Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Real Loss of Michael Jackson's Death

Posted by Tom Degan, AlterNet at 12:00 PM on June 26, 2009.


In the heat of the now-deceased pop star's canonization, why is no one talking about the damage he dealt to the black community?
michaeljackson

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Tom Degan in your
mailbox!

 

This may not do me a bit of good. Gather 'round, children, while Mr. Degan commits journalistic suicide. Please forgive me for not participating in the canonization of Michael Jackson.

This is not meant as a condemnation of the man's private life, his eccentricities or the accusations hurled against him in the last decade and a half of his all-too-short life. A jury found him innocent of the worse charge (other than murder) that can possibly be made against a human being. We can speculate forever but in the final analysis, we have no other choice but to respect their verdict. My problem with Michael Jackson is a bit more complicated.

One day in the Spring of 1971 I heard a song on the radio by a group called the Jackson Five that was called Never Can Say Goodbye. It was (and is to this very day) one of the most beautiful pop songs I have ever heard. A couple of months later I read in the paper that he would be celebrating his thirteenth birthday the following day on August 29. This news piqued my curiosity; I had just turned thirteen less that two weeks before on August 16. Because the two of us were born on the same month in 1958, I would find myself over the years following his triumphs with the pride of a schoolboy watching a favored classmate win the World Series one year after another. Over a span of time, however, that pride would devolve into bewilderment and then later on, disgust.

Although I was never a huge fan of his music (my Jackson collection comprises a mere handful of 45 RPMs and one long-playing album) there was never any denying that the man was possessed of immense talent. It was my belief that, like Sinatra, he'd still be packing them in at eighty years of age. How ironic is that?

Last night in front of the Apollo Theater in Harlem, Al Sharpton was lauding Jackson as a shining example to the Black community. I am sorry but no statement could be further from the truth. At a time in history when young African American males were desperately yearning for a positive role model to look up to, Michael Jackson was running scared from his racial heritage.

This is where I will probably get myself into big trouble. After all, I'm just a middle-aged white guy (assuming I live to be one-hundred-and-one). What right have I to judge Michael Jackson - or any other black person for that matter? Who the hell am I? My "right" (such as it is) is as an casual observer of "American pop culture" and nothing more. I attempt here to be neither psychiatrist nor sociologist.

Watching the slow evolution of his features through the years - the "Caucasianization", if you will, of Michael Jackson - could not have been something that would make your average African American kid swell up with any amount of pride. The martyred South African dissident Steve Biko used to tell his people that "Black is Beautiful". Although Jackson never dared to say it out loud, he spent most of his adult life implying that "Black is Ugly". There is no other explanation for it - none.

Here's the irony: In his heyday, before the multitude of "procedures" which would eventually alter his looks to a horrible, grotesque degree (procedures he would deny to his dying day) Michael Jackson was an extraordinarily good looking guy.

No one could fault him for his first plastic surgery in the early eighties. In the past many Hollywood legends, for whatever reasons (not all of them bad) have sought to "soften" their features. Actually the result pretty was good. Picture him as he appeared in 1983 with Paul McCartney in the Say! Say! Say! video. He looked great, didn't he? Why couldn't he leave well enough alone? What was the man thinking?

By the turn of the new twenty-first century he no longer looked like a African American male. Do you remember the infamous mug shot after he was arraigned in 2003? He reminded me of Faye Dunaway as Joan Crawford in Mommie Dearest. Google both images if you think I'm exaggerating.

What has amazed me since the news of his demise came over the television yesterday afternoon are the writers who have credited Michael Jackson with being the first "cross-over" African American artist to reach a predominantly white audience. Most of those writers are in their early thirties and may be forgiven for not remembering the names Nat King Cole, Johnny Mathis, Billie Holiday, Duke Ellington, Sammy Davis Jr, The Mills Brothers, Josephine Baker, Jimi Hendrix, Ella Fitzgerald, Billy Eckstine, Bill Cosby, Diana Washington, Sarah Vaughan, Eartha Kitt, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Sidney Poitier, Richard Pryor, Dick Gregory, Stevie Wonder, Charlie Parker, Miles Davis, Dizzy Gillespie, Jackie Wilson, Sam Cooke, Diana Ross and the Supremes - and a score or more other pioneers who were able to chip away the walls of America's racial divide years before Jackson entered our collective consciousness. That he was a major influence cannot be argued. But he was not the first - far from it.

