Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Mac & Sleaze: the GOP General Election Plan

Posted by Daniel DiRito, The All Spin Zone at 2:14 PM on February 28, 2008.


The bottom line is that the GOP desperately needs to define Obama…negatively.
mccainwink

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

Those hoping for a kinder gentler presidential election complete with a heaping helping of compassionate conservatism might want to prepare themselves for a plate of partisan politics that will be far less palatable. I find myself suspecting that the GOP may be laying the groundwork for a bait and switch strategy aimed at satisfying voters newfound penchant for a civil campaign.

With the emergence of John McCain as the seemingly inevitable Republican nominee, voters may be under the impression that we're moving beyond choreographed character assassinations and stealth swiftboating strategies. My hunch is that the GOP's alternate approach includes John McCain appearing to take the high road while the usual suspects redouble their efforts to eviscerate the enemy.

I'll try to explain. This week, we may have witnessed a preview of the plan. My concern is that the orchestration was evidenced in Bill Cunningham's introduction of Senator McCain (and his effort to define Barack Obama)...which was followed by Senator McCain rapidly renouncing Cunningham's remarks...even though the campaign had arranged the appearance of the raucous radio personality.

What happened before and after McCain's criticism seems implausible to me. How could the McCain campaign have been so oblivious to what Cunningham was going to say? Why did Cunningham almost instantly withdraw his support for the Senator...stating instead that he would now join Ann Coulter in supporting Hillary Clinton. One, I can't imagine the McCain campaign didn't discuss the introduction with Cunningham. Second, I doubt anyone who is so well connected to a campaign such that they are chosen to introduce the candidate makes such an instantaneous about face. Hence, it's important to analyze his actions; searching for the underlying objective.

Note that in shifting his support to Clinton, Cunningham has left himself room to change his mind should Obama be the Democratic candidate (the same candidate he sought to define as a soft on terror Muslim sympathizer). If we project ahead, let's suppose Obama is the Democratic nominee; leaving the Coulter's and Cunningham's of the GOP without a candidate. We could assume they won't vote...or we could assume something far more strategically savvy. Using Cunningham's own word, I look for these current outliers to suddenly announce their own "kumbaya" moment...the one that states, "I actually supported Hillary Clinton...and that's a difficult calculation to make...but when I imagine an Obama presidency as the alternative to John McCain, I have to support John McCain".

So what does this achieve? Well, it sends GOP voters two important messages. First, it says that some establishment conservatives were actually willing to support one of the most reviled Democrats (Clinton)...a candidate the base could never support. Second, once Obama became the candidate, those same establishment conservatives decided to come back and support John McCain...because Barack Obama must be worse than Hillary Clinton. So what is the conclusion GOP voters will be asked to draw? If the choice in November is between John McCain and a candidate that is worse than Hillary Clinton, they have to get out and support John McCain.

By utilizing this approach, it allows people like Cunningham and Coulter to continue to rail against Obama as they supposedly support Clinton...all the while further defining Obama as worse than Hillary...doing the work for the McCain campaign while he keeps his hands clean and moves to higher ground. At the same time, the media darling McCain can stay below the radar and avoid being directly associated with the scorched earth strategy.

The bottom line is that the GOP desperately needs to define Obama...negatively. Having the GOP candidate do this dirty work isn't ideal in 2008 given that a majority of voters don't seem inclined to accept more of the partisanship fostered by the likes of Karl Rove. If this can be achieved by unattached surrogates who also have the ear of those Republican's less apt to be enthused with a McCain candidacy, all the better.

If they succeed, then the entire GOP can sit down at the table...together with the independent and moderate voters they must have to win in November...ready to indulge in the equivalent of a twice baked batch of kinder, gentler, compassionate and conservative, comfort food...a delectable dish of "Krafty Mac & Sleeze".

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.


Voting Rights Groups Step Up Criticism on VA Voting Policy
Four voting rights groups urge the VA to become voter registration agencies
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 22, 2008.
Fight Over the VA's Ban on Voter Registration Heads to Court
Connecticut is looking at litigation after VA issues new restrictions on voter registration drives.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 18, 2008.
House GOPers Defeat Back-up Paper Ballot Bill
Another attempt to have back-up paper ballots for November dies in the House
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 16, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
527's
Posted by: JSquercia on Feb 28, 2008 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They will do what the did the last time havwe their friends fund those 527's which will swiftboat Obama for not wearing an American Flag pin on his lapel and having a middle name of Huessein

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama will respond to attacks quickly
Posted by: RobNLA on Feb 28, 2008 3:09 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is very effective in defending himself against these attacks. He responds quickly and often manages to make the attacker look foolish or silly at the same time.

