Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reaganomics, Dubya, and the Gospel of Wealth

Posted by Maria Luisa Tucker at 3:39 PM on January 18, 2006.


It's no coincidence that the prosperity preachers are back in action

God wants you to be rich. If you believe in God enough, fortunes will follow … or so some evangelical preachers successfully convinced their congregants during the 1980s. It was during that era of televangelism and the rise of the Christian Right that these messages about wealth were espoused by a evangelical preachers who taught the so-called "gospel of prosperity." According to the prosperity gospel—also called the Word-Faith Movement, gospel of Wealth, Health and Wealth Theology, Name it and Claim it, or Seed Faith Theology—the Bible promises material wealth to true believers.

Well, according to the New York Times, this "gospel of prosperity" is back in fashion. And I believe the ebb and flow of prosperity teaching has something to do with our national politics.

In the 1980s, the religious message of prosperity fit well into the political context of the Reagan years. Both Reaganite Republicans and prosperity preachers viewed wealth as the visible proof of God's blessing on America, and as the ultimate fulfillment of the American Dream. Conversely, poverty was viewed by both groups not as a failure of an economic structure, but as a result of sin. For Republicans, the sin was a lack of a strong (Protestant) work ethic; for prosperity theologians, poverty was proof of a lack of faith in God. (I have a whole theory of how Reaganomics and prosperity preaching went hand-in-hand, which I may write about at a later date.)

The prosperity gospel went out of fashion, largely due to high-profile scandals by prosperity preachers, such as the 1989 conviction of millionaire preacher Jim Bakker on fraud charges. Slowly, the prosperity preachers found themselves with fewer congregants, and lots of suspicious looks. For about a decade, the prosperity gospel was out of the limelight and many downsized from megachurches to online ministries. But, reportedly, the ridiculous prosperity gospel is picking back up.

Today, George W. Bush's worship of both wealth and "Christian" values has re-created the environment where prosperity preaching thrives. It even thrives inside the White House: In 2002, one of Bush's "spiritual advisors," prosperity preacher Kirbyjon Caldwell, stayed in the Lincoln bedroom.

The loudest message of prosperity preachers is that money must "flow." You must give in order to get. Famed prosperity preacher Kenneth Copeland wrote once that the way to "kill the Body of Christ financially" is to "pile up all the money in reservoirs and stop it from moving." Copeland explicitly states "give, and after a while it will get back to you again" then urges his reader to give, and give NOW. As to whom, exactly, we should be giving, Copeland writes: "People are starving and dying throughout the world... There are even preachers going hungry! The biggest complaint from people is that all the preachers are wanting money. Do you know the best way to stop that complaint? Give to them!" Yeah, right.

But then, the prosperity preachers were only following the tenents of trickle down economics: put money into the top echelons of the power structure, i.e. give money to God via your preacher, and that money will miraculously reinvigorate faithful people's own piggy banks. Those that keep their money to themselves are supposedly working with Satan.

Similarly, Bush shares an economic outlook that calls for faith in consumers, investors and businesspeople who, due to tax cuts and deregulation, will supposedly reinvest in the economy and miraculously, prosperity is supposed to follow. Of course, that's not what happens. Congregants who give all their money to their church don't automatically become millionaires; they just go broke. Reagan's economic "faith" resulted in a national debt that had doubled by the end of his time in the White House. And Bush's prayer for prosperity is only working for those who are already prosperous.

Digg!

Maria Luisa Tucker is a staff writer at AlterNet and associate editor of the Columbia Journal of American Studies.