One can't help wonder what might have happened had this most gifted performer not attempted to hide who he was and made more of an effort to reach out to those children of his own race; the youth who would eventually look to identify with the jackasses who produce "Gangsta Rap". Some of these kids - most of whom had no conscious memory of the Jackson Five or even Thriller - believed him to be white. And why shouldn't they think that? He was white! He was whiter than I - and I'm pretty damned white! (Irish complexion, you know).

To say that he was a good example for African American kids to emulate is - forgive me - one step shy of insane.

We have to give the man his due: Michael Jackson was - beyond a shadow of a doubt - a great artist whose recorded legacy will endure for decades, maybe even a century or more. But an examination of his life is riddled with questions of all that might have been; all that should have been. It is more than likely that this was a severely mentally ill human being who never sought the treatment he so desperately needed; surrounded by fawning sycophants who enabled his sickness by constantly reassuring him that he could do no wrong. As John Lennon once said in the same context about Elvis Presley, another victim of the excesses of fame: "It's always the courtiers that kill the king".

The sad, inescapable truth is that, for reasons we will probably never be able to fully understand, his talent and his career were ultimately wasted. Therein lies the real, unspeakable tragedy of Michael Jackson.

AFTERTHOUGHT:

Oh yeah, and by the way, Farrah Fawcett died yesterday, too.

Digg!


Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I have often thought the same things.
Posted by: Xynyx on Jun 26, 2009 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An amazingly talented dancer, musician, performer, etc., Michael Jackson would have been a very sharp-looking black man, had he left nature alone. What was it in his life that caused him to think he needed to look different? Was this an addiction? Was there abuse of some sort? Was it just a lack of self-esteem?

I was never a fan... but I readily acknowledge his extraordinary talent. I think he killed himself, though. It's just... kinda sad.



I was a fan of Farrah, as most teenage boys at the time were. Sad loss there, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The path he chose to follow killed him
Posted by: pelican beak on Jun 26, 2009 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Jackson's music was catchy pop, but it didn't speak to me. But I respect that it did to many others.

At age 54 myself, I consider dying at 50 the age after which no one can justifiably complain their life was unfairly cut short. And I believe dying quickly and suddenly as he did is far preferable to the long slow decline and hanging-on which is the lifeblood of so much modern medicine.

My sadness isn't that he died when he did. My sadness is about how wealth and celebrity screws people up - particularly sensitive artists. MJ had it since childhood, and it fucked him up. I pity him more than anything else, because he wasn't up to the intense psycho-damage he both chose and was forced to endure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The work, art & talent
Posted by: weathered on Jun 26, 2009 1:40 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fell off him as he had so much.
His work w/Quincy, simply elegant.

PurduePharma lost another customer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now I know how my parents and other adults felt
Posted by: badkitty on Jun 26, 2009 3:52 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now I know how my parents and other adults felt when the Beatles came along. Michael Jackson left me cold. There was no song or video (I liked that Johnny Cash video at the end of his life and I really like Current TV) of his that ever impressed me. Of course, I am eight years older than you, Tom, but I've seen James Brown, and of course, early Motown (I'll never forgot the three consecutive months in 1964 in which the Supremes put out Where Did Our Love Go, Baby Love, and Come See About Me) so I never saw anything in Michael Jackson.

So don't worry about your journalistic career, Tom, I'll always enjoy reading you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a white Canadian born with only one racially mixed family in the whole town
Posted by: RR#1 on Jun 26, 2009 4:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What jumped out at me in all of these names is Jimi Hendrix, the undisputed guitar virtuoso who pressed it on everybody, black or white. Jimi Hendrix is practically ignored by both and much of his music remains unsurpassed in it's originality and creativity still light years ahead of it's time. Stevie Ray Vaughn, and a few virtuoso have tried to walk in his shoes but could not...Yet he is not given his due by either racial group for some reason...I don't get it, and I was born in 1955, loved Sammy D JR, Ella, Ray James Brown, Mowtown, Watched SLY STONE give his infamous 20 minute show when I was 12 my first concert, Mother Mother brought tears to my eyes and the list goes on yet none of them crossed over the way Hendrix did. Anybody else feel this way? Tell me, What's Goin On?

RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I worked on an Indian Reservation in a Native Treatment Centre
Posted by: RR#1 on Jun 26, 2009 4:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thanks to their acceptence. In any case what I learned is that the prejudice becomes so ingrained, that individuals self hatred isn't like that experienced by whites but they hate being INDIAN. It is the shame induced in a racially prejudiced community that they hate their very essence who they are so to speak. Of course, after dealing with the regular problems one does in a treatment centre ( this was actually a trauma centre the dysfunction that arises in a community that has been under attack from genocide for a century) it is trama that we are dealing with, the introduction to traditonal beliefs, the medicine wheel, the sweats, the day of the dead and others cerimonies I have forgotten the name of re-introduced or introduced everyone to their heritage and what emerges is beautiful absolutely, and the addictions are overcome. You might think Micheal was full of self loathing for being Black but then you would have to say that his skin disease was a lie wouldn't you? My Aunt had this disease and belive me as a child I felt repulsed until I got her loving and I could "see" how beautiful she truly was....I think she would have bleached to be one colour too if she had the chance.
Cheers,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Folks self-destruct how they choose.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 26, 2009 8:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Money and Beatles rights make those choices a bit more interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have to disagree on one point...
Posted by: jparsons on Jun 27, 2009 12:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it is NOT forgivable for writers, just because they
are in their early thirties, to "forget" about the
other black artists when eulogizing Jackson. It's embarrassing.

The rest? Spot on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't worry
Posted by: andrushka on Jun 27, 2009 3:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom Degan, you certainly wont lose my custom.
No later than this morning I was wondering with my husband about the hysterics all over the world over the death of Michael Jackson. Yes, he was a good artist - he left me completely cold (I am a good bit older than you in age but I don't think in mind...)and I buy every word of your article. Thank you for having written it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michael died about 25 years ago, give or take
Posted by: beachcomberT on Jun 27, 2009 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All we had ever since was a pale ghost, making himself look increasingly ugly and ridiculous. Hardly an inspiration to youth of either race. His family or so-called friends like Diana Ross and Elizabeth Taylor should have gotten him psychiatric help early on. At least now he is out of his misery, and the media can get on with its autopsy frenzy, in the tradition of its past trashings of Elvis, Marilyn, Judy Garland, Belushi, Joplin, et al. Hopefully, in a week or so the circus will be over, and we can get back to the reality of rising unemployment, foreclosures, gutting of health-care reform, and more idiocy in Afghanistan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But none of us knows
Posted by: goeswithness on Jun 27, 2009 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...WHY he did what he did. I think it's would be wrong to make the assumption that it's because he hated being black. After all, he always stayed with a style of music associated with black people. He didn't seem to shy away from associating with them in private or in his videos - remember Iman as the beatiful Egyptian lady in one of them, for instance. His kids' nanny or governess or whatever she is is African American.

I don't know what it was all about - obviously it was some sort of mental problem. One thing I read the other day was that perhaps he wanted to look least like his father as he possibly could. I don't know if that's true either, but I think it's at least as plausible as the idea that he hated being African American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But none of us knows Posted by: blitzmesser
Shame on you Tom Degan
Posted by: highkarate on Jun 27, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is a shallow piece of thoughtless drivel.

As most people know Michael was abused and thrust into the limelight of white dominated pop culture at a very early age.

That Michael developed problems along the way is well known to everyone but to put the onus on MJ and not blame the media or the music industry at all is ridiculous.

MJ was a great ambassador to the world and brought a generation of young people one of the greatest entertainers the world will ever see.

That he had deep psychological issues that caused him to cross the line at the very least is just sad, and will forever be a stain on an amazing artists career.

But to put all the blame on MJ for just trying to adjust to a society that adored him but looked at him as "too black" is ridiculous.

He is a hero to the "black community" and made the sounds of soul and R&B safe for white people.

It was not just sycophants around him, it is a whole white dominated media that is to blame.

Tom, please stick to what you know.

