Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Dismisses Iraq Recession, Claims War Has Nothing to Do With Economy

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 3:06 PM on February 18, 2008.


The Iraq war has created jobs -- for the administration's defense contractor allies.
Bush Dismisses Iraq Recession: The War Has ‘Nothing To Do With The Economy’

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Amanda Terkel in your
mailbox!

 

This morning on NBC's Today Show, President Bush denied that the there's any link between the faltering U.S. economy and $10 billion a month being spent on the Iraq war. In fact, according to Bush, the war is actually helping the economy:

CURRY: You don't agree with that? It has nothing do with the economy, the war -- spending on the war?
BUSH: I don't think so. I think actually the spending in the war might help with jobs...because we're buying equipment, and people are working. I think this economy is down because we built too many houses and the economy's adjusting.
The Iraq war has created jobs -- for the administration's defense contractor allies. Bush's most recent budget is a windfall for contractors, and between 2000 and 2005, procurement was the "fastest growing component of federal discretionary spending." (Halliburton has been the biggest beneficiary of the administration's generosity.)

Five years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, however, national unemployment is going up. Between December 2006 and December 2007, the national unemployment rate increased by 13.6 percent in seasonally adjusted terms, from 4.4 to 5.0 percent. Additionally, 68 percent of the American public believes that redeployment from Iraq would help fix the country's economic woes.

Transcript:

Some Americans believe that they feel they're carrying the burden because of this economy.
G. BUSH: Yeah, well...
CURRY: They say we're suffering because of this.
G. BUSH: ... I don't agree with that.
CURRY: You don't agree with that? It has nothing do with the economy, the war -- spending on the war?
G. BUSH: I don't think so.
I think actually the spending in the war might help with jobs.
CURRY: Oh, yeah?
G. BUSH: Yeah, because we're buying equipment, and people are working.
I think this economy is down because we built too many houses and the economy's adjusting.

Digg!

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


New Right-Wing Craze Prays That Obama's 'Days Be Few'
It's making its way onto t-shirts, bumper stickers, mugs, and even teddy bears.
November 20, 2009.
Right-Wing American Family Association Misfires in the War on Christmas
Eager to make a pariah out of the Gap, AFA wrongly accused the organization of not carrying any Christmas items.
November 18, 2009.
CNN Paid Lou Dobbs $8 Million to Quit
That's a hell of a severance package.
November 16, 2009.
Lieberman Pledges To Filibuster Healthcare Bill, Says Public Option Is "Unnecessary"
Lieberman calls it a "matter of conscience."
November 9, 2009.
On the Lookout for Attempts to Indoctrinate Our Schoolchildren? Try the American Coal Industry!
It's clean!
November 6, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
LouBranch
Posted by: loubranch on Feb 18, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unbelievable!!!Ann Curry traveled all the way to
Africa to ask the numbskull about what is causing
the downturn in the economy. She got the answer that she could have gotten in D.C. Just a whole lot of B.S. I can hardly wait until 1/20/09!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: FACTS CANNOT BE DENIED
Posted by: nochicagoboys on Feb 18, 2008 7:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sharon, nice boilerplate. You must work for the Clinton campaign.

Although I applaud your enthusiasm, I think you're terribly misguided and misdirected. Yes, Bush has been an abysmal failure, but Senator Clinton is certainly not the answer.

Please, no more Clintons in the White House. I don't want to be having this same discussion in four years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: FACTS CANNOT BE DENIED
Posted by: left_libertarian on Feb 18, 2008 7:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, The facts can't be denied:

Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraq War Resolution and the Patriot Act.

I will not support her in any way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unfortunately for the american people
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Feb 19, 2008 2:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the BEST candidate was pushed out before the race began...the BEST candidate was DENNIS KUCINICH.

hillary is NO better than obama for the SAME reasons you cite. so, i exercise my right to NOT vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 18, 2008 7:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It made plenty of jobs for all those people in New Orleans... as long as they wanted to go to Iraq to work for war profiteers rather than being employed as they should have been to rebuild their city.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Schmuck's view of war economics is right out of the 40's.
Posted by: Longdream on Feb 18, 2008 8:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny--it must be all the history he knows, and it's not applicable.

War=jobs only works in a non-privatized, non-profiteering environment.

Another free pass for this gaping asshole who is the most powerful man in the free world.

