Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Voter Suppression Battle In Northwest Indiana

Posted by Josh Kalven, Progress Illinois at 4:47 PM on October 5, 2008.


Democrats want to open satellite voting centers, while Republicans favor voting only at county seats.
density
Northwest Indiana

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

It appears that Lake County, IN may be the latest arena in the GOP's effort to suppress the vote in swing states

First some basics. Under Indiana election law, early voting can only take place in a county clerk's main office. This clearly could be problematic in areas where the county seat is far in distance from the most heavily populated parts of the county. Therefore, the law gives each board of elections the authority to approve early voting centers elsewhere in their county.

Lake County's geography provides the perfect argument for these "satellite" polling places. The county seat, Crown Point, is the 7th most populous city in the county (pop. 24,000) and centrally located. Meanwhile, three of the four biggest municipalities -- Gary (pop. 96,000), Hammond (pop. 77,000), and East Chicago (pop. 30,000) are all located at the northern edge of the county, along Lake Michigan. Together, these towns hold more than 40 percent of the county's residents. Moreover, Gary and Hammond are the fifth and sixth largest cities in the state.

It's in the city clerk's offices in these three towns that the Democratic members of the Lake County Board of Elections wanted to open up satellite voting centers. After all, it's about an hour roundtrip drive to Crown Point from any of them.

But on September 24, the two Republican members of the elections board voted against doing so. Their explanation is that Lake County Democratic chairman Rudy Clay made an agreement early in the year with GOP chairman John Corley to allow satellite voting during the state's presidential primary, but not during the general election.

Why wouldn't the Republicans want residents of these three cities to have easier access to early voting in the weeks leading up to this historic election? Because they're heavily minority, heavily low-income, and heavily Democratic.

Following the 3-2 party-line vote, the board of elections proceeded with its plan to open up the voting centers. Meanwhile, the county Republican Party argued that state law requires each board to unanimously approve any satellite voting and pledged to mount a legal challenge. The Democrats countered that voting centers located in city clerk's offices -- which are part of the county government -- don't fall under the statute cited by the GOP. This is where things get murky. From the Post-Tribune:

At the center of the argument is a 1993 state law creating the combined Lake County Election and Voter Registration Board, a five-member body which now administers elections in the county.

The county clerk is in charge of elections in 91 of the state's 92 counties.

Not in Lake County, though.

According to Republican Election Board attorney Bruce Lambka, satellite voting offices can be set up without a vote in county clerk's offices only in counties where the clerk is in charge of elections.

"In one county, incidentally this one, we vote in the Office of Elections and Registration," Lambka said.

Representatives of Secretary of State Todd Rokita declined to offer an interpretation of the law.

Rokita, by the way, is a Republican.

The GOP's legal challenge has made its way to federal court, where Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen scheduled a hearing for next Thursday and convinced the Democrats not to being early voting at the three locations until he ruled on the injunction filed by the Republicans.

After the recent evidence of voter suppression in Michigan, you can be sure more attention will be paid to this issue in the coming week, perhaps even at the national level. The hearing will ultimately focus on competing interpretations of state election law and the GOP leaders will tell the press that their actions are driven by legal considerations, not political ones. But it's important to remember the critical moment in this whole process: when the two Republican members of the board voted against the additional voting centers, each located in heavily-populated, minority-rich areas. That tells you all you need to know about their motivations.


Democratic Senators: Franken Won't Be Seated with New Class
Fallout from the surreal political scandal in Illinois has now wafted into Minnesota.
Post by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. January 6, 2009.
Update: Al Franken Declared Winner; Coleman's Options Dwindle
"Today, the Supreme Court once again affirmed the validity of the rules under which this recount was conducted."
Post by Steve Benen. January 5, 2009.
Franken Winning Vast Majority of Wrongly Rejected Absentee Ballots
Norm Coleman's lawyers tried to stop the counting of hundreds of wrongly rejected absentee ballots and now we know they had good reason.
Post by tremayne. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Democracy ?
Posted by: Jennie on Oct 5, 2008 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a non-American I find it strange that a country which goes on & on & on adinfitum about democracy being the only proper way to get a government makes it so difficult for its citizens to exercise their democratic rights. Here in New Zealand we also have an election coming up in November and our National news media are full of advertisments for voter enrallment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democracy ? Posted by: naryaquid
The Republicans are dead scared that IN has come into play for the first time in 40 years.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 5, 2008 8:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They know which places are more Democratic than the rest. I hope the Obama camp is on the case as is the Democratic Party at large. Nice to see that state in play. Maybe the languishing labor forces got sick and tired of culture war bullshit and decided to go back to fighting for hope in labor. I don't know if Obama can or even will try but something's got to be done as that state has been suffering severe job losses and heartbroken miseries of broken families and heavy divorces. Indiana shouldn't even be a hick state to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think it's "enrollment". As to the point of your post,
Posted by: naryaquid on Oct 6, 2008 3:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you asking a question or just criticizing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The rethugs
Posted by: willymack on Oct 6, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are like the melanoma on mcbush's face. Excise it in one place, and it appears somewhere else. They'll stop at NOTHING to falsify the vote count, or make life miserable for likely Democratic voters. This is who they are, and what they do, among other illegal and immoral deeds. One thing for certain is that those assholes shouldn't be anywhere near election facilities, or have any power to influence election outcomes. It's time for UN supervision of our elections as we've become a tinpot dictatorship in every thing but name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Putative reasons cited?
Posted by: Scarabus on Oct 6, 2008 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One question is whether they can do it. The other is why they want to do it. No, I don't mean the real reason. I mean how do they justify wanting to make it harder for citizens to vote rather than easier?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lee
Posted by: FernLee on Oct 7, 2008 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder why it's OK for some states to have voting by mail but these people (can you say Democrats?) can't even vote without traveling a long distance? I say get the Indiana Democratic Party to supply chartered buses to the county seats to let these people vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]