Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Limbaugh to Specter: Take McCain and His Daughter With You

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 4:27 AM on April 29, 2009.


"For years, many in the conservative world have wished for an ideologically purer GOP. Their wish has been granted. Happy?"
sspeclimlarge

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

Reaction from top GOP officials to the defection of Sen. Arlen Specter has been decidedly mixed. The less orthodox are interpreting the news as a validation of their biggest concerns, while the dyed-in-the-wool types wave 'good riddance.'

Acid-tongued conservatives have long viewed Specter as an Independent or even a Democrat in GOP clothing. And so when the Pennsylvania Republican announced that the R after his name would be changed to a D, the response was to celebrate the purge of moderation.

"A lot of people said, well Specter, take McCain with you, and his daughter. Take McCain and his daughter with you," talk show host Rush Limbaugh declared during the early hour of his Tuesday program.

"Let's be honest," read a statement from RNC Chairman Michael Steele. "Senator Specter didn't leave the GOP based on principles of any kind. He left to further his personal political interests because he knew that he was going to lose a Republican primary due to his left-wing voting record."

The 'screw Specter' mentality seems expected for a party that, already on its heels, now likely faces filibuster-proof minority status in the Senate. But the more open-minded within the GOP see the reactions of Steele and Limbaugh as reflective of why Specter left the party in the first place.

"This is a sad day for the GOP," Michael Smerconish, a longtime conservative radio host in Philadelphia, told the Huffington Post. "He is what the party needed to be. They need to cultivate more Specters instead of deriding him as a RINO [Republican In Name Only].... The fact that Michael Steele is deriding him for his left wing record is just the same type of bullshit of playing to the base."

Pointing to a Washington Post poll that showed only 21 percent of voters identify themselves as Republicans, Smerconish concluded: "I think the number is down to 20 percent."

Meanwhile Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, one of the few remaining moderate Republicans in the Senate, told the Huffington Post Tuesday that Specter's abandonment of the GOP is "devastating," both "personally and I think for the party."

Indeed, when I spoke with former Senate moderate Lincoln Chafee about Specter's tough political spot roughly a month ago (when the prospect of a primary challenge had only begun to materialize) he lamented the litmus test that GOP officials are forced to take.

"It's enormous pressure, especially with the threats of primary," said the former Rhode Island Republican. "It is a no win. You are trying to help move the country forward and you have this small universe of a Republican primary in Pennsylvania, you are in for a scrap in it."

As David Frum, the former Bush adviser and a forward-looking Republican strategist, opined, shortly after Specter announced his defection: This is "another triumph for the Club for Growth."

"The Specter defection is too severe a catastrophe to qualify as a "wake-up call." His defection is the thing we needed the wake-up call to warn us against! For a long time, the loudest and most powerful voices in the conservative world have told us that people like Specter aren't real Republicans -- that they don't belong in the party. Now he's gone, and with him the last Republican leverage within any of the elected branches of government.

For years, many in the conservative world have wished for an ideologically purer GOP. Their wish has been granted. Happy?"

Digg!

Tagged as: limbaugh, rush limbaugh, specter, david frum, michael steele, arlen specter, specter democrat, olympia snowe, limbaugh republicans, specter steele

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Porn Star Stormy Daniels Is One Step Closer to Taking on Conservative Blowhard David Vitter
Yesterday Daniels announced that she was forming an exploratory committee.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. May 22, 2009.
Democrats Make Massive Gains as GOP Deteriorates
In seven short years, the American electorate has radically changed.
Post by Thomas B. Edsall. May 21, 2009.
Pressure Mounts on Minnesota Governor to Seat Al Franken
Two-thirds of Minnesotans now "believe it's time for [Coleman] to concede."
Post by Sam Stein. May 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Steele is actually right for once
Posted by: Swatopluk on Apr 29, 2009 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apart from the ridiculous "leftist voting record" Steele is imo right for once. I do think that Specter indeed did not change for ideological reasons but because he sees no chance to keep his seat while being a GOPster. I think he is just another Liebermann looking out primarily for himself. Maybe Holy Joe will now switch party too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From One Sinking Ship to Another?
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 29, 2009 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Limbaugh was predictably enraged when Spector defecated--er, defected--and announced he was becoming a Democrat. It's a comfortable fit, because today's Democrats are to the right of the Republican party at the time of Spector's first term. Besides, the GOP gunship is riding low and taking on water fast, so the smarter ones scurry off.

I hope that in future elections we see more than a shift from R to D, red to blue. Both parties have miserably failed the American people. Principled Americans, whether conservative or progressive, should unite behind alternative parties such as the Greens or Libertarians to deny either major party a congressional majority and force concessions beneficial to the people for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Great Loss Pt. 2
Posted by: FullMetalMayhem on Apr 29, 2009 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take him, he was never a real republican, he's a choad and McCain is too. Have them, just give back Powell

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Great Loss Pt. 2 Posted by: VZEQICVA
And the Party of
Posted by: JSquercia on Apr 29, 2009 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the party of old, angry white men shrinks AGAIN . Yes Rush maybe you can drive the Two Modwerate Republicans from Maine into the DemocratIC( Yes Rush it does have an IC at end of its name) Party .
The odd part is that the pool of those identifying themselves as Republicans continues to shrink for just this reason any Moderate Republican who might appeal to Independents is faced by a well financed conservative challenger in the Primary .

