18, 2006 5:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Insanity, barbarism

the entire world LOSES!!!!!!!

Hell, even Sharon would have organized some sort of prisoner exchange.

and did I say insanity? -
--- Total Insanity!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is WHAT justified???
Posted by: aurora2484 on Jul 18, 2006 5:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shovel the fancy words such as "reprisals", "strikes" and even "infrastructure".

Here are the words of someone writing from Lebanon:

"Today, Lebanon is being forced toward total ruin. If Israel's intent is just to destroy Hezbollah, then why are they bombing Christian and Sunni neighborhoods and towns? Why did Israel wait until July 15 to bomb Hezbollah's headquarters in Beirut, making sure to first bomb power plants, bridges and roads throughout the entire country? Israel's clear intent is to trash this entire country, smash everything that makes Lebanon a modern nation, and demolish all of the work the Lebanese have done over the last fifteen years to rebuild their country.

"As Lebanon is ravaged, U.S. President George Bush loudly and proudly asserts Israel's right to "self-defense." (5)

"As Lebanon is ravaged, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rica announces that Israel should continue bombing to "reduce the threat" from Hezbollah. (6)

"Do Arabs possess the right to defend themselves from Israel?

"As Lebanon is laid to waste, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has secured himself newfound adulation within Israel. Everyone apparently loves a killer. (7)

"As Lebanon is destroyed, Olmert has announced that he will refuse to meet with a UN delegation attempting to secure a cease-fire (8), George Bush has publicly refused to call for a cease-fire (9), and the United States is blocking other nations on the Security Council from calling for a cease-fire (10). "
refs at link
www.commondreams.org/views06/0717-23.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This planet is governed by cretins!
Posted by: aurora2484 on Jul 18, 2006 6:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The two most powerful nations on the planet are ruled by little boys playing "I've gotta WAR an it makes me feel BIG"

Having his very own WAR conferred legitimacy to one kid on the block, so he went after a second one. While we were all fed Terry Shiavo on TV - people agonisingly debating keeping someone "alive" by machine, the decision was made to take the lives of Hundreds of Thousand!! Can you say "Hypocrisy"? Can you say "Racism"?

More than 2,000 people are being killed every month in that war that slipped through on Schiavo's life-support machine.

Does anyone give a stuff?

Oh yeah -- the other kid-on-the block says, "Well, if it worked for georgie boy, must be somethng in it" and in turn goes blowing up babies just for the freaking hell of it. Congrats boys -- You have won big time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Is Allowed To Defend Herself?
Posted by: Winston Smith on Jul 18, 2006 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, Israel has a right to defend herself. On the other hand...

Hypocritically, in the neo-orwellian neo-con world of the Bush/Cheney junta, the Palestinian people are NOT allowed to defend themselves!

* The Israeli war machine is provided over $3 Billion in US Military Aide per annum. Israel is permitted to violate UN resolutions with impunity-- whilst Arab nations which do so are condemned.

* The Palestinians have been punished via the deprivation of their water, electricity, and, food sources (and, medical supplies) destroyed by the Israeli government. Moreover, the Palestinians have been ghettoized into little prisons by the hateful Apartheid Wall.

* Israel violates the borders of the Palestinian people. And, Israel murders over 3-4 times the number of civilians over the number of Israelis killed by Palestinians.

Yet, the Palestinians are condemned by Israel's proxy-government in the Bush/Cheney/Rove/Rice White House.

No longer does the US even try to play an honest broker-- which is why the Middle East is on the brink of WW3. For the Arabs do not wish to be wiped-out enmasse. And, chillingly, Johnny-boy "Kiss-Up, Kick-Down" Bolton basically says that the lives of Lebanese, for example, are not as valuable as Israeli lives-- that there is no moral equivalence between the killing of Palestinians versus the killing of Israelis.