If you want thoughtful and relevant criticism of culture and media then look here-

jasondylan.wordpress.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shame on you Tom Degan Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Shame on you Tom Degan Posted by: highkarate
» RE: Shame on you Tom Degan Posted by: masthead
» Nonsense. Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: Nonsense. Posted by: highkarate
» RE: Shame on you Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Shame on you highkarate Posted by: Amy27605
» RE: Shame on you highkarate Posted by: highkarate
I disagree on one other issue.
Posted by: Parcival01 on Jun 27, 2009 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Jackson was a media phenomenon is unmistakeable. My brother years ago kept tabs on some DJ in I think New England who kept track of nationwide media coverage of MJ back in the 1980s. MJ had a public relations apparatus to beat the band! Every day--EVERY DAY--for years, there was something in the national media about Michael Jackson.

Where I disagree with you is MJ's "talent." He was, truly, a well-sold commodity, but was he particularly talented? (Years ago, an acquaintance said she'd gone to an MJ concert which was for her a "religious experience." I told her, "I go to another church.")

That's MARKETING, not talent.

Now we see the consequences of that media overcoverage: the guy looks like an escapee from a leper colony, spent more money in a year than most of our communities will make in our collective lifetimes. He apparently did more prescription drugs than your average Emergency Room.

And you have of all people Deepak Chopra on Keith Olbermann's "Countdown" weeping over the loss of a "brother." I can't tune into an otherwise good news show without hour-long coverage of the death of a freak show!

I mean, American prisons are overcrowded with black inmates in for not doing much, and we're drooling over MJ's death?

The economy is falling apart and most of our retirement funds are dissolving, and we're weeping over the not-unpredictable death of a pop star?

Adults' tears are eroding the streets in Los Angeles, and one can't find other more worthy stories on the news...the list goes on.

Okay, let the challenges roll in. I must be a a minion of Satan, or whoever challenges the role of pop stars gone bad.

And for those who wonder, no, I don't assert that either Elvis or John Lennon were worth all that much media attention either, whether they were talented or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Or are afraid to say... Posted by: Parcival01
» I missed that one. Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: I missed that one. Posted by: marew
Have you no shame!!
Posted by: Pegaleg on Jun 27, 2009 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The man is dead. For godsake let him rest in peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Whiteness" is the Real Problem - for all of us
Posted by: swisewolfcr on Jun 27, 2009 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Jackson's undeniable talent and love showed through the various and nefarious obstacles placed in his way and he should be remembered at least in part for the courage it took to deal with the "fame machine" that U. S. culture has become, even if he wasn't fully able to "keep the faith" and "overcome."

What really caused Michael to deny his God-given identity was the white supremacy that is the basis for U. S. culture, surrounding all of us and "coloring" our perceptions of each other. Until we deal more directly with "whiteness," until we get rid of the mindset that keeps us from loving each other as true equals, as James Baldwin said, "there is no hope for us."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Satanic Minions and the Death of Michael Jackson
Posted by: goodsensecynic on Jun 27, 2009 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite the sensitivies of those who are repelled by poking about in Michael Jackson's life and legacy, I shall cheerfully join the merry minions of mendacity who find the subject irresistable.

I will, however, avoid the existential issue of what is to praise or blame (the individual, various sycophantic "friends," the industry or society at large) for his (and our) various fates. It is an intriguing, enduring but ultimately unanswerable question.

I do, however, want to raise some possibly meaningful issues of the language we use to frame our conversations.

1. If Michael Jackson was an "ambassador to the world," who did he represent and who appointed him? Appeals to two expressions, "role model" and "community" are becoming unacceptably tiresome. Except for such worthies as volunteer fire fighters and influential school teachers, most role models are celebrities notable for displays of integrity, compassion or (most often) relentless ambition. As for communities, they are most often merely accidental demographic data. I am in my mid-60s, male, heterosexual, vaguely leftist, irreligious, of Irish-French ancestry and a college professor. So, I am supposedly a member of these putative communities; but, I would probably dislike many of my fellows and they might reasonably care little for me. If such communities exist as other than pointless abstrations, they should be at least compelled to stage Annual General Meetings.

2. Was Michael Jackson a "hero to the Black or any other community? Heroism is a problematic concept. Someone (Schopenauer, I believe) once called it "the virtue of the second lieutenant." It connotes some display of courage in adverse situations, but it in no way implies wisdom or any of the more reflective character traits. I am, of course, certain that Michael Jackson had his share of trials and troubles, but I am less sure that he demonstrated the qualities necessary to be labeled heroic - unless staying alive in his circumstances for five decades is enough to merit inclusion in that otherwise exclusive club.

