Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fight Over the VA's Ban on Voter Registration Heads to Court

Posted by Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet at 4:23 PM on July 18, 2008.


Connecticut is looking at litigation after VA issues new restrictions on voter registration drives.
usdeptofveteransaffairsseal

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The state of Connecticut may file a federal lawsuit to force the Department of Veterans Affairs to allow voter registration drives, Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz said Friday.

"Time is of the essence," she said. "We have 109 days left before the election. The (Connecticut) Attorney General and I are looking at possible legal action. It is fair to say that is very likely."

Bysiewicz' comments came a day after she was notified by U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs James Peake that the VA would not permit voter registration drives at its campuses and was imposing new restrictions on who could contact veterans at VA facilities to help them register to vote.

"It is a disguised no," Bysiewicz said, referring to the VA's new policy that only "Voluntary Service" officers at VA facilities would be allowed to register the former soldiers. "It is legal mumbo-jumbo that appears to grant something but really takes away everything."

Anytime a person moves they must update their voter registration. This includes former soldiers who are receiving care at VA facilities.

In recent weeks, Bysiewicz has lead a bi-partisan effort among top state election officials to pressure the VA to become a voter registration agency like motor vehicle departments, which ask clients if they want to register during its regular course of business. More than 20 of these officials have signed a letter to the VA, urging a change in policy.

The Connecticut secretary of state is especially angered by the VA policy because the reasons cited by the VA for opposing voter registration drives -- they would interfere with its medical mission and be partisan -- have never been an issue at Connecticut's state veterans home in Rocky Hill.

"Registrars' visit there three or four times a year," she said, saying they assist with voter registration, filling out absentee ballot applications, and providing rides to nearby polling places. She also said the VA has been "a voter registration agency" under prior presidential administrations.

Bysiewicz said the VA's policy of only allowing "Voter Service" officers to regulate voter registration activities banned state and local election officials from helping veterans, and also violated the federal Help America Vote Act, which Congress passed following the 2000 presidential election.

She said the VA wanted her to sign a "waiver" saying the state assented to the agency's new voter registration policy - but Bysiewicz said that she wound not, as that would be surrendering her responsibility to oversee Connecticut elections.

With the election less than four months away, Bysiewicz said the only option to help those at VA facilities to register to vote was litigation.

"I think that will be the only option," she said.


UPDATED: GOP Sheriff in SW Ohio Shadows New Voters
Gene Fischer, a Republican Sheriff in Greene County, Ohio, is demanding new voters produce ID outside of the voting process.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. October 10, 2008.
GOP Backs Off Montana Voter Challenges
Republicans in Montana say they will not challenge 6,000 likely Democratic voters' right to vote.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. October 8, 2008.
Gender Auditors: Will California Ban Same-Sex Marriage?
Courage Campaign's satirical take on a major ballot initiative.
Post by ZP Heller. October 8, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Everybody Loan Them a Laptop, they can Rock the Vote. Then fill out absentee Ballots, okay?
Posted by: Turiye on Jul 18, 2008 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
N/E

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MAYBE IT'S EASY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 19, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Print an absentee ballot and voter registration combination form specifically for Veteran Hopital in-patients. Doesn't matter if they're already registered. Number them for purposes of keeping records. They can be distributed, collected and forwarded to a central location for counting. Please, no nonsense about illegal aliens and other crap. These people have to be allowed to vote and it's up to us to make it easy for them. Not everything is complicated. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Slick
Posted by: lamac66 on Jul 19, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, this administration knows the deal. They've disrespected vets of past wars and the current vets from the occupation of Iraq.

Many of these Vets are not satisfied with their treatment at VA facilities. The VA knows this and will do anything they can to obstruct these Vets from voicesing their displeasure including putting up road blocks to voter registration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's probably going to take some compromises from taxpayers...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jul 19, 2008 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to expand the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities into voter-registration offices.

I'm sure if Congress is willing to throw more money at them, they will come around eventually. It begs the question though: is there any sense of "priority" left when people start discussing what sort of "stuff" should be going on at places that are supposed to be focused on treating sick and hurting vets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]