Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Man Behind Proposition 8

Posted by Max Blumenthal, The Daily Beast at 2:56 PM on November 4, 2008.


The reclusive billionaire, the mother of Blackwater's Erik Prince, and the drive to fund this year's most controversial referendum.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

Among the local ballot measures to be decided on Election Day, California’s Proposition 8 is perhaps the most fiercely contested. Backers of the proposition to ban same-sex marriage in the state cast their campaign in apocalyptic terms. “This vote on whether we stop the gay-marriage juggernaut in California is Armageddon,” born-again Watergate felon and Prison Fellowship Ministries founder Chuck Colson told the New York Times. Tony Perkins, the president of the Christian right’s most powerful Beltway lobbying outfit, Family Research Council, echoed Colson’s language. “It’s more important than the presidential election,” Perkins said of Prop 8. “We will not survive [as a nation] if we lose the institution of marriage.”

The campaign for Prop 8 has reaped massive funding from conservative backers across the country. Much of it comes from prominent donors like the Utah-based Church of Latter Day Saints and the Catholic conservative group, Knights of Columbus. Prop 8 has also received a boost from Elsa Broekhuizen, the widow of Michigan-based Christian backer Edgard Prince and the mother of Erik Prince, founder of the controversial mercenary firm, Blackwater.

While the Church of Latter Day Saints’ public role in Prop 8 has engendered a growing backlash from its more liberal members, and Broekhuizen’s involvement attracted some media attention, the extreme politics of Prop 8’s third largest private donor, Howard F. Ahmanson, reclusive heir to a banking fortune, have passed almost completely below the media’s radar. Ahmanson has donated $900,000 to the passage of Prop 8 so far.

I first met Ahmanson in 2004, when he and his wife, Roberta, agreed to an interview request for an article I was writing for Salon. Their exchanges with me marked the first time since 1984 that Howard had agreed to make contact with a journalist, and the first time since 1992 for Roberta. Howard agreed to answer questions only by email because, according to Roberta, his Tourette’s Syndrome made chatting on the phone with a stranger nearly impossible. He functions “like a slow modem,” she said. Her dual role as her husband’s spokesperson and nurse quickly became apparent.

Few Americans have heard of Ahmanson—and that's the way he likes it. He donates cash either out of his own pocket or through his unincorporated Fieldstead & Co. to avoid having to report the names of his grantees to the IRS. His Tourette's syndrome only adds to his mysterious persona, as his fear of speaking leads him to shun the media. While Ahmanson once resided in a mental institution in Kansas, he now occupies a position among the Christian right’s power pantheon as one of the movement’s most influential donors. During a 1985 interview with the Orange County Register, Ahmanson summarized his political agenda: “My goal is the total integration of biblical law into our lives.”

The campaign to teach “intelligent design” in public school classrooms, the Republican takeover of the California Assembly, and the rollback of affirmative action in California—Ahmanson has been behind them all. He has also taken a special interest in anti-gay crusades. Ahmanson’s most controversial episode related to his funding of the religious empire of Rousas John Rushdoony, a radical evangelical theologian who advocated placing the United States under the control of a Christian theocracy that would mandate the stoning to death of homosexuals. With Prop 8 organizers claiming in a virtual mantra that their measure will not harm gays or take rights away from heterosexual Californians, Ahmanson has good reason to conceal his involvement in the campaign.

When Howard F. Ahmanson Jr. was born in 1950, his father, then 44 years old, was feting visiting kings and queens and basking in the opulence of his mansion on Harbor Island, an exclusive address in Southern California's Newport Harbor. Howard Junior was tended by an army of servants and ferried to and from school in a limousine. Watching the world glide by through darkened windows, he was gripped with a longing to cast off his wealth and disappear into anonymity. He burned with resentment toward his father, a remote, towering presence, referred to by friends and foes alike as “Emperor Ahmanson.” While Ahmanson Sr. showered local institutions in the Los Angeles area with charitable gifts from the fortune he amassed as the founder of Washington Mutual, his son was starved for attention.

The Emperor’s succession plans began to erode when Ahmanson turned ten and his beloved mother served his father with divorce papers. She died a few years later. When Howard was 18, his father died, too, sinking him into depths of despair. With his $300 million inheritance, he was now California’s—and perhaps America’s—richest teenager. But he was without direction, afraid and utterly alone. The tics, twitches and uncontrollable verbal spasms caused by his Tourette’s syndrome worsened. He could not cope with his emotions and during increasingly stressful episodes he would uncontrollably blurt out shocking statements. Unable to look people in the eye when he spoke to them, he became socially paralyzed. Diagnosed as schizophrenic, he spent two years at the Menninger Clinic, a Topeka, Kansas psychiatric institution. "I resented my family background," he told the Register in 1985. "[My father] could never be a role model, whether by habits or his lifestyle, it was never anything I wanted."

