Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is Dick Cheney Running for President in 2012?

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 2:03 PM on May 12, 2009.


I'm not trying to start any rumors, but Cheney is certainly acting like a guy who plans to run for something.
cheneys

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

What's that line? How can we miss you if you won't go away?

Just a few days ago, Dick Cheney explained his belief that it's time for some of the older establishment Republican voices to exit the stage. "I think periodically we have to go through one these sessions. It helps clear away some of the underbrush," the former vice president said, adding, "Some of the older folks who've been around a long time -- like yours truly -- need to move on and make room for that young talent that's coming along."

Two days later, he appeared on "Face the Nation." Next week, he's delivering a speech on national security at a Washington think tank.

Amid claims that the interrogation methods amount to torture and that those who approved them should be prosecuted or censured, it is clear that we know surprisingly little about the scope and efficacy of the Bush administration's national security policy. Many questions linger: What type of information did enhanced interrogation methods yield? Were lives saved as a result? Could that intelligence have been effectively collected by other means? How effective was the terrorist surveillance program in detecting the threat of al Qaeda and its operatives in the post-9/11 period? Will inhibiting these procedures cost more American lives?

On May 21, former vice president Dick Cheney will speak at AEI to address these critical issues and provide a blueprint for keeping America safe in the future.

It's all part of his plan to "move on and make room for that young talent that's coming along."

I'm not trying to start any rumors, but Cheney is certainly acting like a guy who plans to run for something. He's doing lots of media interviews, cultivating his connection with Limbaugh, attacking the president, lying about Democratic ideas, and giving at least one speech at a major conservative think tank about his vision for the future.

Put it this way -- if one of the Republicans with his/her eyes on 2012 maintained this kind of high-profile schedule in Washington, wouldn't the assumption be that he or she was laying the groundwork for a campaign?

I really doubt Cheney has political ambitions at this point; even he has to realize how unpopular he is. But no matter how much Cheney believes what he's saying, it might occur to him one of these days that the Republicans' "young talent that's coming along" might want to deliver a similar message about the same issues. It's not like the former vice president holds a unique level or credibility and/or respect with the nation at this point.

Indeed, I can only assume that the DNC will be working the phones, hoping to get all the networks to cover Cheney's speech next week live and on the air.

Digg!

Tagged as: republicans, gop, cheney, dick cheney, dnc, 2012, dick

Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog, Political Animal. His background includes publishing The Carpetbagger Report, and writing for a variety of publications, including Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, and The Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's "Talk of the Nation," MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Air America Radio's "Sam Seder Show," and XM Radio's "POTUS '08."


Porn Star Stormy Daniels Is One Step Closer to Taking on Conservative Blowhard David Vitter
Yesterday Daniels announced that she was forming an exploratory committee.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. May 22, 2009.
Democrats Make Massive Gains as GOP Deteriorates
In seven short years, the American electorate has radically changed.
Post by Thomas B. Edsall. May 21, 2009.
Pressure Mounts on Minnesota Governor to Seat Al Franken
Two-thirds of Minnesotans now "believe it's time for [Coleman] to concede."
Post by Sam Stein. May 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Scary
Posted by: QQOblivion on May 12, 2009 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney is too weak in the heart (both figuratively and literally) to make a run for the presidency. But he may be trying to increase his influence in the Republican Party so as to help put someone else in the White House who is, I dare say, EVEN WORSE than he is.

Mitt "I want to double the size of Guantanamo!" Romney, perhaps? (Romney once said that Bush and Cheney's problems are that they are too LIBERAL!)

Sarah Palin is an obvious contender. The Dark One's desire for Total Annihilation fits well into Palin's world-view.

Fred Phelps comes to mind. But can he stand the rigors of, you know, all that THINKING-about-stuff that comes with being president!?

John Yoo perhaps? In another Alternet article today, it is mentioned that Yoo has been hired by the Philidelphia Inquirer. Could his star be rising??

Maybe Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israelis already run the US government. Why not drop the America-is-independent act and just make him president?

Or maybe Cheney is ALREADY dead, and is just a pit of pure evil, and so doesn't need a heart, healthy or otherwise. Maybe he WILL be our next president. He could steal the election, or, given the American people's usually-displayed idiocy, actually win fair and square.