Under the Reign of Terror by the Mad King George Bush-- only pro-Israeli propaganda is fed to the sheepish American public. And, those who speak-out about the tragic plight of the Palestinian people are mis-characterized & mendaciously maligned as "anti-semitic" (although many conscientious Jewish people, including "Jews for Peace" also despise the corrupt Bush regime & the ultra-right-wing war-mongers in the Israeli regime).

Intimidating us all into silence in order to control the debate about the complexity of the on-going violence between Israel and her neighbors, is the objective of the neo-con cabal of crooks who have hijacked our nation.

Meanwhile, who is looking out for the American people's best interest? NOT the Bush/Cheney gang-- nope, instead, they take their orders from the Knesset vis-a-vis Mideast policy.

Truth be told:-- there are honest grievances by Israel's neighbors, as well as by Israel herself-- and, this war-of-aggression waged by a powerful Israel against her weaker neighbors, when studied in depth, reveals the cold, hard reality:-- that Palestinians & Arabs are also trying to defend themselves from annihialation by the Israelis.

Who is allowed to defend herself?

According to the neo-orwellian neo-cons:-- ONLY Israel-- NO ONE else-- not even Americans... That's scary!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» YOU ARE WRONG!! Posted by: lordzombie
» The pronoun tells the tale Posted by: jstillwater
ISRAEL HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HERSELF!
Posted by: charlieparisek on Jul 18, 2006 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah.

And if you dare to shout at me, I have the right to kill you and your family.

Yeah.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No, the right question is, "Should Israel do it again under similar circumstances"?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jul 18, 2006 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the answer is that Israel doesn't give a damn what our answer to that question is because those of us not on the scene are the peanut gallery, cheering and booing, like a bunch of fans at a wrestling match.

I think it's quaint and homey that Derkacz's mother still talks to him and even asks for his opinion. She listens. I'd advise her to seek a second opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm glad at least there is some clear reflection in this mire
Posted by: fifthworld on Jul 18, 2006 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet I can't believe there are postings here "defending" poor fascist Israeli Likkudniks and twisting arguments on who started what and who is the threat and must be stopped. You've got a big jack-boot on my neck and I haven't eaten in a month, and the press is saying I'm a threat to world stability.

Stop Israeli war crimes now. Stop the Israeli genocides and the god-damned media's push for "world war III" oh joy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Smart and justified often overlap
Posted by: brunowe on Jul 19, 2006 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Say, instead of hitting Beirut airport and the port of Tripoli that Israel had simply stuck with the blockade--stating that they will search ships for any military supplies and seize those. That would accomplish the effect of interdicting supplies and would send a message to the Lebanese govt. without the same level of civilian casualties. Likewise, instead of massive bombing raids, they did just enough to take out some emplacements and then did some quick insertions by ground forces to grab a dozen of so Hezbollah partisans to trade for the two Israelis.

That would be a proportionate response, there would likely have been fewer civilizan casualties.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Israel Is Its Own Worst Nightmare
Posted by: thinkingsooner on Jul 19, 2006 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember Poland when Germany invaded? The only thing the Lebanese lack is a mounted cavalry. They are virtually defenseless.

Israel has morphed into the very thing that drove them out of Germany in the first place. They are the Gestapo to the puppeteer US Third Reich!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LESSONS UNLEARNED
Posted by: chanceny on Jul 19, 2006 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel seems not to have learned a damned thing by watching the victory we have been achieving in Iraq. Our 'shock and awe' campaign was so successful, notwithstanding the lack of the promised candy and flowers, that we have endeared ourselves to countless Arabs and Muslims. Our use of force was so over the top considering the already weakened state Iraq had become in the 10+ years after "Gulf War 1" and the sanctions imposed. Even considering all that, look where we are now! Killing, dying, destroying infrastructure, eliminating hope for employment, engendering more animosity for America in that part of the world for decades to come. And 'winning' anything, other than a new haven for insurgents of all stripes and better P R for the all-but-forgotten Osama BinLaden, will never happen. Just as the US, led into this morass of hell by the greedy, insolent, arrogant, inept, ill-mannered embarrassment of a 'president', has reaped hatred upon us, will Israel attain the same legacy with their actions that, even unintentionally, kill innocents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple answer, "not justified"
Posted by: Citizendeane on Jul 19, 2006 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The proper question:"Hitler committed war crimes; does Israel?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hezboallah and the Devil
Posted by: rafey on Jul 19, 2006 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should not forget that this organization is the one and only legitamate provider of social services (health, education and welfare) in the nation and represent nearly half the population of the country. It is possible ... just possible ... that they are reacting to Israel's (and the U.S.s') response to the Democratically elected govt. of the Palestinians in which the Palestinians were systematically starved into submission because ... well, just because we don't like them. While there is no question that they represent the extremist POV, military response to this kind of action has NEVER, EVER worked and NEVER, NEVER, EVER, EVER will! If that is as creative as we can get, then there is no chance for a futurefor any of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