After graduating from Occidental College with poor marks, Ahmanson became drawn to a heavily politicized brand of Christianity that was growing popular in evangelical circles. He discovered the writings of a radical right-wing theologian whose family was massacred in the Armenian genocide, R.J. Rushdoony, Rushdoony’s book, The Politics of Guilt and Pity, in which the theologian mocked wealthy liberals, struck a particular chord with the young Ahmanson. “The guilty rich will indulge in philanthropy, and the guilty white men will show 'love' and 'concern' for Negroes and other such persons who are in actuality repulsive and intolerable to them,” Rushdoony wrote. Ahmanson read avidly as though Rushdoony were describing his own life.

While Ahmanson gave no indication he shared Rushdoony’s crude racism, through the theologian’s scathing critique of “the guilty rich” he began to release himself from the burden of responsibility to carry on his father’s legacy. He promptly sold his stock in his father's company and invested it in lucrative real estate acquisitions, with a goal of earning returns of 20 to 25 percent per year. That assured that his wealth would grow quickly, but it also made him vulnerable to people who manipulated his residual guilt complex to get a cut of his fortune.

Rushdoony’s political ideas provided Ahmanson with a framework for his philanthropic machinations. Describing his philosophy as “Christian Reconstructionism,” Rushdoony painstakingly outlined plans for the church to take over the federal government and “reconstruct” it along biblical lines. He provided detailed plans for how it would provide healthcare, pave roads and reorganize schools, and how it would mete out justice.

Calling for the literal application of all 613 laws described in the Book of Leviticus, Rushdoony paid special attention to punishments. Instead of serving prison sentences, criminals would be sentenced to indentured servitude, whipped, sold into slavery, or executed. “God's government prevails,” Rushdoony wrote, “and His alternatives are clear-cut: either men and nations obey His laws, or God invokes the death penalty against them.” Those eligible on Rushdoony’s long list for execution included disobedient children, unchaste women, apostates, blasphemers, practitioners of witchcraft, astrologers, adulterers, and, of course, anyone who engaged in “sodomy or homosexuality.”

After Ahmanson’s awakening, R.J. Rushdoony reveled in his discovery of a financial angel willing to fund the growth of his think tank, Chalcedon, while expanding the influence of Reconstructionist philosophy. He rewarded Ahmanson’s generosity by giving him a seat on Chalcedon’s board of directors. Ahmanson was profoundly grateful. At last, in Rushdoony he had found the attentive and approving father he yearned for his whole life. "Howard got to know Rushdoony and Rushdoony was very good to him when he was a young man and my husband was very grateful and supported him to his death," Roberta Green Ahmanson told me. The Ahmansons were at Rushdoony’s side when he died in February 2001.

Roberta Ahmanson was not reticent about her and husband’s political views. When I asked her if they favored biblical law as a governing model for the United States, for example, she casually responded, “I'm not suggesting we have an amendment to the Constitution that says we now follow all 613 of the case laws of the Old Testament... But if by biblical law you mean the last seven of the Ten Commandments, you know, yeah.”

The year of Rushdoony’s death, Ahmanson gave $1 million to the Institute for Religion and Democracy, a conservative outfit in Washington focused on weakening the political influence of historically liberal mainline churches. The IRD immediately placed Roberta Ahmanson on its board of directors after receiving her husband’s donation. Ahmanson’s money was budgeted specifically to generate a smear campaign against the Episcopal Church’s first openly gay bishop, Eugene Robinson. The campaign’s spearhead came in the form of a 2004 column by Weekly Standard editor Fred Barnes titled “The Gay Bishop’s Links.”

Barnes, who neglected to mention his membership on the IRD’s board of directors in his column, falsely alleged that the Web site of a gay youth group Robinson founded contained links to "a pornographic website,” and claimed without independent sourcing that Robinson "put his hands on" a Vermont man "inappropriately" during a church meeting "several years ago." The IRD circulated the column to various cable news networks, but only Fox News—which also employs Barnes as a regular pundit and host of a talk show—agreed to broadcast it.