Gosh, darn. I have scared myself today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scary Posted by: LTBROWN
» RE: Scary Posted by: Natasha_W
My guess...
Posted by: efrainstacy on May 12, 2009 2:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... is that he's feeling the pressure from the torture scrutiny and perhaps he's trying to manipulate the conversation to try and head off a possible investigation/indictment/conviction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My guess... Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: My guess... Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: My guess... Posted by: LTBROWN
» RE: My guess... Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Total Wimp? Posted by: zipper696
Other times, other methods
Posted by: hquain on May 12, 2009 3:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney is a committed radical. He's merely using the means now available to him to continue with his program, which lost quite a bit of ground in the last couple years of Bush and is seriously threatened now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since We are still fighting a 'War on Terror'- Torture failed ....
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 12, 2009 4:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To get useful information on how to destroy the network, failed to dissaude others from joining terrorist organizations, and, if attacked again, failed to stop them from planning and carrying out other misssion. Let's not forget it took them a full8 yrs before they could regroup after the first WTC attack in '93.So if nothing else Bushies failed to destroy AQ as miserably as Clinton.
Everytime this sociopathic meglomaniac opens his mouth he only prove the Bush Admin Was a COMPLETE & UTTER FAILURE!!!
Cheney's right We are no dsafer after 8yrs of Bush policy's than we were the day after 9/11.
No matter what illegal domestic policies they tried, no matter what WAr crime Acts they committed- There is STILL a 'War of Terror'. Juat another one of the Missions they Failed to accompish.
As for torture having been the keystone to our security and now that it is repealed we are 'less Safe', Isn't Cheney Also admitting there was far more instances of torture than jsut the 2. In fact I beleive I heard DICK state 3. If national security is a Daily vigilance, how many were waterboraded to assure NONE had any 'actionable Intellegence'? Seems to me only using such timgs on 2 or ever 3 meant their were other who could have knowledge you failed to coerce out of them.
AS for Gitmo DICK- glad to hear you thought the accomadations were acceptable, it's probaby Where you will be spending time before We Extradict you for interanational Prosecution- for Torture, Black sits, Rendiction and Hit Squads. Unless we convict and punish you for any one of your Acts of TREASON first!
Perhaps you can be elected by Rummy, Wolfie, Yoo,Baybee,Rice, W,Scalia...As the other Dictator on the Island of Cuba.What a Beautiful palace Gitmo would make ah?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How awful! Posted by: Basenjis
DICK Cheney is...
Posted by: RumbleFish on May 12, 2009 5:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a COWARD...a TRAITOR...and a LIAR. He should be tarred and feathered, and put on a rail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DICK Cheney is... Posted by: kabac
» RE: DICK Cheney is... Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Wasn't he president already??
Posted by: 2thepoint on May 13, 2009 2:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He unfortunately most likely wont be around by then unless his heart isnt as bad as reported. He could never stand up to the pressure of the job in his condition.

He should have ran for president back in 2000 - maybe he did!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hope
Posted by: PJT on May 13, 2009 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All we can do is hope and egg him on. Imagine a Cheney-Obama match up. It would be as though toxic vampire Lestat from the 16th century were running against Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hope Posted by: bettyn
anything close to cheney...
Posted by: ellie on May 13, 2009 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and we're getting out by any means possible... for good... anyone know a good coyote to get into another country???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Dick Cheney Running for President in 2012?
Posted by: UnEasyOne on May 13, 2009 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OMG! PLEASE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aha! This is what the Mayan calendar is warning us about in 2012
Posted by: charles000 on May 13, 2009 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aha! This is what the Mayan calendar is warning us about in 2012.

Talk about the end of the world as we know it.

The living embodiment of Darth Vader, paragon of evil, purveyor of power from the dark side . . .

A slight exaggeration - but only slight

Nothing would surprise me, and I take nothing for granted.

If you think that the archtects of the PNAC doctrine, and their delusions of grandeur have disappeared, I've got a great deal on a bridge to offer.

Folks, be afraid, very afraid . . .

The dark side has not given up, not by a long shot.

They have retreated for the time being, quietly regrouping and developing strategic options for a future time, to re-emerge, like a phoenix, determined to have their way, at any cost.

I know this mindset all too well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I love having Cheney and Limbaugh as the face....
Posted by: LTBROWN on May 13, 2009 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of the republican party. That way, I know they'll never get back in. I encourage them to keep on talking and reminding America of the mess they've made. I could win against Dick, right now. lol

