Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

GOP: Only Our Pastors Can Say Crazy Sh*t

Posted by Blue Texan, Firedoglake at 1:13 PM on March 18, 2008.


As the wingnut chorus predictably disses Obama's eloquent speech, it's important to remember how manufactured this whole Wright "controversy" is.

As the wingnut chorus predictably disses Obama's eloquent speech, it's important to remember how completely ridiculous and manufactured this whole Wright "controversy" is:

...the idea that America deserves terrorist attacks and other horrendous disasters has long been a frequently expressed view among the faction of white evangelical ministers to whom the Republican Party is most inextricably linked. Neither Jerry Falwell nor Pat Robertson ever retracted or denounced their view that America provoked the 9/11 attacks by doing things to anger God. John Hagee continues to believe that the City of New Orleans got what it deserved when Katrina drowned its residents and devastated the lives of thousands of Americans. And James Inhofe -- who happens to still be a Republican U.S. Senator -- blamed America for the 9/11 attacks by arguing in a 2002 Senate floor speech that "the spiritual door was opened for an attack against the United States of America" because we pressured Israel to give away parts of the West Bank. The phrases "anti-American" and "America-haters" are among the most barren and manipulative in our entire political lexicon, but whatever they happen to mean on any given day, they easily encompass people who believe that the U.S. deserved the 9/11 attacks, devastating hurricanes and the like. Yet when are people like Falwell, Robertson, Hagee, Inhofe and other white Christian radicals ever described as anti-American or America-hating extremists? Never -- because white Christian evangelicals who tie themselves to the political Right are intrinsically patriotic.

Well, yeah. Duh.

By all accounts, George Bush had private conversations with Pat Robertson about matters as weighty as whether to invade Iraq. Isn't that a big scandal -- that the President is consulting with an American-hating minister -- someone who believes God allowed the 9/11 attacks as punishment for our evil country -- about vital foreign policy decisions? No, it wasn't controversial at all.

John Hagee privately visits with the highest level Middle East officials in the White House and afterwards pronounces that they're in agreement. John McCain shares a stage with Hagee and lavishes him with praise, as Rudy Giuliani did with Pat Robertson. James Inhofe remains a member in good standing in the GOP Senate Caucus. The Republican Party has tied itself at the hip to a whole slew of "anti-American extremists" -- people who believe that the U.S. provoked the 9/11 attacks because God wants to punish us for the evil, wicked nation we've become -- and yet there is virtual silence about these associations.

Once again, it's important to keep making the point that when you've built an entire political movement on the backs of a crazy mob of Dixiecrat Savonarolas who make outrageous hateful comments pretty much every day, you've sort of opted-out of your ability to throw stones.

Digg!

Blue Texan is a regular contributing blogger for FireDogLake.


Bush Joins In: Says Economic Woes Are All in Our Heads
Energy crisis joins the recession as things that the GOP think are all in our heads.
July 15, 2008.
100-Year McCain Has a Sadr Moment (As Does Joe Lieberman)
St. McCain is quickly becoming the Miss Teen South Carolina of the GOP with yet still another Iraq gaffe.
April 2, 2008.
100-Year McCain Yet Again Compares Iraq to Germany, Japan
St. McCain is increasingly annoyed that his "100 Years In Iraq" pledge is predictably biting him in the ass.
April 1, 2008.
McCain on War in Iraq: "We're Succeeding, I Don't Care What Anybody Says"
Just like Vice President Last Throes, St. McCain doesn't give a rat's ass what the American people think about his awesome war.
March 25, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ah, hypocrisy...
Posted by: Suz on Mar 18, 2008 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though not exclusive to them, it IS what "right-wingers" seem to do best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP gets away with it 'cause majority of white male voters are behind it
Posted by: PakiBoy on Mar 18, 2008 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush-Cheney carried 62% of the white male votes...Effing troglodytes!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Elephants have never
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 18, 2008 9:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
distanced themselves from the rantings of these wing-nut psycho-christian armaggedon-loving mad dogs! They haven't had to because no one has held them accountable the way the media is holding Obama accountable. The media doesn't want to come off as "intolerant" of so-called Christians, so they sit there with their thumbs up their asses and say nothing while these Hate-Mongers go to town every Sunday, spewing the most vile right-wing propaganda. And what do we hear?

*crickets chirping*

I'm sick of the hypocrisy, and I'm sick of the media being afraid of those assholes. I have sent a letter to each media outlet (12 so far) asking them to use the same rules for the Elephants as they are using for the Democrats. At this rate, the Dems don't stand a chance in the election.

The deck is stacked against them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Elephants have never Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: The Elephants have never Posted by: blackie4aces
"Liberal" Media
Posted by: QQOblivion on Mar 19, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the media doesn't report it, then it didn't happen in most Americans' minds.
Hence, there is nothing wrong with McCain ACTIVELY COURTING racist bigoted pastors who want to bring about THE END OF THE WORLD, preferably by nuking Iran.
Yet, the "liberal" media goes on and on and on and on about Obama, who has separated himself more than is necessary, in my opinion, from his pastor.
It's like Rupert Murdoch runs EVERY network, I swear.