3. What, if anything, is so great about making an entertainment form "safe" for the melanin-challenged. Quite apart from Tom Degan's representative, if not exhaustive, inventory of "cross-over" artists, can anyone say that Mae West and the Marx Brothers were funnier aften Hollywood succumbed to self-censorship in 1934? Was Elvis Presley's recording of "That's Alright Mama" a genuine breakthough, or an evisceration of Black music in the United States? Would "All in the Family" ever have been broadcast on American television if it had been true to the much edgier British series "Till Death Do Us Part" on which it was based? And what, in the end, did the Kingston Trio do for (or to) traditional American folk music? Only Tom Dooley knows for sure!

These are nevertheless questions that students of (and participants in) popular culture might usefully address. Michael Jackson's legacy will, of course, be discussed in the popular press for a few days. Hyperintense graduate students of sociology will surely craft MA theses on the postmodern semiotics of "Thriller" and polysyllablicly deconstruct it in terms of racial-racist hegemonic discourse. In the end, it will do us no irredeemable harm to discuss these matters. Michael Jackson was, after all, a temporarily important commercial commodity, and ours is a remorselessly commerical society. So, holding an inquiry into Mr. Jackson's place in the music business is apt. Who knows? It may even yield an occasional insight.

Meanwhile, we may assure ourselves that Michael is quite indifferent to our musings. He is peacefully decomposing and at rest ... as, of course, we shall all be in time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Valid questions... Posted by: Parcival01
According to Al Sharpton,
Posted by: progressive-life on Jun 27, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MJ did more good for the black community than anyone else...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: According to Al Sharpton, Posted by: oldhippy39
Michael Jackson has many fans
Posted by: vsargis on Jun 27, 2009 11:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amazing no one had anything positive to say when he was being accused of child molestation etc, but now he has been canonized as the King of Pop. How low can MTV go to boost record (CD,DVD, mp3 etc.,) sales? Corporations still make profits even in his death. At the same time they try to pass it off as "celebration" of the King of Pop...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When I got the news-
Posted by: oldhippy39 on Jun 27, 2009 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Michael Jackson was dead at 50, I immediatly went out and bought a 6-pack to celebrate. Yes, he was acquited on charges of child molestation, but then so was O.J. Simpson
My point is that if you're a celeb in California and have a lot of money, you can quite literally "get away with murder"
I wonder how many jurors became "instant millionaires when M.J. was acquited?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rhinoplasty abuse
Posted by: marsmath on Jun 27, 2009 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was MJ's brothers that 'reminded' him all the time, as a kid, that he had a huge nose. I doubt that any of them have ever felt a little guilty. Look how they were all raised.

Personaly, I think that all of his music is just 'Pop' fluff. But then, I'm into progressive rock and classical. You know, real music.;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

does not matter if your black or white...
Posted by: thealltheone on Jun 27, 2009 3:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He did not represent the black race and wanted to transend race. If you do not understand how he was raised, how he lived, how he thought and were not a fan, you really should not write an article or comment at all. I saw plenty of coverage of Farrah...plenty, leading up to her impending death. MJ died suddenly. MJ had the biggest hit of all time in Thriller. they played it at a club I went to last night and the dance floor went wild. Whether it is your cup of tea or not, he was well loved by many. I was never a big fan, but being in the music biz, he was considered a genius and made a lot of money doing it. As a philanthropist, in 2000 he was listed in the Guiness book for suporting the most charities by a pop star, the song "we are the world" raised millions for famine relief in Africa, he gave to everything from Elizabeth Taylor's Aids foundation, make a wish, juvenile diabetes to sickle cell. can't even name them all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah, Mikey was such a saint... Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: Yeah, Mikey was such a saint... Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: Yeah, Mikey was such a saint... Posted by: thealltheone
» The price of celebrity. Posted by: Parcival01
"credit to his race" argument?
Posted by: shahzhi on Jun 27, 2009 4:35 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know Tom - I think you are basing your opinions on some assumptions about black Americans. Here are my thoughts as a middle-aged black woman who listens to music from all over the U.S. and the world (and has followed Michael since 1969). I listen with my ears, not my eyes:

1. If Michael had been white, would you have held him up as a role-model for all of white America, or are black folk only supposed to look to other black folk for inspiration? I don't know a black person who isn't a fan of his.

