Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

GOP's Civil War Rages on: Gingrich Strikes Back at Limbaugh

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 5:47 AM on March 9, 2009.


Gingrich: "You’re irrational if you don’t want the president to succeed."

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

In his speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference last week, hate radio talker Rush Limbaugh repeated his assertion that he hopes President Obama “fails.” In the same speech, Limbaugh took a veiled shot at former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who is one of his rivals for the leadership of the conservative movement, saying that people who say the GOP needs to move on from Ronald Reagan must be stamped out.

On NBC’S Meet The Press today, Gingrich fired back, saying that “you’ve got to want the president to succeed.” “You’re irrational if you don’t want the president to succeed because if he doesn’t succeed, the country doesn’t succeed,” said Gingrich.

Asked by host David Gregory if that clashed with the views of people like Limbaugh, Gingrich warned against calling for Obama’s failure:

GREGORY: Do you think that Republicans are discordant on that point, about whether they want him to fail or succeed?

GINGRICH: I don’t think anyone should want the president of the United States to fail. I want some of his policies to be stopped, but I don’t want the president of the United States to fail. I want him to learn new policies.

Gingrich’s warning echoes Bill Kristol’s break with Limbaugh on Fox News earlier this week. “Americans wish a new president well,” said Kristol. “They hope his policies succeed, as they should.”

Transcript:

GINGRICH: I thought Mort Zuckerman got it exactly right. This president has popularity, although the fact is that his current approval rating is about the same as George W. Bush at the same point in 2001. Fifty-eight percent for a new president is very normal because people, you’ve got to want the president to succeed. You’re irrational if you don’t want the new president to succeed because if he doesn’t succeed, the country doesn’t succeed. So, fifty, I mean, that’s not…

GREGORY: Do you think that Republicans are discordant on that point, about whether they want him to fail or succeed?

GINGRICH: I don’t think anyone should want the president of the United States to fail. I want some of his policies to be stopped, but I don’t want the president of the United States to fail. I want him to learn new policies.

Digg!

Tagged as: rush limbaugh, barack obama, newt gingrich

Matt Corley is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Porn Star Stormy Daniels Is One Step Closer to Taking on Conservative Blowhard David Vitter
Yesterday Daniels announced that she was forming an exploratory committee.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. May 22, 2009.
Democrats Make Massive Gains as GOP Deteriorates
In seven short years, the American electorate has radically changed.
Post by Thomas B. Edsall. May 21, 2009.
Pressure Mounts on Minnesota Governor to Seat Al Franken
Two-thirds of Minnesotans now "believe it's time for [Coleman] to concede."
Post by Sam Stein. May 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Grousefeather
Posted by: Grousefeather on Mar 9, 2009 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right Newt, and what new policies have you learned?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Newt who?
Posted by: ghoster on Mar 9, 2009 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Newt? Why is he getting any air time at all? Wasn't he the speaker that resigned fifteen minutes after a phone call? He is tainted, but then so are the republicans. Once they figure out that they can't fool all of the people all of the time then they may become relevant again, but not for another four years, and wait until mid terms? That should be fun!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Newt who? Posted by: Quannah
I THOUGHT THE REPUBLICANS LOST THE ELECTION ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 9, 2009 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The daily dose of Rush, Newt, Steel, etc. is getting boring. We spend too much media time and space trying to find the cure for what ails the Republicans. I don't believe I've ever seen losers get this much attention. Let them rebuild their own party. Think about it, we were shunned and ignord by the press for 8 years. I'm all for being civilized, but this is ridiculous. If they chose to have Rush as their leader, so be it. Since when did losers become the news of the day? We are falling into a dangerous pattern by allowing them to dominate the news. Face is, they're just waiting for more awful news (if that's possible) to jump all over Obama. By all means keep an eye on them, but this daily Republican rundown of events is not news. The Repubs don't like looking at Michele Obama's bare arms. "Cover up", they say. Simply put, the gentlemen are lying. Speaking of 'real news' what gives with Afganistan? Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gingrich Strikes back?
Posted by: lamar777 on Mar 9, 2009 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hardly, he was in lockstep. C'mon Alternet I am tired of the semi sensational headlines had it said Gingrich, same old same old I would have skipped it altogether. It is not news. Why has this become old hat here at Alternet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Wu
Posted by: MisterWu on Mar 9, 2009 3:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The nation would be better served if Newt took over all of Rush's speaking engagements. He was a better advocate for debate than Speaker. In someways his reign was the end of civil peoples' representation and the beginning of the age to total partisian politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush Limbaugh
Posted by: Defenestrator on Mar 9, 2009 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rush Limbaugh from Chocolate News

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]