Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

US Military Escalation Leads to Record Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan

Posted by ZP Heller, Brave New Foundation at 3:41 PM on June 29, 2009.


Take action to help those affected by recent US airstrikes.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Take Action in your
mailbox!

 

According to the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and a newly released UN report, there were 800 civilian casualties between January and May 2009. Armed clashes between insurgents, the US military, and the ISAF are up 24 percent this year, and have displaced tens of thousands more people. With over 1,000 recorded incidents of violence in May alone, Afghanistan is experiencing the worst security since the war began. And to make matters worse, the UN reported concluded, “The next period will likely experience an increase in the level of violence compared with the same period last year, including complex suicide attacks, intimidation and assassinations carried out by insurgents.” That period, unfortunately, coincides with the Afghan presidential and provincial council elections slated for August. The deadly consequences of militarizing the political crisis in Afghanistan may seem logical, but they're no less disturbing as we see staggering numbers of civilian casualties from this war. Complicating matters is the fact that insurgents have been targeting NGOs and aid workers. In the past six months, there were over 60 security incidents involving NGOs, with many aid workers reported killed or kidnapped. Such violence undercuts the chances of already underfunded humanitarian efforts, and yet the Pentagon has responded with more troops and airstrikes, creating more violence, more casualties, more anti-American sentiment, and the need for even more aid.

US military leaders clearly view the precarious situation in Afghanistan in part as a PR war. That's why they were so quick to blame Taliban militants for the Farah province aistrikes that left up 140 civilians dead. But as Gareth Porter reported last week, the official military investigation of that disastrous attack revealed there were no Taliban fighters killed during second and third B-1 bombings, in which the majority of civilians died. So much for the military's human shield theory. We can't allow the Pentagon to continue blaming Taliban insurgents when it's obvious that these civilian deaths are primarily the result of current US foreign policy. To help those Afghans whose lives have been shattered by US military operations, contribute to RAWA through the Afghan Women's Mission. And to help change foreign policy to incorporate a more humanitarian approach, sign up to become a Peacemaker.

Digg!

Tagged as: death, barack obama, civilian deaths, rethink afghanistan, bombs

ZP Heller is the editorial director of Brave New Films. He has written for The American Prospect, AlterNet, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and The Huffington Post, covering everything from politics to pop culture.


Has Japan's Dolphin Slaughter Been Prevented?
Media presence in Taiji seems to be keeping the dolphin killers at bay -- for now.
Post by Tara Lohan. September 1, 2009.
GOPcrazy: Stop the Angry Mob
The conservative mob scare tactic isn’t new. Let's stop it in its tracks.
Post by John Sellers. August 19, 2009.
What's In It For Jim?
Millions of Americans are in real need of health care reform. Here are just a few of their stories.
Post by Sally Kohn. August 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Wow Sad...
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Jul 6, 2009 1:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so sad.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]