2. As strange as it is to change one's skin color (his skin condition aside) or have plastic surgery (just my opinion), black Americans realize that we come in a huge variety of shades, so the comment as to where he should have stopped, is your opinion, but his business. By the way, I know blacks who are his shade naturally. How do you explain white Americans who risk pain and melanoma trying to get darker?

3.Based on the reactions of people of all races in the U.S. and around the world, people paid attention to his talent, not his looks. The reaction to his death was spontaneous, not a media blitz created by the MSM. An instantaneous reaction of this magnitude says a lot.

4. It really seems that black artists, athletes, etc. are held to a different standard by white America and somehow seen as being representative of all of us.

5. Finally, when it comes to appreciating those who came before, Michael knew and acknowledged whose shoulders he stood on. He took what he learned to "the next level". This country has a long-term memory problem when it comes to giving credit where it is due, and outright amnesia when it comes to giving credit to black folk for what we have done for this country the last 400 years. The black Americans I know paid attention to his music - his skin color was his own "thing". And he did what he wanted to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thank you Posted by: thealltheone
» THANK YOU shahzhi Posted by: colocha
» RE: "credit to his race" argument? Posted by: IRIQUOIS227
toby
Posted by: Toby on Jun 27, 2009 7:26 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of this wole thread, it is mostly Shahzi who gets it right. Why are so many white, middle aged men feeling called upon to evaluate MJ? As one myself - a gay one with a black partner of many years, I would mention my partner has a mild case of the skin disorder in question, affecting only his legs, and it bothers him psychologically a great deal. He will not wear shorts, for example. This disorder is NOT some fantasy of MJ's. It is quite real. As for the nose job, personally I think it was a big mistake but you what? It is NOT my nose in question. Are all those white women (and men) who have the same procedure denying their whiteness? Michael was a kind, generous person and, regardless of the oh-it-was-just- commercial attitudes of previous posters, his music clearly moved millions of people. Anyhing that can do that is ipso facto important art. However, what I most object to in the column this thread refers to, is the snide,self righteous opening in which MJ's trial is gratuitously brought up and then grudgingly laid aside with the observation that, since a jury found him innocent, we will just have to go along with it. How vile and insinuating. If there is a mind in the gutter here, it is not Michael Jackson's.You all might recall that the only one of MJ's posse of young friends who ever actually spoke to the issue was the Culkin boy, who said, unequivocally, Michael never did anything wrong. Culkin was himself of legal age when he spoke and had no obvious reason to speak out except to clear the air. That a part of MJ never grew up is fairly obvious. From thence came both his genius and his trouble.For Heaven's sake, the man is dead - let us respect his accomplishments and let the only dirt be that which decently covers his grave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MJ had Vitiligo
Posted by: fratricide08 on Jun 27, 2009 8:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He didn't hate his skin color. He had a disease that stole his color, left him splotchy like a jersey cow, and brought the entire world's ignorant indignation upon him. The "lightening" of his skin was done after his skin had gotten to the point where the only way for him not to look like a human dalmatian was to go through the rest of the depigmentation process. His body had already turned him mostly "white."

This is what he was going through while everybody was busy judging him.

Photos of MJ's vitiligo can be seen here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MJ had Vitiligo Posted by: IRIQUOIS227
bravo.
Posted by: IRIQUOIS227 on Jun 28, 2009 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Well said, Barrett, cried the town"

"Barrett's Privateers."

tedbohne

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jackson was a Cyborg and an inspiration to all
Posted by: disfasia on Jun 28, 2009 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I highly disagree with this article on the basis that it attempts to racialize Jacson when in fact, Jackson deracialized himself. Many posters here mention is skin condition evidenced in many a photo. And his choice to deal with this pigmentation was Jackson's choice alone. Did he try to look white? Uh, not any more than he tried to look black, not any more than the idea of "looking" white or black is purely offensive to those of us who have fought long and hard for the civil rights of us all. To be blunt, there is no "correct" eway to look and Jackson taught us all this lesson (if you were paying attention). "Beat It" recaptured moments of Rebel Without a Cause, "Thriller" the early days of of horror (and horror as kitsch), and his influences were neither "white" nor "black". Jackson redefined the United States and we all owe him a great deal in terms of bridging that ridiculous of what was once was referred to as "white music" and "black music". If you study his videos, it is quite clear that Jackson was bridging humanity in much the same way that any performer does--only with permanent makeup (ie. plastic surgery). Though we can easily say, "I would never do that", we simply cannot judge how we would have lived our lives if we were deprived of our individuality and childhood from the age of five. It is so so easy to judge others and this is a terrible violence to do to someone who revolutionized sexuality, dance, music and visual culture in the United States. Jackson made it "cool" for men to dance and to explore their femininity be they gay or straight. He also made innovated dance for the stage and screen such that live concerts have forever been changed. Michael Jackson was also unduly utilized by the media, hunted more than any other figure in history to my mind, and forced into a life of seclusion which actually superficially made him appear much more "freaky" than he actually was. One thing that strikes me about Michael Jackson is his honesty--a world mega star and yet he talks about his feelings being hurt with names this "Jacko". He is a man who transcended race and sexuality (he was by all measures asexual in his real life, only sexual in performance).

