Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Too Little, Way Late, Mr. Kissinger

Posted by Alexander Zaitchik at 4:12 PM on January 5, 2007.


Alexander Zaitchik: Not liking the nuclear trend lines, Kissinger finally flashes the peace sign.
kissinger
PEEK

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Alexander Zaitchik in your
mailbox!

 

In 1958, Harvard Professor Henry Kissinger published Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. The book argued that people should relax about the use of those newfangled hydrogen bombs, which didn't necessarily spell doom for humanity, let alone vast continental powers like the United States and the Soviet Union. Because manageable, limited nuclear war was possible, the nuclear option should be kept on the table during crises, argued Herr Professor. In certain cases, the nuclear option was preferable to a prolonged conventional war.

As in, say, the latter stages of the Vietnam War. Nixon and Kissinger famously and seriously contemplated using nukes against North Vietnam; "madman theory" hype aside, they really did think about it.

But there was the same Henry Kissinger -- who, together with Edward Teller, was one of the inspirations for Dr. Strangelove -- arguing in the Wall Street Journal yesterday for the abolition of nuclear weapons. The essay -- entitled "A World Free of Nuclear Weapons" and co-authored with George Shultz, William Perry and Sam Nunn -- lays out a commonsense and urgent plan for American leadership to stop and reverse proliferation, with the ultimate goal of complete abolition. Fifty years after writing a sanguine book about thermonuclear charges being detonated over cities, Kissinger is worried that things have gotten out of hand.

Describing a post-Cold War world in which reliance on nuclear weapons for deterrence is "becoming increasingly hazardous and decreasingly effective," Kissinger et. al. site Reagan's vision of a world without nukes and put forth a laundry list of steps to get us there. They are taken largely from the Ted Turner-funded Nuclear Threat Initiative, which Nunn co-chairs. The main elements include immediately reducing the size of nuclear arsenals, taking weapons off of hair-trigger alert, and halting the production of all weapons-grade fissile material. The last of these is arguably the lynchpin. To paraphrase Stalin: no material, no problem.

Kissinger's late conversion to abolitionism is not the first time a hawkish doyen of Cold War strategy has seen the nuclear light in his sunset years. Paul Nitze, author of the foundational Cold War document NSC-68, became a passionate crusader against nuclear weapons in his last years. Former Sec. of Defense Robert McNamara is another vocal proponent of abolition.

Nitze and McNamara had almost zero influence when they began penning their anti-nuclear op-eds in the 1990s. But Kissinger, if Bob Woodward is to be believed, still has the ear of George W. Bush. One wonders if the real Dr. Strangelove has taken a moment to admonish what is likely his last student on the folly of his nuclear ways.

It's possible, but I tend to doubt it.

Digg!

Alexander Zaitchik is a journalist in Washington, D.C.


Is Reason Magazine Afraid of Naomi Klein's Book?
Alexander Zaitchik: Klein's book is a serious one, a monster shot across the bow of staunch Friedmanites like the ones at Reason.
November 19, 2007.
Jerry Falwell's War On Kwanzaa
Alexander Zaitchik: The Moral Majority has seen the enemy, and it wears a dashiki.
January 3, 2007.
Castro Outlives Another American President
Alexander Zaitchik: Remembering Gerald Ford (and Frank Church), who took the bulls-eye off the bearded one.
December 27, 2006.
George Will Hates "You"
The dean of conservative columny tees off on citizen journalism.
December 22, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nukes are worthless
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jan 6, 2007 5:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in this new world. Kissinger et al realise that now that the 'unwashed' have nukes that it is time to try to get rid of them. Don't worry, the 'powers' have plenty of nice biological and chemical 'ideas', some of which can be targeted for quick-vectors or genetic makeup or pre-vaccination use. Nukes are obselete because they destroy too much. A nice biological/chemical (or the neutron bomb, which, I guess is a nuke but -supposedly- us and the Russkies did away with) is a much better option for the Kissinger, Brezinskis, Cheney, Albright types....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too Little, Too Late
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Jan 6, 2007 7:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No atonement for Kissinger and Nitze. But yes, we can fantasize about Kissinger suggesting to Bush that his administration can their cockamamie nuclear ideas like reduce the number of nukes, but make newer, more effective ones so you don't need as many. Not to mention, don't even think about using tactical nukes in Iran.

For what a negative force a comparative unknown to the public like Paul Nitze was since World War II, read James Carroll's House of War, about the militarization, and more specifically, the nuclearization of the US since WWII.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Herr Professor
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Jan 6, 2007 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Herr Professor Kissinger should be sent to International Court of Justice to be tried as a war criminal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Herr Professor Posted by: Just Curious
Dr Strangelove
Posted by: askirsch on Jan 8, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No argument about the column, especially, but a note about the alleged connection between Kissinger and Strangelove. Alex shows the same ahistoricity of most of the people who went to see revivals of Dr S in the 70s and 80s. The film came out in 1964; most people (certainly most in Hollywood) had not heard of Henry K until his appointment as Nixon's National Security Avisor in 1969. K had nothing -- repeat, nothing -- to do with the movie. Teller, maybe, but the main inspiration was Werner Von Braun.

The character addresses the president as "Mein Fuhrer", something Teller (a Jewish refugee from Hitler) would certainly not have done. Von Braun, on the other hand, was the leader of a pack of German rocket scientists, some of whom worked for us, others for the Russians; a common gag of the day was "Our Germans can beat your Germans".

Most readers, of course, were born since 1960 and so have no sense of this context. And Alex was born in 1975, I think. (He was two when I arrived in Boston in 1977) The projection, by the audience, of Kissinger onto Sellers' character says more about the audience, during and post-Vietnam, than it does about old Henry.

Say hi to Allison and the folks, Alex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ancient Briton
Posted by: gcarnal1 on Feb 2, 2007 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate that any peace talk from Henry Kissinger is bound to be received with some skepticism. But I read the Wall Street Journal article after studying the British Government's White Paper proposing a replacement of its current nuclear weapons system so that it could stay nuclear to the middle of the present century. The Kissinger/Perry/Schultz/Nunn article showed an awareness of 21st century realities which was completely lacking in the White Paper. The article has been little noticed in Britain, where a hangover from our imperial past makes a lot of people feel nukes are necessary to help us remain a significant player on the world stage.
As for Kissinger himself, skeptics should remember that in politics the right thing is seldom done until there are bad reasons for doing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]