Though a panel of bishops investigating the charges discredited Barnes' smear, it helped widen the rift within the Episcopal Church and divide it from its global affiliates. In May 2007, 11 ultra-conservative congregations from Northern Virginia bolted from the Episcopal Church and joined forces with the Anglican Church of Nigeria, led by Archbishop Peter Akinola. Akinola, who once called homosexuals “lower than beasts,” spent much of 2006 lobbying his Nigeria’s legislature to pass a bill meting out five year prison terms to any gay people who dare to gather—or even touch one another—in public.

While the Episcopal global schism represented a towering achievement for Ahmanson, the passage of Prop 8 would be the apotheosis of his long career. He does not seek credit—recognition only damages the causes he funds. Ahmanson derives satisfaction from transforming a nation the same way he transformed himself. “The Christian view of man is that we're not perfect,” Roberta Ahmanson told me. “You don't give to things that base themselves on the optimistic view that human beings are going to be doing it right.”

Digg!

Tagged as: religion, california, documentary, san francisco, 2008 election, san diego, proposition 8, spiritual warfare, lou engle, elsa broekhuizen, howard f. ahmanson

Max Blumenthal is a Nation Institute Puffin Foundation Writing Fellow whose work regularly appears in the Nation. A winner of the USC Annenberg Online Journalism Award, he is also a Research Fellow at Media Matters for America.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
LOL
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Nov 4, 2008 4:34 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ROFL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» most controversial referendum? Posted by: Iconoclast421
Propoganda disguised as Journalism
Posted by: pcuff on Nov 4, 2008 4:51 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a bad case of propaganda disguised as journalism. The nut-job featured here contributes 1% of the "Yes on 8" funding and you call him the man behind Prop 8. Of course, this is all to draw a connection between his weird motives and the Proposition---one that doesn't really exist. I read this article thinking I was actually learning news, only to find out I read a long "No on 8" commercial instead. I wonder what you could find if you looked at the money poring in to "No on 8." There are probably a handful of 1% donors who are equally as twisted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» There are 2 sides to that coin Posted by: wolfgangmo
POOR REPORTING
Posted by: DUNKONYOU on Nov 4, 2008 8:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several times you refered to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints as "The Church of Latter Day Saints". I found it interesting that you left out the name Jesus Christ. This is a Church that has been around in the United States since 1830. Membership in the U.S. has reached over 6 million members. Is it too much to expect a reporter to get the name of the Church correct.
Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: POOR REPORTING Posted by: bcgirl125
» RE: POOR REPORTING Posted by: schnoggi
» RE: POOR REPORTING Posted by: DodgerBlues
» re: victim mentality. Posted by: wolfgangmo
» RE: re: victim mentality. Posted by: Lauren
» RE: POOR REPORTING Posted by: Vik
» RE: POOR REPORTING Posted by: Vik
» I am in love with Lauren.... Posted by: Fencerider
Outstanding article about Ahmanson
Posted by: terredee on Nov 4, 2008 8:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The stunning relevance of this article is that most people who might have voted for 8 have no idea what its backers have in mind - a hidden agenda almost no one would want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor timing
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 4, 2008 9:42 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have TS as well. I also came from a fundie Xtian cult. I'm even more outraged at Ahmanson than I was when he and his bank tried to destroy the Conejo Valley with his mammoth housing development, Ahmanson City. While I took a healthier path out of the cult and in dealing with TS, this rich bastard chose to drop grenades and become a domestic cultural terrorist. Disgusting.

And now tomorrow we're going to have to deal with a Republikaaner, protofascist CA legislature and Prop 8, the most heinous piece of pro-fascist legislation in the history of the US. These people need to be stopped. They need to be silenced and shut down and put in prison. They are un-American and anti-American. They're cultists and terrorists.

Thanks Max.... too little, too late. Once a haven of progressive values, California has now become a cauldron of Xtian Taliban hate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poor timing Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Poor timing Posted by: DaBear
Clearly this law is unconstitutional
Posted by: handygeek on Nov 5, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone ever hear of the first amendment? This is why putting state amendments in the hands of the people is fraught with problems. Those making constitutional amendments and those voting on them should have to understand the concepts in the US Constitution. This law will not stand for long. We need a gay couple to take the lead in presenting a case for a supreme court hearing. We need a Roe v Wade for same sex rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uncle Leo
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Nov 5, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm used to religious loonies with southern accents and plastic hair. This guy looks like Seinfeld's Uncle Leo.