madashell
Posted by: abby on Jul 19, 2006 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're Jewish, aren't you? It doesn't matter how long you've been here - for life perhaps, or what this country and its people have done for you, when it comes down to making a choice, you will choose Israel every time over the US. Of course, you don't want to live there - too dangerous. And the US keeps dumping its millions of dollars of taxpayer money on Israel, who has illegal nuclear arms and has never been punished by the UN because the US vetoed it. It's actually funny to see the Jews in bed with the Christian fundamentalists and pushing up the rhetoric about that funny stuff that Bush believes in--like getting taken up in the air to J.C. before armageddon. But the funniest part of all is that the scriptures also say that those who have not accepted J.C. (Jews maybe?) will be slain. Oh, well, the Jews don't believe that anyway.....but Bush does!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» feel better now? Posted by: aurora2484
nanna
Posted by: nanna on Jul 19, 2006 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let the last commentor calm down a bit. You seem hysterical. I asked the question and I agree with the answer.
mom

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nanna Posted by: nanna
An Eye for an Eye makes the whole world blind....
Posted by: Lillith on Jul 19, 2006 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ghandi......we need you

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JUst a thought
Posted by: davewuxi on Jul 19, 2006 7:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if Israel would have reacted as she has if she did not have the unwavering and fawning support of the US government and the sense that anyone who might wish to criticise her could immediately be accused of 'anti-semitism' and, so, silenced?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JUst a thought Posted by: Lillith
Who's in charge?
Posted by: mom'z the word on Jul 20, 2006 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when is it necessary to jusify doing the right thing? Since when has it become necessary to ask permission to make peace? As near as I can tell the only time justification of an act is necessary is when it is going to cause someone harm, impose on someone else's free will, take away choice,or deny someone's right to be. It is always necessary when doing a wrong, bad, unjustified, illegal, unlawful act against humanity to get the masses to agree it is o.k. Making laws makes everything o.k.


Criminals can make laws because there is no law preventing them from doing it. Lawlessness and chaos exist in a society where laws are written to make wrongdoing right. And I will say it again, there is no right way to do the wrong thing. Making a law does not make it right. It may make it legal but that still does not make it right. Defending oneself is proper and necessary. What we did in Iraq and what Israel is doing in Lebannon and Palestine is wrong. There is no if, and, or buts about it. However, the truth of the matter is we are not concerned with right or wrong, good or bad, we are only concerned with legal. This attitude is going to get everyone killed. War is going to be justified and standard operating procedure. The Patriots Act is a prime example of how you legalize wrong doing.

Unless of course, moms, dads, people with some common sense, just refuse to listen to a bunch of crack pots and take the law into their own hands by refusing to kill on command. We do not need permission to stop fighting. We do not need permission to declare peace. We do not need permission to do the right thing. You just do it. Doing something wrong, bad, and dispictable on the other hand needs a lot of justification and convincing. Listen to who is doing all the talking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: kattmanduu
Posted by: PEEK on Jul 20, 2006 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, this is an excellent example of an antisemitic rant as well.

