Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bhutto Didn't Trust Bush With Sensitive Evidence of Rigging Pakistan Elections

Posted by GottaLaff , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 7:56 AM on January 1, 2008.


Can't say I blame her.
benazirbhutto
Bhutto

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

How interesting that Benazir Bhutto felt the way a lot of us do, and about the very same thing...rigging elections:

The day she was assassinated last Thursday, Benazir Bhutto had planned to reveal new evidence alleging the involvement of Pakistan's intelligence agencies in rigging the country's upcoming elections, an aide said Monday.

Bhutto had been due to meet U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., to hand over a report charging that the military Inter-Services Intelligence agency was planning to fix the polls in the favor of President Pervez Musharraf.

Safraz Khan Lashari, a member of the Pakistan People's Party election monitoring unit, said the report was "very sensitive" and that the party wanted to initially share it with trusted American politicians rather than the Bush administration, which is seen here as strongly backing Musharraf.

Can't say as I blame them.

[Safraz Khan Lashari, a member of the Pakistan People's Party election monitoring unit], said the report claimed that U.S. aid money was being used to fix the elections. Ballots stamped in favor of the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, which supports Musharraf, were to be produced by the intelligence agencies in about 100 parliamentary constituencies.

So now BushCo money is being used to expand election fraud to other countries. Let's hope if it happens here again, SuperObama, or SuperHill, or SuperJohn, will whoop 'em once and for all.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, pakistan, election fraud, musharraf, bhutto

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What, Not Trust the Bushies?
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 1, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have got to be kidding....what would have given Ms. Bhutto the feeling that she could not trust the present U.S. government?

Boggles your mind, doesn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What, Not Trust the Bushies? Posted by: blitzmesser
Who benefits most?
Posted by: magistre on Jan 1, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who benefits most from the "zombie"-style assasination? If you answered: "Buckshot & Bush" you win the "prize"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We'll get 'em
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 1, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Holy cow, we have another bunch "we have to bring to justice" How many does that make for The Texas Turd to corral before he leaves office?

BTW ~ how much longer do we have to deal with the TT? One year, 19 days? Are we going to make it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Send Pakistan our electronic vote machines
Posted by: lc on Jan 1, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bring Musharif into the digital age of vote rigging by Dictator's R US, and send him all of our digital dictators designed as computers where not only are we nothing but numbers but we don't even get counted.
India went digital in 2000 and hard wired every voting computer from lever to paper totals to final complete totals in a day. India is the largest real democracy in the world and they had insignificant glitches. There was no way to rig anything because it was hard wired instead of electronic digital data , but still a computer that did all the stuff a computer is meant to do, FAST AND ACCURATE.
Send the US Election Commission to India for a lesson in Democracy and computerized voting.
IM
Belteshazzar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where I live,
Posted by: Longdream on Jan 1, 2008 5:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in a well-populated area in Massachusetts, we vote like this.

You go up to a counter, give your name, and a ward officer hands you a big 11x17 sheet of paper with the candidates and questions on it. There are big, black arrows next to every person or question we need to vote for.

At the voting station, there are some black crayon-type pencils.

We fill in the center of the arrow next to our choice with one of the pencils, and then we take it and feed it into a machine, which sucks it in and counts the votes, with the same technology used by the SAT's for decades.

I've never been able to figure out what more you'd want as a voting method.

Except an electronic way to cheat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]