Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Missouri Amendment Would Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote

Posted by Attaturk, Firedoglake at 6:58 AM on May 12, 2008.


The Missouri Secretary of State estimates the amendment, if passed, would disenfranchise up to a quarter million citizens.
passport
passport

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

Here's to you Milliard Fillmore, the nation's Lou Dobbs viewers turn their bitter eyes to you!

Now that the Supreme Court has issued its execrable decision allowing more strict voter identification at the polls, though no evidence of widespread voter fraud has ever been produced, the nativist still do not think it is enough. Now, it is about disenfranchisement of groups that vote against conservative agendas and nothing less.

The battle over voting rights will expand this week as lawmakers in Missouri are expected to support a proposed constitutional amendment to enable election officials to require proof of citizenship from anyone registering to vote.
The measure would allow far more rigorous demands than the voter ID requirement recently upheld by the Supreme Court, in which voters had to prove their identity with a government-issued card.
How bad is Missouri's plan, pretty damn bad:
The Missouri secretary of state, Robin Carnahan, a Democrat who opposes the measure, estimated that it could disenfranchise up to 240,000 registered voters who would be unable to prove their citizenship.
In most of the states that require identification, voters can use utility bills, paychecks, driver’s licenses or student or military ID cards to prove their identity. In the Democratic primary election last week in Indiana, several nuns were denied ballots because they lacked the required photo IDs.
Measures requiring proof of citizenship raise the bar higher because they offer fewer options for documentation. In most cases, aspiring voters would have to produce an original birth certificate, naturalization papers or a passport.
So how many of you walk around with your birth certificate, how many of you actually have a passport, how many of you carry it around with you?

And yet, apparently on the suspicion of a poll watcher, these requirements may be instituted. I am guessing in a lot of places that standard will be applied real uniformly...in favor of white people.

And not only is this loathsome proposal the progeny of bad Supreme Court law, it is being used in a way that truly will appeal to the latent xenophobe, it would be put up to referendum in Missouri before the election, a crucial swing state, to ensure as many otherwise non-motivated bigots rush to the polls to vote.

Sponsors of the amendment — which requires the approval of voters to go into effect, possibly in an August referendum — say it is part of an effort to prevent illegal immigrants from affecting the political process. Critics say the measure could lead to the disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of legal residents who would find it difficult to prove their citizenship.
So an effort to sneak it in, before the November elections with the hopes of disqualifying a quarter-million eligible overwhelmingly non-Republican voters.

Surely the thing so many people have died for...restricting the vote by being a dick.

Digg!

Tagged as: voting rights, voter suppression, disenfranchisement


Porn Star Stormy Daniels Is One Step Closer to Taking on Conservative Blowhard David Vitter
Yesterday Daniels announced that she was forming an exploratory committee.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. May 22, 2009.
Democrats Make Massive Gains as GOP Deteriorates
In seven short years, the American electorate has radically changed.
Post by Thomas B. Edsall. May 21, 2009.
Pressure Mounts on Minnesota Governor to Seat Al Franken
Two-thirds of Minnesotans now "believe it's time for [Coleman] to concede."
Post by Sam Stein. May 20, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?