What is truly mind boggling is that these so called Conservatives don't vote as Conservatives when they are in power .They expand the size of Government , run huge deficits (see Reagan and Bush ), and actually make us less safe by serving as recruitment tools for Muslim extremists . They do cut taxes but most of that benefit flows to the upper class by cutting taxes on unearned Income
Of course most of those protesting of Tea Day would actually have THEIR taxes cut by the Obama Administration . You know like Joe the Plumber .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And the Party of Posted by: luzmejor
IT'S NOT ABOUT PARTY LOYALTY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 29, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think it's possible to be totally committed to a political party and serve the people well. Their philosphy changes over time and it's only right to stay with why people voted for you in the first place. I myself don't vote along party lines simply because it's 'loyal'. I'm not trying to be loyal to anyone, I want to elect the right people. It takes more guts for a politician to change party affiliation than it does to stay on and 'play the game'. It's not in the best interest of the people. So I think Specter did the right thing. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Set Guidelines to the Disaffected Republicans this time
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 29, 2009 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's not allow these Newbies to slide in once again without setting clear guidlelines- like we failed to do with the Clintons and their DLC in the '80's.
We finally give the high hard on to the Clintonites who were nothing more than the Rats who jumped of the Moral Majority Ship in the '80's and now we have some new defectors who will only solidify the Corp Whore 'ConservaDems'- fuck that!
Heres the Guiding Principles to be a Real Dem and being afforded Our Support
Rule 1- Our mantra is 'We the People'
Rule 2- Equal Rights for ALL
Rule 3- Labor Rights
Rule 4- Generational Responsiblity (to the elderly,the disabled, the kids and the envirnoment)
rule 5- Extending the adage 'We the People' to the World community when faced with international issues.
When in doubt refer to Rule 1. If it does not serve, protect or Defend said Rule- vote against it!
Let's make this very clear a 'Republic' is merely the collective institutional entity (brick & mortar) of 'We the People', aka the DEMocracy.therefore it ranks second in regards to your mission as a Public Servant to 'We the People'!!!thus any rights, priviledges and existence of these Brick & Mortars are reliant on, and Serves at, the Pleasure of the People.
Fair warning to these ConservaDems and any new initiates to the DEMocratic party. This Country was Built By the people and is here to Serve the People, Not the Corps, foreign 'friends' nor any Religous institution.
Your first Test Mr. Spector before granting Membership is EFCA. The ConservaDems should also take heed.
FYI Hillary the current Drug wars going on in Mexico are the same ones we faced after the Corps pulled the rug out from under US. It is not an increase in Drug Use here the the US, nor more weapons production- it's that the Same corps screwed them that screwed US and are now in the process of screwing Asia(refer to Rule #5)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush has opinions about who should leave the Party of the Dead?
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 29, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hah!

After you, Fat Ass.

Specter's defection was a severe psychological blow to the Fat-Assers, and the number 60, while it probably won't mean anything in practice, is a magic mojo number.

None of my business, but if I were Olympia Snow about now (I thought she protested a bit too much), I'd look at Limbaugh, contemplate being represented by this ripe manure machine in the year to come, and reconsider my affiliation. Maybe then it will be 61, and who knows what will happen in 2010.

Sure as I'm born, if Fat Ass and Company keep it up and the poll numbers get any worse any Republican with enough brains to keep breathing will be distancing from the hippo ballet. They won't all become Democrats, of course, but they will want to stop looking like idiotic obstructionists. The only reason they could possibly consider this is rabid self-interest, and I think handwriting is going to start appearing on some walls very soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah, Rush...
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 29, 2009 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that Republic Tent keeps getting smaller and smaller, while you continue to get bigger and bigger... pretty soon Rush will be the only one left in the Tent.

Which is a proper place for his circus act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't let the door hit you in the ass!
Posted by: 2thepoint on Apr 29, 2009 11:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rush is an ass and Steele is right on.

Who wants someone who would vote for a multi trillion$ stim package that is going to do nothing more than weigh down our children with debt with out reading a word of it.

Specter was losing his seat and he sold his soul to the devil, I mean democrats! Obviously those that voted him in office are meaningless to him.

Those type of politicians won't be missed!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what they aren't saying.
Posted by: luzmejor on Apr 30, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Radicals within the Republican noise machine never say what they DO want. Of course, what they want is a return to their high holy days of deference from everyone who believes in honesty, freedom and justice.

America is in a precarious place right now because of their childish and excessive demands to be treated by the rest of us as their uncrowned kings with their courtiers in tow.

They are hoping that by accusing the rest of us of something (anything) they will be able to escape blame for robbing America not only of its goods, but of its wisdom, conscience and humanity..

No, they are not done with us yet. Mark my words...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]