Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Updated: Feverish speculation about an October Surprise.

Posted by Joshua Holland at 9:45 AM on April 25, 2006.


It's what they do, right?
october
october

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Echo Chamber in your
mailbox!

 

Over in Peek, Melissa touched on the piece former White House Counsel John Dean had on Findlaw (I got it via The Smirking Chimp) predicting an October Surprise by the Bush administration as it tries to rescue an embattled GOP:

If anyone doubts that Bush, Cheney, Rove and their confidants are planning an "October Surprise" to prevent the Republicans from losing control of Congress, then he or she has not been observing this presidency very closely.
What will that surprise be? It's the most closely held secret of the Administration.
How risky will it be? Bush is a whatever-it-takes risk-taker, the consequences be damned.
Dean throws out a few ideas. Maybe they'll replace Dick Cheney with someone palatable like Rudy Giuliani. Yes, but I don't think that would be enough to do the trick. Perhaps the administration can achieve a grand coalition of "great powers" that will present a united front against Iranian nukes. But diplomacy? Nah. Anyway, Russia seems set against escalating our pissing match. Of course, he adds, there's always the option of starting another war. I just pray Dean's wrong on that one.

"If there is no 'October Surprise,'" he writes, I would be shocked."

Ok, I think it's a bit early, but I'll play along.

My first thought is immigration. But I'm very (very) doubtful the Senate's going to pass anything on that front, and if they do the Tancredo wing in the House is going to make reconciliation a nightmare. Today, the WaPo had a piece about how Bush was pressing for a deal to be struck by Memorial Day, but he doesn't want to take the lead on any specific measure, only to have it die later (that'd be a waste of political capital, see?). They only have 71 legislative days on the calendar and tthe Republicans who set the legislative agenda are themselves way too divided on the issue. Plus, if they were to pass something, whatever it is, it would make some constituency really unhappy.

Of course, they don't need to actually enact any real reforms. They can do something showy. Joshua Bolten, the new Whitehouse Chief of Staff may have tipped the strategy in his "five point plan" to rejuvenate Bush's limp presidency. The very first point, according to Time, is:

DEPLOY GUNS AND BADGES. This is an unabashed play to members of the conservative base who are worried about illegal immigration. Under the banner of homeland security, the White House plans to seek more funding for an extremely visible enforcement crackdown at the Mexican border, including a beefed-up force of agents patrolling on all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). "It'll be more guys with guns and badges," said a proponent of the plan. "Think of the visuals. The President can go down and meet with the new recruits. He can go down to the border and meet with a bunch of guys and go ride around on an ATV."
Are photo ops on the border and some arrests going to be enough? I wonder. They've stirred up the passions on this issue very well. Perhaps too well for Bush to go down to the border, play cowboy for the media and call it a day.

There's a lot of talk about doing whatever it takes to keep a disgruntled Republican base from staying home -- abortion, gay marriage, flag-burning -- the usual.

But I'm going to go with gas prices, because I think those social issues are going to get a lot less traction with gas costs at $3.50 a gallon. There's not all that much they can do in such a short window -- the prices are high because of Bush's saber-rattling towards Iran, a touchy situation in Nigeria and because domestic refining capacity hasn't fully recovered from Katrina. But there is one thing they can do: flip-flop. Bush promised never to tap the Strategic Oil Reserve except in a genuine crisis, but I think I saw Karl Rove standing behind him with his fingers crossed.

Thoughts?

**Update: Earlier today, the administration ordered the DOE to halt deliveries to nthe Strategic Petroleum Reserve until the Fall, when there will be more oil on the market.

Digg!

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


Peace in Lebanon -- now!
The USA has a moral obligation to resolve the conflict raging in Lebanon and rest of the Middle East -- and it can.
Post by Rep. Dennis Kucinich. July 24, 2006.
President Bush sent me an internet
Democrat v. Democratic and the Iraq War
Post by Evan Derkacz. July 24, 2006.
A new kind of money
Today's money is based on the belief that it's worth something. Crazy, no? Why not back your dollar in sustainable energy produced in your hometown?
Post by Julian Darley. July 20, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Surprise????
Posted by: ng1944 on Apr 25, 2006 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, You will have Your surprise,
a "litle electronic voting device"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Surprise???? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: What Surprise???? Posted by: Jonnikhan
» RE: Surprise???? Posted by: bannelee
$3.50 per gallon gas
Posted by: Rod in 83706 on Apr 25, 2006 7:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joshua,

The only thing Bush could do about the high cost of gas is to have the Navy force oil tankers bound for China on the high seas to change course and head for the USA. Then Bush could show up at a press conference with a patch over his right eye, a sword in his hand, and a parrot on his left shoulder. Aarrrrgghh, matey!

Rod

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: $3.50 per gallon gas Posted by: deaudonnee
Another reason to support your state legislator
Posted by: saywhat? on Apr 25, 2006 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"oh it can't be done"
" they are all fascists" --- well oct suprise could be better gotten by a public defense instead of all us americans thinking we are priviledged to enjoy a better lifestyle by oil barrons who have no interest in our demise..,.they won't help us, get with it...start by conserving your resources, and tell the politicians, " no more bush" IMPEACH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why bother...
Posted by: doremi on Apr 25, 2006 11:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with complicated shenanigans like that when he can just orchestrate another 9-11 and suspend elections altogether? Why worry about congress when he can just blow them to hell? That's what's got me worried about the dumb fuck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He will bring home a sizeable number of American troops from Iraq
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 26, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He will claim it is possible because the war is going well. Amid the local parades of national guard returnees all over America, will be his Repug Fall candidates.

The temporary drawdown will calm the resistance in Iraq. Our control of the airspace over the Mideast will not be diluted, since our bases are secure.

And because Americans are so easily sucked in by gestures, and because the Demos will not be able to object to the war (and how can they since we are 'winning'?) we must endure another two years of Repug control and journalists whining about Bush's lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gas prices
Posted by: chaoslegs on Apr 26, 2006 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real culprit is reduced refining capacity as documented by Senator Wyden's report from 2001. Between 1995 and 2001 closing reduced the capacity by 830,000 barrels per calendar day.

And in 2004 we have this from Rep Joe Barton, R-TX:

“How do we make up the difference if we do not expand capacity domestically? We increase imports,” Hall said. “Again, Oil Daily reports, ‘To satisfy demand, imports of finished motor gasoline have increased by nearly 100,000 barrels per day to 555,000 barrels per day in May.’ These are staggering numbers. This is sobering news.”

“The lack of refinery capacity needs to be addressed. Today, demand for refined products outpaces supply by 10 percent, the difference coming from foreign suppliers,” said U.S. Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee. “Domestic refiners are producing flat out, operating at more than 95 percent of capacity. Forecasts show no appreciable increase in refining capacity, all the while demand is ever-increasing.”


Do you see that? Domestic capacity reduced by 830,000 barrels per calendary day, while 3 years later we are importing 550,000 barrels per day (not sure the difference between calendar day and day) of gasoline.

Remember the energy crisis in California in 2001, that was the power companies gaming the system to CREATE shortages to drive up prices of their product.

So if anyone really wants to deal with the gas prices they will work to increase the refining capacity, and they will do it before October.

Sorry for a post that is such a repeat of that on another article on Alternet, but this gas price thing is getting traction now and people need to know what happen. Read Wyden's report!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» don't forget the collusion ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: don't forget the collusion ... Posted by: Joshua Holland