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He would be best as VP
Posted by: wagner on May 13, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, not for President. He wants to be Vice President again, so the ticket would be either Limbaugh - Cheney or Palin - Cheney. Either choice would electrify the Republican Base.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He would be best as VP Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: He would be best as VP Posted by: wagner
» He would be best as dog food Posted by: leighsure
Please
Posted by: mrbailey47 on May 13, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't let us forget that Mr. Cheney, "Der Puppetenmeister", worked in the Nixon administration. His mouth speaks, his heart fails.....in more ways than the poetic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor planning,
Posted by: linecrosser on May 13, 2009 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick as always been short sighted. He never considered that it would take so long to bring about the One World Government, or he would have planned for retirement. He is now lost and confused, his original plan would have had him as world leader where no one would have been questioning his past decisions. All of the past administration should swing like Saddam. Wouldn't it be nice if the UN and the world court would open their own investigation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't slam the door on the way out.
Posted by: inprov73 on May 13, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Some of the older folks who've been around a long time -- like yours truly -- need to move on and make room for that young talent that's coming along."
I would suggest euthanasia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OLDER PEOPLE Posted by: zipper696
Republican, Democrats, it doesn't matter-We're Ruled by Financial Interests and the MICs
Posted by: ATH on May 13, 2009 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who are actually in control. The Federal Reserve has far more to do with the quality of your life. It is bankers who have made slaves out of all of us, stagnating our wages for decades while they steal our wealth from us in multiple ways. They are stealing the very wealth of our dollar. They have stolen the people's gold in Ft. Knox. They are the true villians, and Congress, for the most part, their puppets. There are a few members in Congress--Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, at least--who know what's going on and are, IMO, trustworthy as any politician can be trusted. They also both happen to believe the same about the Federal Reserve--that it is an un-constitutional and undemocratic institution that is destroying the prosperity of almost the entire nation to the benefit of a handful of bankers, CEOs, and Wall Street tycoons, and anyone friendly with the central banks of the world.

Americans just can't seem to find their cojones to stand up. By the time Americans get mad enough to revolt, the Police State will be complete, and it will be far too late. Actually, it is already too late to preserve life as we once knew it. In order to live sustainably, we must return to individual farming, and taking care of the land as it takes care of us. The population of the world--human pop.--must be decreased, and nature will find a way, through disease, and her other destructive means. The population of the Earth must be kept below 600 million people or so, in order for us to survive, and we must keep the population growth rate down to about 1 or 2 percent per year. The difference between 1 and two percent is either a doubling of the population every 70 years, or every 35. So, you see, even with a population as small as 600 million, you soon have--at 2%--a doubling to 1200 million within a mere 35 years! Since the lifespan of humans will decrease inthis new world, that may be okay. It will have to be something upon which a close watch is kept.

But there's no way to solve our current predicaments. People will die in the billions, from war, famine, disease, and who knows what else. Agriculture is now defined as "the use of land to turn petroleum into food!" If so, what the hell do they plan for us to eat in 10, 20 years max?
Monsanto may have, by screwing around with the genetics of nature, end up creating seeds that infect all others, and will no longer work for non-petroluem type farming!

Monsanto should be stopped from what it is doing. I can't believe it was ever allowed to begin with. Money trumps brains!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He should be running for his life, and if the Dems, had a set
Posted by: bitsfick on May 13, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of balls he would be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Give me a break.
Posted by: GuitarBill on May 13, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick Cheney will be lucky to be alive in 2012, let alone run for president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He Wouldn't Survive A Campaign
Posted by: mikeblack on May 13, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The man is going to have 19 heart attacks between today and November 2012. He won’t be running, he knows he’s in too poor of health to withstand the stress of a campaign again.

Think about it: he could be down in the polls, getting pulverized by Obama at a Presidential Debate about Iraq. Jim Lehrer will say “Mr. Cheney, your response?” to which he’ll reply “LYNNE, THIS THE BIG ONE!” and drop dead on live television. I mean, there’s only so many entire sticks of butter you can consume on top of a baked potato before no medical care on the planet can save you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please, O please, O please....
Posted by: Reality Chick on May 13, 2009 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. let him run. it will solidify the Progressive rule for the rest of my life. What a lovely thought that is.. 40 years of Progressivism! never to have to look at one more hypocritical, smirking repug Tool again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT ONLY NO BUT HELL,NO! I WILL NOT VOTE FOR THIS RICHARD NIXON CLONE
Posted by: joeocho88 on May 13, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So he has decided to drop the puppet strings and come out from behind where he was hiding when he was running Bush II's administration!

HE WAS TIRED OF BEING THE REAL POWER BEHIND THE THRONE!

AND HE IS SUFFICIENTLY OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO THINK THAT WE WILL ELECT SOMEONE LIIKE HIM!

RICHARD NIXON WAS HIS MENTOR AND I CAN TELL HE LEARNED WELL AT THE FEET OF HIS MASTER!