Not Your Soldier
Countering the military’s dogged recruitment of minority youth
May 10, 2006.
Marvel Comics takes on homeland security
Maybe superheroes can help?
May 5, 2006.
In Government We Trust, apparently
Poll says Americans trust government over media
May 3, 2006.
Majority favors earned citizenship
Anti-immigrant readers, begin your conspiracy theories
April 26, 2006.
The rapists in charge
HIV study reveals disturbing news about prison rape
April 24, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Posted by: yellow on Jan 18, 2006 6:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone remember this Weberian classic from sociology? Religion, like most everything else not directly related to social class and the material conditions of the production and work, is mostly "spin"; that is to say a form of consciousness that allows primordial attachment to religious identity to make us susceptable to appeals on behalf of political agenda that have nothing to do with religion. In other works, religion like much else is a form of power brokering. Christianity, for more than one and a half millenium, never had anything to say about work and saving. True, the expulsion from the Garden of Eden and original sin compelled man to "earn by the sweat of his brow" yet this played little role in the overall messege of Christianity until 16th Century English Puritanism. What changed was the world economy and the rise of petty capitalism in the form of textile cottage industries in the English countryside. This development eroded the old fuedal order and integrated rural productive capital with trading or merchant capital in a way that gave shape to the origins of modern capitalism as a global system. Imported cotton and flax from the Netherlands was woven and dyed in England and shipped to export markets. This was the start of modern industrial capitalism's linkage of trade to internal production such that they functioned as part of an integrated system transcending the former system of simple arbitrage. Such a system required a new shift to a modern ethic of discipline, hard work, sacrifice, and thrift. It was capitalism, not Christianity, that required a new ethic the adherence to which became a moral duty never before instilled by the Church. Fundamental change in the world economy and social organization called forth a recasting of the Christian Faith as one where work was holy and sloth was sin! Similarly today we find a Christian faith that once touted charity and abhored unearned wealth to be in favor of tax cuts for the very wealthiest and a redistribution of income upwards away from those who toil the hardest. In our epoch of global neo-liberal economics, the new agenda is being packaged by the Church as a moral and religious obligation to be unquestioned by those whose interests have little to do with US corporate capitalism. Religion has instilled false consciousness in the masses for centuries, recasting its core messege to fit the changing interests of economic elites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» that sounds about right to me Posted by: deborama
my two bits
Posted by: meldada on Jan 18, 2006 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just my take on this. yeah it's true rayguns power was fueled by these zealots like that creepoid robertson. they pushed this star war thing. nukes in outer space. and now creep bush and his straight antiseptic brush clearing fundamentalism is scary. yknow that glassy eyed thing. but we're all suckers, christians jews blacks, whites asians.all programmed by mass media to consume and gather wealth. its a zombie land out there at the malls. kinda like night of the living dead feel to it. it is a shame. withthe earth warming we want more things. as for the christian right,though they seem so serious about it and MOTIVAtED. and then they live in these antiseptic communities in huge gated homes. airless and vapid. they bless business. that's sick cause it's a rat race and boring.
it doesn't add up other than these cats are a death cult.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well..it is interesting to me
Posted by: Cornfused on Jan 18, 2006 10:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly don't think being rich is bad and I don't think that giving money to good causes is bad. I think that extreme attachment to objects and money (i.e., greed) is bad (for many reasons).

However, I have always found myself skeptical to groups asking for cash when I can't see the obvious works of their good deeds. This is one of the reason why I hate taxes because we let those folks on capital hill spend it on so many stupid things which most americans, unless they research it, never find out about.

I'm not against mega-churches per se, but I just don't see the fruits of their labor in our society. I do see big ass churches and fancy suits. In the end, God (if you believe in God) will judge these people. If you believe in God, then make sure your money goes to charities that help people. If you don't believe in God, then make sure your money goes to charities that help people. If you believe in the suit and that is good enough for you...well..that is your choice with your money....but beware that you are paying for suits, jets, and vacations to the bahamas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: well..it is interesting to me Posted by: JimTheAnarchist
» RE: well..it is interesting to me Posted by: kelly.nickell
bamboozlers for Christ
Posted by: Talleyrand on Jan 19, 2006 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the secular world, what these preachers are doing is called a pyramid scheme and is illegal. The one difference is that you do have a minimal chance of actually winning some dough in a pyramid scheme. The preachers on the other hand seem to throw the money received in the air (after paying for mansions, churches, airplanes and big cars) and what God can catch, He can keep.

And millions of people subscribe to this blather??? Caveat emptor, I guess. I personally don't give much of a hoot either way, if people feel like fattening some bamboozler, well all power to them... and when they become indigent, well that church should be put in charge of taking care of them. But when these preachers like Robertson (please read his report on the subject in Best Democracy Money Can Buy) start putting their fingers into politics, I begin to wonder if the FBI shouldn't be called in .... and the IRS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What goes around, comes around.
Posted by: Artkansas on Jan 19, 2006 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, in the '80s it was Robert H. Schuller booming out from the Crystal Cathedral, preaching the gospel of prosperity.

Last Sunday I was scanning the channels and what do you know, there was Robert A. Schuller booming out the gospel of prosperity from the Crystal Cathedral.

