Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Getting cozy with Jack and Josie

Posted by Tai Moses at 3:38 PM on September 12, 2005.


The phrase 'baby-blue party dress,' in connection with the Senate Judiciary Committee, strikes a discordant tone.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Tai Moses in your
mailbox!

 

Nothing surprises us anymore. We thought.

True, at first we were disturbed by this paragraph -- the beginning of a news story on today's Senate hearings for Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts:

"John Roberts, nominated to be chief justice of the United States, introduced 5-year-old Josie, in her baby blue party dress and white headband, and 4-year-old Jack, in his blue blazer, bow tie and short gray flannel pants, at the start of his confirmation hearing Monday."

To our highly attuned journalistic ear, the phrase "baby-blue party dress," in connection with the Senate Judiciary Committee struck a discordant tone. After all, as our esteemed colleague Rachel points out below, this is the freaking Supreme Court we're talking about. One wants gravitas, solemnity, showy demonstrations of intellectual rigor. Not tots in frocks.

But okay, so a few crusty senators went gaga over the nominee's adorable towheaded offspring, who were apparently brandished like Molotov cocktails by the nominee's charming and ambitious wife. We decided to overlook it. One does not want to be accused of curmudgeonliness.

Reading further, however, we were given pause -- shaken, really -- by the word, "frolicking," followed in short order by "fidgeting," and then "wiggle," all in connection with the abovementioned tots, who seemed upon closer examination to be entirely dominating the proceedings. And as we read on, groping in vain for the Valium we thought we had hidden in our third-down desk drawer, our forbearance snapped entirely when we came upon the word "snuggle." SNUGGLE. A concept that should never be associated with the Supreme Court in any way, shape or form.

Can the apocalypse be far off?

Digg!

Tai Moses is the editor of AlterNet.


Monster cookies
What orangutans, Wal-Mart and Oreos have in common.
March 21, 2006.
Sex and Taxxxes
Our legal team ponders why Britney Spears would watch a sex tape with her estate planning lawyers.
December 23, 2005.
Turkmenistan zoo story
If you can't stand the heat, get out the penguin.
December 20, 2005.
Warning: no-irony zone ahead
One of life's epic moments, involving a large marine mammal.
December 15, 2005.
All Over But the Dying
His bid for clemency denied, Stanley Williams' execution is scheduled to take place just after midnight.
December 12, 2005.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I don't know
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 12, 2005 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But should I show off my multiracial dreadlocked baby at the next protest to get some attention?
I mean come on now, give me a freaking break!
Quit pimping those kids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]