And what's with that bizarre gyrating on stage, dude?...Not that there's anything wrong with that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» P.S. Posted by: kepstein7777
Newsflash!
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Nov 5, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of who supported or opposed Prop 8 with money and influence from the shadows, in the end, it is the VOTERS of California who have spoken, LOUD & CLEAR! A commenter in an earlier thread suggested that states get OUT of the marriage business and issue ONLY "civil unions," allowing churches to perform marriages, or not, according to their own teachings and beliefs. This affords gays the "equality" they demand without "crossing a line" that a majority of voters, for sure in CA and most likely in many other states, are not prepared to cross.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Newsflash! Posted by: mjglow
» The Real News isn't News Posted by: dudelette
» RE: Newsflash! Marriage! Posted by: lmwilker
A note to the "Man" behind Prop 8
Posted by: vincentkeith on Nov 5, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My the Lord forgive you sir for your actions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep Your Church Out Of My State
Posted by: mgloraine on Nov 5, 2008 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When religious fanatics decide they need to legislate their lunatic dogma, it's time for Americans to organize against them to defund and dismantle their political machines in order to preserve our democracy.

It's an outrage that a normal gay couple is prohibited from organizing their lives around a stable relationship by by fanatical fringe groups like the Mormon "Church" who meanwhile insist upon their "God-given right" to pedophilia and polygamy. Marriage in California has to be between one man and one woman, but in Utah, Arizona, or Texas, it can be between one man and 18 teenage girls, who get to consummate their "holy matrimony" on a mattress in the "temple" while the elders of the congregation look on (or assist in holding the victim down). But that's OK because God told them to! God also told them to take their ill-gotten cash and start buying laws in other states to replace science with fairy tales, replace education with indoctrination, and to make America safe for pedophiles, polygamists, con-men and fascists.

All religion is fake. Those who profess to believe it are either clueless dupes, or the con-men playing them for their cash and obedient conformity. Time for Americans to wise up and reject religionist dogma as a basis for civil administration. Every political initiative instigated or supported by religionist groups is an assault on freedom and scientific intelligence. The aims of religionists run counter to society as a whole, so it's time for Americans to reject religionists, religious institutions, and their self-serving moralistic fantasies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Straighten your facts
Posted by: Gwendolyn on Nov 5, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, it's the "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," and second, "the church" didn't donate anything. It was members of the church like me that chose to donate, volunteer time, and educate others about the consequences of redefining the most basic unit of society. As a citizen of CA and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I had complete autonomy to participate or not in this campaign. I'm so grateful I did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Straighten your facts Posted by: sade2187
» RE: Straighten your values Posted by: Lauren
» A question Posted by: Karina
This Horse is Already Out of the Barn
Posted by: ms_happy on Nov 5, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let these intolerant boobs spend all their money on trying to quell the tide. You think an unfair law like this will stand when there are already hundreds of gay marriages on the books? Like Civil Rights (we now have a Black president!) the recognized right of gays to marry each other is just around the corner. These nut jobs really can't stop it. I just wish we could send 'em all out on a barge to an undisclosed location where they could wallow in their "God-given" intolerance without bothering the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO MORE SEPARATE BUT EQUAL - and Ahmanson better step out that closet
Posted by: pollen8 on Nov 5, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For many voters Proposition 8 was a "testament of faith." Yet, sadly, this issue had very little to do with faith. For many it was a way to express their disgust for a minority group, and to ensure that they would not enjoy the same privileges as the rest of us. This is a story that repeats itself over and over again in America. SEPARATE BUT EQUAL died in 1957 with Brown v. Board of Education. Let it stay dead so that we can all share the same rights under the Law. AND - for those people who are out there thinking that gay people are wrong, evil, sinful, diseased, unfit --- go look in a mirror and then call a therapist. I'm just saying... ISSUES!! (All closets have doors, bro, STEP OUTTA THAT CLOSET)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is what happens...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Nov 5, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When people don't study history and allow themselves to be led by biggots of all stripes maquerading as messengers from on high. Your assignment today is to go online or to your library and really learn about what marriage is and has always been. An institution devised by states to better keep track of wealth, "rightful" heirs and tax rolls. Most of the crackers who dreamed up this cruel proposition act like gawd itself wrote all this stuff down. All those writings, people, were written by men... men of power with axes to grind in a time when only those in the employ of the king could read and write. The masses were read to and those readings interpreted by the powerful orators of those times and severe examples were made of any who spoke up in disagreement. Fast forward to today and we have all these otherwise good folks believing that something called gawd decrees that only people of the opposite sex or who are "legally" married (Oh yes, those of you heteros who have been life partners but not married for decades will be affected by this too) have the legal rights of marriage. The defeat of Prop 8 will only bring more misery into a world that is bleeding badly from it already.
There are people out there whose job it is to keep the moron factor high in this country. Thet did a splendid job this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is what happens... Posted by: sade2187
» RE: This is what happens... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: This is what happens... Posted by: leafsong1
Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Nov 5, 2008 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in California and am disgusted by these freaks from out of state and our prison system who have decided how California ought to live. I hope they all burn in hell, every last one who thinks that marriage is this big freakin deal and shoud be reserved for men and women. I think Coleson should go back to prison where he belongs and read a couple of history books. Marriage for most of history has been all about money. And people who peddle this doomsday scenario about gay marriage destroying our country should just shut the hell up and get the hell out of my state. If they don't like the way Californians choose to live then stay in Utah or whatever backward, low brain state they come from. I'm so sick of having the religious freaks press their way of life on me I could scream and the very first person who happens my way that pushed this piece of crap initiative will have a facer planted on them. I'd love to hear just one, only one thought on how extactly gay marriage will ruin my life. They have never given one specific thing that would happen. Never.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deb Posted by: JoeSch
» RE: Deb Posted by: sade2187
» RE: Deb Posted by: brucetra
» Now, look here, Fundie Posted by: BobKincaid
» RE: Deb Posted by: DodgerBlues
God Bless America
Posted by: pwprop08 on Nov 5, 2008 2:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is really THE ONE behind!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Religious right
Posted by: sicntired on Nov 6, 2008 12:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people claim to be Christians but have not one Christian trait in their repertoire.They are mean spirited,abusive,prejudiced and don't hesitate to tell everyone else how to live.I prefer the real thing to the opiate of the masses.It does less harm all round.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eligious right Posted by: Lauren
XPolygamistWife
Posted by: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE on Nov 6, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad the author left "Jesus Christ" out of the LDS name! Why do Mormons call themselves LDS v JCLDS? Probably because their religion has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, and everything to do with their pedophile polygamist prophet Joseph Smith who married girls as young as 14.