You remember Nixon..his infamous slush fund of illegal campaign donations from the international bankster cartel back in the 1950s and nearly cost him the Vide Presidency nomination and the only thing that saved him was when he begged the question in his infamous CHECKERS Speech named after the Cocker Spaniel which was the only thing he admitted taking...diverting the suspicion from where he stashed his ill-gotten gains.

NIXON WAS EVIL PERSONIFIED. And he was stopped the only way he could be stopped legally but his own HUBRIS and greed for POWER like his idol HITLER also helped in his delcine.

IF CHANEY RUNS --ASSUMING HIS HEART CONDITION PERMITS -- HE WILL BRING IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER AND ALL OF ALEX JONES' NIGHTMARE SCENARIOS WILL BECOME REALITY! SINCE NIXON TRIED AND FAILED TO GET THE NEW WORLD ORDER DREAM OF THE INTERNATIONAL BANKING CARTELS IMPLEMENTED ( THE SAME ONES THAT PRESCOTT BUSH WORKED FOR!), CHANEY WANTS TO PICK UP THE BANNER AND DO WHAT HIS MASTER COULD NOT!

DO WE HAVE ANYONE WITH THE RESOLVE TO STAND AGAINST CHANEY LIKE THE OLD CONGRESSMEN STOOD AGAINST NIXON?

THIS MAN NEEDS TO BE IN PRISON FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY NOT TO MENTION HIS COMPLICITY IN THE TORTURES AND ATTORCITIES IN IRAQ, IMPLEMENTING THE HOMELAND SECURITY GESTAPO,THE BAILOUTS OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR CRIMINALS AND ON AND ON...NOT TO MENTION PRESIDING OVER THE MELTDOWN OF AMERICAN INDUSTRY!

THAT WAY HE CAN HAVE AN EXCUSE TO UNLEASH PANDEMICS MIXED IN LABS ( LIKE THE LAST "SWINE FLU" DEBACLE --three viruses that do not occur together naturally all combined in the same lab! to get rid of the "surplus people" the "useless eaters."

Unemployed people are desperate people and that is how Germans were rooked in by Hitler and the international bankster and military-industrial cartels that financed his way to absolute power.

The financial cronies our tax dollars bailed out made a lot of investments in companies that OUTSOURCED our industrial base and other important jobs --AND they are putting us OUT OF WORK!

IF AMERICANS ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO ELECT THIS MAN FOR PRESIDENT --THERE IS NO HOPE LEFT FOR US! I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR HIM -- I WOULD RATHER VOTE FOR CANDIDATES WHO ARE IN TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE, WHO KNOW WHAT IT IS LIKE TO ACTUALLY WORK FOR A LIVING.

I guess it is too much to expect honest and ethical candidates...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Attacking in a different direction ...
Posted by: on May 13, 2009 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't that the standard description of a retreat!? (It was when I was in the Marine Corps, used cynically.) But the point is: No, nope, naw, Cheney is running away –– not from his conscience, since he wasn't in line when they issued that particular character trait, but from the things he has done to this country & others. If we miss corralling this pompous, lying bird & putting him into a small cage, or against a solid brick wall, we've missed the entire point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney and Berlu
Posted by: Jaffe on May 13, 2009 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My sources inform me that Dick Cheney has held several secret meetings at undisclosed locations with Silvio Berlusconi on the subjects of cosmetic surgery, Mussolini redux, irrepressible ambition, and getting old gracelessly.

They discussed imperial cruelty with considerable fervor but did not discuss sex--a Berlu special--because Cheney is done with all that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cheney and Berlu Posted by: zipper696
If he does, I'll work for his campaign
Posted by: hurricane hugo on May 13, 2009 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...just to be there when he buries the Republican party. :D

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cheney, part deux
Posted by: willymack on May 13, 2009 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can see it now: Ol' quasimodo building up a head of steam for a 2012 presidential run. At the rate he's going, by 2012, he should have an approval rating of, lesee.....at least three percent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not To Worry...
Posted by: FairFight on May 13, 2009 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick Cheney's wouldn't stand a run for any office. Electioneering is a very stressful pursuit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

running for...?
Posted by: ozonekidd on May 13, 2009 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I respectfully submit that the only legitimate thing Cheney should be running for is the border.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Voter's have short memories,
Posted by: lewb on May 13, 2009 6:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
witness Tricky Dick's comeback from defeat in '62'
California governor's race. This electorate is capable of electing anybody. This country has elected middle of the road politicians that main-
tain the status quo. The special interests control
this country for the few.Don't believe if Cheney
is the anointed one that money won't flow to him,
just like it went to Obama our current maintainer
of the staus quo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WAIT! YOU ARE ALL MISSING IT!
Posted by: Quannah on May 13, 2009 9:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CHENEY just might run for President in 2012... just not Dick. He's been trotting his daughter, Liz, out in front of any camera that will have her. She's been defending her dad to anyone who will listen.

