Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Democratic Do-Over in Florida Is Unlikely

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 12:34 PM on March 13, 2008.


When I first heard of the proposal, my thoughts were: ripe for fraud and ballot box stuffing.
t1home.1937.clinton.obam.ap

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

It's looking increasingly like the proposed do-over of the Democratic Party presidential primary is DOA. There have been several proposals batted around, the latest of which is a mail in ballot type of affair. The Dem chairperson in Florida appears to be concerned about the sheer logistics of conducting such a vote:

The head of Florida's Democratic Party said Thursday the proposed vote-by-mail presidential primary is unlikely to go forward because of strong opposition and concerns about conducting the vote...

...[Karen] Thurman will review comments from Democratic leaders and make a decision by Monday on whether to proceed with the re-vote. But she acknowledged that Obama has had concerns and the Democratic National Committee won't support a proposal unless both candidates also back it. She said there's a serious question over whether the state could legally verify the signatures of a privately run election.

"If this becomes something that we can't do, then we can't do it," Thurman said...

When I first heard of the proposal, my thoughts were: ripe for fraud and ballot box stuffing. After all, it would be exceedingly difficult to verify and validate every single one of more than a million-plus ballots.

On the other hand, even if it took days (or weeks) to validate and count, this type of a primary might just be the ultimate in voter enfranchisement. Florida Dems would be able to take some time in casting their votes, and it's probable that doing it this way would result in a huge turnout.

Regardless, there are some excellent reasons why the Florida Democratic Party delegation should be seated (and their votes count) at the upcoming convention in Denver. Let's not forget that it wasn't the Dems in the Fla. state legislature who proposed and approved the shifting of the primaries to Feb. 5th, in defiance of DNC rules. The GOP forced the date on Dems. Mary Beth Williams has the details at Wampum, and makes an excellent argument for why a re-vote should happen, no matter how it takes place.

Digg!

Tagged as: florida, dnc, democratic party, obama, clinton

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


Voting Rights Groups Step Up Criticism on VA Voting Policy
Four voting rights groups urge the VA to become voter registration agencies
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 22, 2008.
Fight Over the VA's Ban on Voter Registration Heads to Court
Connecticut is looking at litigation after VA issues new restrictions on voter registration drives.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 18, 2008.
House GOPers Defeat Back-up Paper Ballot Bill
Another attempt to have back-up paper ballots for November dies in the House
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 16, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Am glad to hear it
Posted by: jpopphan@charter.net on Mar 13, 2008 1:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I for one am happy to hear that there probably won't be a "do-over" in Florida. Hopefully the same will happen with Michigan. It may not seem "fair" to some people that their delegates won't be seated or counted, but I think to change the decision now would be patently unfair to those of us in the other 48 states.

If the DNC can't discipline state parties, then what's the point? The people in Florida and Michigan need to direct their anger towards those in their states who insisted on moving their primary dates even when the DNC told them of the consequences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Am glad to hear it Posted by: jvaljon1
» RE: Am glad to hear it Posted by: Kuressaare
Outsource the election to the Canadians
Posted by: sdbest on Mar 14, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A suggestion: in Canada, we've been running elections for over a century with paper ballots and ballot boxes. In each election, tens of millions of people vote with nary a hint of fraud. Perhaps, we Canadians could run the elections in FL and MI for you. I'm sure that a price could be negotiated. Once we've shown you how to run an election, you could handle it on your own after that. Elections aren't that difficult. Even an American could learn to do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fair players don't try to change the rules in the middle of the game
Posted by: metamind on Mar 14, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the best reason why Clinton should be rejected by the voters. It's not right to have one set of rules for part of the campaign and then change the rules so you can gain an unfair advantage later on in the game.

The rules are the rules. Stick with them.

It's the right thing to do.

Play fair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]