Thanks for this nearly over-the-top parody of a jew-hating fool. Really, for a minute there I was laughing at your idiocy and then I realized you were just slyly showing how entirely ahistorical and juvenile this point of view is.

Keep up the good work!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sofla100
Posted by: sofla100 on Jul 20, 2006 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, here is what I say and many in the Arab world. ISRAEL IS A TERRORIST STATE. It grabs thousands of Palestinians and other Arabs and imprisons them for years without trial. Then it goes beserk when somebody or another captures a couple of its soldiers. It's vaunted Mosaad tortures, kidnaps and murders people all the time. It has hundreds of nuclear weapons and its military is largely a creation of the USA. It's an apartheid nation, millions of Palestinians live in squalor while the Israeli's live in air-conditioned large homes. It won't give Palestinians the vote of course, as the "character of the Jewish state would be no more." Well Israel, it did not work in South Africa and its not going to work for you. The best answer is for Iran to probably get nukes - why, because then, and only then, will you stop the land grabs, the torturing and murdering, and be forced to work for real peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sofla100 Posted by: PEEK
ISRAEL: THE RIGHT TO EXIST AS CONCEIVED AND ACT
Posted by: michaelo on Jul 22, 2006 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To keep it simple - please go to:
http://blog.radioleft.com/blog/ _archives/2006/7/18/2138315.html

NO SPACES

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RETURN TO ZION
Posted by: uneeq on Jul 24, 2006 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq invades Kuwait and the world – the western world – is up in arms. Israel invades Lebanon. Silence. Which makes sense for anyone whose “consent has yet to be manufactured” by the western media and who understands that silence – that is, little or no condemnation against the IDF, is tacit if not apologetic approval of the murderous slaughter they conduct against innocent Lebanese human beings.

This conflict began in 1948. And it is - for those who can “see” – a Zionist war against Arab-Islam nationalism. Would Israel exist if it weren’t for US funding, support and approval? No. Therefore, when the Palestinians elected Hamas as their democratic government, the US – and its satellite state – Israel, had to make them pay. So the IDF kidnapped a Palestinian doctor and his brother two weeks prior to Hezbollah kidnapping two Israeli soldiers. And let us not forget that Israel holds up to 10,000 Lebanese and Palestinian prisoners, most of whom without charge.

Bang! Israel had the perfect pretext to enter Lebanon and bomb it into smithereens.

But who cares? I mean, Israel – according to the UN and international law – which the US does not recognise, has held the Palestinian people hostage for almost 60 years. It is a fact that Palestine is now the largest prison on earth. I wonder how an element like Hezbollah, Hamas – or any other “terrorist” group - could ever have been spawned under such democratic, egalitarian and humanistic conditions?

I wonder how those who try to live in their own country are termed “terrorists” just in order to survive. If anyone bothered to compare and contrast a map of Palestine between 1948 and 2006, one would clearly see the slow genocide of a culture, tradition, race, nation and a people perpetuated by a world not interested in peace. Palestine – and now this “war” in Lebanon – if that is what a sane person can call it – is a by-product, a creation of Western hegemony in a region on earth the West just does not understand or control. And who pays for this?

This will only end – based on current western foreign policy – with a return to Zion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE UNITED STATES OF ISRAEL
Posted by: uneeq on Jul 24, 2006 8:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel is America's satellite state that performs one of two tasks:

1) Acts as a destabilising force in the Middle-East that ensures its resources are easily acquired by the West

2) Maintains the US stranglehold against pan Arab-Islam nationalism

In short, without Israel, the world’s greatest hegemon would be powerless to allow the Middle-East to be that just that - the Middle-East - to control its own affairs and destiny.

Hence, the power struggle, violence and spread of "terrorism" throughout the world are a by-product of western imperialism. Ironic, then, that the West has created its own "Frankenstein" and then blames Frankenstein for existing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is Iraq anyway?
Posted by: uneeq on Jul 24, 2006 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I often wonder where humanity has imploded today. I wonder how much of the world can allow nations to be usurped and imperialised without a hint of disgust and rebellion. But I guess those in power – the hegemons and their satellite acolytes – have manufactured our consent so much that we lie comatose in a disillusioned and numb state.