Check this out from Wikipedia:

She is the elder of the two daughters of Dick and Lynne Cheney. She is married to Philip Perry, the former General Counsel of the United States Department of Homeland Security.

In 2002, Liz Cheney was appointed to the position of Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, a pre-existing vacant post with an "economic portfolio," which is a mandate to promote investment in the region. Amid reports, including a New York Times editorial by Paul Krugman, saying that the job was created especially for her, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said that she had come recommended by Colin Powell...

The appointment followed publicized policy divisions between the Vice President's office and the State Department on Middle East policy. In that position, she was given control of the Middle East Partnership Initiative, designed to "foster increased democracy and economic progress in a troubled region." The program spent $29 million in 2002, increased to $129 million in the following year. Cheney's task was to channel money to pre-screened groups, some of which were not identified publicly for fear of retaliations from extant governments they sought to undermine. For the budget year 2004, the project sought $145 million.

After two years of service, Cheney left her first State Department post in 2003 to serve in her father's re-election campaign. Participating in the "W Stands for Women" initiative to target female voters, Cheney spoke often of how women have enlarged their scope of political issues, invoking September 11 and "security."

In February 2005, she returned to the US State Department and was appointed the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State For Near Eastern Affairs and Coordinator for Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiatives. In this position, Cheney supported the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, C. David Welch, and coordinated U.S. multilateral efforts to promote and support democracy, expanded education and economic opportunities in the Middle East and Northern Africa. Her position made her the second-ranking U.S. diplomat for the Middle East. In that capacity, Cheney endorsed a controversial draft of a new Iraqi constitution. In November 2005, Cheney was questioned by a Turkish reporter Ysemink Congar of Turkish CNN that there was "a lot of skepticism building about the U.S. advocacy for democracy and human rights, based on a recent Washington Post story on "black sites" operated by the U.S. and the CIA in some of the countries receiving MEPI support.

[continued in next post]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WAIT! YOU ARE ALL MISSING IT... PART DEUX
Posted by: Quannah on May 13, 2009 9:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[continued from previous post]

At the same briefing, Cheney was asked by Tarek Rashad of the Middle East News Agency about the "paradox" of the MEPI funding NGO's supporting democracy and human rights would be "rallying in fact against the regimes and the governments in the region. Cheney answered that contributions to the Foundation had come from governments, but the foundation would not include government officers on its board or as its chairman, that "no government entities will be in either position."

Elizabeth Cheney also headed the Iran Syria Policy and Operations Group (ISOG), established in March 2006, a unit within the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs.

In April 2006, The New York Times published a story critical of Cheney's work, particularly with respect to Iran. Of particular scrutiny was a grants program administered by Elizabeth Cheney's unit, in collaboration with a Republican-affiliated foundation, the International Republican Institute. The Times maintained that when the group became controversial, attracting criticism from some who saw it as plotting covert actions that could escalate into war with Iran and Syria, the group was disbanded, by May of 2006. Shortly before the ISOG group was dissolved, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice initiated a major effort to engage Iran and Syria in efforts to stabilize Iraq. As late as April 11, 2009, Iranian officials investigating "cyber-crimes" (Revolution Guards Corps) cited Cheney's efforts in the daily newspaper Iran, specifically the "Democracy Program" [sic] initiative as parallel to a Netherlands-funded push for a "velvet revolution" accomplished by a media campaign to polarize the country, "despite the 1981 Algiers Accords signed between the U.S. and Iran in the aftermath of the U.S. embassy takeover in Tehran."

------------------------

Hey, if this doesn't scare the shit out of you, nothing will. He's been grooming his own daughter to take his place!

This is not good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dogcatcher?
Posted by: travelertoo on May 13, 2009 11:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think 'Shotgun Dick' Cheney could run for dog catcher and win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LOL
Posted by: xmvince on May 15, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AHHAA DICK CHENY FOR PRES? THAT ALMOST BE WORSE THAN JOHN MCCAIN!! LOLOL!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This answer is NO and u know it
Posted by: reelman on May 17, 2009 5:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO...just muddy the water because you can't handle a motive that is not politics, power or money...
cause libs know nothing but those...NO NO NO...
its a goofy premise but that allows u to avoid reality...another lib strength...big yawn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]