Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

"The Texas Baby Purchasing Act Of 2007"

Posted by Bruce Wilson at 8:00 AM on March 22, 2007.


Bruce Wilson: $ to mothers who sign their babies over to the state

Anonymous author "moiv," whose hard-hitting, exposes on the Christian theocratic movement's ongoing war on women's rights could at this point fill several good sized books, writes in her latest jeremiad that:

Texas State Sen. Dan Patrick, author of a current proposal to criminalize safe abortion care, has figured out that adoption tax credits have a serious limitation: they don't do anything at all to increase the number of newborn babies available for adoption in the first place. But Senator Dan's the man with a plan to even out the shortfall.

Under Patrick's SB 1567, AKA the Texas Baby Purchasing Act of 2007, women would qualify for a $500 payment from the state within 60 days of signing away all parental rights to their newborn children.

If Patrick gets his way, childbearing in the service of the state won't be just creepy Handmaid's Tale fiction anymore. How's that for some moral family values?

As freakishly "Brave New World" as it may sound, the new bill introduced in the Texas State legislature that would pay $500 to unmarried mothers who signed their parental rights to their babies away to the Lone Star State is not unexpected coming from from a legislative body that last hit the national radar screen when one of its top members circulated a memo alleging the theory of Evolution to be a Jewish Kabbalist conspiracy and referencing a website that declares Copernicus was wrong and that the Sun revolves around the Earth. What could really top the fact that one of the most powerful politicians of one of the largest states in the Union had promoted the notion that the fundamental scientific breakthrough - that the entire celestial world, the whole heavens and cosmos, didn't revolve around the Earth each and every every 24 hours and which some would say was a key conceptual advance that helped usher in the Enlightenment - was actually a Jewish cultic plot ?

That said, this latest political excressence of the Lone Star State's far right and theocratic religio-political culture has potential media legs beyond the liberal, metrosexual, public radio crowd cosily ensconsced on those populous American coasts that AIPAC ally Pastor John Hagee says may get nuked, in the war he's lobbying for, as an act of divine retribution for insufficient support of the political platforms of the Israeli far-right. Here's why...

"The Texas Baby Purchasing Act Of 2007" may just touch a deep, raw nerve among the "New World Order" conspiracy crowd that both expects a coming Apocalypse but also fears that George W. Bush might just be the Antichrist, or at least a minion of the AntiChrist. And, leaving the Apocalyptic theological views out of it, the proposal that states should pay hard cash to buy babies, on condition that mothers sign away all parental rights, seems pretty darn menacing. But, who knows? Maybe that's the intent.

Still Texas State Senator Dan Patrick really missea golden opportunity to set new standards for creepily Orwellian, menacing state legislation ; with a few bold strokes of his legislative pen, Patrick could have both set in motion a state-run baby breeding program and , by taking up Al Mohler's advocacy for medical procedures that could "fix" gay babies, written a legislative mandate that human babies purchased by the state of Texas ( at an average per pound rate cheaper than good quality sushi-grade Tuna, a bargain ! ) who might be gay must be "fixed" with brain surgery and also liberal doses of hormones. Dan Patrick, who is no doubt a 'Bible-believing' Christian but seems only lukewarm in his devotion to his faith, might heed the Book Of Revelations :

Revelation 3:15–16. "[15] I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou were cold or hot. [16] So because thou art lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spew thee out of my mouth."

Digg!

Bruce Wilson writes for Talk To Action, a blog specializing in faith and politics.


Joining GOP's Bold March Backwards, Bobby Jindal & Louisiania Democrats Pass "Stealth Creationism" Education Bill
Law Will Allow Insertion Of Religion, Posing As Science, Into Public School Science Class Discussions On Evolution, cloning and global warming.
June 27, 2008.
Clinton, The 'Nuclear Umbrella' & The NeoCons
'Meet the Press' commentators, nuclear deterrence expert from Scranton, PA disturbed by Clinton's nuclear agenda.
April 23, 2008.
Not Wright: Black Man Damns US and Gets Vilified, White Man Calls for Nuking Cities and Gets Applauded
If Obama's pastor said what white Christian leaders often do, Obama '08 would be over. Frank Schaeffer suggests it's racist and hypocritical.
March 26, 2008.
McCain Pursued Hagee Like a Dog In Heat
Apocalyptic, anti-Catholic megachurch Pastor John Hagee reopens McCain endorsement controversy with a New York Times Magazine interview.
March 23, 2008.
According to McCain, By Choosing John Hagee, He's Choosing the 16th Century
McCain's own words from the 2000 election come back to haunt him.
March 7, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
poe
Posted by: janiepoe on Mar 22, 2007 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS IS CREEPY!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just so you know...
Posted by: carcinoid112 on Mar 22, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dan Patrick is a genuine Loony Tune. He was a bad TV broadcaster/personality who got tossed off TV, then off radio. So, he ended up buying time on a suburban Houston "loser" station, and then he found his schtick--as a downhome Rush Clone. Unfortunately, he's made a LOT of money doing so. Ain't nothin' legitimizes major league stupid like lots of money.

He's a joke to anyone but the Wingnuttiest of the Wingnuts--and to all the other wealthy reich wingers he's gotten to believe that he'll help protect them in the upcoming race wars. He was sure that Houston was gonna end up in flames over the immigrant situation, until he realized he needed to shut up or else learn to do his own yard work.