He does this by exposing the attacks for what they are...distractions from the real issues that voters are concerned about, health care, the economy, the Iraq War.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There will be no election
Posted by: TheJamea on Feb 28, 2008 10:56 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I, personally, think that martial law will be declared on some pretext(false flag, anyone?), or other, some short time before the election. (See this interview with Naomi Wolf. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0LvtQAQ6sc)
And, no, my conspiracy theories don't give me comfort.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Martial Law Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Martial Law Posted by: AndyF
» Don't forget BLACKWATER!!! Posted by: xvictor
Bobby Decker
Posted by: Bobby Decker on Feb 29, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHEN DR FRANKENROVES DONE......THEYLL HAVE CONVENCED 51% OF AMERICA OBAMAS WILLIE HORTON WHOS CONVERTED TO ISLAM IN PRISION.....OR...OR BRITNEY SPEARS IS FOUND DEAD AND NAKED IN SOME HOLLYWOOD BUNGALOO IN OCTOBER {ECLYPSING ALL OTHER NEWS COVERAGE}....OR....JEB BUSH AND THE ENRON CONTRAS GO ON A COVERT MISSION TO IRAN AND LIKE MAGIC GAS DROPS TO 99 CENTS A GALLON OVERNIGHT....OR........?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good one
Posted by: solrev on Feb 29, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is really nice to see an article on AlterNet where some one actually thinks in place of reporting facts. You may not be 100% correct, but I will bet you are 95% correct. The repuks are just so much better at running a campaign than the demons. Winning the election is going to be a lot tougher than the demons think. I hope they do not end up scratching their heads wondering how the election was stolen from them. I will check out the web site, I hope there are a lot of thinkers and not just reporters there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy to Do;
Posted by: Andie927 on Feb 29, 2008 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the States Obama's winning in?? Red states! He lost the two BIG Democratic strong holds, the Northeast & California! Even with the Kennedy support! (Mass. voted overwhelmingly for Hillary, 'they heard all the same speeches from Deval, 16 months earlier. With no results after)

Read: 'The Nation' Feb. 11th, 'Subprime Obama'
by Max Fraser. Who explains in detail who Obama's financial adviser's are, and when you look up their positions, a lot becomes clear!
Krugman was Right! Obama is Right of Hillary on economic issues! His BIG doners, are Wall Street, Nuclear, and Coal!
Obama's FOR: Health INSURANCE, not sigle-payer healthcare, he's for de-regulation (more) of Corporations, and For Corportions being allowed to Voluntarily Comply!!He's For: Privitization of Social Security!! On his web-site he talks about Private Retirement Accts.

Wake-up, the reason so many Repugs. have come out and voted in the Democratic Primaries, is because they know a Dem. will probably win, and Obama's the Best Corporate Democrate for THEM, not US (We the People)
**Country Before Party**Go Green (Party)**www.votesmart.org**

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OFF THE TRACK
Posted by: crazy carlos on Feb 29, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back cover of the 3-10-08 Nation--CHENYCARE.ORG
Two Nurse Organizations have co-sponsered a bill in Congress HR 676 for health care for all that is the same as what Cheney got for his heart problems(unfortunately he survived)If it is good enough for government employees, then we should have the same!!

The heavy lifting has been done, now all we the people have to do is get off our dead asses, stroke a few keys and get behind this bill!! Please at least take a look. Type in CHENEYCARE.ORG. Do it now. Crazy Carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

....because they've been fellating him for the past year
Posted by: xbj on Feb 29, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In order to mainpulate the Democrats into nominating him (which, BY THE WAY HE HASN'T WON YET) to be creamed against McCain by racist voters throughout the south and elsewhere IN BOTH PARTIES.

WAKE UP!!! THE "O" IN GOP STANDS FOR OBAMA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ms cheryl lynne - southbury,CT [ a mostly repug-lican semi rural CT suburb of 21,000]
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Mar 1, 2008 12:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gods! I love this site , at least alternet tells us the truth [ unlike ms kiss the male bosses and tell the news- katie couric and her friend, shuster!*giggles* ] yeah, after reading in NARAL exactly what this mc crap man is really all about, how he voted on some of the most important issues concerning women[ and liberal men] today; I had to think about how " every pigeon seems to have some hidden sh*t under its tail feathers" this seems to best describe this MC CRAP character quite well to be honest. and even though they say that obama's of the " far left" , what I read in here seems to make him more of one of the GOP's big money people. no wonder all those " white men with 50K + salaries are fixing to vote for him! it seems like hillary is the REAL UNITER and the one whom "will make us proud again"; this ever since ronald reagan said those same exact words and sure enough; he did just that- at least to all the yuppies and " old greenwich, CT's good old BUSH family and their neighbors" and mr sam walton & co. yeah, I've been feverently working hard as a volunteer on the hillary campaign; which is not in the good ol' boy state of texas. just tonight I have been talking with a few hispanics, mexican-americans and yes, both MEN, and women! I get so many hang ups and refusals, true. but when I ask many whom they are supporting, like this one man and a woman in the el paso area whom both emmigrated from mexico, they seem to feel that hillary's the best and most experienced! to quote one man, " I feel that we need a woman , as only a woman knows how to best get this country back together." when I asked what help make his decision, he told me," I like her health care plan especially." he then went on saying about immigrants and coming here from mexico some 20 yrs ago; " we come to america for a better life we all dream of! but , especially since the republicans took over, it seems like the rich people get it all while the poor people never get to see their dream which they came to find!" honestly, it seem as if the poor hispanic americans are actually quite smart! they follow closely the politics and most seem to feel that hillary's the one with the most experience for the job of USA president; especially after 8 years of the big eared moron whom unfortunately was their governor down there. he did tell me that he could NOT understand how the people in the red states could've been so stupid as to choose this bush guy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]