Deja Vu all over again, for a new generation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prosperity gospel - it's not just for televangelists anymore
Posted by: Jasonix on Jan 19, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a lot of small-time Christo-hucksters feathering their nest with the same prosperity gospel crud. There are probably three or four such preachers in your own town. The last two churches I went to each taught "tithing," which is the idea that the Christian is obligated to give 10% of his income, regardless of his quality of life or ability to pay his bills, to the church. They both promised that "God would provide" if you forked over the cash. The pastor of one church had a 2,800-square foot home with a one-acre yard that cost at least $500K - and he took a vacation to Disneyland less than a week after telling his congregants that they needed to dig a little deeper in their wallets "for the church"! Not all evangelical Christians are the apocalyptic, fanatical, far-right wackos that progressives make them out to be (e.g., Jimmy Carter) - but then again, a lot ARE, and it seems like there are more and more crazy ones all the time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hilarious hypocrisy
Posted by: esactun on Jan 19, 2006 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What was all that about camels walking through the eyes of needles being more likely than a rich man entering Heaven? Or about Jesus kicking moneychangers out of the temple? Or love of money being the root of all evil?

Or did I just miss the parts about "Thou shalt have stock options" and Moses's financial seminars in Egypt?

"Prosperity gospel" is so blatantly antithetical to everything Christian that it's almost Orwellian. Fact is, when you look at it, Christianity is a heck of a lot closer to Marxism than capitalism.

I'm not a Marxist, but I am a former Christian, and am constantly amazed at how the atheists I know behave more in accordance with Christian values than many believers.

blog.myspace.com/metriccheesehead

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hilarious hypocrisy Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Hilarious hypocrisy Posted by: kelly.nickell
Changing the meaning of the message
Posted by: allen1249 on Jan 19, 2006 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What was all that about camels walking through the eyes of needles being more likely than a rich man entering Heaven?"


debunking the camel gate lie

It's funny how far people pervert the message of the bible to suit their needs, while all the while condeming others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An Overlooked Point
Posted by: mizpearl on Jan 19, 2006 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe you are missing a very important aspect of the whole prosperity thing – in fact, the entire purpose of it. And it’s no wonder, considering most, but not all, of the “prosperity preachers” are either neglecting it, or they don’t get it themselves, so you’ve probably never heard it. And it is this: The reason God wants us to prosper is not to hoard it all up for ourselves, or even to line anyone else’s pockets. It is to move the money to the people who need it – poor, homeless, sick, or in any other way in need. God wants to supply our needs, but He never intended for any of us – including the preachers – to keep the excess. That is to go to the people around us who need it.

Not all preachers are corrupt or in league with the Republicans. If you do a little research, you will find that since the hurricanes hit, while the government was dropping the ball and pointing fingers, a large percentage of the help that has come, in just about every form imaginable, has been from ministries. This has been true also of the aftermath of the tsunami, the earthquake in Pakistan, and countless other worldwide and local situations where people need help. The money has to move somehow, and that is through giving what we have, rather than stuffing our bank accounts. But most of us check out the ministry we’re giving to, rather than just sending the money at just any preacher's command.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Religion and Perfidy
Posted by: yellow on Jan 21, 2006 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All throughout modern history organized religion played an insideous role in politics particularly at great times of social upheaval and political crisis. During the depression era, the Roman Catholic Church was known to be quite supportive of the Nazis, Mussolini, and other fascist regimes throughout continental Europe. The reasons had to do not only with the inherent conservatism of the Church and its open hostility to anarchist and socialist parties than quite popular in inter-war Europe, but also with their traditional fears of violent anti-clericism associated with the Left. During this time Pope Pious XII signed the concordat with Hitler promising not to oppose fascism or any Axis Power in exchange for the secular one-party fascist regimes not restricting the traditional perogatives of the Church. The higher reaches of the Church even turned over known opponents of fascism to the Nazi occupiers to show good faith. Some of those turned in were Bighops and Archbishops. In Czechoslovakia, Cardinals like Hlond and Tiso ran puppet governments on behalf of the Nazi occupiers. Needless to say the post war history of the Church involved the establishment of "ratlines" or legal assistance to former Nazi war criminals and collaborators to protect them from prosecution by the allies and get them safe passage to the West! Religion continues to play an insideous role in the support of reactionary causes the world over including the right-wing Bush agenda in the USA. No doubt it would eventually stand behind the establishment of a fascist regime in the USA. It's time to separate Church and State now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]