So I do find it offensive that any one community can pretend to own a spirit as beautiful and free as his.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Innovative excuses. Posted by: Parcival01
THE MIRROR DOTH LIE ...
Posted by: on Jun 28, 2009 4:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Jackson loathed being black &, in, fact, eventually, wasn't any more black than I am (Welsh, Italian, Irish w/skin that sunburns & freckles). My point is that one must wonder what exactly Jackson thought when he looked into the mirror, which I'm sure he did with great frequency. I know what he didn't see: He didn't see a black man, & he didn't want to ... Sad stuff, besides some justified pride (I guess), what else did he do for his brothers & sisters (not his family, his race), except raising some money to feed Africans? I'm sorry, but when a man rejects everything he is, to continuously attempt (horribly) to become something he is not , all I can feel is sadness & disdain.
m. swof.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't worry you told the truth
Posted by: jaglover on Jun 29, 2009 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you catch heat for telling the TRUTH then shame on those BRINGING the heat. The fact of the matter is that Michael set out a long time ago on a journey to become something that was IMPOSSIBLE for him to be and that's a rich white kid raised in an affluent neighborhood with a fairytale life. He spent every waking moment when he wasn't rehearsing, recording or performing trying to make it a reality. Then he went out and did a farce marriage to Lisa-Marie who was WAY more masculine than Micheal could ever dream of being. Then he went out and bought him some white kids and claimed that he was the actual father of them when it's obvious that those kids don't have a single drop of Black blood in them. No I knew when it was announced that he passed away that the reason would come down to the toxicology report because he was in constant pain and surrounded by yes people who enabled his addicition to numerous narcotics. Unfortunately I was not at all surprised...saddened but not surprised because I really really loved that kid like most people in the world who grew up with him back in the 70s and 80s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Degan needs to go back and finish high school
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jun 29, 2009 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...maybe then he can learn some manners. (his blog states that he didn't bother to complete his basic education)

I can't believe Alternet printed this tripe and furthermore I'm horrified at the stone-throwing comments by others here. The man is dead at 50, have a little compassion.

People seem to think that entertainer/artists are answerable to the public at large for the personal choices they make. Like they're our property or something.

Listen up honky, you have no right or basis for the things you said. And that goes for the choir too. People who are capable of such spurious criticism before his body is even cold need to get a life.

Michael Jackson wasn't beholden to you or anyone for the way he lived his life. Certainly the last part of it seemed like something of a train wreck but to offer this kind of tasteless eulogy goes beyond the pale if you know what I mean.

You disgrace all of us born in the year of the Dog ('58-- Prince, Madonna, me,) with this nasty piece. In fact you embarrass all white people by expressing a viewpoint those more enlightened (!) don't share which is that all black people want to be melanin-challenged like your own pasty self. I bet you're as poor a dancer as you are a writer.

Like I said, go back and finish high school before you drop another nasty load on the blogosphere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If it weren't for Alternet Posted by: 2dogarage
» Cheez Whiz Posted by: 2dogarage
» Sweet non-sequitur Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Sweet non-sequitur Posted by: RR#1
my favorite
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jun 29, 2009 3:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Jackson is gloves down my favorite pedophile. With all his pigmentation crap he ended up nearly as white as Barak Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ooh I hate to admit it Posted by: 2dogarage
Michael Jackson is not ashamed. Here's what he says about his skin condition
Posted by: rclord on Jun 30, 2009 4:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I have a skin disorder that destroys the pigmentation of the skin. It's something that I cannot help, OK? But when people make stories that I don't want to be who I am, it hurts me. I'm a black American. I'm proud to be a black American. I'm proud of my race. I'm proud of who I am. I have a lot of pride in who I am and dignity."

- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8121209.stm

Call me naive and gullible, but I believe him. As troubled and complicated as he may be, surely he''s never totally lacked self-awareness or esteem? How could he possibly not notice how gorgeous he is, and always has been; especially before his skin condition happened?

Those wild stories accusing MJ of being ashamed (inclding this article) are just that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's not speak ill of the dead, people.
Posted by: CovertRage on Jun 30, 2009 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mike took his special brand of self-loathing to an unspeakable level that was very disconcerting. My little neice was shocked to learn that Michael was once brown just like she is. She thought Michael was white. Even now, she can't wrap her 4 year old brain around the reality that he started out as an attractive little brown boy. Meanwhile, she admires Chris Brown for his falsetto and energetic dancing.

I'm a black woman who grew up in Northwest Indiana in the '60s and '70s. I and my best friends owned the Jackson 5 like family. We wore the Jacksons like a mantle dropped from heaven long before the boys were lauded at the Appollo, cable television first made it to Lake County, Indiana, and MTV was even a concept in corporate marketing chambers. We adored Michael at Motown. But, we lost track of the star we adored when Joe Jackson took the boys from Barry Gordy to make huge bucks off their talent and sweat in Vegas with Epic and CBS.

Oh, we watched their weekly variety show on TV religiously, still clinging to our idealic facade of the Jackson 5 that we slowly had to admit was long gone. We followed the Jackson boys over that cliff of failing record sales in near horror, wondering what had become of the teen idols whom we worshiped at Motown. Finally, the Jacksons fragmented, and a terrifying hollow plastic shell of Michael emerged to be tortured and manipulated by the pressures of family, friends, fans, the entertainment industry, and the ruthless mainstream media, all needing Michael to be that consummate money making tool that enriched everyone beyond the most avaricious dreams of greediest eel among them. In the end, poor Michael was absolutely everything demanded of him at a point in time when it was crucially lucretive for all his money addicted stakeholders. After years of trafficing in the commerce of one man's soul, essence, and spirit, a battered, worn, brittle, twisted, damaged peice of plastic was once again placed in the corporate mold to sate the hunger for money, despite Michael's being weakened by impropriety, overuse, too many damaging exposures, and his irreparable undoing from the ravaging indignities of time alone.

Michael has danced and sang for money from the time he was a 5 year old, performing James Brown tributes in smoke-filled dives. This poor pitiful man was never a child. He was an unpitied professional performer. To the industry, Michael was never even human. Michael was a well traded commodity that aptly served their profiteering interests. In the end, Michael was little more than a spectacular, marketable cybernetic organism with all the attributes of a human being except a life and personhood of his own. A disposably marketed brand callously peddled until more modern entertainment models were cheaply mass produced, easily commodified, and coyly sold to a gullible public told whom they should worship. But, these ignorant kiddie-tainers and obnoxious spectacles like Chris Brown don't really satisfy. So, Michael was being reintroduced, the way Ford did the T-Bird, hoping for a fat return on an investment. Now, they're sure of a lucretive return for years. Ford, too, got a return on its investment when the Thunderbird died. It's just business.

My favorite Jackson song is 'I'll Be There.' Closer to the truth, though, is that Michael was never really there, especially after Las Vegas. Michael was an illusion created strictly for entertainment profit. Still, despite all, I'll always love him. I will treasure my Off the Wall platter. Michael Joseph Jackson will forever live in eternity as that very handsome brown boy warning me of the The Love You Save, while I fantacize about the BLACK man I really wish he had become, as opposed to the white woman he sought to be. In my mind, my heart, and my memory, Michael Jackson will always be that very cute brown boy, calling this cute little brown girl to look over her sholder, always there, smiling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I dentity is Not about skin colour anyway, that tells you nothing about a person
Posted by: RR#1 on Jul 3, 2009 12:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
other than that they are like most of the rest of the world in that regard. How can anyone have an identity crisis in such a world. Caucasian is an aberation if we want to go by world or species standard.
Pedigree, what a trip.
Cheers,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]