Jesus wept.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a leader must have some basic notions about economics
Posted by: socrates2 on Feb 18, 2008 8:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gore Vidal back in the 70's defined politics succintly: "Politics is the art of collecting and spending money (i.e. taxes)."
With that organizing principle the questions to ask any leader or candidate are: do you propose to _continue_ to spend 50% of the national budget (our taxes) on military expenses, unlike any power in history since the Romans? (A dead-end, economically and socially unproductive expense.)
Or, do you propose to invest our taxes in national infrastructure, from public works to building more colleges and elementary schools and funding renewable energy research to retrofitting aging roads and bridges to investing in a national mass-transit system comparable to the best in Europe or Japan? Do you propose to offer free college, vocational training and free text books to knowledge-hungry, motivated students with our billions? After all, isn't the definitive "safety net" for any country an educated and vocationally trained human being?
Do you intend to bring back the New Deal and fund anyone who needs training for jobs that are certain to be needed in the future, from health care to assisted health care to public works building and maintenance?
Would you have the courage to insist that capital gains and interest-earning wealth of the 5% of the individuals who own 90% of the national wealth be taxed at realistic, WW2 levels?
Will you insist that a person who supports a family of four not be taxed on his labor income unless it exceeds national "living wage" standards?
Will you insist on a national health care plan much like all the Western industrialized nations in the civilized world have?
And/or will you insist that we continue our dead-end dependence on foreign oil and continue to militarize the oil fields in the Middle East and south-central Eurasia such that a handful of oil-distributing corporations profit and no one else?
Gravel, Kucinich and even Edwards honestly answered these questions. Guess who got short shrift and were ignored by our corporate media and their toady reporters?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As if it's not bad enough...
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 18, 2008 10:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that we all have to suffer the effects of this recession, we have a bone-head president who denies it has anything at all to do with the trillion-plus we're spending on the war! And this guy has an MBA??? Of course people are feeling that we are carrying the economic load in this country!

Consumer spending accounts for 7/10 of US GDP! In China, it's 1/3. So, tell me Mr. President, how is this not being borne on our backs???

I swear, he lives in Bizzaro World, and he's forcing us all to live there with him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a complete fucking idiot
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Feb 19, 2008 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's called alcoholic thinking
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Feb 19, 2008 2:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my alcoholic ex-boyfriend never wanted to put the cost of his beer (at least 12.00 a day) into the budget...he said it "didn't count" - bush's idiocy is no different AND is a function of his alcoholism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You got Posted by: boydranchitos
ah, the parable of the broken window. or: 7 years of a bush economy
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 19, 2008 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

make the pie higher!

where is yellow, a wonderful poster to alternet, when you need him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The thing is this.
Posted by: Longdream on Feb 19, 2008 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We don't manufacture anything anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The thing is this. Posted by: the man with a dog
Stupid is...
Posted by: nmeyer on Feb 19, 2008 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I vote the president's statement as among the most tragic, glib, detached presidential statements in history.

The Founding Fathers never imagined a STUPID president, and they never imagined a STUPID Congress and they never imagined a STUPID electorate, the perfect storm for STUPID – and hence only external factors (not of our own choosing) will remedy this situation.

The Constitution doesn’t have a remedy for STUPID x 3.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stupid is... Posted by: particle
» RE: Stupid is... Posted by: Lauren
Sorry American
Posted by: heinz57 on Feb 19, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to apologise to the rest of the world for this fool that calls himself President of the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unemploment
Posted by: tomo57 on Feb 19, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what would happen to all the workers displaced if the troops all came home [sarcasism] I hate bush the war and our economic structure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What I want to know is
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Feb 19, 2008 2:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how does this woman, Laura Bush, stand next to this guy without puking.

What kind of woman would choose George W. Bush for a husband?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What I want to know is Posted by: Longdream
» RE: What I want to know is Posted by: master09
» RE: What I want to know is Posted by: blitzmesser
Like John McCain
Posted by: indepentent on Feb 20, 2008 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush doesn't know anything about economics either.

Nor do the Republican Senators.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Ah, Honey..."
Posted by: buffeliscious on Feb 22, 2008 12:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I'm on my way out, so it doesn't really matter much what I say. They've taken all the other hogwash I've said over the years hook, line, and sinker. And we're headed for a sweet retirement as some of the wealthiest people in America. Ah, yes... we've done pretty good, managed to push aside the ignorant masses, with this war and all, and make life better and easier for us privileged few. America truly is the 'land of dreams!'"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Makes ya
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Feb 23, 2008 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
want to just puke!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]