Miss Molly was right. When the kooks get too kooky to let 'em walk around loose at home, Texans send 'em to the Lege for some R&R. Somehow, I think she was also right when she pointed out that Austin has TWO huge bat colonies. The ones at Town Park Lake may carry the odd disease, but some of the ones in the Capital are RABID.

The Bad News Boy, Mr. Talk Radio Dan Patrick--yeah, he's rabid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

$500 for a baby?
Posted by: Lizmv on Mar 22, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9 months of pregnancy and all he offers is $500? Shows you just how much value is really placed on women.
This whole thing just makes me want to puke!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just CREEPY, but also inevitable!
Posted by: djnoll on Mar 22, 2007 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider this: When Welfare-to-Work was passed in most states, they failed, as did Congress, to fund adequately for child care. This forced many young single mothers to either give up their children for adoption, leave them in foster care, or lose their benefits and watch the kids starve, because they could not work and pay child care and still cover food and rent!

At the time, my own daughter was one of these young mothers, and when I got into it with a Child Support caseworker, I asked him point blank - do these legislators want to create a baby pool of acceptable adoptable babies so that their trophy wives do not lose their figures during pregnancy? The response: It sure looks like it. And that was in 1996 in Washington State!

Now from the State of Texas which sent us BushCo, we have what will amount to a new class of slave breeders - the poor who get pregnant just to get money. I would bet you dollars to donuts that this program is only if the child is white, healthy, and adoptable. Otherwise, they may take the child and let it grow up in foster care or put it out for adoption to people who should not be allowed anywhere near a child for good reason. After all, those children are the "throwaways" of our society under Bush and the Republicans anyway. Just look at how they are educated under No Child Left Behind.

Patrick may be a certifible nutcase, but the fact is that these Republican monstrosities that are nothing more than Nazis under a different name, believe in selective breeding and when your own elite won't breed you have to find someone to do it for them. If I were a citizen of Texas, I would be planning on marching on Austin and demand this man be arrested for endangering the life of a child.

I am beginning to think it is something in the water there - Bush, Cheney, Patrick, Lay.... What is it that makes people in Texas allow these monsters to continue to be in the public eye, because they are certainly not in the public service!?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Adoption Tax Credits
Posted by: chaoslegs on Mar 22, 2007 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most state credits mimic the federal program from 1997-2002, tying the credit to expenses. Thanks to the work of advocates, the Treasury Dept did a report (PDF) on the usage. Using the data from the report, they were able to make the adoption tax credit not tied to the "expenses for the legal process of adoption" for children with special needs (or hard to place). This is key in providing additional support to families adopting children from the US foster care system.

Last week I testified in my home state on behalf of a proposed state adoption tax credit that learns what the Feds learned and doesn't tie it to expenses for children with special needs (also hard to place), and goes a step further to make it refundable. The legislator who I was speaking on behalf gets child welfare issues. The competing bill was only tied to expenses, and while from the same party, his focus was reducing abortions.

Texas SB 1567 does NOT require that families voluntarily relinquish parental rights to the State as the hyperlinked text indicates. I do not think $500 is much of an encouragement to carry a child to term and relinquish, but maybe they can claim it is helping families.

If Texas really wanted to support families, they could increase their adoption subsidies for children with special needs who are adopted from the public foster care system. They have reduced the subsidy rates twice in the past 9 years.

Back to SB 1567, I think this is the most disturbing part:

Sec. 50.002. APPLICATION FORM. (a) The department shall develop an application form to be used by a woman who applies for funds under this chapter.
(b) The department may only distribute the application forms to abortion providers.


The only place you can get the form is at abortion providers, so are they encouraging folks to visit abortion providers?

As the original point of the post made, adoption tax credits are incentives on the demand side of the issue, folks wanting infants. It does not one thing to birth parents who give birth and relinquish.

On the Handmaid's Tale reference, I know it best from the opera, my impression is that was having children for the ruling class more than the state.

If you have questions about adoption tax credits (or adoption of waiting children), you can e-mail me at chaoslegs@gmail.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They will come like a thief in the night...
Posted by: zorro on Mar 23, 2007 11:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are no clear lines between state and the ruling class. The ruling class is often the state. If I squint, I can see a genuine desire here to discourage abortion by offering a humane alternative by suggesting that the wasted fetus will not die but live, and share in the same dripping sweat of dreams as all the rest; crying, screaming, swimming in the soup of her mother's shit and amniotic fluid--experiencing all the joy of gut-wrenching mortal pain, the silent moments of joy, and the rare instants of overflowing howling emotion: a cacophanous torrent that that the soul sheds and releases like a dam bursting, containing all the world's sordid fear, and morbid, rotting, utterly baffling fluvial waste...a chance to live and grow up in a caring home, or even a nurturing orphanage (one hopes)....but I think a Handmaidens Tale should be the least of our worries. As the corporate-state wars of water and race engulf the American frontier, that is the world, and the impoverished masses become less reliable--or less malleable--with too many conflicting interests, exposure to sordid truths and filtered pseudo-truths, etc., the monsters must find, and will find another way to get their freak on, and to march over the wasted lands crowing lies and weaving their malaise of disaster. State-owned babies for experimentation, brainwashing, and enhancment will make great fodder as soldiers of future corporate militias and dark armies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]