By the way, McCain is 6 points ahead of Obama, even further ahead of Hillary, according to a new Reuters/Zogby poll. Guess the media's priorities are making an impact on the voters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Liberal" Media Posted by: angelofdeath
Clintons Papers
Posted by: angelofdeath on Mar 19, 2008 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE TORRES-VIGNALI CONNECTION is explored in detail in a congressional report that resulted from Pardongate, when revelations surfaced that President Clinton granted clemency for Carlos Vignali Jr. — convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to 15 years in federal prison in 1995 — along with other convicted criminals and one-time international fugitive Marc Rich. The granting of clemency occurred after payments were made to Clinton’s brother-in-law, Hugh Rodham, the brother of former first lady, New York state senator and 2008 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Released in March 2002 by the congressional Committee on Government Reform, “Justice Undone: Clemency Decisions in the Clinton White House” details Hugh Rodham’s involvement in the Vignali affair, as well as the long business history Vignali once shared with George Torres.

The report takes to task top L.A. elected officials, including county Supervisor Gloria Molina, then–state Senator Richard Polanco, then–state Assemblyman Antonio Villaraigosa and U.S. Representative Xavier Becerra, among others, for lobbying on behalf of Vignali Jr., in light of his drug conviction and the fact that DEA agents long suspected Vignali Sr. to be involved in drug trafficking — along with Torres. While a member of the California state Assembly, Villaraigosa wrote the first letter on Vignali’s behalf on May 24, 1996.

In particular, L.A. Sheriff Lee Baca and former U.S. Attorney Alejandro Mayorkas were heavily criticized for lobbying for Vignali Jr.’s clemency. The report found the input of Baca and Mayorkas to the White House to be “instrumental” in the decision to grant clemency to Vignali Jr., who at his drug-trafficking trial in 1994 confirmed a close family association with Torres. Attorneys for Torres told the Weekly in 2005 that the association between the Vignalis and Torres has long since ended

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ?????????? Posted by: blackie4aces
Something to Bear in Mind
Posted by: blackie4aces on Mar 19, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Roughly 45% of those in America who consider themselves Christians believe the bible is the literal word of god. 25% of those who identify themselves as Christians also fit the category of fundamentalist/evangelical, roughly a third of this group being Dominionists, the movement that shares with the jihadists the belief that government should be run according to their own particular interpretation of god's law as opposed to democratic principles. That's one hell of a lot of crazy motherfuckers running around loose in one country, even if it happens to be a big one. Crazier than batshit on a hot summer night they may be, but they do buy shit, a lot of shit because there are a lot of 'em. And based on what they believe, they obviously can be sold just about anything, which means "a substantial market," my friends.

A much, much smaller group is the African American Christians who ascribe to liberation theology in the prophetic tradition, which, despite the idiotic media's portrayal of this brand of Christianity among black Americans as somehow "the Black Church"-there are many other forms of Christian worship practiced in the black community (Charismatics, Catholics, Seventh Day Adventism, etc.), though white people genrally wouldn't have a clue. So, if you decide to villify a politician in connection with their church or pastor or spiritual mentor for the sensationalism and viewer hook, who is it going to be? Which group can your bottom line most tolerate if they get all riled and pissed-off? Corporate news organizations, particularly television news, have as their purpose making a profit. That's the purpose as opposed to their mission, which is disseminating information. I need not state which of the two is primary.

Should you doubt the power of the religious groups on this issue, ask the question: "Why all of a sudden (the last decade or so) has all this religious bunkum become so goddam important?" Think about the endless prattling on about religion in the campaigns of both the Republicans and the Democrats, all of the front-runners trying to out-god the others. Consider the fate of the candidates, the two-percenters, who didn't get into the god-O-rama. The issue of religion has become almost as dominant as domestic policy, and in the case of the Republicans, whose domestic policy is implicit to their constituency-there isn't any and that's the way they like it-religion is second only to foreign policy-usually. One has to wonder if this trend is a symptom of the fear and hopelessness in the society having grown to such proportions as result of economic instability, fear-mongering as a ruling zeitgeist, and the gestalt of an almost totally mediated reality, that the concern as to whether god is or is not on our side has risen to a level of primal importance (and irresistable for those who might profit from it).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: metoo Posted by: blackie4aces
Great Article
Posted by: ddsharper on Mar 20, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well stated. Ah. The subtleties of racism in the media. Like a hammer on my head! Conspiracy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Typical Double Standard
Posted by: lamac66 on Mar 23, 2008 7:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course this has not been pointed out in the mainstream media. Coporate America owns the media and coporate America is full of closeted right wingers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Typical
Posted by: Taylor Siluwe on Mar 23, 2008 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's supposed to be apple pie, but we all know hypocrisy is the American way. Just like everyone expresses outrage when a politician is caught cheating ... when everyone with two brains cells to rub together knows all men do it, and most women too.

Hagee is 100 times worse than Rev. Wright. Hagee wants to bring on the apocalyse so he and his wide-eyed followers can be raptured outta here. And I won't even talk about his 'Slave' game. Racist kooks like that scare the hell outta me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]