A case in point is Iraq. Who owns Iraq? The Iraqi people or some other entity? History books tell us modern-day Iraq was formed by the British. What those books fail to mention was that it was formed by the British so they could control its vast potential resources. Not to mention acting as Kuwait’s protector and overload.

But why should history books - or for that matter historians – care about such trivial information? Why should we care about the fact that Clive Churchill called Arabs “sand niggers” too mentally deficient to look after their own lands?

He must have been right. For look at Iraq today. Pillaged and plundered. A nation once run by a despotic tyrant who – and it doesn’t matter - was backed by the CIA in a coup to overthrow a democratically elected government some 40 years ago. But like I said, who really cares?

The fact that he was supported by the worlds greatest sponsor of state terrorism should be a foot-note void of mention. That he was supplied weapons of mass destruction as well as biological weapons should raise no eyebrows. That he used these weapons against Iranians and Kurds should not bother historians either. And why should it?

I mean, despite all these “facts”, Iraq did prosper as the most advanced of all Arab states. It had the highest literacy rate; the lowest infant mortality rate and perhaps the best education system as woman were allowed to attend University throughout the country. Need I also mention the fact that Iraq had a free and expansive health system? Why bother when it no longer exists?

And why, God forbid, should Iraq try to develop its own nuclear reactor – an idea foreign to the rest of the world? A neighbouring country, I heard, with the tacit approval of “someone”, flew one day into Iraq and blew it to smithereens! Did anyone say anything? No and why should they?



And then one day, the Western-backed and supported ruler of Iraq did something his master did not approve. Not that the things he did before were wrong – which is irrelevant mind you. He overstepped the mark and invaded poor Kuwait. Actually not really “poor” as it was a British-cum-US client state that needed to be herded away from Saddam’s hands. It was said that the West would not tolerate any nation invading another nation – ever!

Interesting rhetoric. I do recall a little nation by the name of Nicaragua and another called Panama. Real threats to world peace the papers screamed. Thank God America came to the rescue. And remember 9/11? No, I don’t mean 2001. Chile, 1973?

Anyway, these are insignificant moments in history. So please forget that I mentioned them. Because the rest of the world – apart from a few “conspiracy” theorists - have neither the time nor inclination to re-write history for the sake of historical fact and truth.

Like they say, peace is bad for business. Maybe this is why there is so much pre-emptive war today? Maybe it’s enacted to protect not people but resources and industry. But let’s be frank, why would oil be so important to a few businessmen who run Western governments? How could oil – and gas –motivate a few people to ruin the lives of others? But this is only a conspiracy theory void of merit, intellect, validity and common sense.

What was I thinking? Maybe that is the problem. Thinking.

So where is Iraq anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Perfect Pretext
Posted by: uneeq on Jul 24, 2006 9:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost 400 Lebanese have died - mostly civilians - at the hands of an indiscriminate and psychotically-deranged Israeli army and government. How can any “democratic” state justify such an inhumane act against defenceless people? No civilised person can argue that the capture of two Israeli soldiers – let us not mention the fact Israel kidnapped a Lebanese doctor and his brother two weeks before and also the fact that 9,000 Lebanese and Palestine prisoners, including woman and children, languish in Israeli prisons – can justify bombing a country?

But if we look deeper, we can see the reasons why. Water. Israel needs water and will do anything – using any fabricated pretext – to grab more land and hence take water from the Latini River. The second is that Israel is trying to finish a job it did not complete in 1982 – and that is to annex southern Lebanon and install an Israeli-US friendly regime. And the third and underlying reason is a call to Zionism. Extreme Zionists believe that “Greater Israel” extends from Syria to Cyprus. And this goal is slowly but surely coming to fruition. Even if it is at the expense of innocent humans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]