And why did Mormons spend 20 million on Prop 8 when they do NOTHING about polygamists in Utah who practice tyranny over women and children and receive tens of millions annually in taxpayer handouts?

Watch the video: http://www.bankingonheaven.con

**It's ironic that Ahmanson has Tourette's Syndrome, a very common affliction among FLDS polygamists in Hildale, Utah.

**There are 50-100,000 polygamists in the Utah region.

**FLDS polygamists at YFZ Ranch in Texas are from Colorado City, Arizona and Hildale, Utah.

**Utah polygamists are moving into Texas, South Dakota, Nevada, Colorado, Idaho, Wyoming, and New Mexico.

**Polygamists breed 5-7 times faster than the national average. In 1953 there were less than 300 members in the FLDS - today 10,000. The FLDS represent approx 15% of Mormon polygamists.

**Nearly 200 countries support the United Nations ban on polygamy because it is a human rights violation.

**Male to female birthrates are 50-50, globally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: XPolygamistWife Posted by: Lauren
Here is something you might do...
Posted by: brer on Nov 6, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.mormonsstoleourrights.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Latter Days"--a great film on Mormons and gays
Posted by: zooeyhall on Nov 6, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People might want to check out a gay-themed movie called "Latter Days". I love the scene in it where the Mormon missionaries are telling the gay guy about how god talked to Joseph Smith, and gave him the revelation etc. etc.

And the gay guy asks: "Why is it that if god talks to Joseph Smith, it makes him a prophet. But if I said that god talks to me, people would call me a schizophrenic?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is needed
Posted by: BobKincaid on Nov 6, 2008 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At this point, it's time for the tables to be turned on these Fundie purveyors of hate and bigotry.

"How did you vote on 8?" should be the query. No gay person, nor any person who understands that the Constitution applies to EVERYONE, should speak to, serve, accomodate or have anything to do with those who attempted to institutionalize bigotry, fear and hate.

See, the Fundies want gay folk out of sight, but they still want what the gay community does for society as a whole. Screw that. Let the damned fundies do it for themselves.

And finally, in solidarity with those who fight bigots everywhere, we're putting a sign by our front door: A basball bat with three simple words: "Fundies Not Welcome"

Get On The HORN!

[